Topical Blog Due 2/10 10pm

| 18 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

You have you choice this week of which topic to blog about:

addiction/recovery (choose one or more articles from this page): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/addiction--recovery

or

eating disorders (choose one or more articles from this page): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/eating-disorders

Summarize your topic and viewpoint. Make sure to have some tie in to violence.

 

 

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.psychologicalscience.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/2253

18 Comments

The first article I read on Huffington Post was entitled "7 Signs of Addiction." In this article, Rogers outlines seven signs that are indicators of addiction. This article was short and to the point concerning the indicators of addiction. Instead of writing the article to make others aware of signs of addiction, Rogers wrote it to help the addict become aware of their addiction. I thought this was interesting because many articles I have read are to help loved ones, friends, and relatives spot signs of addiction. I do not know how effective this article would be in convincing an addict they are, in fact, an addict, but it was interesting to read an article with a different point of view. Rogers does say that addiction is out in the open now. She states this makes people who are addicted feel they are not alone. I think this is important for an addict to understand, especially because many times, as this article states, addiction can cause feelings of isolation.

The second article from Huffington Post that I read was
"Clinic for internet addicts opens in US." This article discussed a clinic opened not far from Seattle for internet addiction. In this recovery program, addicts spent 45 days away from any internet or video games. They also receive therapy and counseling during their stay. The article talked about the first resident named Ben Alexander who reported playing a video game for 16-17 hours a day before he got treatment. I though this article was interesting. I knew video game and internet use has been getting out of control among some individuals, but I did not know there were cases such as Ben playing a video game for the majority of the day. The internet technology has created great advances in society, but when it begins to affect one's way of life and everyday functioning, they need to get help.

The third article I read was titled, "Why Do Some People Have Addictive Personalities?" I really enjoyed this article. It was very informative and interesting. I thought the most important part of this article was when the author discussed recovery for addicts. Krupp stated,”
To overcome addictions, people must address the underlying causes. Our emotions and experiences shape and are shaped by our brain chemistry. Recovering requires people to understand what drives them to their addiction." I really related to this statement because I also believe this is the most important part of addiction treatment. Many treatment programs attempt to use cognitive restructuring and it is often referred to as 'stinkin' thinkin', which is attempting to restructure thought and instill self-control methods. I do not think this is the most effective way of treating addiction. This is the quick way to move addicts in and out of treatment programs, which is the most cost effective method for the little amount of funding treatment programs receive. This treatment method may help for awhile, but the causal factors that led to addiction will remain present. Many of these treatment programs do not even incorporate counseling into the program, which is the most effective, long-term treatment strategy. Krupp ends with another point about addicts,”
Without understanding the reasons and finding a healthy way to manage them, addicts will often kick a habit only to replace it with another one."

These three articles all concern addiction and recovery. The question is, can addiction be considered a form of violence? I suggest it can be, but like self-harm, it should be in its own category of violence. Another aspect of addiction that can be tied into violence is that many times, addiction can spur violent behavior. Drug addiction can result in increased aggression, burglary for drug money, domestic violence, etc. Many of these articles stated that addiction causes one to do acts out of desperation. Desperation can cause individuals to act out of character and in violent ways. While conceptualizing addiction as violent behavior, it must be remembered that while it is mostly a form of self-violence, it can fester into person-to-person violence as well.

For my topic, I chose the article Al-Anon 12-Step Recovery Program: Love It or Leave It. The basic premises of this article was to take a brief look into the Al-Anon program (which is the AA equivalent for friends and family members of recovering and non-recovering drugs and alcohol users). In the article the gave opinions in support of and against the program.
Being a former member of Al-Anon, I think the program is a crucial component in helping those closest to the addict understand and cope with their loved-one's disease. When you attend a meeting, you are never "told" what you should do unless you directly ask (and even then, you are given several possible options and are told that you need to decide for yourself what is the right choice). Rather, the other members are there to lend a supportive ear to your dilemma. There is also comfort in knowing that you are not alone. Through the stories of others, you gain insight into your own situation and develop methods to regain your sanity in a life filled with chaos.
Many people may assume that Al-Anon is only beneficial when you are still directly associated with the addict. This could be further from the truth. When I joined Al-Anon, I had already left my ex-boyfriend who was suffering from alcoholism and drug addiction. In Al-Anon, I was able to work through my issues that I had still lingering from the relationship and to somewhat make sense of the situation I had found myself in (it was during this time in my life, that I had first been introduced to the term "co-dependency").
Al-Anon operates in the same fashion as an AA meeting. The 12 steps that AA strive to complete are slightly modified (in language anyway) and are used as the 12 steps that members of Al-Anon strive to complete. In case some are unfamiliar with the 12-Steps, they are the following (the Al-Anon addition):
1) We admitted we were powerless over alcohol-that our lives had become unmanageable.
2) came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
3) Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of a Higher Power as we understood Him.
4) Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5) Admitted to our Higher Power, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
6) Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
7) Humbly asked our Higher Power to remove our short-comings.
8) Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
9) Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
10) Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
11) Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with our Higher Power as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
12) Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps, we tried to carry this message to others, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Now #8 and #9 of the 12 Steps may seem a bit odd. After all, it's the addict who harms themselves and sometimes others right? Wrong. Those closest to the addict do harm others, including the addict. How is this possible? Simply put, when involved with an addict, your life and responsibilities start to revolve around the addict and their addiction. You get caught up in the chaos of the lifestyle and your reasoning and perceptions become altered. In doing so, we may harm others by lying to cover up the truth (or at the very least the full extent of situation), we neglect ourselves of our own needs which in turn may also needs of our children (both emotionally and physically). So how do we harm the addict when it's their very actions that is putting us in this situation? Simply put, we're enablers. We enable the addict to continue their use by covering up for them at their jobs, with other family members, taking care of financial issues, bailing them out of jail or other legal issues, etc. Our harm to them is not direct but indirect in that we care so much for them that we do not let them hit rock bottom (as we may all have heard before, the only way an addict will be willing to go into recovery is if they hit what they perceive as rock bottom)and feel the full effects of the destruction their addiction is causing them and others. So in a way, our actions may essentially be equivocated to holding the bottle up to their mouths for them (a slightly controversial analogy but one I feel does fit).
In Al-Anon, one of the key things you are taught is that you can not in any way shape or form, control the addict, their addictions, or their actions. This is the message that both programs (AA and Al-Anon) hope to get across to their members through repeating the Serenity Prayer at the beginning of each meeting "God grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference."
Once the full extent of this message is clearly understood ("the wisdom to know the difference" line of the Serenity Prayer), the way you handle yourself is completely different. Whether you choose to stay with the addict or move on from the relationship, from that point forward you begin to regain control in your own life.
As we discussed in class, addictions can be viewed as violent in that the destruction and harm they are cause is to themselves. Well the destruction and harm they are causing is not just to themselves. It's also inflicting pain and anguish on those closest around them and that is then transcending on to the people closest to them. So the violence of the addiction is actually perpetuating through close personal social networks to others although the effects tend to be more emotional than physical. So I would have to argue that addiction is violent from the stand-point that it does cause unwanted harm on to others through the psychological torture of watching their loved-ones deteriorate from their own actions.
While doing this assignment, I started referencing my Al-Anon material. The book "One Day At a Time in Al-Anon" is one of the handbooks that is used during meetings. The book is written not to be read from front to back like a novel. Rather it is composed of daily affirmations in which you read a short page for each day. One thing that was often mentioned about the "weird" workings of these affirmation books, is that some days you will come across a post that is so fitting for you on that very day that it is almost scary. Well keeping true to this, the post for the day reads this:
"February 9
Would it help my situation to know why the alcoholic drinks to such excess that everything around him is damaged in some way by his compulsion? If he drinks to drown out the pain of shattering childhood experiences, which he does not even identify or remember, how can such pain be located and removed? Certainly not by us; we are amateurs-- and emotionally-involved amateurs at that! It would take years and thousands of dollars worth of psychiatry--and even then the outcome would be uncertain. But at least the knowledge that he suffers should keep me from condemning him.
Today's Reminder
It is enough for me to know that the unhappy drinker can get help in AA, where so many have found contented sobriety. It is enough for me to know I can overcome my own confusion by using the Al-Anon program.
'Let me conduct myself and my life in such a way that I will have no reason to reproach myself for making a bad situation worse. This, at least, is within my power: to make it better.'"

