Please read chapter 8. After reading the chapter, please respond to the following questions:
Next you will be asked what three things from the chapter that you found interesting?
1a) What did you find interesting?
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
2a) What did you find interesting?
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
3a) What did you find interesting?
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
7b) Why?
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
Thanks,
--Dr. M
1A) time to collision
1B) I found this interesting because I play sports not as much as I used to so thinking about the whole keeping eye on the ball gives a new meaning to me. also I hope to use this information when I get the job I want I think it will come in handy.
2A) smooth pursuit.
2B) I liked this concept because we use it so much in our every day lives. we are constantly looking at objects moving about. I do this all the time in my job. and its amazing to learn about how we do it and why. how it all connects to the brain and how we perceive it. it kind of ties into the previous one I liked. because when we are trying to cross the street. we are looking at the moving cars and thinking can i cross without getting hit.
3A) vergance.
3B) the reason this was interesting was simply do to my recent own experiences. with my eye surgery sounds like some of the eye movement i have experienced.
4A) akinetopsia
4B) the only reason this was a part of the chapter I didn't enjoy as much was because I cant pronounce the word. when ever i cant pronounce a word i don't understand it as well or remember it as well. the information about it is interesting but if i had to pick something that didn't sit well with me in the chapter that's what i would have to pick.
5) I think this chapter is very important in understanding sensation and perception. because it talks about movement. Movement is a very important part of our lives. we are always moving and seeing objects move. The thing i think about most is driving. we are always having our eyes dart around looking at different things making sure we don't crash. or looking at something that catches our attention.
6) It relates to the previous chapter because the last one talked about attention. and this chapter is about movement you need to understand your attention before you can understand how we see movement.
7A) collisions
7B) I like to learn more about collisions and how are reaction time comes into play. I think this is a very big thing that we use in our daily lives.
8) I kept relating all the information or daily life and how we use it. movement is what we use everyday.
9) sensation, preception, precive, brain eyes, collisons, movement, vergence, akinetopisa, smooth prusit, time to collions.
1A&B) I was interested to learn about motion aftereffect (MAE). MAE occurs when neurons sensitive to a certain direction of motion become tired viewing that direction of motion. When gaze is shifted to a stationary object, the opposite direction neurons work faster than other neurons because they are not as tired. I was interested to learn about this because it happens if you watch the credits of a movie, you feel like the rest of the world is moving like a waterfall, which is an odd situation to be in when you know it is impossible.
2A&B) I was also interested to learn about the complex interactions between the muscles attached to the eye, and how they are controlled. What is interesting is that several parts of the brain work to direct eye movement, and these areas are complete separate from each other in the brain.
3A&B) While reading the chapter, I was particularly interested on pages 237-238, where it talks about types of eye movements. There are three major types or eye voluntary eye movements. First, smooth-pursuit movements are when our eyes deliberately focus our gaze on a moving object. Vergence eye movements refer to the converging or diverging of the eyes (rotating them inwards or outwards). Finally, the saccade is a quick jump of the eye from one spot to another, up to 1000 degrees per second. The book discusses reading English in terms of eye movements; while reading, saccades of about 7-9 letters occur repeatedly. Processing takes place only during a small portion of fixation. I was interested to learn about this because I am not a strong reader. I read at a fairly slow pace have extremely poor reading comprehension ability. This is a frustrating position to be in in college, I have a lot of reading to do, because I am slow it takes a lot of time, and I don’t want to feel like I’m wasting time reading if I’m not getting the main ideas. This section made me curious to know if my fixation or some other factor could be interfering with processing. In general, eye movements have a lot to do with attention, scene perception, and motion.
4A&B) I kind of get bored where the book goes into what parts of the brain are involved with what activity of the visual system. In general, we don’t seem to know what or how these parts work to produce a given visual or psychological experience, so it is difficult to get interested in these parts of the chapter.
5) Movement is a fairly important aspect of vision and perception, and contributes to a variety of psychological responses. I wish the book as a whole brought in more psychology related to vision and the other topics covered in the book, rather than sticking so strictly to biology and physiology.
6) In chapter three we covered central and peripheral vision. Peripheral vision relies a lot on cues that movement may be occurring in our periphery area, so we shift our gaze to focus on the movement. It also contributes to attention and scene perception, topics covered in chapter 7
7A&B) I’d like to learn more about saccadic suppression. In the book, this is the visual sensitivity that occurs making saccades. Although an object is not moving, one might suppose saccades (eye movement) would cause the perception that the object is moving. This turns out not to be the case, however. It would be interesting to learn more about research done in this area.
8) Throughout the book, I always think about concepts from the text in the context of driving. Movement is crucial for driving; we must avoid collisions (literally), estimate distances. We’re constantly scanning down the road, mirrors, speedometer, etc…. The section about saccades was particularly interesting in this context. The book says we can only process during fixation. As driving requires repeated saccades, it seems like very little processing may be taking place? How is it that we can (usually) safely arrive at our destination if we can barely process visual input? Am I understanding this correctly?
9) Motion After Effect, motion perception, neurons, smooth-pursuit movement, gaze, vergence eye movements, convergence, divergence, saccade, fixation, processing, attention, scene perception, saccadic suppression
1a) What did you find interesting?
I thought apparent motion was interesting. Apparent motion is the illusory impression of smooth motion resulting from the rapid alternation of objects that appear in different locations in rapid succession. An image of something that appears in A’s receptive field, then disappears, and then reappears in B’s receptive field a short time later will drive M to respond just as strongly as if the image had moved smoothly across the two receptive fields. It was first demonstrated by Sigmund Exner in 1875. Exner set up a contraption that would generate electrical sparks separated from each other by a very short distance in a space and a very short period of time. Even though there were two separate sparks, two different perceptual objects-observers swore that they saw a single spark moving from one position to another. This relates to what we see on television. Objects change positions each frame, and when the frames are shown to us at a sufficiently fast speed we perceive these position changes over time as motion.
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
This is interesting to me because in my childhood the Disney commercials would always show how the cartoons were made. They’d show the artist drawing a character on several pages and then flip the pages to show the cartoon moving. Of course this was completely over my head and fascinating when I was little. But even still now it’s interesting to me how our eyes perceive it as a fluent motion.
2a) What did you find interesting?
I also found the correspondence problem to be interesting. Apparent motion works for our motion detection circuit, but there is still a problem. An example of this is with movie diagrams. Movies have two frames that alternate back and forth. The difference between the two frames is that only one object in the movie has shifted diagonally by a short distance. But in other cases, the movie will be perceived horizontally, not diagonally. This relates to the correspondence problem because this is in motion detection, the problem faced by the motion detection system of knowing which feature in frame 2 corresponds to a particular feature in frame 1. Part of the problem is just in general knowing which circles in frame 2 correspond with what circle in frame 1. Our detectors compete to determine our overall perception.
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
This was interesting to me because I never knew we had this type of problem. I always just assumed how we saw movies or these types of slides just worked vertically. I didn’t know our eyes had a problem competing with each other with horizontally and vertically seeing these types of slides.
3a) What did you find interesting?
I also found vergence to be an interesting concept. Vergence is a type of eye movement in which the two eyes move in opposite directions. For example, both eyes turning towards the nose, which is convergence, or both eyes turning away from the nose, which is divergence. There are three types of voluntary eye movements. Convergence, divergence, and saccade. Saccade is the type of eye movement made both voluntarily and involuntary which the eyes rapidly change fixation from one object or location to another. A fast jump of the eye that shifts our fixation point from one spot to another. We can decide to make a saccade deliberately, but whether we’re thinking or not, we will make three or four saccades every second.
