Topical Blog Week #1 (due Thursday)

| 36 Comments
By now you should have been able to log in and comment on the blog site. What we would like you to do now is to go to the following pages and read some of the comments left from the students in the class before you.

http://www.psychologicalscience.com/perception/2011/04/topical-blog-week-15-due-friday.html
http://www.psychologicalscience.com/perception/2011/04/topical-blog-week-14-due-friday.html
http://www.psychologicalscience.com/perception/2011/04/topical-blog-week-13-due-friday.html

After reading the posts please answer the following:
Which posts did you like the best? Why?
Has reading these posts changed your idea of what sensation / perception is? Why or why not?
Based on these posts are there any specific topics you are interested in learning?

Thanks,

--Dr. M

36 Comments

I liked the posts that were the most detailed. Ones that usually used real life examples and experiences to explain what they were feeling or thinking. I liked these because it was a lot more interesting to read and more importantly I understood what they were really trying to explain. Knowing more about the person who was writing it was also an extra little piece of knowledge that made it that much more fun to read! When reading them, I learned something new about sensation and perception. Some people talked about music and what sensations and perceptions we get from it. I never really saw music as something we would study in this class but it makes perfect sense that we would! Music is a big part of my life, as I have been playing the cello for 10 years. This changed my perception of this class in a good way! We will be learning so much more than just the eye (which was my idea of the class pre-reading these posts).
I am for sure excited about learning about the sensations and perceptions of music! I have always been curious about music therapy and how it really does help people. I think this class will give me a great opportunity to explore it further :)

Audition is an amazing and underrated sense, mostly due to the fact that a majority of the focus in the field has been on vision. Music perception is one step further within audition because of all the emotive, cultural, and perspective altering aspects associated. Definately take the time throughout the course to explore audition and music perception more on your own. You'll probably only have a chapter or 2 related to this stuff, so take the time to check out the cognitive neuroscience of music. "Musicophilia" by Oliver Sacks is a good place to start.

--Dwight--

"The one good thing about music is when it hits you feel no pain." -- Bob Marley

I'm not sure what posts I liked the best, they were all pretty detailed some more so than others. Reading these posts hasn't changed my idea of what sensation and perception, because from other psychology classes I have taken gave me a decent idea of sensation and perception is, but I know I have so much more to learn about sensation and perception. I'm not sure if there are any specific topics that interested me but I know there will be something interesting I will learn this semester.

In some ways, you already are interested in the topics of S&P because it's how you interact with and experience the external world. The principles of this course will help you modify and expand your internal model of the external world. Expand your knowledge of your own experience. Enjoy!

--Dwight--

In a way you already are interested in the topics of S& P. It is the way you experience the world and learn new things about it. Use this course to expand your internal model of the external world.

Enjoy!

--Dwight--

In a way you already are interested in the topics of S& P. It is the way you experience the world and learn new things about it. Use this course to expand your internal model of the external world.

Enjoy!

--Dwight--

I really enjoyed the posts about psychology and music. The example about the repeating a sentence over and over and noticing the tempo and melody that occurs rather than listening to the actual words being spoken. Reading these posts have in some way changed what I thought about sensation and perception as a whole but at the same time it didn't. This occurs with a lot of the classes. Usually by reading the title of a class you perceive what you think the class will be about. Sometimes you are somewhat correct in your assumption and other times you are way off. By hearing sensation and perception, I can somewhat generate an idea of what I think the class is going to be about. After reading the posts, I have affirmed my thinking but at the same time I haven't because I do not understand some of the language and terminology in the class just yet.
There is a topic I am interested in but I am not totally sure it relates to the class but if it does I will probably write about it in a topical blog later in the class. Recently I was watching an episode of Criminal Minds where an ex green beret was suffering from a disorder called Capgras Syndrome. Essentially what this is is that a person is holding a delusion that friend, parent, spouse etc. has been replaced by an imposter. What is interesting about this is that by covering their eyes, when the friend, parent, spouse etc talks to them, they recognize them, but the moment that the thing covering their eyes is pulled away, they think the person is an imposter. Really interesting but I am not sure yet if it relates to the class.