The topic that I have chosen to blog about is the addiction and recovery articles on huffingtonpost.com. After the discussion in Tuesday’s class about addiction and being a Psychology major, I have already taken drugs and individual behavior so this seemed to be an interesting take on addiction and recovery. I have become familiar with huffingtonpost.com since I have taken a couple of classes with Otto, but I have never noticed the addiction and recovery section in the site.

One of the topics that caught my eye right away was the internet addiction center that was opening in the U.S. Though the types of addiction that we covered in the class on Tuesday was about the abuse of drugs and alcohol, I still think that this could pertain to violence and addiction because of the amount of exposure that sex and drugs have on the internet. Once I think about it, those who are addicted to the internet may be addicted to sites on the internet that could lead to violence such as chat rooms, or porn sites. Even though internet addiction is a little off topic; it could still be tied into violence; that is in my eyes. Binge drinking among college students is another section that caught my attention, mainly because I am a college student and I do drink occasionally. Alcoholism is a problem in the United States, and I believe that besides starting at home, the problem starts in college or during the traditional college age (18-23).

The topic that I really want to concentrate on is the article of having an addictive personality. In the past, I have told myself and close friends that I do have an addictive personality (somewhat). This is because I find myself diving into activities head first and really participating in them to the point where they could be seen as being addictive. For example, in the past I really wanted to lose ten pounds, so I went crazy for two weeks with working out and eating healthy. I did lose some weight, but it wasn’t an unhealthy stint such as excessive dieting and working out in relation to eating disorders. Ironically, I did become addicted to cigarettes during that time and have since tried quitting altogether.

In the article, Krupp mentioned that whether you are addicted to sex, shopping, or drugs, the urge “Hijacks the brain, overpowering the analytical part involving good-decision making.” This could lead to destroying relationships, finances, or careers. If those things are ruined then the person may take their frustration out on themselves or others, which would be seen as violent. For example, if a person addicted to shopping ruins a relationship with someone they care about, then that person could turn to alcohol and drugs, which are even addicting than shopping. It is like a never ending cycle, being that the person in the first place has an addiction problem.

In relation to violence, I think that having an addictive personality could possibly be seen as violent, but only to an extent. If a person has an addiction to shopping then I don’t necessarily see that as violent because it is materialistic, and not really hurting them or causing pain physically. In contrast with shopping, a person who is addicted to drugs or alcohol may be seen as violent because alcohol is known to make people aggressive, along with drugs.

Both people who have addictive personalities and those who abuse drugs and alcohol have biological concepts that would explain why they are addicted in the first place. The brain chemical dopamine is involved in motivation, pleasure, and learning. For the people who don’t find satisfaction in everyday life, they may try to find pleasure elsewhere and this is because dopamine goes into overtime to “fix” it. While trying to relate addictive personalities to violence, it is important to remember that genetics and biology are involved, along with environmental factors.

I read the addiction article - "Why do some people have addictive personalities" I choose this article because I believe I have addictive personality traits and the article made a lot of sense to me. The article discussed the differences between habit and addiction, factors associated to addiction, the dopamine role/brain chemistry issues and brief insight about ways to treat and overcome addiction. The article first distinguishes the difference between habit and addiction, defining addiction as, "when it (the behavior) takes center stabe and shoves everything else off, destroying relationships, finances and careers." I believe it is very important to understand this distinction when working with and processing addiction. There is a distinct difference between habit and addiction and it should be treated and analyzed distinctly. The article also addresses the factors associated with addiction. I feel that this information is very helpful in understanding the possible causality and ongoing addictive behaviors. This information can be useful in developing prevention programs and treatment of individuals with addiction. The article also discussed the brain chemistry which is effected by addictions and was very helpful in reading and enhanced my understanding overall of addiction. The end of the article emphasizes, "without understanding the reasons for and finding healthy ways to manage them, addicts will often kick a habit only to replace it with another one." I found this notion to be very beneficial and insightful. I believe it encourages individuals working with addicts to gain a better/ more holistic understanding of the individual in order to treat them most effectively.
I believe that addiction is strongly correlated to violence because the primary definition of addiction specifically identifies that the addiction takes center stage and shoves everything else off.... I believe this is related to violence because it identifies that an individuals moral judgements and decision making abilities are compromised when they are struggling with addiction. I feel that this makes the individual very vulnerable to potentially violent behaviors.

