Read Chapter 12.
What really is personality? Why is testing and categorizing so important in the study of personality? Should it be? How has your understanding of personality changed since reading this chapter?
From your reading, which topic(s) are most interesting to you?
What was the most surprising or memorable thing you learned about in this reading?
Provide a list of psychological terms that you used in your comment at the bottom of your post.
Write your response in Word or other word processor, and SAVE IT. Then, click on 'comments' right below the title of this blog post and above the picture. You will be prompted to log in. Once logged on, you can copy and paste your assignment into the box and submit.
Explore!
5 Factor Personality Test http://www.personalitytest.org.uk/
test
The exact definition of personality is “The characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances.” Personally, I believe that personality is partly, but mostly, shaping an individual. I think that it is so important to test and categorize because each person is different than everyone else. The pieces that make up personality are self schema, working self concept, and self esteem. The definition I gathered was the idea of yourself based on your past decisions and experiences. Based on the figure, it says that self schema consists of interrelated knowledge of yourself, so basically, how you think of yourself. I think that is the hardest category to understand because it was so broad. Working self concept is a lot easier to comprehend. The figure helped me, though. I know that when I am in a group of people that are very fit and eat healthy, I always feel very out of shape and bigger. Self esteem, is how you feel about yourself. I completely agree with the sociometer theory. It is so relatable because, like I previously said, when I go out to eat with friends and they all get salads, I feel like I’m going to get rejected because I’m not as “healthy” as them. Therefore, my self-esteem goes down at that point. When I am talking about something I know a lot about, I really feel good about myself because I know they can’t reject what I’m saying, so I have a high self esteem at that point. Since reading this chapter, I understand now that there are multiple parts to a personality. I could never really explain what it was besides maybe, it’s makes someone who they are. That is a very broad explanation and now it’s easier for me to grasp the concept of personality.
The most interesting topic to me, was Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic theory. The figure of the iceberg was very informative. The outside of the iceberg is the conscious. This is the ego, which is the component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. The preconscious is the iceberg in the water closest to the surface. This explains the superego which is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. Last, is the base of the iceberg, which is unconscious. This is the id: the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle. I think the reason it was most interesting is because the picture was a really clever way of explaining the topic to the readers.
The most surprising thing to me was the cross cultural research on personality traits. This is the graph that explained the five factor theory of personality traits. For the most part, North America had some of the highest levels, except for neuroticism. East Asia was almost the complete opposite. They all had very low levels except for neuroticism.
Psychological Terms: personality, self schema, working self concept, self esteem, sociometer theory, psychodynamic theory, conscious, ego, preconscious, id, superego, unconscious, neuroticism
Chapter 12 blog response
11/6/14
Personality is the individual differences between people’s emotions, cognitive thoughts and behavior. Personality seems to be something that is intangible, something that can’t really be quantified. A personality really has a lot to do with how you see yourselves, as well as how others view you. In a way, it can be linked with social psychology because of how an individual’s personality reacts with others.
The answer of the question of why is testing and categorizing so important is the same answer to why do we study psychology. We want to categorize types of personalities so that we can study them more in depth. If we are able to see common characteristics and personality traits within human groups then we can focus our attention on why and how these traits develop. The same goes for testing, if we are able to come up with evaluation assessments of people’s personalities, we will be able to understand that person’s personality and therefore give them more effective advice for how they should handle that type of personality. If they have a problem with an aspect of their personality we can tell them where that particular trait may be coming from and help them to fix it, but first we need that knowledge! Which is where theories like the psychodynamic, humanistic, cognitive, and trait come in!
One thing that I feel has changed since reading this chapter for me is just that environment seems to have so little to do with personality. I feel like this is kind of an uncommon thing because almost every aspect of psychology seems to be split down the middle in debate of Genetics vs. Environment.