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought this was interesting because it talks about the things we don’t even notice our eyes doing voluntarily and involuntarily. I didn’t know there was an actual term for going cross eyed, which would be convergence. I also didn’t know what saccade was or that we do this movement every couple of seconds without realizing it.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
One thing I found the least interesting was the middle temporal area(MT). This is just simply because I’m not much of a science person and didn’t find this part to be very interesting. The middle temporal area is an area of the brain thought to be important in the perception of motion. Information from the magnocellular neurons feeds into V1 and is then passed on to the middle temporal area of the cortex, and area commonly referred to as MT. This motion-sensitive area may have at least two separate maps located on the lateral surface at the temporal-occipital boundary.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
I think knowing the basics is important to go on. So I think knowing what smooth pursuit is, is important. Smooth pursuit is a type of voluntary eye movement in which the eyes move smoothly to follow a moving object. This keeps the image of an object stationary on the retina while it is in motion.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
This chapter relates to previous chapters because it talks about motion perception. The previous chapters have talked about spatial vision, perceiving and recognizing objects, and space perception. This chapter builds on that by going over how we view things in motion. The previous chapters were just basics on how we see. But this chapter uses that information and describes how we then see with moving objects.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
I would like to learn more about comparator. Comparator is an area of the visual system that receives one copy of the command issued by the motor system when the eyes move. The other copy goes to the eye muscles. The comparator compares the image motion signal with the eye motion signal and can compensate for the image changes caused by the eye movement. By sending out two copies of each order to move the eyes, the motor system is thought to solve the problem of why an object in motion may appear stationary. The comparator can then compensate for the image changes caused by the eye movement, inhibiting any attempts by other parts of the visual system to interpret the changes as object motion. I want to learn more about this simply because I find the topic interesting.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
I thought about old Disney commercials I’ve scene and how they actually show how cartoons are made. How the artists draw a few sheets and then flip them together to make it look like the cartoon is moving. This related to his chapter because it talked about apparent motion.
Terms: Apparent motion, illusory impression, rapid alternation, rapid succession, receptive field, Sigmund Exner, perceptual, perceive, motion, correspondence problem, motion detection circuit, detectors, perception, vergence, convergence, divergence, saccade, middle temporal area, neuron, cortex, MT, magocellular, lateral surface, temporal-occipital boundary, smooth pursuit, retina, comparator, image, interpret.
Apparent motion was one of the first topics in the chapter. This is the illusory impression of smooth motion which is the result of altering objects very fast that looks like movement when shown in quick succession. The text describes it as when an image appears in A’s receptive field and then reappears in B’s receptive field very soon after will make cell M react as if the object had smoothly moved across the receptive fields. I think I found this most interesting because it is how cartoons are created. I remember having the little books of pictures that I could flip quickly through and it looked like it was animated. It was really interesting to see the science behind it as it is not something we even give a second thought about how it occurs we just simply know that it does.
Time to collision was also very interesting. This is how we estimate how long it will take a moving object to collide with a non-moving object. The text discussed tau which is the information in the optic flow that may signal the TTC without having absolute distances or rates of speed being estimated. Basically as in the case of a ball coming at you the increasing size of the ball in the retina. The text says that there are a lot of other things that come into play in detecting the time to collision but the tau was really interesting. It made me think of my son who is an avid baseball player. When batting there is the chance of being hit by the ball. However the ball coming at you at a great speed is something that has to be carefully calculated. You cannot step out of the batter’s box or the batter is out, move to quickly and it is a strike, move without taking the bat with you and it is a strike. I wondered if by repetitive practice tau usefulness increases?
The disorder akinetopsia was fascinating, probably because it was something I had not heard of before. When I first read about it the disorder seemed so strange, almost unreal. As I understand it basically people afflicted with this are unable to perceive motion. When an object shifts the person will be aware that it happened but not experience the actual motion. One woman described the movement of her own arm, she reported that she saw multiple fuzzy images like that in a cartoon. Experts believe the disorder is caused by disruption so to cortical area MT. The disruptions can be caused by side effects of drugs, trauma to area MT like from stroke or surgery. The disorder is sometimes able to correct itself several weeks after the surgery event.
The correspondence problem was my least favorite section of this chapter. The definition in the text was that in motion detection it is the problem faced by the motion detection system of knowing which feature I the next frame corresponds to the feature in the previous frame. The example in the book was a square made of red dots that seemed to be slightly altered and it is difficult to perceive the changes. I think it just didn't make very much sense to me so the topic did not hold my interest.
This chapter builds on the previous of how the biology of sight and then how we perceive objects and depth into how then we see these objects in motion.
When I read the chapter I was fascinated by how our brain has multiple areas of sensing motion that appear to work seamlessly together to detect the motion in the world. The act is so simple but the science is so very complex.
I would like to study more on tau and TTC just to see what the various opinions are on the role of tau in perceiving speed of moving objects.
Terms: Apparent motion, illusory impression, receptive field, Time to collision, tau, akinetopsia, Middle Temporal, correspondence problem, motion detection, perceive
1a) What did you find interesting?
i thought the aperture problem was pretty interesting.
Aperture Problem is the fact that when a moving object is viewed through an aperture, the direction of the motion from the object maybe ambiguous
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
it was interesting to me because our eyes can be very bias about things too as much as our minds could be, depending on how we see things, or what angle we see objects from
2a) What did you find interesting?
Another thing that i was interesting in was the MT, MT is the middle temporal area of the brain thought to be important in the perception of motion.
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
i thought this was pretty interesting because it's actually very important to our central cortex, the fact that it has two different maps that are located in the on the lateral surface at the TO spot, (Temporal occipital) these two locations are also know as the MT or V5, To-1 or To-2.
3a) What did you find interesting?
in this area, i thought First order motion was interesting as well. First order motion is the motion of an object that is defined by changes in luminescence.
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
i thought this was interesting because of the white and gold, or the blue and black dress situation that happened couple of weeks ago, i thought the color changing problem might be because of the changes in luminescence.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? one thing that i found least interesting was the motion aftereffects revisited section
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
i don't think it's because i found it least interesting, i think it's because the examples that were given to explain the section weren't really relatable to me, i didn't find them that helpful, or that interesting.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
i thought how motion objects were explained was very useful, the MT section was helpful mostly because it the center of visual perception, using images and drawings to exemplify things is very visual representation of how sensation and perception can be put into use by everyone in their everyday lives.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
the last chapter was basically talking about our visual attention , focusing on stimulus, knowing whether or not we can multitask with things, while this chapter is basically talking about the motion of visual perception, the difference in how we perceive things and how fast we do it, also about how there are different levels we go through in order to perceive an image correctly or understanding an object functionally while in motion.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
i thought this chapter had some great topics overall, but if i could pick one i would choose Akinetopsia,which is a rare neuropsychological disorder in which the affected individual has no perception of motion.
7b) Why?
I want to learn more about this topic because it seems rare, interesting, and reading the story of the two patients that weren't able to see motion was very interesting and i can't imagine going through that process everytime i see new objects.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
while i was reading this chapter, i didn't really think there was such difference in seeing an object and having an aftereffect on it seconds later, but after reading this, i found out that you actually have those things occur, and it makes sense when you see an objection and have images of it later on in our lives about that image, that's mostly how we remember certain things, and also that people with high motion objects memories are the people who have the photographic memory.
TERMS:Akinetopsia, First order motion, Lumninace defined object, temporal cortex, visual fields, V5, aftereffect motion, Aperture, Aperture Problem, Middle temporal Area(MT)
1) The first thing that I found interesting was the concept of apparent motion. I found this interesting because I have filmed stop motion short films before and apparent motion applies to this concept. When making the film, I took a series of still images, and then placed them in a program that sped them all up, and played them consecutively, which produces the illusion of motion. I hadn’t really had a term to describe the motion that is perceived by stop motion, so it was interesting to know there is a name for it. I also watch cartoons a lot and play video games which all rely on apparent motion as well.
2) The next subject that I found interesting was biological motion, and more specifically the ability of individuals to detect gender based on positioning of “lines and lights” on images of humans without the human visual. I think this shows that our visual field works with our brain to utilize motion cues to understand the world around us, including what other people are doing.
3) The final thing that I found interesting was akinetopsia, or the inability to see or detect motion. I think the issues described by the individuals who suffered from this disorder perfectly demonstrate how our ability to see motion (fluidly) is important to our functioning in every day life. We live in a world that is constantly in motion, and without the ability to see motion, we are left vulnerable.