For this assigment, I went to the Huffington Post website about eating disorders. I found an interesting article called "How Social Networks Spread Eating Disorders" that talked about the influence western media has on eating disorders. Author Alice Park observed girls in fiji that had been exposed to western media (more specifically, television). What she found was the startling statistic that the girls who had been exposed to television were 60% more likely to suffer from abnormal eating problems. We have already, as Park points out, have seen this trend with girls in developed nations.
With the growing fad of Facebook and Twitter combined with the already strong relationship teenagers have with television, I feel that this is a very important article for younger generations to read. No matter how hard we try to deny it, every single person is influenced by media every single day of their lives. You are constantly seeing advertisements on television about the new miracle weight-loss pill, you are seeing billboards with picutres of women air-brushed to look like they were a size two. Even men can't escape the influence media has on body image. You see pictures of men with strong muscles and, as we pointed out in class, waists that are just as small as the women in the billboards.
I feel that this article can really relate to our violence class. We have already agreed that eating disorders (especially those done with the person's knowledge) is a form of self-harm behavior. People know that it is not healthy, but they are not happy with themselves so they do it anyway.
The best way we can start to prevent this violent act from happening is by looking at our current media and the message we are sending to people.
The article also had a link to a similar website on Time.com about how girls use the internet and get influenced to participate in self-starvation and purgint behaviors to get thin. The article, entitled "Study: online communities encourage eating disorders" by Sora Song, talks about online websites for girls that are "pro-ana" and "pro-mia". Ana and Mia are nick-names given for the eating disorders Anorexia Nervosa and Bulima Nervosa, which we have already learned about. These websites are open to the public and do not require a login name and password. These websites also include what is called "thinspiration". They post pictures of skinny models in order to keep the dream of being thin alive.
What I want to know is why girls would want to do this to their bodies? Studies have even shown that men desire women to be about a normal weight and don't want them to be as skinny as most girls desire to be. So, why then all the fuss over being a size zero?
The media definitely perpetuates the idea of being thin and having the "perfect" body, especially in western cultures. Heck, even clothings stores perpetuate this by selling tiny clothes and not necessarily catering to the normal size or full-figureed women.
These behaviors are just helping to keep the violent acts of eating disorders alive and strong. We talked about how socialization was one cause for violent behaviors. If we can find a way to change what the media tries to pass off as the "ideal" woman, then we can have a better shot at preventing eating disorders.
Another thing we talked about in preventing violence is education. We can take part in educating young women about how it is not humanly possible to look like the women in the advertisements. We can show them how the effects of airbrushing can make women look more skinny and flawless than they really are, and men more muscular than they really are. We can also educate them more about the dangers of eating disorders and how to diet properly if they really are still unsatisfied with their current weight.

I read 3 different articles: 7 Signs of Addiction; Is Cheating an Addiction?; and Do You Have an Addictive Personality?. In 7 Signs of Addiction, they list the signs that addicts can use to determine if they have an addiction. I thought this was a good list of easy to determine symptoms. I agree with Kenlyn that this may not help many addicts realize they have an addiction, but it might help those that realize there's a problem and want to change. I do firmly believe that realizing there's a problem is the 1st step to recovery. Most addicts will deny, deny, deny until they realize that they are hurting themselves and others, often violently, since addiction to substances can and does result in declining health for the addicted person and makes them more prone to violent outbursts with family, friends, and even strangers. It's still a long road after that, but you can't fix a problem you refuse to acknowledge.
The 2nd article I read, Is Cheating an Addiction?, talked about how many people are linking cheating spouses/partners to sex addicts. The article talked about how this may be, to some extent, an excuse to blame the behavior on something "outside" of someone's control. I buy into that argument. Just because you want to do something doesn't mean that you should or that you do. Some people may seriously have a problem controlling their urges, but there is help for that. To say that you don't have willpower to stop cheating is not the same as saying that you don't have willpower to stop smoking or drinking. These people typically are getting sex from their spouse or partner, so it's not like they're sex-starved. While sex is quite pleasurable and activiates the same neurotransmitters that smoking and drinking does, cheating doesn't replace the neurotransmitters like smoking/drinking do. Quitting cheating doesn't stop the neurotransmitters and doesn't give people withdrawals... at least, not physically. Like I said earlier, I do recognize that some people have a very difficult time controlling urges, but I don't think that we should make everything an addiction and "excuse" bad behavior that way. It makes a mockery of both our free will as humans and the restrait that a majority of people show. I see problems such as cheating as violent, although not in the physical sense. I believe that it can be very emotionally violent, for both the victims (who has to deal with shame, anger, sadness, and often, lowered self-esteem) and the perpertator (who also usually has feelings of guilt and remorse).
The last article, Do You Have an Addictive Personality?, had a quote I really liked, "A healthy person plans excerise around their life. An addict plans their life around excerise." This obviously is just one example of an addiction. Overall, though, I was really disappointed in this article. I thought it would list some traits or brain functions that most addicts seem to have in common. Instead, it talked about different kinds of addiction and that to cure it, you must address root issues. This is certainly very important advice, but not the advice I thought I was getting. Again, I think there's a component of violence in all addiction behaviors, whether it's physical violence such as being violently aggressive to another person or persuing a drug that you know is harming you but you can't stop, or emotional violence such as putting people and yourself through emotions that are usually very intense and very violent in nature.