One of the most interesting topics to me in this chapter were actually in the first section when it talked a lot about how we view ourselves through our self-concept. I guess I just found it to be interesting, because although we have a long-standing self-schema, how often do we actually take the time to consciously evaluate who we are as a person? I know that personally, I never take them to time to actually think of who I am generally as a person, and at some moments, I don’t entirely know! Although this was an interesting concept I related more with the working self-concept because I think that all of us experience this on a pretty regular basis. As a whole, I know things about myself, but things seem to be changing all the time, especially internally so I tend to evaluate myself at specific moments in time rather than in large groups.
Within that section, I also found the sociometer theory to be enjoyable and memorable! Everybody talks about how self-esteem is important, and I agree, but nobody likes that person that has much too high esteem for themselves and believes they are above everybody else. Really, it all depends on the environment around you sometimes. Like they mentioned with downward comparisons in the book, if you compare yourself with someone who is less confident of course you will feel better and have more esteem. Opposite of that, if you upward compare, you will always feel worthless and lowly. If you think of it like this, that there will always be people above you and below you, self-esteem shouldn’t be something that is an issue.
Terms: Personality, Social Psych, Psychodynamic theory, Humanistic Theory, Cognitive Theory, Traits Theory, Self-Concept, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Sociometer Theory, Self-Esteem, Downward Comparisons, Upward Comparisons.
Personality is how a person behaves, thinks and feels. A person’s personality and the way they perceive themselves can be shaped by many factors. These factors are determined by testing and categorizing which is why it’s so important to the study of personality. Without the testing and categorizing of personality, people would have a hard time understanding it. One example of categorizing is the way researchers study personality. These different approaches allow researchers to look at personality in different perspectives each time. Humanistic approaches is one example. With this approach, researchers emphasize self-actualization which is where people seek to fulfill their potential through understanding of themselves. Another common approach researches use is cognitive approaches. With this, they study personality by recognizing that the way we think affects personality. There’s also trait approaches which looks at a person’s traits. By looking at these methods of testing and categorizing, theories are made which help further explain personality. One theory that comes to mind instantly is expectancy theory which implies that behavior is directly associated with personality. Locus of control deals with this theory because it is the idea on whether or not people control the rewards and punishments that they experience. Because of testing and categorizing, many theories and studies are able to take place with personality, so of course they’re rightly important.
Since reading this chapter, I’ve become more understanding of the complex nature that is personality. Before reading this chapter I viewed personality to be how we are. I figured it was something natural and we couldn't control it. But after reading this chapter, I’ve come to realize how much there really is to personality! I already knew about the basic stuff, like self-esteem, ego, and basic tendencies; but I had no clue that there were such things as self-schema, which is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and ideas of the self, and psychodynamic theory which is the idea that unconscious forces determine behavior. I had a slight concept of those ideas, but I never knew how detailed and important they really were to the idea of personality.
The topic that was most interesting to me was the idea of self-esteem. I have personally struggled with this my whole life. I’ve always had a low self-esteem which has held me back in some of my life adventures. I was curious to see how the book explained it. The discussion of downward and upward comparisons really interested me because I was instantly able to picture people that I knew who compared themselves like the book described. I knew that I would be an example of a person who uses upward comparisons constantly. I always catch myself comparing my looks to those prettier than me. So this section was very interesting to me because I could easily relate to it.
The most memorable thing I learned about was the idea of id, ego, and superego. I really loved the visual the book provided because it helped me understand the concept. Sometimes the book uses words or phrases I’m unfamiliar with and I become confused. As I read the chapter, the definitions of id, ego and superego were put into terms that I barely understood, so seeing this picture of the angel, devil, and man helped me understand the concept better. What’s crazier is that as I noticed the picture to help me out, I was unknowingly partaking in a personality concept, which is defense mechanisms. Because my mind became confused, I looked to something to ease my frustration and distress, which was the picture. Crazy how that stuff works! But I really enjoyed the picture because I cannot count the number of times I’ve seen that concept of the angel and devil conscience on television and in movies. One specific example that I kept thinking of was in The Emperor’s New Groove where Kuzco was debating his choices with a devilish and angelic version of himself on each shoulder. I didn’t know that the “devil” or bad thoughts would be considered an id while the “angel” or good thoughts would be called a superego. But I was aware of what an ego was.