4) I didn’t find time to collision that interesting, but I understood it for the most part. I was a catcher in softball so where a ball was going to land and how fast it was approaching was important for me to understand if I didn’t want to get hit or drop the ball. I thought it was interesting to have a name for it, but it wasn’t the most interesting thing to me from this chapter.
5) I think the most helpful information in this chapter is the basic knowledge that we posses different physical features that help us to perceive motion. Saccadic suppression compensates for our eye’s rapid movements while the comparator makes up for the image changes caused by the movement of our eyes. Without these structures and funtions in our eyes and brains, we would be like the people with akinestopsia, and we would be left vulnerable in a world of motion.
6) I noted a specific topic of vergence which related to the previous chapters about our eyes abilities to move outward (diverging) or coming together (converging). These topics related to smooth pursuit in this chapter. In addition this chapter discussed more ways in which our perceptions of the world can be tricked (such as motion aftereffect).
7a) I would like to learn more about apparent motion or akinetopsia. I would want to learn more about apparent motion because it related to things I have done before and really enjoyed. I would want to learn about akinetopsia because it was only briefly discussed, but sounds interesting.
8) When the chapter was discussing apparent motion the first thing I thought about were Christmas lights that look like a light is moving down the string, or moving in some way, when in actuality it is a different light lighting up at different times, not one light moving. Despite this we perceive there to be a motion of light. The other thing I was thinking about was in CGI movies there is often a person who is connected to a dot suit, their motions are recorded and then plugged into a computer where the animation is overlaid and programed with the recorded motions, this reminded me of the biological motion.
9) apparent motion, illusion, motion, biological motion, akinetopsia, time to collision, saccadic suppression, comparator, vergence, diverging, converging, smooth pursuit, motion aftereffect
1a) What did you find interesting?
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
The first thing in chapter 8 that I found interesting was the section of the detection of global motion in area MT. This section fused on the middle temporal area or often referred to as the MT. The middle temporal area is an area of the brain thought to be important in the perception of motion. Originally this wasn't very interesting to me and then when I continued my reading it became very interesting to me. The middle temporal area of the cortex is only in nonhuman primates. The human equivalent of MT, has been localized using functional MRI and variously labeled as MT+ or V5. It wasn't recently discovered that this motion-sensitive area may have at least two separate maps located on the lateral surface at the temporal occipital boundary. I found this to be extremely interesting; an area of our brain that has two full maps on it that helps us locate and notice motion.
2a) What did you find interesting?
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
Focus of expansion was the next term I found interesting in chapter 8. The example in the book explains a pilot coming in to land a plane; when she is landing the plane she will always be focusing on one point, the center, or the focus of expansion of the optic array. The focus of expansion is the point in the center of the horizon from which, when were in motion, all points in the perspective image seem to emanate. The focus of expansion is one aspect of optic flow. This is one place in the visual field that will be stationary which helps us determine where things are and where we need to focus on to land. This was interesting to me because we need to have this in our every day lives. One example for me is that I am a runner; I love to run and I often push myself to reach new goals. When running I often focus on an end point and focus on that point to blur out the fact that I am running giving me no choice but to finish strong at that end spot, my focus of expansion.
3a) What did you find interesting?
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
The third thing I found interesting in chapter 8 was the theory of biological motion: the pattern of movement of living beings (humans and animals). I found this interesting because it is the movement of us and how we do things both differently and similarly to other species. Recognized by Gunnar Johansson that there might be something special about the motion of animals and people. There is even evidence that observers can use biological motion to identify whether a set of moving light is attached to a male or female walker.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
One thing I didn't really find interesting mainly because it seems like common sense. A type of voluntary eye movement in which the eyes move smoothly to follow a moving object. I didn't find this interesting because I feel like it seems like common sense. This keeps an image stationary on the retina even when you are in motion. This is actually an interesting term because it is something that we use so often in our every day lives but reading about it felt kind of pointless because it happens so often for us and because it is a voluntary movement that we choose to do; making it seem very much like common sense.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
I thought that all of the terms that had to do with transferring motion. Like interocular transfer which is the transfer of an effect from one eye to the other; or first order motion: the motion of an object that is defined by changes in luminance. Or second order motion: the motion of an object that is defined by changes in contrast or texture, not by luminance. All of these terms seems pretty similar however they all relate to what we are learning in Sensation and Perception very well. The small changes that happen within our eyes to help us notice or recognize something are what give an image its details and diversity. Noticing the small things in an image make you feel a different sensation and have a different perception toward the image.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
It builds because as we continue through the chapters each chapter builds on something that gives more and more detail to the image that we see when we look at something. explaining each chapter how more in depth we can see and perceive images and how this happens. This chapter focuses a lot on motion and how we can still focus on certain or specific images when we are undergoing motion; this is more complex than the idea of just looking at something while not moving which we would have covered in precious chapters.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
7b) Why?
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
things that relate to the chapters when I am reading them for me are always memories. For some reason whenever I learn about or read about a new term it helps me to try to relate it back to something that happened to me; a memory that I can look back on and say "oh yeah that is why I could do that>" For me learning all of this new information is useless unless I can relate it to something that matters to me in my life; whether past or present or future.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
apparent motion, illusion, biological motion, smooth pursuit, interocular transfer, first order motion, second order motion, correspondence problem, sensation, perception.
1a) What did you find interesting?
biological motion
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
Because all semester i have been receiving these emails from the psychology department about how they need volunteers to come in and based on moving lights, to determine whether the person was male or female. I had been wondering how one would judge gender on just light alone, but now it makes a little more sense.
2a) What did you find interesting?
time to collision (TTC)
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
I found this interesting, because i always sucked at hitting a baseball or catching anything. But i am good at avoiding collisions. I guess i never took into consideration the physics behind it. TTC = distance/rate. I think i personally must have a problem with Tau, though i didn’t trust my friends enough to have them throw a ball at my face so i could see what the book described.
3a) What did you find interesting?
microsaccade
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
I think this is the disorder that my roommate has, though he is away at the time of me typing this. But basically he can read normal and everything, though he does have reading glasses, but the abnormality shows when you ask him to track a finger… his eyes bounce back and forth, like a drunk person who is being pulled over and given a sobriety test. Which has caused some unneeded attention by police in his past.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
Basicly the whole chapter
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
I don't understand most of the things it talks about, biological and math wise. I lack the prior knowledge to grasp this book at the level that i should be able to.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
Probably biological motion, because it gave insight a bit on how we perceive two people either dancing or arguing based on certain points and mimicking of movements.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
Biological Motion
7b) Why?
It is about the only thing i was really interested in in the whole chapter.
Terms:Biological Motion,time to collision (TTC),microsaccade,Tau
1a) The first interesting concept from chapter eight that I came across is the idea of apparent motion. This can be explained as the illusory impression of a smooth motion resulting from the rapid alteration of objects that appear in different locations in a rapid succession. This was first represented in 1875 by a machine that generated sparks at different times that made it look like there was only one spark moving when in reality it was two sparks that were set off at different times.
1b) This was interesting to me for a few reasons. First it made me think about these little quarter operated toy machines that you can find at the entrances of many stores like Walmart and Target. The game is set up where there is a light the “moves” around and you must click a button to stop it on a red light in order to win a prize. Now the light is not actually moving, instead it is apparent motion because one light after another goes off making it seem like it is actually moving. This is the same for seeing things on TV. The pictures on the television screen are not actually moving in your own home; instead it sort of tricks us to make your mind believe that it is moving.
2a) The next part that was very interesting to me from this chapter was on first-order motion, which is the motion of an object that is defined by changes in lighting, combined with luminance- defined object which is an object that is delineated by changes in reflective light.
2b) This was interesting because it reminded me of a classroom experiment that I can recall from high school where the teacher turned off all the main lights in a room and used a strobe light to illuminate a small fan. By making the strobe light flicker at different speeds we could actually make it look like the propellers on the fan were spinning backwards (though they weren’t).