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3ACapgras%20syndrome&page=1 Is a link to a book about disturbances of the mind. Also, if you enjoy the more neuropsychological aspects of what goes wrong in perception when brain injury occurs, check out Oliver Sack's books (any are good).

--Dwight--

The posts that appealed to me most were the ones on selective attention. These posts caught my attention because I can relate to the topic. I was diagnosed with AD/HD when I was about 6 years old, so that was something that I dealt with growing up and I still deal with now. I am interested to see a different approach to viewing the phenomena that is associated with AD/HD. I think it will be very enlightening and help me understand something better that I deal with on a day to day basis. I don't think any of the posts changed my view of what sensation and perception is, as I don't feel like I have a great grasp on the subject period. I am looking forward to this class and I know that I will learn a lot of interesting things about sensation and perception. A topic that I want to learn more about is selective attention. I am just interested in the whole are of sensation and perception in general, so I am looking forward to this class.

If you're interested in attention, I can give you some great empirical articles that are fascinating. Start with the basics of attention (Treisman's feature integration theory, Posner's attentional cuing paradigm, neglect due to parietal damage, the list rages on). There's lots of stuff out there, so just read what interests you and don't get overwhelmed.

--Dwight--

It was hard to pick a distinct one because I enjoyed reading all of them however I did enjoy reading the post about our sense of smell a bit more. It impressed me to see how well written the blog was and the simple fact that the author knew a lot about the topic. I’ve heard before that our sense of smell is the best sense out of the 5 that helps us recall our memories. For example, if there was a girl who wore a certain perfume and every time you were to smell that perfume, you would think of that girl. Reading some of the recent posts hasn’t necessarily “changed” how I think of sensation of perception but it does give me a MUCH better understanding of the class. I was surprised at how much science there was to back up what they were talking about. We use our 5 senses hundreds and even thousands a time per day. However I’ve never really stopped to realize exactly HOW I use them and how my body interprets them. I’m very interested in learning about different relationships in regards to our senses. I read a lot about differences between men and women but I think it would be interesting to take a good look at how our senses impact our relationships with others such as romantic, friendships, enemies, etc.

If you like the olfactory stuff, there's not as much out there, but Linda Bartoshuk (spelling might be wrong) is the leader in the field. She's got a lot of cool research that she's done with smell, pheromones, etc. Another thing that might interest you is the research on the link of olfaction to memory, wherein some smells are inextricably linked to a distinct episodic memory.

--Dwight--

Taking this a class of yours before, it doesn’t surprise me on how much detail some people put into their blog posts. After reading some of the blogs on each of the links I noticed the same pattern as before. Many of the students enjoy expressing their opinions on topics they research. It’s like students become mini experts on the topics they research. I found this happening to me in behavior modification when I would rant and use terminology I had no clue existed until I read and explored the material. After reading the articles, I think I’m most excited to learn how our senses impact our decisions and thinking all together. I find it amazing that by just touching or smelling something we are able to decipher what that thing might be. I want to learn the science behind all of this, so that’s what I’m looking forward to most about this class. From reading the blogs, its sounds like there will be a lot of interesting information in the book that we will cover and I’m sure I’ll find a lot of great articles for the topical blogs from websites I explore. Also, as with the last class, I’m excited to learn all the terminology that comes along with learning this new material. I find myself still using behavioral terms from behavior modification. From the posts I’ve read so far, it seems there’s a lot of terminology that comes with this material and many of the students were using new terms in their blogs (some more than others). I’m pretty excited to learn more about sensations and perception so it should be a pretty fun class.

What's great is you've seen the applicability of these courses to your life and to your interactions with other people. The cool thing about S&P is that you can use this material to shape your hypotheses about the world that you've been making (consciously or subconsciously) throughout your life. Enjoy!


--Dwight--

The blogging looks the same from behavior modification, except for it seems like there is a lot more writing, which is fine with me because I could just keep going, and going, and going.

I went to the first link (after going to the second one) and decided that I liked the last post on topical blog #15. The girls name is Missy. Her post was about SID (sensory integration disorder) which is a neurological disorder usually noticed in childhood. This simply means that their brain won't connect with their sensors.