Psychological terms I used were personality, self-schema, self-esteem, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, psychodynamic theory, ego, id, superego, defense mechanisms, humanistic approaches, locus of control, cognitive approaches, trait approaches, and basic tendencies.
Personality is the characteristic of thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual overtime throughout circumstances. Each person sees themselves differently, for college students they see themselves through gender, age, student status, interpersonal style, personal characteristics, and body image. When we think of ourselves it is called a self-schema which is by integrated sets of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about yourself. If you think about yourself at a certain point in your life it is a working self-concept because you are working on it at that time. Putting these together can give you an affective aspect of yourself, this is called self-esteem. Self-esteem is an important part of life but not as important as one thinks. It is usually the motivator for the day but having a high self-esteem can have downsides. In some cases, criminals have high self-esteems or if someone feels they aren’t being treated well they will lash out in anger. To control your esteem, people make downward comparisons and upward comparisons by putting others down to feel better about themselves or putting other up to make themselves feel down. Personality is difficult to go after because there are so many different people that act so different. There are four different approaches that help scientists try to categorize them. The psychodynamic theory which is personality based on unconscious wishes that create conflict between id, ego and superego. Humanistic approaches personality based on our tendency to fulfill our potential growth. Cognitive approaches which is personality based on how we think, and trait approaches which is personality based on characteristics. When these come together, scientists can predict personality better. These should be split up because they very much effect how a person acts and feels about themselves. This has changed the way I feel about personality because I can do things with myself to make me feel better and to do better at college or other problems I may have. Some of the most interesting reading to me was how people from different countries have different personalities because of what they are exposed to. The most surprising thing and how temperament is affected by your activity level, emotions, and social identity.
Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, downward comparison, upward comparison, psychodynamic theory, id, ego, superego
Psychology
Chapter 12 blog
11/08/2014
According to the book when you talk about “yourself” in general you are talking about he mental representation of your personal experiences such as memories and perceptions of what is going on at any particular moment. This might also mean your self image or what you see when you look into a mirror and your conscious awareness of what its like to be different then someone else beside you. This is because no two people are exactly the same, in how they, look, believe or act. This is also known as self concept. The book also states for students like us who are enrolled in a college major our sense of self is often looked at with age, gender, and major. Instead of personality and views. Often the way people look at themselves reflects on the behavior they have. For example a child who thinks they are stupid and cant learn anything in school will often act our in stupid behavior and not put in effort into learning new material because all their life they have believed that they are not worth learning because they simply can’t do it. This is not true however because if the child actually believed in their selves they would soon come to realize that they are much smarted then they believe and they can do anything they put their mind to with a little effort and the right help.
According to the book there are three structures of personality. The first called, Id, is the most basic level or completely submerged. The id operates according to the pleasure principle, which pushes us to seek pleasure and avoid pain it is the force that drives the pleasure principle “libido” today it has a very sexual meaning to it. But Freud meant to define it as the energy that promotes pleasure seeking. It acts on impulses and desires. Second is the superego, this act as a brake on the id. This personality structure develops in childhood it is the social standards of behavior. Last but not least s the third personality structure, ego. Ego is defined as the need to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the rules of the superego. It is often in the middle of the id and the superego.
What I found interesting and surprising about this chapter was that personality is affected by genes and the environment. Research has shown that certain genes can be linked with personality traits. But even if someone does not have a certain link doesn’t mean they cant do certain acts of personality. Such as a person who likes to go out and try to cause trouble will only be a person who is raised in a household that had the same morals.