3a) The last really interesting part to me was one biological motion which is the pattern of movement of living beings. This goes for both humans and animals alike.
3b) This part got my attention because the example they used was a tennis player, and as a tennis player myself, I was drawn to this example more than normal. It shows how the motion of our bodies work together to make these smooth movements, whether it is just walking or something more vigorous like tennis, it is good to know exactly how and why it works.
4a) One of this least interesting parts of chapter eight was the part on correspondence problems. The book tries to explain it as a problem in motion detection of knowing which feature in frame 2 corresponds with a certain feature in frame one, but I cannot grasp what this means. They then use a few picture to try to show their meaning, but it is very difficult to understand.
4b) This was not interesting to me because I still do not think I quite understand what they are trying to convey. In my opinion the book does a terrible job of explaining this idea so I plan to ask about it in class this coming Thursday. If even Dr. Maclin cannot describe to me what correspondence problems are then I will just try my best to not let it bother me and train myself more on other concept from the book and forget about this one.
5) Everything in this chapter that explains how we see and analyze motion is an important factor to understanding sensations and perceptions. This ranges from the different light pattern to our brain make up. All of the terminologies in this section are very good at explaining these functions.
6) This chapter does a great job of building off of some concepts from chapter three concerning cells in the primary visual cortex and how they selectively respond to motion in a particular direction. It also goes along with attention from chapter seven and how motion actually helps attract or differ our attention.
7a) I would like to know more about smooth pursuit eye movement.
7b) I liked the example they gave in the text concerning this using the pencil and a black dot, and I would like to know more about it what other research is out there on it, and whether or not there can be complications in the brain that could also affect this.
8) Much of what I read I related it back to my cats, I even stopped for a bit to use a laser pointer on them because I was influence by what I read with motion.
9) Terms: Motion, apparent motion, smooth motion, smooth pursuit, first order motion, luminance-defined objects, biological motion, correspondence problems
1a) The first topic I found interesting was motion afteraffect (MAE).
1b) MAE describes the perceptual illusion when a stationary object appears to have motion. This occurs after a person spends an extended period of time focusing on an object in motion. For example, if you were to stare at a long train roaring across the track for an extended period of time and then turn your attention to the motionless steering wheel in front of you, the steering when may appear to move. I find this interesting because it just seems strange to me that when the eye sees motion for an extended period of time, that motion is transferred in a way to a still surface.
2a) The second thing I found interesting was apparent motion.
2b) Apparent motion is an illusion of smooth movement when viewing a set of images in fast succession. These images contain subject matter that changes location in each image, thus creating the illusion of movement. I find this interesting because this is the basis for some of my favorite movies and cartoons as a child. One could say that apparent motion is responsible for a great deal of my childhood.
3a) The next thing that I found interesting was akinetopsia.
3b) Akinetopsia is a very rare disorder that results in the inability to perceive emotion. They see the world as a set of still images that occur in rapid succession. This neuropsychological condition seems to originate from damage or interference with the middle temporal cortex of the brain. I find this interesting because when I think about how the world must look to those with the disorder, I think of stop motion films (like apparent motion) going a little slower. When I don’t allow my mind to forget that the pictures don’t exactly flow, I don’t feel comfortable with the way it looks for some unknown reason. I think it must be incredibly strange to see all motion like this.
4a) The thing that I found least interesting was correspondence problem.
4b) The correspondence problem is a dilemma for the brain’s motion detection system when it needs to figure out which point in one frame of vision matches to a point in the next frame. I did not find this interesting simply because it did not spark my interest. It just seems like a weird thing to spend time on in order to understand. It’s a relatively simple concept and it didn’t seem particularly interesting.
5) What most helped me understand this part of sensation and perception was the description of why we developed motion sensing mental processes to the extent that we as humans did. This knowledge sets up the rest of the chapter by explaining why motion perception is so important.
6) This builds upon previous chapters because this chapter expands on our perception of what we see. In the chapters before, we explored the basics of sight sensation and perception. After that we learned about specifics about how certain processes work. However, all the images gone over were still. This chapter puts the previous knowledge into respect by then explaining how the brain receives the previously still sensations and perceptions into motion.
7a) I would like to learn more about Akinetopsia.
7b) I want to learn more about this disorder because this was really the only part of the chapter that caught my interests in more than just an “oh neat” way.
8) I honestly didn’t think much during this chapter. The only part that really sparked my thought process was apparent motion, but all I thought about was nostalgic memories of my favorite childhood movies. This was not that interesting of a chapter to me.
Terms: sensation; perception; motion afteraffect; correspondence problem; akinetopsia; apparent motion; neuropsychological; middle temporal cortex; motion detection
1a. For first concept from chapter eight that I found interesting was the topic of using motivation information to identify objects, specifically biological motion.
Biological motion is the pattern of movement of living beings such as humans and animals. Researcher Gunnar Johansson pioneered the idea that the specific motion of animals and people are special and can help us identify both the moving object and its actions. Further research into this interesting perceptual experience suggests that we can identify whether a set of moving lights is attached to a male or female walker. It seems that because males have broader shoulders and narrower hips their center of motion is higher and can be identified even when an individual is shown lights moving instead of the human body moving. Additionally, the amount of body sway while walking can also give away a clue as to the gender of an individual. Women were found to sway their hips more frequently than men in the study.
b. I found this topic to be very interesting partially because during my sophomore year I was involved in a psychological study at UNI that involved identifying the gender of a set of dots and lights walking on a computer screen. At the time I was unaware of the exact psychology of the visual system and the physiological experience that contributed to my ability to identify the gender of the walker. I also found it an interesting concept because we perceive motion almost constantly so it is fascinating to learn how the visual system actually perceives the movement around us.
2a. The second topic that I found interesting discussed different types of eye movements that humans experience. Specifically I was interested in reflexive eye movement which can otherwise be known as vestibular eye movement that is an automatic and involuntary movement of the eye. This happens when the eyes move to compensate for head and body movement while still fixated on a particular target. Reflexive eye movement can also occur when the eyes are involuntarily tracking a continually moving object. While this is happening the eyes smoothly move in one direction in pursuit of the moving object and then snap back when it can no longer track the object.
b. I found this interesting as I thought about all of the objects and people that my eyes track every day. Even when I am not consciously following an object my eyes move involuntarily and I never knew the physiological reason behind it until reading this section. I found it fascinating when I took into consideration all of the moving people, including instructors, that my eyes track every day. Without the ability to track movement it would be impossible to function in social settings and would be detrimental to the ability to survive.
3a. The third concept that I found fascinating was the case study of a man who could not see motion. He suffered from a rare neuropsychological disorder known as akinetopsia that results in the inability to perceive motion. The man experiencing this disorder could see that objects or people had changed position but had no perception of the motion that accounted for their new location. Researchers discovered that this horrible disorder resulted because of disruptions to the cortical area of the medial temporal lobe and were occasionally a side effect of prescription antidepressants but could also be caused by trauma such as a stroke or brain surgery. It is possible to regain normal motion perception if a patient is removed from related antidepressants or after full recovery from surgery.
b. I found this interesting because I am always fascinated in deficits of the visual system. It is maladaptive to be unable to perceive motion because it would hinder an individual from tasks such as driving and interacting in social environments. I also found it extremely fascinating that prescription drugs such as antidepressants can cause such a horrible deficit and wondered if they have altered the chemical composition of the drug to decrease that effect in the medial temporal lobe.
4ab. I did not find any part of this chapter to be uninteresting but I found the section of Tau to be a little overwhelming to read because of all of the information. It can be hard to fully comprehend all of the concepts and mathematical terms stuffed into one paragraph.
5. I found the section on biological motion to be the most useful to my understanding of sensation and perception. It is extremely applicable to our daily lives to be able to perceive the motion and actions of other human beings and animals. This ability aids us in survival as well as in social interactions with others. Additionally it provides us with important information for how the visual system works and the specific parts of the brain that are involved with motion perception.