Her post of course goes on to explain more and it really is interesting. I wasn't really expecting these kind of topics for sensation and perception. I guess the first thing that came to my mind when I heard this was those fun pictures you look at and you say "can you see the rabbit and the man?" Of course, I knew there would be more, but I thought it'd be more visual then all five senses.

I'm pretty sure anything we talk about this class is going to be very interesting. But if it's not, I can just go ahead and let you know that it didn't tickle my fancy.

The perspective images are interesting, and their are lots of cool illusions you'll see throughout the course, which will challenge your internal model of reality. I think that's a good thing. Here's some more cool pictures to look at. (Who knew cathedrals could be so visually stimulating, although it is from Belgium, so that's a good start).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/31/light-festival-ghent-2012_n_1245311.html?ref=arts

--Dwight--

I enjoyed reading most posts because a lot of these topics are knew ideas that I hadn't heard of before. In particular I liked woolfs blog about synesthesia. This is where people mix up their senses. I liked this post because it was something that I had never heard of before, was a very interesting topic, and I had never thought about it happening. The blogs that I enjoy reading the most are blogs that explain concpets well and give real life examples. This helps me understand the topic easily and then relate it to my real life.

I really didn't have a very good understanding of what this class was going to be like, but reading other peoples blogs is giving me a better understanding of what kinds of topics will be covered in the class. I think that sensation and perception is intended to show how what happens in the actual world and how our brain perceives it.

Topics that sound interesting to me include synesthesia and selective attention. Selective attention is interesting to me because it happens to everyone and you can see it happen infront of you. I would like to know more about this topic to be better able to control its effects on myself and other people.

A link to a TED talk by Ramachandran on synethesia.

http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/the-synesthesia-condition-explained

Check it out!

--Dwight--

I also enjoyed the posts about synesthesia best, though most everything was intrinsically interesting to me. Synesthesia is not a new concept to me, but is one of the most fascinating perceptual quirks I have come across. Reading these posts has not changed my opinion on what sensation and perception is, but the breadth of topics covered is very exciting. I do not have any specific topics that I would like to know more about, but if we do cover synesthesia, that would be awesome.

http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/the-synesthesia-condition-explained Check out this and Rama's longer version of his TED talk.

Also, if you guys are interested maybe we could skype in during a class, I've got a few friends who do research at UNR with synesthetes. They've discovered some pretty cool things over the past year or so.


--Dwight--

I enjoyed the posts and blogs about selective attention. In a way it made me think and gave me new ideas about the topic. Also I find this topic interesting, and it is a topic that I would enjoy learning about. The blogs that were done about selective attention were for the most part easy to understand. I also enjoyed that they related to real life experiences that I have been through.

When I registered for the class it was mainly because this class fit with my schedule and it fulfilled a requirement, so coming into it I didn’t really know what to expect with the topic sensation and perception. All I really knew was the tid bits that were discussed in other classes and what the description on the course was. After reading the blogs and posts I have come more familiar with what we will be learning about, so in that aspect yes my ideas about sensation and perception have been changed.

After reading the posts and blogs selective attention is a topic that really hit home for me, and it is a topic that I am interested in. It strikes an interest because I believe it’s not only something that affects me but also affects others. I would like to learn more about why we pay attention to certain things and not others. I also believe selective attention is something we deal with on an everyday basis.

If you like the attention stuff, check out the work with neglect patients (parietal damage). Also, the selective attention stuff should lead you to work on feature integration theory (and the binding problem), also check out what happens in the brain when we attend to a particular visual stimulus in the face of other competing stimuli.

--Dwight--

I am proud to say that I enjoyed reading these posts and I found myself going back and re-reading certain posts just for fun-which usually doesn’t happen when I read textbooks. I respected the posts that were thorough but not too in-depth. I think that some posts went too in detail and in doing so the topic was lost in the words. I also valued reading the posts that had a personal aspect to them; this is what makes reading these posts so interesting. Even though some posts covered the same material, they were each different in their own way. Each person has their own spin on a topic and I think that this is crucial in gaining knowledge and to fully understand all aspects of one particular topic. One topic that I personally found interesting was the post regarding cognitive habituation and how we adapt to certain smells as we are more exposed to them. This relates to a phenomenon that I have always been curious about which is how everyone’s house has a specific odor. This is not necessarily a bad smell, though it can be, but instead it is a distinct smell that is unique to each individual household. I am curious to learn how exactly it is that we cannot smell our own “odor” and to learn the research on this topic.

