Here's the website for more information : http://helpingpsychology.com/criminal-profiling-the-job-of-a-forensic-psychologist
Recently in Expert Witness Category
Here's the website for more information : http://helpingpsychology.com/criminal-profiling-the-job-of-a-forensic-psychologist
As we all know Parkersburg, Iowa and the whole state of Iowa suffered a tremendous loss, Ed Thomas. Mr. Thomas was the high school football coach, track coach, teacher, driving instructor, and most of all a father, husband, and grandfather.
The trial for Mark Becker is in some of its last states. The jury has been in deliberation for over 8 hours now. They will either find of him guilty of 1st degree murder with life in prison without parole, or they will find him guilty, but categorize him as insane and Becker will undergo dramatic psychiatric evaluations.
This is a trial that is using the Insanity Plea, which is very unheard of for today. It is hard to prove someone legally insane, because you have to prove to everyone that before the crime, the time of the crime, and after the crime, that Mark Becker had no idea what was going on and it was out of his control. I want to make it clear that insanity is a legal term when used in law, not a medical term. Insanity is when they try to see if Mark Becker knew what he was doing, and if he knew right from wrong throughout the whole process of the crime.
This is going to be a hard case to defend based on the facts. Mark Becker did plan out this murder. He dressed so that he could hide a gun in his clothing. He drove himself to the high school and admitted to being scared that he would be pulled over with a loaded gun on him. These are just a few things that push away from the insanity plea.
Below is the Des Moines Register, which has been following the trial very closely. On the left side bar is over 15 blogs that take you through the trial, even a blog just recently posted about the juror's deliberation. In the middle of the web page will a section also taking you through the trial in detail.
I urge everyone to go through theses blogs and really see what it is like for the people of the court system. They have an expert witness, a Psychiatrist that the prosecution hired and his diagnosis and thoughts are very interesting to read.
While on the topic of eyewitness identification and memory in general I want to show this video that I saw quite some time ago that Elizabeth Loftus did on 60 minutes about false memories involving Disney World and Bugs Bunny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RLvSGYxDIs
This other clip is also about being able to suggest memories that never happened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQr_IJvYzbA
I believe because of cases like this that it is very hard for me to believe memories that have been brought up in therapy to be used as evidence in court. It just goes to show that with memory anything is possible and if it never happened that's not a problem because one can suggest a picture so vivid that in your mind you can see it happen even though it never did.
http://www.expertwitnessradio.org/
This article looks at the case of Maria Teresa Macias. Macias was killed by her husband Avelino Macias. The Sonoma County Sheriffs Office were the ones dealing with this case. It was states that Maria had contacted the Sheriffs office on more that 22 different occasions leading up to her death. In this documentation Macias family is suing the Sheriffs department for not acting properly to the act of domestic violence that lead up to the domestic homicide of Maria Teresa Macias. Maria's family claims that the Sheriffs Office neglected to take her case seriously becasue she was not only a women but a latino woman. In this case a expert witness, San Diego Police sergeant Anne O'Dell was brought in to review the case. In the link I provided below you can see the way in which O'Dell went about determining that the Sonoma County Sheriffs office did indeed neglect an attempt to prevent this homicide from happening . O'Dell states that in many case and situations the Sheriffs Office could have responded but simply brushed the numerous 911 phone calls away. Personally I think the article is very interesting. We hear a lot about expert witnesses in trials but I have never actually seen a case in which one has been used and ultimately determined the outcome. I am sure there are many cases out there where this has been the case (otherwise expert witnesses wouldn't be as important as they are).
In November 2009, Kehoe stood trial for the murder of her son Seth and plead insanity. She was later found guilty of 1st Degree Murder, Attempted Murder, and Child Endangerment. In December 2009, she was sentence to life without the possibility of parole for the murder, 25 years for attempted murder, and 10 years for the child endangerment charged.