6. This chapter builds on other chapters because it further explores the medial temporal lobe and its function in the visual system. It also addresses vision as low level perceptual phenomena that was previously discussed in chapter three. The authors further discuss the parts of the brain associated with vision and go into further detail about the motion parallax covered in chapter six. This previous knowledge aided in my ability understand the new material that was incorporated.
7ab. I would like to learn more about akinetopsia because I am extremely interested in neuropsychological disorders and their causes as well as treatments that are available.
8. While reading this chapter I thought about deficits that could result in a lack of ability to perceive motion and the causes of them. I also thought about treatment options that are available and the parts of the brain that are associated with the inability to perceive the motion around us.
Terms: biological motion, Gunnar Johansson, perception, motion, reflexive eye movement, vestibular eye movement, akinetopsia, motion parallax, neuropsychological disorder
1. The first thing I found interesting was the ear decides how loud a sound is. This is done by examining the intensity and loudness of the sound. The audibility threshold is the lowest sound pressure that can be reliability heard at a given frequency. The lowest frequency humans can hear is 2000 Hz and the highest frequency is 6000. We can hear these frequencies because the of the shape of the ear canal, which helps capture sounds so the middle ear and the inner ear can use those sounds. Temporal integration is a process that plays a big role in how loud a sound is perceived to be. This is because temporal integration is why people think a sound gets louder the longer it is heard. Any sound that is heard for longer than 100-200 milliseconds will be perceived as louder the longer it is heard. I noted that, despite the fact we measure sounds using frequency; people actually hear the pitch of a sound. This is interesting because it explains a lot about why we find some sounds louder than others.
2. The second thing I found interesting was the concept of frequency selectiveness. Frequency selectiveness is the idea of matching. Matching is when one sound is harder to hear because another sound is being heard at the same time. This can be perceived as both positive and negative depending on the circumstance at the time. I perceive it to be annoying when people talk through classes, especially lectures, because that is what is happening. But it can be a good thing because white noise is an example of this when used for good. White noise is hearing all the audible frequencies at once, which sounds counterproductive, but it works because all of the sounds blend into the sound of nothing. This is interesting to me because this is why I can’t hear professors lectures if someone that is sitting close to me is talking through class, which is a big pet peeve of mine.
3. The third thing I found interesting was the role the cochlea plays in what sounds we hear. The cochlea has the job of coding the amplitude and frequency of the sound. The more amplitude a sound has the more the sterocilia bend, which is how sound is detected in the first place. This process is done by the corti measuring how much the tympanic membrane and the oval window bumps ( aka bounces) against the corti, which activates the . The oval window is the barrier between the middle ear and the inner ear, so it bounces against the tympanic membrane. The tympanic membrane is located in the outer ear and moves in and out when a new sound it heard. The number of number of times the tympanic membrane bounces called the firing rate and the firing rate is what the neurotransmitters read to send information to the brain to interpret the sound.
Coding for frequency is a harder than coding for amplitude because there are different stereocilia that curl up (aka the firing rate) for different frequencies. This is called displacement. Higher frequencies cause the oval window to bounce more, and lower frequencies displace more of the apex. This is called tuning, or place code. I thought this was interesting because both play an important role in determining what we hear.
4. The part I found least interesting was the part where we learned about all of the parts of the ear, because a lot of the terms were new to me and that made it harder to understand.
5. I think all of the stuff in my answers for 1-3 is useful to know because the combination of the concepts is basically what explains the differences between what I hear and what others hear.
6. This topic doesn’t really build on the previous information except that the visual system uses the hearing system to know when to look for something unexpected.
7. I would like to learn more about matching or if there is a biological basis for music preferences based on how each individuals ears react to different types of music because they both seem interesting to me.
8. I thought about fire alarms when I read about temporal integration, as now know that is why fire alarms on campus seem to get louder if a person chooses to not go outside during a fire drill.
9. Sound pressure, ear, sound, intensity, loudness, audibility threshold, Frequency, inner, ear , ear canal, middle ear , Temporal integration , pitch, frequency selectiveness, white, noise , cochlea, coding, amplitude, sterocilia, corti, tympanic membrane, oval window , bounces, bumps , outer ear , firing rate , neurotransmitters, stereocilia, displacement, Higher frequencies , lower frequencies, apex, tuning, place code, visual system , hearing system.
I accidently did the wrong chaper, here is chapter 8 summery.
1. The first thing I found interesting was the part about how important apparent motion. Apparent motion is an example of an optical illusion explained by Sigmund Exner. It is defined as ‘illustionary impression of smooth motion resulting from the rapid alternation of objects that appear in different location in rapid succession”. This is a complicated way to say that if a human sees one perceptual object in two different places in two different pictures, the brain fills in the information that the object moved, when it in reality did not move. A common example of this cartoons, because the animators don’t draw every moment done by the character-just the key ones. This is where apparent motion comes into play because we, the viewers, take in the pictures and fill in the motion not drawn. This topic was interesting because I didn’t know how of often I used apparent motion, though it seems I use it quite a bit because it is used in a lot of the anime I watch.
2. The second thing I found interesting was the role of VI neurons in motion detection. VI neurons are located in the primary visual cortex. The problem with this is that he primary visual cortex does not have as receptors. Specialized VI cells are used in seeing the world because they use a small aperture; small openings that only let the eye see part of an object. This works well because it makes it easier for the brain to see which direction the object is coming from. There are VI cells that only focus on up and down movement an there are different VI cells that only focus on left and right movement. An area of the cortex called the middle temporal area (along with the: central sulcus, postcentral sulcus, motion processing parietal cortex, and the lingual gyrus) then take this information and combines it to form the thought, “oh look, there a Frisbee flying at me.” This information was interesting because it is the physiological basis for how the brain sees motion and then tells the brain if I need to duck (or what is much more likely in my case-make a failed attempt to avoid the flying object).
3. The third thing I found interesting was the concept of how our brains use motion detection at all times. I was surprised to find that this is even at play when we are looking at stationary objects. This is because the eyes are constantly moving, to avoid the blind spot from becoming a problem. Using motion detection as a way to see happens because in the opponent-processing-system, the specialized VI neurons become tired after too much use and the eye must use a different kind of VI neuron to determine if an object is actually moving. This was interesting because it is the physiological basis for how the brain sees motion, which is very important when navigating the world.
4. One thing I found boring was the idea of the correspondence problem. It was boring because it didn’t make any sense and seemed to directly go against the concept apparent motion. That didn’t make any sense to me, so I automatically found it boring.
5. I think the idea of the brain using motion detection all the time relates to the class the best because it is very important that it work well.
6. This chapter talked about the opponent-processing-system, which was talked about in chapter
7. I would like to explore how stereo-blindness, or maybe just being nearsighted or farsighted, impacts the brains ability to detect motion.
8. I thought about optical illusions are not just a fun thing done to kill time, but are used in everyday life even if we don’t know it.
9. Terms: apparent motion, optical illusion, Sigmund Exner, smooth motion , perceptual object , VI neurons , primary visual cortex, receptors., VI cells , aperture, eye, direction , up and down movement , left and right movement , cortex , middle temporal area, central sulcus, postcentral sulcus, motion processing parietal cortex, lingual gyrus, motion , stationary , blind spot, opponent-processing-system.
The first topic that I found interesting was the computation of visual motion. I found this section particularly interesting because the developing of a motion detector is something that has always seemed so complex. Throughout reading this section in the book it made motion detectors and the visual motions seem less complex and easier for me to understand. Looking at the way that motion involves a change in position over time which then involves the object to pass through different receptive fields. Each receptive field is made up of different neurons that respond and eventually take four parts to complete one cycle and create a mechanism that is sensitive to motion.
The second thing that I found interesting was the section on the aperture problem which is closely related to the correspondence problem. This happens when motions is watched through an aperture the direction of motion of a feature or part may be ambiguous. This makes it look different when we look at a image through a aperture. like the figures in 8a,b,and c. The motion component parallel to the line cannot be inferred from the visual input. which means that a variety of contours of different orientations moving at different speeds can cause identical responses in motion sensitive neurons. I found this topic interesting as I looked further into in in reading about the difference of the images. It made me think a lot about how one person can see one item one way but another person might view it completely different.