I recently took a cognitive psychology class and I loved it. I then enrolled in this class hoping that it had some of the same concepts and after reading these posts it appears that that is correct; and I’m ecstatic! I am interested in learning about face recognition and neglect as well as memory and attention.

You'll be right at home with this course. Dr. MacLin has done a great deal with faces, and I've dabbled in the world of faces myself. Also, the neglect stuff is very interesting. Check out the work on simultanagnosia (a symptom of Balint's Syndrome) and representational neglect if you're interested. While the perception course doesn't directly deal with memory, there's alot out there about memory as well and if you're interested I can give you some references to expand your thinking on the topics.


--Dwight--

The comments that I liked the best were the ones that went over and beyond what was expected out of them, and I assume that this is because they were intensely interested in the topic; and it shows.

One good thing about reading these topics is that they are from my peers, as compared to an experienced expert writing a textbook. A textbook author may try to simplify and generalize the material explained, but reading my peer's posts is much more personal; given that we have many more similarities.

The posts really haven't changed my idea of what sensation and perception is. My personal construct of these cognitive processes is that sensation is all input received from sensory organs (skin, chemoreceptors, taste buds, etc.) and perception is the concentration of the consciousness on certain stimuli; having attention as the "filter" for choosing what is important on focusing on and what is not.

A lot of these posts were about specific sensations; how touch works, for example. These were each very interesting, but what really garnered my interest was the post about the interaction between all of the senses. Through learning about the senses, most students get a reductionist perspective on sensation; that these are each individual pieces that make up a whole. However, an error of most students is that they don't think about how sensation works on a whole; which the sum is greater than the individual parts. This includes the interactions between the individual senses, and how communication between their respective areas of the brain make up a "multidimensional" concept of what you perceive.

Interesting perspective. You'll be interested (if not already) in the Gestalt psychologist perspective on perception (a more synthetic approach). Check out older work by Metzger and some of the old Gestalt psychology researchers.

--Dwight--

The post that I like the best were the ones that showed that the writer was interested in what he or she was writing about. it really isn't too hard to see whether or not the writer was interested. I also like the post that were broken up into subsections. It was easier for me to grasp the things being said in those post.

The readings did not really change my idea of what sensation or perception was. It has been addressed in some of my other classes but it was good to read more about it.

From the readings to topics that really stood out to me were the eyewitness testimony, and also what I read about psychology and music. The eyewitness stuff interested me because I like court cases. I am not really a fan of music appreciation (or basically old music) but one of the post talked about how that correlated with scoring high on test so that was interesting to me.

Music is definately an interesting topic. Seek more out about music since most of the course will be about vision. Also, the eyewitness stuff should be pretty accessible throughout the course since Dr. MacLin is a major authority in that world and has provided testimony regarding EW research in many court cases involving questionable EW identifications.

--Dwight--

I liked the Week #13 posts because they were students looking deeper into a subject that interested them and putting in the time to do their own research and coming up with findings/articles and sites that related to their interest. I always enjoyed doing these in other classes because everyone has different interests and everyone can bring something new or different up for discussion. Sticking to just a textbook or what an instructor tells you to research can get really boring after a while.

When I was going through Week #15, I saw a lot of posts about how music and rhythm can have a really big effect on people and what they are doing or their mood. Sadly, I’m not surprised by this at all. I notice this a lot when I work out or when I am at work. The fast the rhythm, the fast I move and got my work done or the faster I would run.

Not yet, but I also haven’t read the chapters for myself yet so I don’t know if there is something else mentioned that will interest me.

Look deeper into the things that interest you throughout the course. It's likely not everything will be the best thing ever, in your opinion, so with the topics that get you moving, have fun with it. Think about why the rhythm in the auditory stimulation affects your own movement and speed. There's no doubt some cool research out there on this.

