Article Summary Project

"Forensic Psychology Expertise in the Wake of Daubert" by Jane Goodman-Delahunty

Case: Daubert vs Merrell Dow Parmaceuticles, Inc

In this case the rules of "general acceptance" of scientific evidence were over ruled. In question was whether or not an experts testimony could be trusted. Because the forensic Psychologist will have to be more exact about the scientific evidence supporting their conclusion. This will bridge the gap between psychology and Law.

This is a breif summary of what is explained and argued throughout this article. Law and Psychology are very similar fields in that they both strive to help people. There is a problem, however, when a psychology expert is called to testify. This is because their views, or opinions, are taken in account as scienctific evidence.

http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uni.edu/stable/1394168?seq=1 

Here is the link to the full article.