Terms: id, superego, ego, self concept, self image, personality
Jacob Clark
Psych
November 8, 2014
Chapter 12
Personality are the traits that define who you are and determine behavior. Many different things determine personality such as: environment, genetics, and physiology.
Testing and categorizing in personality i feel is very important. There are so many different kinds of personality and patterns of behavior. I feel it does us well to understand into which of these categories we may fall. This may help further our understanding of self, as well as raise our self esteem.
Since reading the chapter, the only thing that has changed is that it left me with more questions. As i read the chapter i kept trying to place myself in certain categories. The only problem was, that most of them i was riding the fence on. It puzzles me deeply to know i behave very differently at different times without much change in situation or environment.
The topic i found most interesting was presented by my boy, Freud. Psychodynamic theory as it is called, caught my attention straight away. Theres something that intrigues me about theories on how we function at a subconscious level. In explaining the Id, Ego, and Superego, it helped me understand how the inner machinations of the mind may work. Especially the Id and Superego
The most memorable thing i read was the oedipus complex as part of the psychosexual stages of developement. I find it memorable because i feel I have observed it, and understand kind of how that thinking works. A boy “battles” the father over affections of the mother. He sees the father get her affection and ultimately copies said actions to receive affection.
Terms: personality, psychodynamic theory, Id, Ego, Superego
According to the textbook personality are the characteristic thoughts, emotions and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. We often make opinions about other people based on their personalities. Each of us has specific characteristics that best describe us. A person's actions and feeling can vary from his mates or friends' feelings in different life situations. For example, two friends can differently feel themselves on parties or act differently in car accidents. Some of us are call themselves shy and quiet and some of us are sociable and outgoing. For me personality is all factors and characteristics that can best describe us and which make us different from others.
We all have our own sense of self. When we are trying to describe it, we usually use our mental representations of our personal experiences, memories, physical appearance and conscious awareness of being separate from others. In other words it's called self-concept or how we believe who we are. This sense is important in life because it affects how you think and guide your attention to information that is relevant to you. Also so it influences your behavior and has impact on your feelings. An integrated set of memories, beliefs and generalizations about self is called self-schema. In other word is interconnected knowledge about self, it helps us perceive, organize, interpret and use information our self. Eventually self-schema, self-concept and other aspects help to understand our personality.
I think that texting and categorizing is really important in study of personality so we can better understand personality. It is really broad topic and psychologists use testing and categorizing to study personality in depth. Psychology as any science should have evidences. So to understand any phenomenon and aspects related to people lives, they are testing, doing different researchers and studies. There are so many people on the earth with different types of personalities and psychologists cannot categorize all of them as one whole. Studying about personality is so broad and complex topic and at the same time one of the interesting topics in psychology.
The new for me was information about how nature affects our personality throughout our lives. I didn't know that biological factors such as genes, brain structures and neurochemistry play so important role in determining personality. For example one research has shown that certain genes can be linked with some personality traits. A gene that regulates dopamine receptor is associated with novelty seeking. So adventure seekers may have one form of this gene deficient in dopamine. In other words they seek for new adventures. Also one of the interesting parts that I did not know before that childhood temperament may predict behavioral outcomes in early adulthood. Temperament is biologically based tendency to feel or act in certain ways. This sense of a person is broader than personality traits. Life experiences may alter personality traits but temperaments represent the innate biological structures of personality. So based on study where psychologists have predicted adolescent behavior of more than 1000 people based on their temperaments at age 3. For example individuals who were judged as under controlled at age 3 were later more likely to be antisocial or to have alcohol problems.
