I was watching videos on TED again and found a very fitting video related to our classwork on extrinsic motivation. Follow the link above.
The speaker, Dan Pink, was explaining how businesses reward employees with extrinsic motivators such as cash bonuses, perks, or other benefits and he has proven that this method is not the most effective in the work place.
The example study in the video clip is "The Candle Problem":
The researcher gives
subject a candle, matches, and a box of thumbtacks and instructs them to attach the
candle to the wall so that the wax doesn't drip onto the table. Some try to
tack or melt the candle to the wall before realizing that they need to tack the
thumbtack box to the wall and place the candle inside. Researchers found that
subjects who were the "control" or
"norm" group finished faster than those offered incentives for
finishing the fastest.
The overall conclusion from the video was that for complicated
tasks, rewards narrow focus and hold people back. Increased autonomy, mastery, and purpose has been shown to improve performance.
So:
If-then rewards
destroy creativity.
Intrinsic drive
improves performance.
if-then rewards are
good for mechanical tasks.
Reeve (2009) also says that a problem in our society is that so many people expect rewards for doing things they do. Is there a way we can stop this problem? For example, if a non-profit organization asks a big corporation for a donation of some kind a lot of times it is an if you give us this we'll do this for you (usually advertising). Is this something we have to begin as parents with our own kids. Instead of saying "wash your hands and you'll get a cookie for dessert" say "go wash your hands because it is important for your health...kill those germs!"(or something to that effect).
What do you think?
If you go check out TED and find a video you like then I will reward you with a nice bonus! (oh wait now you won't want to do it.)
Leave a comment