The third thing that I found interesting was the section over the man who couldn’t see motion. Akinetopsia is a rare neuropsychological disorder which affects those individuals with no perception of motion. I found this interesting when reading about the man who would see images frozen and as soon as the motion ceased the images collapsed into each other. I think this is interesting because I don’t personally know what it would be like to not be able to see or notice the different of frozen objects in your visual perception i feel like it would be something that would be very hard to adapt to.
One thing that I didn’t find interesting was the section about physiology and types of eye movement. I found this section very complex to understand, especially once it went further into the part of the eyes.
The thing that can be taken from this chapter that is important to sensation and perception is the fact that motion is something that we see everyday and to be able to better understand how our eyes obtain motion i think is important and to also know that it is not something that everyone gets the chance to experience.
This chapter continues to build on the eye and how we perceive items at first it talks a lot about how we see items and what our eye goes through but now we are able to learn about motion and what different types of receptors that are used to see.
One thing that I would like to learn more about is akinetopsia, I think it would be interesting to know more about the background of this disorder and what some of the symptoms that are caused by it. I also think that it would be interesting to know more about how one person can live a life affected by this disorder.
while reading this chapter I was thinking about a lot of different things like why we even have senses and who even thought of them. What if we didn’t have any senses but especially those in which we are more dependent on like our ears and eyes. Do you think more people would be likely to develop in a different way and rely on other items? Would those items then become senses?
Terms: visual motion, motion detectors, receptive fields, neurons, aperture, aperture problem, motion component, visual input, motion sensitive neurons, akinetopsia, neuropsychological disorder,
The first thing I found interesting was motion aftereffect (MAE). This is the illusion of motion of a stationary object that occurs after prolonged exposure to a moving object. After viewing motion in a constant direction for a sustained period of time, one will see any stationary objects as moving in the opposite direction for a short period of time. This was interesting to me, because I used to experience this effect whenever I played guitar hero for long periods of time. Whenever I would look away from the screen, everything around me appeared to be moving upward.
The next concept I found interesting was apparent motion. This is the impression of smooth motion due to the rapid alternation of objects that appear in different locations in rapid succession. The most common example of this is through movies or cartoons. These are simply a series of images that are shown in quick succession that make the objects on those images appear to be moving. I find this interesting, because, as a young kid, I always found the way cartoons were made by individual drawings to be fascinating.
The third thing I found to be most interesting was saccade. This is a type of eye movement where the eyes rapidly change fixation from one object or location to another, whether that be voluntary or otherwise. These jumps between objects or locations are extremely quick at up to 1000 degrees per second. We can make this jump deliberately, but we will generally make 3 or 4 saccades every second automatically. This is interesting to me, because I often try to fight the automatic tendency to commit this act. Unless I take the time to truly focus, I still find myself making tiny saccades even as I focus on a single point.
One thing I found to be of little interest was the middle temporal area. This is the area within the brain that is thought to be the most important in the perception of motion. This was not interesting to me, because for whatever reason, I seem to find no excitement whatsoever in studying the anatomical regions of the brain.
The thing that will probably be the most helpful in my learning of sensation and perception is the mathematics described in the chapter. As a senior psychology major, I have heard much of this information presented before, albeit at a very basic level. The mathematics, however, have never been discussed in any of the classes I have taken beyond this one.
This chapter relates to previous chapters because it talks about motion perception. The previous chapters have talked about spatial vision, perceiving and recognizing objects, and space perception. This chapter builds on that by going over how we view things in motion. The previous chapters were just basics on how we see. But this chapter uses that information and describes how we then see with moving objects.
One topic I would like to do further research on is saccadic suppression. This is the visual sensitivity that occurs while making saccades. Although an object is not moving, one might suppose saccades would cause the perception that the object is moving. This, however, turns out to not be the case.
While reading, I spent most of the time thinking about how easily apparent motion can be conveyed through a medium as simple as a flip book made of post it notes. I think it is fascinating that such an intricate and delicate network of sense perception can be fooled by such a simple illusion.
Terms: Motion Aftereffect, Illusion, Motion, Exposure, Apparent Motion, Smooth Motion, Middle Temporal Area, Perception. Saccades, Focus, Fixation, Saccadic Suppression
1a) What did you find interesting? 1b) Why was it interesting to you?
The pattern of movement of living beings which are humans or animals is an interesting topic to me. Defining my first sentence presents the term biological motion. We obviously use motion information to guide us as we move through our environment. What engaged me is that actually motion can also help inform us about the nature of objects. In reference to the picture of the tennis player in real time, and then the tennis player in the dark with lights attached, we can identify whether the lights attached resemble a male or female thanks to biological motion. Body sway, center of motion, height of motion all provide cues that allow ourselves to analyze biological motion and understand human action. But oddly enough we seem to do a better job in discriminating biological motion of a human when two humans are acting in sync with each other.
2a) What did you find interesting? 2b) Why was it interesting to you?
I also found that using motion information to navigate wherever was interesting. It was so interesting to me because naturally our vision helps guides us through motion and space. But explaining something that you think is so simple and you body just does automatically is a hard thing to explain in text. That’s like asking someone to explain why the sky is blue. Our vision collects light that interacts with objects in the world in front of the viewer, this is called an optic array. We then move through our environment an experience patterns of optic flow, which is all the changing positions of an image as we move through the world. As we navigate, we seem to zoom in and focus on where we want to end up. This is our focus of expansion, like when we are driving down the road we should hopefully be focused on the road. Explaining how we just go with the flow is easy, explaining how we use that information of motion to navigate is not so easy.
3a) What did you find interesting? 3b) Why was it interesting to you?
Time of collision and tau were very interesting to me. They were interesting to me because I played a lot of sports in high school. The most common coaching advice to a player was, “just keep your eye on the ball.” Good judgement comes into play when a ball is racing at you and it might possibly collide with your body at some time. How does our mind calculate exactly when that ball might hit us, or how do we estimate the time of collision. Optic flow information could signal the time to collision using tau. Tau is the ratio of the retinal image size at any moment to the rate at which the object, or ball is expanding. Tau is an interesting, but it is just one of the different ways our visual information can be used to judge the time of collision.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? 4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
The computation of visual motion was the least interesting topic I found in the chapter. Building a motion detector, and the topic on our motion detection cells seemed hard for me to understand. Creating a mechanism that is sensitive to motion is something I will let electrical engineers tackle unless they have an easier way of explaining it to me so I can comprehend it.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
Fast detection of our own direction of motion is important to our survival. Motion perception provides us with the ability to “go with the flow,” and navigate through our everyday adventures. Motion information helps us identify objects, avoid imminent collision, and overall recognize the movement of animals and people.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
The previous chapter describes that we pay attention to certain stimuli, but the brain can only process so much attention at one time. This chapter tells us that we will selectively respond or be more attentive towards something with a direction of motion.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about? 7b) Why?
I would love to learn more about avoiding imminent collision, sports have always interested me a lot. Understanding how we keep ourselves out of trouble by estimating a time to collision, making split second decisions between life and death, and other estimation sources of visual information used to judge the time of collision interest me quite a bit.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
I thought about how bad I was in middle school at avoiding imminent collisions and in turn made my parents insurance premiums rise. I also thought about if I was in a dark room analyzing lights attached to an object, person, or animal would I be able to distinguish what it was. I wondered how blind people navigate without the presence of motion information.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
Optic array, Optic flow, Focus of expansion, Biological motion, Time to collision, Tau, Motion perception
1a & b) What did you find interesting? Why? The first item in this chapter I thought was interesting was motion aftereffect (MAE). I thought this was interesting because it was very comparable to color aftereffects. Motion aftereffect is the illusion of motion of a stationary object that occurs after prolonged exposure to a moving object. I had recently seen an episode of Brain Games on NatGeo; that had a whole series of viewer activities to follow along with at home. The first exercise was staring at a B&W spiral in motion. We were to stare at the center for 5-10 seconds then look at a still picture of a storm cloud. The storm cloud looked as if it were about to spawn a tornado. Motion aftereffects are caused by opponent processes for motion detection. Not only does the waterfall example work in real life, but if you’re ever standing over a bridge over a river, if you stare down at the moving water long enough, when you look at the road you’re on, it appears to be moving as well.