One of the most interesting parts in this chapter was different approaches that describe our personality, such as humanistic approaches. These approaches emphasize goodness in people. This is way of studying personality that emphasizes self-actualization, where people seek to full-fill their potential through greater self-understanding. For example in person-centered approach there are two issues which are crucial in the development of personality. The first issue is our personal understanding of our lives and the second is how others see us and evaluate us. The interesting part in this approach is that this theory shows how parents can affect our personality development. Most parents provide life and support to their children. The parents love their children on the condition that the children do what the parents wants them to do and live up to the parent’s standards. This condition creates a discrepancy between a child’s self and how parents evaluate him, which leads to development of a personality based on conditions of worth. Thus children’s desires, wishes and feelings will depend on approval from their parents. Children will act and show only those traits that elicit parents’ love and support. For example, children make play on musical instruments only because it makes his parents happy. So it shows how children depend on positive regard from their parents.
One of the most memorable parts was cognitive approaches. This is ways of studying personality highlights the importance of cognition or the way how we think in understanding many aspects of human behavior including personality. For example expectancy theory said that our behaviors are part of our personality. Our behavior is result of thinking about two things. First is expectancies for reinforcements and second one is the values we ascribe to particular reinforces. Expectancy theory proposes that our personalities are based on our locus of control. It means whether people control the reward and punishments that they experience. There are two types of locus of control. People with internal locus of control expect that their own actions influence events and outcomes. People with external locus of control expect that forces outside their control influence events and outcomes in their life. For example, I’m typical example of internal locus of control. I believe that everything depends on you. If you need positive outcomes, you have to put an effort to get it. Everything is under your control.
Terms used: Personality, self-consept, self-schema, mental representations, genes, brain structures, neurochemistry, dopamine, temperament, humanistic approaches, person-centered approach conditions of worth, cognitive approaches, expectancy theory, internal and external locus of control.
After reading chapter 12, I learned what the true definition of personality is. Personality consists of the thought, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable over time, in an individual. I believe that testing and categorizing in personality is important because we know that each person is different and differentiates in personality. Self-schema and the working self-concept help us define ourselves in our own minds. Self-schema helps us perceive, organize, interpret, and use information about ourselves. While, working self-concept can influence your behavior because it helps you retrieve memories, your role in situations, and they affect how you act in those different situations. For example, your sense of self include traits such as, fun and intelligent. With this, during an exam you may think of yourself as more intelligent than fun. These factors play a major role in our personality and our self-esteem which is the aspect of our sense of self. They are also good examples of how categorizing and testing is important while studying personality. My understanding of personality has changed because of the several aspects that determine why we are who we are. I didn’t realize how in depth the studies of personality could be.
The most interesting topics that I enjoyed reading about were how our self-esteem can change with age. In Figure 12.6, it demonstrates how females and males have varying scores of self-esteem. Researchers found that females have a lower self-esteem in the late teens to early twenties. For both males and females, self-esteem scores lower towards the end of life and peak during their mid sixties. But, they both share the same general pattern. The other topic I found interesting was the three structures of personality. What are they? The id is the component that is submerged in the unconscious state. The superego is the component of personality that acts as a brake on the id and reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. It occurs in the preconscious state. Lastly, the ego is the component that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id and during this process the ego is also trying to be responsive to superego. With a persons greater understanding of their ego and personality, they can take a humanistic approach and emphasize the goodness in themselves. This could possibly higher their self-esteem. I find it interesting that most of these topics can relate and tie into each other.
The sociometer theory was what I found most memorable while reading this chapter. Our self-esteem is a sociometer, which is an internal monitor of social rejection or acceptance. If we have a high self-esteem, the probability of rejection is low. But, if we have a low self-esteem, the probability of rejection is high. Somebody that is believed to have too high of a self-esteem is considered a narcissist which means, the individuals is arrogant and very interested in his or herself. This is can be a huge difference between someone that has a very low self-esteem meaning, they have no confidence or belief in themselves.