Click here for the article about the trial. This also has short video clips of the trial including testimony from both psychologists, the recorded statement from Kehoe's surviving son, and the Kwik Star surveillance video of the family shortly before the horrific crime.
Click here for the article about the sentencing hearing and how Kehoe's husband asked for leniency but the judge denied it. (Please note that the dates written in the article are wrong. Kehoe committed the crime in 2008 and the trial was held in 2009)
For me, this case hit extremely close to home, in more ways than one. First off, there is the physical aspects of the crime. Kehoe stopped with her boys at the Kwik Star in Jesup, Iowa (which is where I live) and the store clerk who testified is a person that I know.
After leaving Kwik Star, Kehoe drove down the road and stopped to let her boys play at the playground in front of St. Athanasius School. This playground is located directly behind my house (all that separates my yard from the playground is a single row of trees) and my oldest son plays there often. At this point in the time line, Kehoe purposely left her cell phone so that nobody could call for help.
From the park, Kehoe drove a few miles further to Hook-n-Liner Pond. This happens to be my husband's and my fishing spot (since this happened though, we have decided to find a new spot). It is located in an extremely secluded location so a person would have to be familiar with the area to find it. Kehoe was originally from this area. In fact, the house down the road from it used to be owned by one of her relatives.
This case also hit close to home for me emotionally because I am a mother of two boys as well (my oldest is 6 and my youngest is 18 months) and their ages were relatively close to the ages of Kehoe's boys. As a mother, it is hard to fathom how a person could harm their own child. Even on the most stressful of days (and believe me, there are a lot of those when you have two young ones), I still cannot even dream of hurting them. Although I have always been interested in psychology and criminology, it is this lack of comprehension that propels me to learn more in search of answers or better yet, theories as why this sort of thing happens.
I followed this case very closely because I suspected that Kehoe would attempt an insanity plea. My initial thoughts, before I knew all the facts, was that her attorney would claim it was Munchhausen Via Proxy (based on an incident prior where she drove her van with her kids inside into a river and then in this case, the fact that she ran for help after the fact and concocted the story about being kidnapped).
When I watched the trial on CNN's In Session, I was very surprised to hear about how severe Kehoe's depression was. The psychologist for the defense testified that Kehoe had actually undergone Electric Shock Therapy treatment up to 44 times in the last 12 years. Regardless of the severity of her depression, Kehoe was not insane (by the legal definition). She knew right from wrong and there was a lot of strong evidence to support malice aforethought (which is the determining factor for Murder in the 1st Degree).
Another thing that stood out to me during the trial was Kehoe's defense attorney. When I saw her, she looked, at times, somewhat disheveled in appearance compared to the crisp, clean-cut prosecutor. Her closing arguments were also horribly delivered. She occassionally stumbled across words, at times seemed to lack confidence in what she was saying, and a few times she paused for long periods of time as if she had lost her place in her speech. Even though the evidence against Kehoe was overly abundant, it is my opinion her attorney really didn't help her case either.
You can see the closing arguments, other court segments, and a photo timeline of the Kehoe case here as well.
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/psychology/insanity/7.html
General research interests include cognitive and metacognitive aspects of face recognition as well as applied aspects of face recognition such as eyewitness identification. Specific research projects include comparing simultaneous vs. sequential lineup administration, suggestibility of show-ups, developing computer software to facilitate lineup administration, examination of the cross-race effect, and the examination of the perceptual dimensions underlying face recognition.
http://www.uccs.edu/~faculty/egreene/
Edie Greene is Professor of Psychology at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs (UCCS). She received a BA in psychology from Stanford University, an MA in experimental psychology from the University of Colorado-Boulder, and a Ph.D. in psychology and law from the University of Washington. She has served as Fellow in Law and Psychology at Harvard Law School and as a faculty member of the National Judicial College.
http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~glwells/
Extensive information on eyewitness identification, as well as information about identification of suspects from photographs and lineups.
Recent Comments