2a & b) What did you find interesting? Why? The second item in this chapter I thought was interesting was biological motion. Biological motion is the pattern of movement of living beings (humans & animals). I thought it was interesting to think about putting lights on ordinary people. I never thought about the placement of the lights. By putting lights on different spots on males and females, we could tell the differences in the sex of that person. Males have broader shoulders and narrow hips; females on the other hand tend to have narrower shoulders and broader hips. Even more interesting was the body sway the person walking might display. The book gives an example of the phrase, “it takes two to tango”, thinking about that phrase given the reading in that section, really puts that phrase in perspective.
3a & b) What did you find interesting? Why The third item in this chapter I thought was interesting was learning about the types of eye movements we have, more specifically, saccades. The three types of voluntary eye movements are: 1) Smooth pursuit movements that we use when we are tracking an object; 2) Vergence – rotating our eyes either inward (converging our eyes), or outward (diverging our eyes) to focus on an object near or far away. 3) Saccade – an eye movement that is both voluntary and involuntary, in which the eyes rapidly change fixation from one object or location to another. The stat the book gave of 3 saccades x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 16 hours = 172,800 saccades per day, not including the saccades made during REM from our dreams was something amazing to think about.
4a & b) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? Why? I found the correspondence problem to be the least interesting. I found this the least interesting mainly because I didn’t understand it that much. It was very confusing going back and forth from the examples at the bottom of the page, to go up to the reading again, and so on. It probably would have made more sense if I could see what it was they were doing in real time. Having said that, the next part of aperture had me confused as well. I kind of understood the basics about that section, I just didn’t know why it was so useful to know.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation/Perception? I thought the section of motion information was a very good section. I found the part about optic flow easy to understand. Optic flow demonstrates us seeing patterns. As we see and comprehend these patterns, our visual system determines where we should go. The example presented in the book, I believe, gives me the perfect recipe for what Sensation & Perception is all about. “Humans could estimate their direction of heading to within 1 to 2 degrees, using as their sole guide the pattern of optic flow simulated by the moving dots, even when the display contained only a very small number of dots”. I think as a student of this class, if we can understand why were a “predetermined” to go a certain way, we can find answers to many of our evolutionary questions.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters? This chapter builds on previous chapters by presenting new information and terms that correspond to pre-existing terms we’ve had in previous chapters. For example, when reading about the aperture problem, the book discusses the neurons in the V1 (primary visual cortex) has a limited receptive field. By looking back at that chapter and refreshing my knowledge on the V1, I could better understand what this particular part of the chapter was talking about.
7a & b) What topic would you like to learn more about? Why? I’m a little bit torn on this question. I would like to know more about biological motion and akinetopsia. Akinetopsia is a rare neurological disorder in which the affected individual has no perception of motion. I am interested in this subject because, yet again, it’s another disorder that deals with perception. I am very curious about why disorders happen and what treatments are out there for people to do to get better. As I am heading into the OTA field, I feel like the more I can be aware of some of these problems, the more ready I’ll be for surprises. As far as knowing more about biological motion, I think it’s interesting that we can perceive animals and humans according to their actions. Not being able to see human emotions tell a story, it’s more about their bodies telling a story.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter? There wasn’t a lot of things I was thinking about while reading this chapter. The most pronounced relation was at the end of the chapter, about the man who couldn’t see motion. All I could think about was him seeing a comet trail when he looked a moving lights. I could only imagine this what it would be like tripping on acid perhaps? I wondered what kind of drugs were out there that would have a similar problem.
9) TERMS: motion aftereffect (MAE), color aftereffects, illusion, biological motion, saccades, smooth pursuit movements, vergence, REM, converging, diverging, correspondence problem, aperture, aperture problem, motion information, optic flow, V1 (primary visual cortex), akinetopsia
1. A) I thought that akinetopsia was interesting.
B) I thought this was interesting because I wonder how people perceive things without motion.
2. A) I thought motion aftereffect was interesting.
B) I thought it was interesting learning about motion illusions. I didn't really understand it until the waterfall example.
3. A) I thought reflexive eye movement was interesting.
B) I thought this was interesting because it's something that a person can't help, it's involuntary. I wonder if there is treatment or medication for this.
4. A) I thought the section about the middle temporal area was least interesting.
B) I thought this was least interesting because I don't like learning about areas of the brain and it started getting confusing with the two maps on the lateral surface.
5. I think it will be most useful knowing how we perceive motion in our brains and what kind of problems or illusions we might see.
6. This chapter builds on with how we perceive motion.
7. A) I want to learn more about akinetopsia.
B) I want to learn more about it because it's a rare disorder and I would like to learn how people cope and if there's treatment for it.
8. I was thinking about how I look at things while in motion and how they change while I'm looking at them.
9. Terms: akinetopsia, motion aftereffect, reflexive eye movement, middle temporal area, lateral surface, motion, illusions, perceive.
1. The first concept from chapter eight that I found interesting was apparent motion. According to the book, apparent motion is the illusory impression of smooth motion resulting from the rapid alternation of objects that appear in different locations in rapid succession. We experience apparent motion every time we turn on the television. Cartoon characters are actually just a series of drawings that are put together and at 60 frames per second. Live-action movies and television programs work in the same way. I find this interesting because you never really notice or appreciate all of the work that goes into a movie such as the workings of apparent motion.
2. The next thing I found interesting was the concept called focus of expansion. According to the book, the focus of expansion is the point in the center of the horizon from which, when we’re in motion, all points in the perspective image seem to emanate. The example in the book of the pilot landing her plane really helped me to understand the whole concept. I found this interesting because our vision is what guides through our everyday lives. When I am driving I am always focused on the center of the road to prevent accidents. I never really knew what it was called when we focus all of our attention on one speck in the distance. Although I understand it, I find it really interesting on how all of this works.
3. Another thing that I found interesting from chapter eight was vergence. Vergence is a type of eye movement in which the two eyes move in opposite directions. Convergence and divergence are related to this term: convergence meaning that the two eyes move in towards the nose and divergence meaning that the two eyes move away from the nose. I found this interesting because people used to think that having the ability to go cross eyed was so cool. Some people can go cross eyed but I’ve never seen anyone who can look in two opposite directions such as the term of divergence. I also found this interesting because we don’t always know that the actions we are doing are either involuntary or voluntary. We don’t always know we are doing some things especially when it involves our eyes.
4. One concept from chapter eight that I didn’t find very interesting simply because it wasn’t very easy to understand was the section on correspondence problems. Correspondence problem is the problem faced by the motion detection system of knowing which feature in frame 2 corresponds to a particular feature in frame 1. The book used a couple of pictures to clarify the meaning on this concept but I still had to look over this section a couple times to even grasp a little bit of the meaning. I don’t tend to find things interesting if you don’t fully understand them.
5. I believe the section on biological motion is one of the main concepts one should understand when researching sensation and perception. Being able to perceive the motions of other humans and animals is very important. This ability helps us in our everyday lives such as in social relationships, work, school, and other places. There are so many different concepts present in the idea of biological motion. Just knowing how the visual system works and the parts of the brain involved in it is important and beneficial when trying to understand sensation and perception.
6. Chapter eight builds off of the previous chapters in many ways. Chapter eight was about motion perception and many of these terms related to this correspond with other terms from the previous chapters. Many different terms are described in each new chapter and each of these terms relate to another term. I believe everything in sensation and perception builds off of each other because it is all about us and how our brain and body perceives things.
7. I would like to learn more about the concept of collisions. I think that there is so much to learn about the time to collision because there are so many details associated with it. When I was reading this section I found myself wanting to learn more about it.