Terms: Personality, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Id, Superego, Ego, Humanistic Approach, Sociometer Theory, Sociometer, Narcissist
Personality has always been something that has been used to combine all of our individual thoughts and internal instincts about how to live our lives and how it makes up our actions towards others and how we make decisions based on our emotions. Our personality is created though our lives and it plays a major part about how we view other people as well as how we act towards certain things with how our unconscious and conscious mind mixes to figure out how we will act in a specific situation. With specific things like our ego, superego, and id helping make our decisions our personality makes a major part of our everyday lives. The id is something that is completely unconscious in our subconscious and it is the one that governs over the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, that sets up how we act when trying to get pleasure from others or from objects and how we tend to try and earn it, wither through violence or other ways that people use to earn pleasure. The superego is the conscience that we have when thinking with only our id, it is there to gives us our morality when going over problems. Finally the ego plays the part of the mediator between the id and the superego, making sure that the id Is able to find the pleasure that it is searching for as well as making sure that the superegos morals are being followed, this comes out as our everyday actions as well as how we act in different situations. There can be some problems whit the mixing of these factors and many times it causes major personality shifts in one’s life and can extremely change how one can act, luckily though we all have specific defense mechanisms that the ego uses to make sure that we are able to protect ourselves from distress and make sure at the same time to push anger off of ourselves and to other areas of life. These can cause massive problems for some people who have problems with their subconscious because it can cause large shifts in personality in different situations and make it so no one really knows how someone will act.
All of these things are extremely important to how we act in our day to day lives and how we act towards other people. Our personality is something that defines us through our life and it gives people the first impression when we meet them, a good personality is something that will help you though our entire life and make it easier or harder to get along with others.
Terms used: Personality, Id, Superego, Ego, Defensive Mechanisms
The definition of personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Trying to figure out other people’s personalities is like an everyday task for everyday people. Each person has their own different personalities. Some can be loud and obnoxious, some people can be quiet and keep to themselves. An easy way to figure out people’s personalities is to see the group that they are usually affiliated with. Because most of the time, people with the same personalities and behavior all hang out together. Because nobody really wants to hang out with someone that they have nothing in common with. Something that helps capture our own personalities is something called self- schema. Our self-schema consists of interrelated knowledge about ourselves. For example, for my self-schema it could show things like, student, daughter, sister, etc. It most just consists of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves. Categorizing like this is important when it comes to the study of personality because it shows what really makes up all of our different personalities. It shows us the reason why we act like we do. Another part to people’s personalities is self-esteem. The definition of this is the affective aspect of the self. This is important because it helps make up a person’s personality. If someone feels good about themselves, then they will usually be more loud and outgoing. But if someone isn’t very comfortable with themselves then it could make them a little more shy and not as outgoing. My understanding of personality has changed a little since reading this chapter. I knew that personality was describing people’s behaviors and how they acted. But I didn’t know that personalities were categorized to help explain why they act the way that they do.
I think that the most interesting part of this chapter was that social comparisons is a big factor when it comes to people’s different behaviors. Because people who are usually more “popular” are usually loud and outgoing and sometimes might be intimidating to approach, so our personality might change when we are around them, because we don’t want them to judge us. I think that it is sad that we live our lives like this. How “popular” people get to have power over others. And how they make downward comparisons to people who are not as popular as them, and they treat them poorly. and the people who are not as popular tend to make upward comparisons because they think that the popular kids are god-like. I just think that it’s sad that society is based on this and it shouldn’t really matter how popular or not that you are.
Psychological terms: personality, self-schema, self-esteem, social comparisons
In the chapter, it says that personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. My definition of personality is related to this in that your personality is made up of how someone thinks or acts and how the environment affects them. Everyone has a different personality that is unique to his or her self. The testing and categorizing of personalities is so important because it helps psychologists understand why people are the way they are. There are many tests today that help categorize personality. One of the best-known ways to test personality is the Rorschach inkblot test. A person looks at a series of inkblots and describes what they see. This helps release unconscious thoughts and conflicts that people may not want to be told. There is also the Thematic Apperception Test. With this test, a person is shown a picture and is told to tell as story about what they see in the picture. This type of test is meant to reflect a person’s personal motives. My understanding of personality has changed a little bit since reading this chapter. Your self- schema is what really describes yourself as a person and self-schema is something that I had not really heard about. When I look at my own personality now, it helps me look at all the parts of my self-schema. I have always been someone that has had a great personality about a lot of things and I think that anything that I do is going to help other people.