I chose to read more about eating disorders. Overall, I think eating disorders should be considered violent and be in its own category. People who have eating disorders are causing harm to their bodies by either stuffing themselves full of food which causes discomfort along with other physiological issues, or they neglect their body’s needs for a healthy balance of nutrition. People with eating disorders are intentionally harming their bodies; however, one could argue that at the beginning stages of the particular disorder the person may not have been aware of the potential damages their behavior could cause on their body.
The first article I read was titled “Drunkorexia, a growing trend among college students.” The term ‘Drunkorexia’ isn’t a technical medical term; however, many college students are using the term to describe the practice of swapping food calories for calories found in alcohol. This particular problem is now becoming more acknowledged across many college campuses. Many college students have the mentality that since they’re drinking on a given night, they don’t want to eat too much so they have a very small meal beforehand. According to the article, students talk about seeing their friends drink on empty stomachs, binge on foods such as pizza and hamburgers, then feel guilty about it and throw it all back up. The article also mentions a study published in 2009 which suggests a connection between binge drinking and eating disorders. This type of disordered eating and drinking behavior in and of itself might not be considered an “eating disorder”, but it definitely has the potential to become one.
The second article I read was titled, “Eating Disorders: Colleges Highlight Quiet Problem.” This article talks about the importance of awareness/education about eating disorders as well as possible causes of eating disorders because many people misunderstand what having an eating disorder really means. Eating disorders affect both men and women and cause people to eat too much, eat too little, or strictly follow restrained diets. The article also discusses a new eating disorder called orthorexia. Orthorexia is an eating disorder in which the person eats as healthy as possible because they want their body to be ‘pure’. I had never really thought of this type of behavior as being an eating disorder until reading this article. I wonder what specific qualifications there are for this to be considered as such because there’s a lot of people who eat very healthy because they want to stay in shape and just be in general good health. This disorder is not officially recognized by the DSM as being an eating disorder.
Although the articles I mention deal with college life, eating disorders are prevalent in other populations as well. How the media presents the ‘ideal body image’ really sets the stage for how females and males want to look like and therefore directs their eating behaviors in one way or another. We talked about how one cause of violence is socialization and I think this same principle can be applied to eating disorders as well. For example, it seems to me that models are getting skinnier and skinnier every year and less and less attractive in my opinion. Young girls seeing these photos or movies think “of course models/actresses look perfect so I should look like that too, “and in some cases will do anything to obtain the ‘perfect’ body. Being all skin and bones looking just isn’t what I would want anyone to look like. Thea makes a good point about how advertising companies use a lot of airbrushing techniques with their photos—the images simply are not realistic. I also agree with her on how awareness and education on this topic are key if we want to succeed in preventing a greater prevalence of people with eating disorders.

I read the addiction article “Creating a false self: Learning to live a lie.” Dr. Dayton discusses how people, usually beginning in childhood, create these false selves. She explains that all of us, to some extent, create these false beings as a form of protection. We all act differently in different situations, depending on who is there, where we are, and what is expected of us. Some people unconsciously take that to the extreme and create this complete false self as a compulsion to help hide one’s true self and fight things such as deep emotions, anxiety, problems, etc. She calls this false self the “idealized self” because this is the self we feel we should be because we feel our true self is too weak or inadequate. We may be in a situation constantly that we feel we need to gain approval, so we put on this mask and don’t take it off. This ideal version lets us be strong and cope better. She says that we may even idealize the false self, giving different terms to things such as bullying (strength) and manipulation and controlling (cleverness or compassion). This is a form of unconscious defense that we put in place with these false selves. If we do this so much that it becomes compulsive and an addiction, we can harm the growth of our true selves. While our false self may become stronger and better, our true self becomes weaker and goes deeper into hiding.

Dr. Dayton says that the creation of this false self often begins in childhood in a family setting. Family is the one place that we should be able to express our true selves, but if we have family that has problems, such as alcoholism, or has extreme standards, such as religion and wealth, we may feel we have to “be” that false person to survive and to fit in to what we were born into. Many times these family types overlap, such as alcoholism and wealth. The kids start to grow up where they are taught not to express their true feelings or they will be belittled or attacked. Their families are so invested in this “status quo” and if you do not act like you are expected, it could turn violent. People that are in these positions feel that they cannot be truthful or they may lose the one institution which is supposed to be there for them 100% of the time, no matter what. This becomes such an important aspect of their existence that the false self begins to overpower the true self. They can no longer differentiate between the two in other settings and it may go into adulthood. Dr. Dayton says that “the false self in an adaptive (though actually maladaptive) reaction to a dysfunctional situation.” The people who have lived as this false self do not usually know it consciously. Problems can arise if you try to confront them on it or challenge their sense of self. This is where violence can be a major factor. False selves do not want to admit they have had a problem. They try to fight off or cope with unfelt, unacknowledged pain, so when you confront them, you challenge it and they can become very defensive and often times angry. Hurt is such an important and deep feeling that if you confront it, you trigger other deep and intense feelings such as anger or retaliation. They begin to feel vulnerable and can be very scared, so they immediately “protect” themselves, or at least the selves they believe they are. They become so engrossed in this self that they actually believe this to be their true self. How would you feel if someone told you that your “true self” wasn’t really who you were?

I, to some extent, can relate to this article. My boyfriend grew up in a home where he had to always protect himself and not show any emotion. He had to somewhat create this “false self” of someone who is always so strong and is not bothered by anything. It has often caused problems, because I, myself, am a very upfront, honest person. I call him out on his stuff. I like to talk about things, and if he feels even the slightest bit like he is being “attacked” or criticized, his anger is triggered and he goes into defense mode. He will often say that he really doesn’t feel how I am suggesting and that it just isn’t how it is. This false self has created someone who lies to protect themselves, even about stupid little things. He doesn’t know how to act differently because he spent so much time protecting himself when he was younger. We have been together for 3 years and I have only seen him show other emotion, besides anger, and cry, maybe 2 times. That is why I chose this article. I think that realizing why people may act this way when you confront them is vital. I know it’s not him just trying to be a jerk sometimes or lie to me; he has just made himself be this person who immediately wants to protect whatever he is really feeling. He doesn’t want to be vulnerable. I think an important thing for violence to realize is that it doesn’t always have to be physical. In some ways, I think that verbal and mental violence is worse than physical. It creates mental scars that don’t go away as easily as physical ones. There have been times when his false sense of self has been so “threatened” that his only way to ward off that pain is to lash out with words to get that attention away from the “problem”. That is one recurring problem with addicts of false selves. If confronted, even if they are not typically a violent person, they will do about anything to get the focus off of themselves and this self that is threatened. He has never been physically violent with me, and that is wonderful, but I can definitely see how this creation of a false self can be a violent problem. I always knew that lying could be an addiction, but I never really thought that this behavior in him was something that he didn’t realize he was doing. I have, for a long time, discussed with him the fact that he may not be able to help it because he has had to do it for so long, from such an early age, but realizing that he may unconsciously be doing this makes me think about how I have reacted to these times myself. It is a cycle of violence, not necessarily physical, but violence nonetheless. Maybe if you know someone who seems to have this sense of false self, they should be approached a different way to try to help them overcome it and be who they really are. You cannot just confront this type of person, but get them help, because professional help will allow their true selves to become just as strong as the false self. That is what I believe anyway.