--Dwight--

After reading all the blog responses, I liked the comments from the week 15 link. The first thing I noticed was how in depth and long their responses were. The more information that was present caught my attention much more and gave me a greater chance to comprehend the material. The second blog on the week 15 link was my favorite. This person started directly with the topic presented as selective attention. They gave a definition as well as listing characteristics of its meaning to help clarify the topic. Another thing I thought was very beneficial in the post was giving examples which produce a more vivid and clear idea of what we see. I also like this topic for the interest in what selective attention is as a concept and how I was able to gather more knowledge on a topic of interest to myself. I believe most of the posts do help change my idea of sensation and perception. There was a lot of information that helped explain why and how we visual see certain things and stimuli. Some students blogged about music, which was also very interesting to hear and learn about because, I always listen to music when I type papers, or any typing, such as right now! It connected with me right away. I was able to stop and think for a bit about sensation and perception through music when I had never given it the slightest thought before. One particular word stuck out that appealed to me which I know almost nothing about. I would like to learn more about synesthesia. There were a few posts that gave me a little background on the term and what it actually is, but I would really like to find out more information on this particular topic.

After reading all the blog responses, I liked the comments from the week 15 link. The first thing I noticed was how in depth and long their responses were. The more information that was present caught my attention much more and gave me a greater chance to comprehend the material. The second blog on the week 15 link was my favorite. This person started directly with the topic presented as selective attention. They gave a definition as well as listing characteristics of its meaning to help clarify the topic. Another thing I thought was very beneficial in the post was giving examples which produce a more vivid and clear idea of what we see. I also like this topic for the interest in what selective attention is as a concept and how I was able to gather more knowledge on a topic of interest to myself. I believe most of the posts do help change my idea of sensation and perception. There was a lot of information that helped explain why and how we visual see certain things and stimuli. Some students blogged about music, which was also very interesting to hear and learn about because, I always listen to music when I type papers, or any typing, such as right now! It connected with me right away. I was able to stop and think for a bit about sensation and perception through music when I had never given it the slightest thought before. One particular word stuck out that appealed to me which I know almost nothing about. I would like to learn more about synesthesia. There were a few posts that gave me a little background on the term and what it actually is, but I would really like to find out more information on this particular topic.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=hearing-colors-tasting-sh-2003-05

Try this article for some background on synethesia. It's from Ramachandran, who you should know about while taking an S&P course.

--Dwight--

So somehow I didn’t get this one posted on the site and it just came to my attention when grades were posted this week. Here is my topical blog for that week. Sorry it’s way late.
I thought the blog post by kmarie was very interesting. This individual posted about why there are sometimes cultural differences in tasting of food. She related it to the genetic ability to taste PTC. It was discovered that there is an actual gene that allows one to either taste or not to taste PTC. We did an exercise in high school where we determined if each of us could taste PTC. Kmarie concluded that cultural differences in taste may be something that we have developed to help us survive in our environment.
I liked this post because I think it is interesting that different people taste different things. Taste is something that in theory should be held constant, but it is not, different people have different concepts of taste and it is interesting that this development may be due to evolution. This has broadened my view of sensation and perception. I never really thought taste was something that one could really study and find interesting, but it is. I think it would be interesting to learn more about this.

I really enjoyed reading the previous posts about selective attention and music perception. After reading these posts I saw that perception and sensation is more complex then our knowledge. Many of us do not understand or realize the processes that goes on with the brain to understand what we are looking at in our environment. Music perception has always been an interest to me because I love music and learning more about how a person observes musical sounds. Selective attention to my knowledge is when we pick out something we are focusing on, which is very important because this happens on a daily basis. After reading some of the older posts I realized that there is so much I do not know that is happening inside my body everyday to visualize my environment and people around me. It has changed my idea on sensation and perception because I never knew looking at one object or figure took so much work inside my brain and how fast it is transmitted to the brain. I am excited to learn more about this process. I am very interested in the music perception and also facial recognition and how we interrupt favorable objects.

I enjoyed the posts that had personal ideas related and connected to the original topic. I believe that these posts were more interesting because they weren't just delivering facts from the book. They were giving more information based on the material learned in the book. They also give more insight into what that specific person believes the author was trying to say. It is awesome to get to understand through your peers and listing what you yourself got out of the chapter. The posts that are longer tend to have more detail that make it easy to understand the posts.

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Reading Activity Week #1 (ASAP)
Topical Blog Week #1 (ASAP)
Reading Activity Week #2 (Due Monday)