8. While reading chapter eight, I was thinking about how we use all of this stuff in our day to day lives without really realizing it. I found this chapter really interesting.
9. Terms: Apparent motion, focus of expansion, vergence, convergence, divergence, correspondence problems, sensation, perception, biological motion, motion perception, collision, time to collision.
Chapter 8 - Motion Perception
#1 What did you find interesting? And why was it interesting to you?
Motion aftereffect (MAE), the illusion of motion of a stationary object that occurs after prolonged exposure to a moving object was not only the first definition from chapter 8 but it was very interesting. It lead to the “waterfall illusion”.
#2 What did you find interesting? And why was it interesting to you?
Vergence was also very interesting to me. I guess because I didn’t know what is was truly called but I knew it existed. I know people who can make their eyes cross-eyed or what convergence is. I have seen only a few people who can do this exact thing. I mean, an eye movement in which the two eyes move in opposite directions. And I didn’t know that they are people who can look opposite like away from each other (divergence, pg. 237).
#3 What did you find interesting? And why was it interesting to you?
Finally, akinetopsia, a rare neuropsychological disorder in which the affected individual has no perception of motion. The whole story about the man who couldn’t see motion was unbelievable to me as well. I even researched who he was and what ever happened to him.
See this link.
#4 Least favorite thing about this chapter was:
The motion sensitive areas in the brain. I think the brain is fascinating but the parts, and labels of the brain are just not my forte. From the central sulcus, postcentral sulcus, lingual gyrus, to the lateral fissure, I just couldn’t even begin to describe what they all do. To be perfectly honest, I am not good at remembering the parts of the brain and what they do. I know that you must be extremely intelligent to work with the brain and must truly know every single term in this book and so many more.
#5 What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Sensation / Perception?
Our motion information is critical and very important for us to be able to function in this world. If we couldn’t identify it then we would all be bumping into things everyday. Recognizing that movement is essential and a part of not only our world but also the world of animals was also something that I learned and read in this chapter.
#6 How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
Motion aftereffect (MAE) builds from Chapter 3, where I learned that many cells in a primary visual cortex selectively responds to motion in one particular direction. The “waterfall illusion” again, is a phenomenon that is just another piece of evidence for some that there is something special about motion.
#7 What topic would you like to learn more about?
Personally, after reading about akinetopsia and how rare it was I was very interested in finding out if there was a cure and/or treatment. I also wondered if people really do live a happy life or if they live a normal life.
#8 What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
I definitely thought about motion and how we use it daily without even realizing it. To walk, do stairs (up or down), moving throughout your home or out in public. I thought motion sickness for some reason as well.
Terms: Akinetopsia, motion, neuropsychological disorder, perception, motion, vergence, eye movement, eyes, divergence, motion perception, cells, visual cortex. motion aftereffect (MAE), waterfall illusion, evidence, treatment, rare disorder, learning, motion sickness, evidence, phenomenon, motion, and convergence.
I found many topics interesting, a few in particular stuck out. The first was visual search experiments, because these give a more accurate approximation to attention in the real world, than do many other cuing experiments, especially related to reaction time. During one of these visual search experiments, the subject searches for a target in a display full of distractor elements. The target is the goal of the visual search. As humans, we do this in the real world all the time, looking for necessary objects around the house, people we recognize in a crowded place, cars in a parking lot, and so on. The number of items in a display or scene, called a set size, affects the difficulty in finding a desired object. The higher the number of distractions, the harder it is to find the target in a display.
I also found the concept of RSVP and the attentional blink interesting because the timing of the acts of selection, and how the timing can affect accuracy of identifying target stimuli is actually more interesting then it sounds. Rapid serial visual presentation, or RSVP, is an experimental procedure in which a stream of stimuli appear at one location at a rapid rate, usually 8 per second. During this type of experiment, a subject watches a stream of letters that all appear at the same location in space, and they try to find a number in the stream of letters. The variation in the experiment occurs when the speed of the characters presented changes. The goal is to see how fast the stream can move, with the subject still being able to make accurate decisions. This experiment can be done with photographs of various scenes or objects as well as letters and numbers. The task can also be changed to find two digits instead of one in the stream. The first digit called T1 for target 1, and the second digit called T2 for target 2. According to the textbook, the critical variable is the interval between T1 and T2, the surprising result is if T2 appears 200-300 milliseconds after T1, and if T1 is correctly reported, the subject was likely to miss T2. This is called an attentional blink, because your ability to visually attend to the characters in the RSVP sequence were ‘knocked out’ for a short time, despite the subject’s eyes being open. An attentional blink is the difficulty in perceiving and responding to the second of two target stimuli amid a rapid stream of distracting stimuli if the observer has responded to the first target stimulus within 200-500 milliseconds before the second stimulus is presented.
I found visual attention disorders interesting as well. Brain damage that results in complete inattention is close to functional blindness, which is very rare. A visual-field defect is more common. This is when a portion of the visual field with no vision or with abnormal vision, typically resulting from damage to the visual nervous system. If a person loses primary visual cortex in the right hemisphere of the brain, they will be blind on the left side of their visual space. But if the brain damage occurs in the right parietal lobe, that person would have difficulty directing attention to objects on their left side of their visual space. These problems manifest themselves through neglect and extinction. Neglect is the inability to attend to or respond to stimuli in the contralesional visual field-typically on the left field after right parietal damage, and neglect of half the body or half of an object. A contralesional field is the visual field on the opposite side of the brain lesion. Neglect patients usually only see what is to the right of fixation and ignore objects on the left, this can mean eating only food on right side of plate, or shaving only right side of one’s face. Extinction is related to neglect, but it is the inability to perceive a stimulus in the presence of another stimulus, typically in a comparable position in the other visual field. The example used in the book helped me understand this concept better. It said if a neurologist told the patient to focus on her nose, and held a fork in the patient’s “good” (right) visual field, and the patient would be able to identify the fork. Next she would hold a spoon in the “bad” (left) visual field, and the patient would be able to identify the spoon. But if the neurologist held up a fork in one hand and a spoon in the other, the extinction patient would report only the object in the “good”/right field, and the other object would be perceptually “extinguished.”
The concept I found the least interesting to read about in the chapter was change blindness, not because it is not interesting but because it was discussed in another one of Dr. M's classes. Change blindness is the failure to notice a change between two scenes. If the change doesn’t alter the meaning of the scene, quite large changes can pass unnoticed by the observer. In the 1990’s, Rensink and some colleagues created a different picture memory experiment. They allowed participants to observe one picture at a time, and then it would disappear for 80 milliseconds, and then replaced with a similar picture. The participants were supposed to determine what had changed between the two pictures. The two images were shown back and forth with a blank screen in between the two images. This was done until the observer saw the change or the designated time ran out. In Rensink’s experiment, it took participants several seconds to find the change, and some never spotted it at all. They found that if the blank screen is not shown, the changes are more obvious to spot because the participants experience a kind of apparent motion effect that we learned about in chapter 7, when objects move positions, vanishes, or changes color.
The concept of visual search will be the most useful to understanding of sensation and perception, because we are constantly looking for targets in displays with many distracting elements in our daily lives. People are constantly looking for specific targets in scenes and situations full of distractions, like trying to find your car in the parking lot, or looking for friends in the crowds. The number of items in the display or scene can affect the difficulty of this task.
I wouldn't mind more information about visual searches and experiments related to this topic, its what really made the chapter, for me anyway. I would also like more information about limited-capacity parallel processes, because I don’t think I fully understood the concept while I was reading about it in the textbook.
While reading the chapter I kept relating a lot of the information to our daily lives and how we use it.
Terms: visual search, target, attention, distractor, set size, cueing experiments, reaction time, additional blink, RSVP, rapid serial visual presentation, digits, T1, T2, target 1, target 2, visual attention disorders, vision, eye, complete inattention, visual-field defect, visual field, visual nervous system, primary visual cortex, right hemisphere, left hemisphere, visual space, parietal lobe, neglect, extinction, contralesional, fixation, change blindness, limited-capacity parallel processes