Here is the article; I think it is definitely worth the read: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-tian-dayton/creating-a-false-self-lea_b_269096.html


I read most of the articles on the eating disorders page. I have to say that they are not very helpful in understanding eating disorders. The main thing I took from the article is that eating disorders are not meant by the person to harm themselves. I think that if the harm is not intentional, the act should not be called violent. Eating disorders arise for a multitude of reasons. They could begin as a way to feel in control of something, a result of peer pressure or media pressure, depression or other psychological disorders, or just a personal feeling of being disgustingly fat.

One of the articles I read was titled “Family of Anorexia Victim Speaks Out: 'It Really Took Everything That She Was'.” This article was about a young woman who struggled with anorexia for 20 years. Her problem began in college and ended with her death. This story is presented by her parents. Her parents tried to get her help so many times but nothing ever really worked. With this young woman, Emily, her anorexia began as a need for control in a stressful time in her life. There also could have been some social pressures. Towards the end of the article one of Emily’s sorority sisters said that many of them starved themselves in college but most got over it and they thought Emily had too. Her parents recognized her problem as an addiction and put her in rehab programs over and over but no matter how many times Emily went through treatment, anorexia always took control over her life. Her parents talked about it as an illness and a disease, not as self-harm.

Another article I read was titled “Social Networks Can Spread Eating Disorders.” This article explained findings in Fiji about irregular eating and television watching. There was one finding that girls who had TVs had more irregular and unhealthy eating habits than girls without TVs. These girls also seemed to have an effect on the girls around them. They spread the ideas they got from media to their friend which impacted them to eat irregularly. This study shows the power of social networks to influence one’s actions. Also, a video I watched had a girl talking about her eating disorder and she talked briefly about how she surrounded herself with others with eating disorders. I think these things show how social pressure or need to conform can lead to an eating disorder. Again, I’m not sure I can call this violent behavior.

One thing that I do see as potentially being considered violent is the pro-anorexia websites I read about. I Googled pro-ana sites. The most surprising thing I found were the pictures of these severely underweight girls. I literally do not know how some of them are even alive. It’s very aggressive to have websites promoting such unhealthy behavior. Maybe the promotion of a disease is violent. Otherwise, I do not see eating disorder as being violent but they are definitely forms of self-harm. Like I said in previous posts, there should be a category of self-harm that is considered violent and maybe some self-harm acts that are not violent.

I read three articles concerning the effects of eating disorders: One covering a new “trend” in college called Drunkorexia, another discussing the effects of the social network, and the last one also covers more about disordered eating in college. I tried to pick articles I thought would relate well with the college generation. Due to the pressures of society placed upon people to be thin (more often women, but not excluding men), it is not surprising how often one hears of another engaging in unhealthy eating habits. Weight-loss is almost always seen as positive in our society now, and oftentimes it does not seem important how said weight is lost, either. This sort of negative thinking ingrained into our everyday lives can have harmful consequences overall, physically and mentally.

The first article I read was over eating disorders in college. Eating disorders are often known as the “silent scourge” of college campuses, according to the article. This statement actually is quite resonating. Unhealthy eating habits are quite common all over any campus, but it often seems to be swept under the rug (so to speak) when it should be considered more than just a hectic life. I know personally when in discussion with other college students, we do not always eat three meals a day (or even two!) and sometimes our “meals” are nothing more than a beverage or something to tide a person over. I do think, however, once the disordered eating (which is not considered as severe as an eating disorder, but still has many harmful bodily consequences) becomes intentional is when a college students’ eating habits should be taken notice. As also mentioned within the article is pressure, which I had mentioned earlier. Entering college can be an extremely stressful time for either male or female, and controlling what one eats can often be a way of relieving anxiety.

The second article I read, also in conjunction with the first article, had to do with the topic of drunkorexia. This is apparently a new trend in which alcohol is often swapped for food calories. I believe society’s acceptance with college binge-drinking could be helping to further propagate this idea of alcohol replacing food as not such a big deal. This is harmful to the body, which ties in to violence due to willful intent to starve the body along with risking potential death with alcohol poisoning (which could be even more potentially fatal with those struggling with weight problems). “Anorexia nervosa has the highest death rate of any psychiatric illness,” says Dr. Kenneth Weiner, medical director at Eating Recovery Center in Denver. When death is involved, especially at such a high rate, it definitely seems to be related to violence. This sort of problem seems to becoming more popular within binge-drinking too. And while students might not be as drastic as full-blown drunkorexia, they still might engage in instances of drinking on empty stomachs (to “get your money’s worth”), or to stave off extra weight one might just think it is okay to skip a meal sporadically because they are drinking those calories. Also, as mentioned above, many students perceive this sort of unhealthy engagement can assuage their social anxiety. Drunkorexia seems to be gaining more popularity due to the fact those who struggle with eating problems can keep it hidden more easily by hiding the problem behind binge-drinking.

The last article had less to do with college dysfunctions, but it still discussed something that affects everyone’s lives in every way possible: social networks. This article showed the differences between those who own a television versus those who do not. It appears that body image is affected negatively for exposure to the media (with the article even going as far as to say second hand exposure still has a negative influence on body image). It seems this sort of emotional negativity cannot be avoided, even by those not within the actual range of social networking. Mentioned within this article is also the fact that social networks spread eating disorders, which are obviously harmful psychologically to teenagers, which the articles were more focused on.

I chose to do my topical blog on addiction and recovery. I focused on the article Barb Rogers: 7 signs of addition and browsed through a few more stories. For this blog I will talk about the article about the 7 signs and how it relates to violence and my view points of the article.

The first sign of addiction is questioning. People that have an addiction wonder if they have an addiction and question their actions and behaviors. I think that questioning of addiction can probably eventually lead to other questioning like "is my wife cheating on me" or "why are people disrespecting me?" I think these things can come from paranoia and also from the addiction depending on what it is. And if these things purpose a threat to the addict they could act out violently.

The second sign of addiction is defensiveness. This is when a person acts defensive about the topic when it is brought up, even in a casual setting. This is particularly interesting with relationship to violence. Defensiveness could easily lead to violent behaviors brought out by anger and shame for the addiction that the person suffers from.

The third sign of addiction is blaming. This is when the individual blames situations around them for the reason the addiction is occurring. I think this can be associated with defensiveness because a person probably blames something else for their behavior after being questioned about their probably. I think this can definitely lead to rage and anger in addicts and end with a physical lash out if questioned about their problem frequently.

The forth sign is secrets and lies. This is when people of addiction are covering up their problem by lying and keeping secrets about their addiction. This could potential lead to violence among families because of missing items or money to pay for the item of addiction. The person with the addiction could easily be the offender or the victim in this situation because they are being accused of doing something wrong so they may get angry or the person losing their things may take their frustrations out of the person with the addiction.

The fifth sign of addiction is time and effort. This is when the person suffering addiction begins to consume all of their time and energy with their addiction. This can make them more irritable and sensitive about their addiction making them more frustrated and attached to their problem when things don't go correctly. If they are doing drugs and by their supplies for a dealer and things go badly, the person may get very frustrated and harm the person with the supplies. Or they may do what even it takes to get to the thing they are addicted to.

The sixth sign is guilt and shame. This happens when the person realized their addiction is a problem and feels bad about their actions effecting other things around them. These internal processes can cause some lash out by the addict as well.

The eight sign of addiction is isolation. With this the addict separates themselves from others and tells themselves that no one understands. This can lead to violence of the self or to others around the addict.

I think addiction is clearly a violent problem within society. Many addiction come with mental illness that may result in violence against others. Also, addiction to anything is a self-harm behavior because there is an unhealthy attachment with some kind of item.

I chose to read the article “Why Do Some People Have Addictive Personalities?” I chose this article because this question has been an important area of study for quite a long time and I find it very interesting. The article included information regarding personality traits that have tendencies to be more addictive, brain chemistry of addictive individuals, and differences between addictions. The interesting distinction made in the article was identifying the difference between habit and addiction. We all have habits that may be healthy or unhealthy. The difference is when we are addicted it causes significant problems in our lives, personal or professional. When the “habit” becomes problematic and disrupts a healthy lifestyle, it becomes an addiction. The article discusses differences in our brains that have been found to distinguish addicts from non-addicts. Addicts utilize their addiction as a way to increase dopamine in their brain. Whether shopping, gambling, sex, or drug usage gives a person the satisfaction they need, it is that “high” they get from the rush of dopamine entering the brain that they rely on.
The article also points out that women are more likely to become addicted to shopping and eating issues, while men are more likely to abuse drugs as their addiction. It is discussed that because women may have more pressure from society to fit a particular physical image that these issues are seen more in women.
While addiction may not directly relate to violence on the surface, there has been large amounts of research done on addicts and violence. As the explanation of addiction in this article states, individuals become so obsessed with the object of their addiction that everything else in their life comes after it. So while violence may not have a direct link to addiction, it is possible that those dealing with addiction issues may become violent if something stands between them and the object of their addiction. I have worked with clients who have gotten into legal trouble due to their addiction because they became violent because they were under the influence or were attempting to gain access to the drugs. While this does not mean that all addicts will be violent, it is important to address the issue and further research is needed in order to provide the best possible treatment to those with addictive personality traits.

I chose to read about eating disorders. I first chose an article called "How Social Networks Spread Eating Disorders." This article examined young girls in Fiji who had televisions and exposure to Western culture. The article states that girls who have televisions in their homes are about 60% more likely to have unusual eating habits. Furthermore, this article states that one girl with an eating disorder may spread the same ideas to several others through her social network. I thought this was incredibly interesting. It shows that while eating disorders are violent against the self, they are often "spread" in an indirect way. I completely believe that this may be correct. It is often discussed how Western "culture of thinness" contributes to eating disorders because of societal views of perfection and beauty. It is perfectly logical that others exposed to these same cultural ideas will have the same problems. The biggest problem with this is that these eating behaviors can be spread through media to areas without good healthcare. Basically, eating disorders in these areas can become fatal. Eating disorders often lead to malnutrition. In an area where malnutrition is already present, eating disorders will only further develop the malnutrition. When you think about violence in general, it is often also spread through media. There are violent television shows, movies, video games, and types of music that spread the ideologies of violence. It seems possible that self violence ideologies could also spread in these ways.

The other article I read was about fashion models and Barbies, and how their weight and size is completely unrealistic for normal women. Fashion models are a major part of the culture of thinness and a large reason why many girls strive to achieve the same look through eating disorders. Many of these fashion models have eating disorders themselves, according to the Mayo Clinic article we read in class. If we glamorize fashion models who often have eating disorders, are we not glamorizing eating disorders and unhealthy weight? What would be the difference in making Barbies and fashion models be 300 pounds and being carted down the runway while smoking a cigarette? Either way, unhealthiness is glamorized.

When these images are glamorized, girls and women everywhere want to look the same way. It is completely unhealthy and unrealistic for most women. These images could certainly be a reason for why people with eating disorders see themselves as fat, although they are not. It is possible that they are wanting to see what they see on a runway in the mirror. When they do not see the same image both places, they begin to think that they are fat or overweight, leading to more eating behavior problems.

This article states that the average American woman is about 5 feet 4 inches tall and weighs about 142 pounds. The average fashion model is about 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighs under 115 pounds. Why are these women glamorized so much when it is completely unrealistic for the majority of women? It is interesting to note that while the average American woman is 5'4" and 142 pounds, it is a barely normal body mass index. If a woman weighed just 4 more pounds, her body mass index would be considered overweight and unhealthy. Of course, it does depend on the body type. An athlete is going to have more muscle, which weighs more. Their body mass index may say that they are overweight, although they truly are not.

I found an interesting website that lets you upload a photo of yourself and change your weight around. It then warps your photo to show an approximation of what you might look like if you gained or lost an amount of weight. You choose your current height and weight at the top. It only lets you switch the level to certain amounts of gained or lost weight. I had some fun playing around with it. I changed the level to me losing 41 pounds and being severely underweight. At that point, I would be 5'2" and weigh 72 pounds. The image was horrifying. My best features were completely gone! I looked like one of the fashion models on the runways, minus the bones sticking out. I would never want to look like that. Obviously, it's for entertainment purposes and should not be used to truly asses weight and body image, but it is very interesting to play around with. Here's the website if you're interested! http://www4.weightmirror.com/weightmirror/index.php?id=

I chose to read an article on addiction: “Should Alcoholics Really Be Anonymous?” This article was really insightful, and gives a new approach to help groups for alcoholism. Her view on the subject has a very valid point, and I think that more help groups should pay attention to this type of view point; as it could really help generate more people into their clinics and support groups.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maggie-lamond-simone/alcoholics-anonymous_b_810802.html
The author is a recovered alcoholic herself, which seems to lend more credibility to her theory. She discusses how the anonymity of AA groups instills a more severe aspect of shame into the recovery process. At first, my response was that being an alcoholic is somewhat of a shameful addiction, why should we eliminate negative feelings from something that is looked down upon? I found myself sort of thinking that alcoholics should feel shame for what they are doing to their bodies and to society- they deserve it. But as I continued to read the article, it occurred to me that she was making a point to say that the recovery process should be a source of pride, rather than shame. Shame is going out and getting wasted every night, waking up hung over, and going out and getting wasted again. Pride, on the other hand, is having the courage to make a change and get help from programs like AA.
This article brings up a variety of ways that this approach could change the recovery process for addictions. While having an unhealthy addiction can definitely be a shameful occurrence, I think it’s a great idea to encourage people to get help by making the support groups more open. Making rehab a source of satisfaction could increase the success rates, making others take notice that people really can make a change in their lives. In addition, taking away the anonymity of the group could present people with a sense of accountability. When going through a rehabilitation process, it can be difficult to stick to their intended recovery plan. If the patients feel as though they are accountable by society to complete their recovery plan, maybe they will be more successful in the improvement process. If there is a sense of dependability; that is, society is depending on you to get better and recover from your addiction, success rates are likely to increase.
When I took Motivation and Emotion, I read the book A Million Little Pieces by James Frey. The book gives great detail in one man’s road to recovery. It expresses his deep shame and almost a hatred for himself, something that I think many addicts experience. That sense of depression can increase the chances of relapse, as it did with the character in A Million Little Pieces. His recovery plan was very intense, and caused him to really concentrate and put all of his energy towards getting better, even though he felt depressed enough that he often thought of suicide. While he is in his rehab center, he meets a few friends. These friends were a key point in his recovery process; as they made for a sense of accountability. They made sure that he was sticking to his recovery plan-and made sure that he knew that they were counting on him to make a full recovery. I think that this feeling could be increased if we applied the thoughts from the article to all recovery centers.
As far as the violence aspect goes, James Frey gives a great example as to how much harm addicts are really doing to their bodies. When he arrived in his facility for his physical check up, the doctors told him that he was so close to death that they were astounded he was functioning by himself, let alone alive. His many years of alcohol and drug abuse had destroyed his body to such an extent that he was close to his death bed. I think that addictions could go along the same lines as suicide and self harm, as there is only one person that acts as both the victim and the persecutor. The violent acts that are inflicted on the body as a result of drug and alcohol abuse could definitely be seen as violent, as these things can often lead to illness and many times can cause death.

I chose the addiction topic and the Huffington Post page sent me to an article about Internet Addiction. I have heard of that being a controversial 'diagnosis' of an addiction, but one that I feel is based in some truth.

I know of guys who participate in online poker groups. They make this into a profession more than just a hobby. One of my male roommates last year would lock himself in his room on the weekends and be in there all day long playing poker. He had strategies and certain opponents. Another example is a guy I just met in one of my classes. He considers his online poker playing a full time job. He has a separate bank account just for his poker money and sets a schedule for his poker hours. The amount of devotion put into one online game just blows my mind.

Another online activity that has been in the spotlight is the game World of Warcraft (WOW). The article quotes a supposed student from Iowa University (?) who was one of the clinics first residents. He says that WOW overtook his life and was consuming 16-17 hours a day! I think most anyone can see that spending that much time with one game is unhealthy, even an addiction. You might have different definitions of what an addiction is, but for me it definitely includes: spending large amounts of time/ a majority of your time doing an activity, thinking about doing it, planning the next time you will do it, talking about doing it, etc. Basically, when you can't seem to function without it, it's an addiction.

I read the comments at the bottom of the original article, and a lot of the people were criticizing the 'treatment' program itself. One problem they have is the cost; "for a little over $14,000". Some posted that it was ridiculous to spend that much money and 45 days in a treatment center for an addiction that many people don't think is even real. They see the creator, ironically named Hillary Cash, as laughing her way to the bank when people could essentially treat themselves by just stepping away from the computer.

However, I can see how some feel it is serious enough to seek help. Part of the Internet addiction focuses on pornography or shopping. Stereotypically, men are the ones looking up porn and women are the ones spending hours shopping. These too can become an addiction if they start taking up many hours of a person's day and interfere with the rest of their life. Porn can obviously ruin relationships, and shopping can quickly deplete finances.

I think our world has become so technology-based that we just accept computer use as normal. I personally know my life very much revolves around my computer. Checking email, Facebook, keeping up with news, and especially even the whole hybrid concept of this class. We have such opportunity to reach out all across the world by this little box and keyboard. But I think, along with everything in life, moderation is the main advice to keep in mind. If your life becomes on your computer or glue to the TV and nothing else, there may be a problem. There needs to be moments where we all de-technology our lives and explore what else is around us in person.

As for whether Internet addiction needs actual clinical treatment, I feel like it should be the individual's choice about how serious they think their problem is. Regarding violence, I think it could lead to violence, but the use of the Internet itself is not violent. The person is harming themselves socially or financially, but not necessarily physically. If a WOW player becomes obsessed about their playing and someone tries to step in or unplugs the Internet, they might react violently. If a man watches a lot of violent/aggressive pornography, he may take those ideas into a relationship and suggest more extreme sexual acts that could cause harm. I think overall it just needs to be a balance in our lives of face time and screen time.

I agree with these seven steps 100%. When we know we truly don't have any addictions, we tend to not think about what the signs of an addiction can be. I had an uncle who had a gambling addiction, but he was able to admit he had one. He just never looked for help to stop. It took his boss figuring out he had a gambling addiction and forcing him to sign papers that said if he was reported at any Casino he would be arrested. Before this my uncle had spurts where he would do good not going and then would relapse.
What I admired most about this article was how it mentioned that addictions don't discriminate against gender, race, financial status, or anything else for that matter. I don't have and never have personally had any addictions, but I can only imagine how tough it has to be to admit to yourself that you have an addiction. But even after you find the courage to admit to yourself, it has to be even tougher to admit to someone close to you that you have one.
These seven signs are great ways for people with addictions or people who feel they may know someone with an addiction to help them. Sometimes it takes close friends or family to seek help for them. This may be a better option rather than waiting for them to admit to you that they have an addiction.
After reading this article, I thought back on my life to see if I could relate to any of the seven signs. Fortunately I can't, but this definitely gave me some insight to be able to detect if anyone close to me may have an addiction that I could possibly help with. It also wakes us up that when the word "addiction" is mentioned, the first thing we tend to think of is drugs, alcohol, or gambling; things like that. But it informs us that an addiction can be something as simple as shopping or letting clothes clutter up.
There are so many different types of addictions to list that it's not safe for anyone to just say "I KNOW I don't have an addiction!" without actually taking time to think back to "habits" they may have and making certain that they have not turned into addictions.

I agree with these seven steps 100%. When we know we truly don't have any addictions, we tend to not think about what the signs of an addiction can be. I had an uncle who had a gambling addiction, but he was able to admit he had one. He just never looked for help to stop. It took his boss figuring out he had a gambling addiction and forcing him to sign papers that said if he was reported at any Casino he would be arrested. Before this my uncle had spurts where he would do good not going and then would relapse.
What I admired most about this article was how it mentioned that addictions don't discriminate against gender, race, financial status, or anything else for that matter. I don't have and never have personally had any addictions, but I can only imagine how tough it has to be to admit to yourself that you have an addiction. But even after you find the courage to admit to yourself, it has to be even tougher to admit to someone close to you that you have one.
These seven signs are great ways for people with addictions or people who feel they may know someone with an addiction to help them. Sometimes it takes close friends or family to seek help for them. This may be a better option rather than waiting for them to admit to you that they have an addiction.
After reading this article, I thought back on my life to see if I could relate to any of the seven signs. Fortunately I can't, but this definitely gave me some insight to be able to detect if anyone close to me may have an addiction that I could possibly help with. It also wakes us up that when the word "addiction" is mentioned, the first thing we tend to think of is drugs, alcohol, or gambling; things like that. But it informs us that an addiction can be something as simple as shopping or letting clothes clutter up.
There are so many different types of addictions to list that it's not safe for anyone to just say "I KNOW I don't have an addiction!" without actually taking time to think back to "habits" they may have and making certain that they have not turned into addictions.

For this assignment i took a look at addiction. I actually read one article, then got drawn in by a second. the first was on twelve step programs and how they may not be the best way for addicts to ovecome thier addictions. research shows that the faith based programs, such as AA, which ask you to put faith in a higher power during recovery don't work as well as other forms of therapy, such as cognitive behavioral therapy. There are higher rates of depression and relapse in the faith based program participants when compared to other types of therapy groups at four months. I would have to assume that the patients who put thier stock in a higher power may feel like God has failed them, bringing on some depression, if the cravings and urges are still nagging at them months after starting treatment. Those who do behavioral training and cognitive restructuring may find that they have more tangible resourses at their disposal, thus keeping urges and cravings at bay and thwarting the depression that accompanies a relapse.
The second article I read was on addictive personalities. I felt this fit in good wiht the GAM we discussed earlier in the class because it is looking at more biology and personality traits that would contribute to someone being more suceptible to addictions than others. One branch of research looks at low seretonin levels in people making them more likely to have an addictive personality. I think it's interesting that brain chemistry can effect our lives in such a drastic way. those suffering with addiction find themselves basing their entire lives on "getting a fix" and will forgo all relationships, thier jobs, their health, they will break laws and do things that were unthinkable before becoming addicted.
Addiction may not be one of those things we think of as violent in a traditional way, but if we look at the self harm behaviors that an addict may exhibit we see how violent they behave to themselves. Years ago I watched the movie "Requiem for a Dream". I think this is a great example of how addiction can completely destroy a person beyond recognition. If you haven't seen it, you should. Addictions of all types can be terrible forms of self injurious behaviors. It's interesting to see how addiction fits in to the general aggression model and the different ways research is finding to attempt to help those suffering form addiction, because for many they are truly suffering.

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Extra Credit Opportunity--The Joyce Benner Story
Attend this session and reflect on it as a comment to this post. Relate to psychology of violence. 10pts.…
Extra Credit Opportunity--Self Defense
So how does self-defense fit into our understanding of the psychology of violence? What factors is this course (see…
Conviction Screening Extra Credit
If you attended the screening of Conviction, you will receive 5 pts (and i have your name on the sign…