One topic that I found interesting in the chapter was the reciprocal determinism. There are three parts to this theory of personality. The first part of it is the person’s environment. The second part of it is the person’s self-confidence, characteristics, and expectations. The last part of this theory is the person’s behavior itself. I find this theory really interesting because there are so many parts to it and it clearly describes how a person acts.
There was one thing that I found kind of surprisingly in the chapter. I found it surprising that there were three parts to the concept of temperament. One level of temperament is the activity level, which is all the behavior and amount of energy that we exhibit. There is also emotionality in which there is the intensity of our emotional reactions. Then there is the part of sociability, which refers to the tendency to affiliate with others. This is surprising because I thought that temperament was just one thing and that there were no parts to it. When I think of temperament, I think of a little child getting mad over something that he or she wasn’t given. I didn’t know that temperament was just someone’s energy in general.
Terms: personality, temperament, Rorschach inkblot test, Thematic Apperception Test, self-schema, reciprocal determinism
This chapter was about personality. It raises many questions each explained by the different sections. The first is how do we know ourselves? The second, how can we understand personality. The third, how does biology affect personality. The last, how do we assess personality? These are very big questions. As explained in the story in the beginning about internet dating, we know a lot about ourselves. What we sometimes struggle with is what we want in other people. Also how do we know ourselves? If you asked anyone that question you would might get the same response, “I don’t know?”
The first section, how do we know ourselves? To answer this question we have to define what “self” is. Our sense of self according to the book involves mental interpretations of our personal experiences. It also includes our physical body and awareness from being separate from others. Our sense of self influences how we think by guiding information that is relevant to us. It also influences the way we behave and feel. This all fits into our own self schema. This is a set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves that is organized into an interconnected knowledge about the self. The self-schema helps us perceive, organize, interpret, and use information about our self.
The second section explains how we can understand personality. There are few approaches to personality that psychologists take. The first is a humanistic approach. Humanistic approach emphasizes how the unique goodness in a person, his or her own growth, and self-understanding all influence personality. This main humanistic approach is considered the person centered approach. This involves our sense of self and how others evaluate us. The second approach is cognitive approaches. This is exemplified in the expectancy theory. The expectancy theory states that our behaviors are part of our personality. You weight the rewards and punishments and that is determined off of your personalities. The Last approach is the Trait Approach. The main theory in the trait approach is the big five theory. This says that personality if affected by openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
Biology has an effect on our personalities in a couple ways. The one personality widely studied is temperament. This has been shown to have a genetic link. In a study researchers rated child’s temperament rate and it was a good predictor of personality as a young adult. Another aspect of genetics and personality is personality stability. This is how much does personality change over time. In a survey they did they showed that interest as child influenced what kids would do as adults. This suggests that personality is stable and only changes in unique cases such as a trauma to the head.
How personality is assessed is the last section. This is somewhat of a contradictory chapter. Personality is tested through projective measures, objective measures, intrusive records, and observationally. These are all explained as being hard to get the true sense of personality. On questionnaires we are likely to lie to not seem as bad. Using an electronically device to record all of your conversations is very debatable. These are the only ways we know of to study personality, and as humans we are curious. Maybe something’s are just meant to stay a mystery?
Key Terms: Personality, Sense of Self, Self-Schema, Humanistic Approach, Person-Centered Approach, Cognitive Approach, Expectancy Theory, Big Five Theory, Temperament, Personality Stability, Objective Measures, Projective Measures
Personality is a set of personal thoughts, emotions and behaviors that make us all unique. Researchers test and categorize personality because it is important for us to know what triggers certain behaviors. Research has shown that behavior is influenced by a mix of personality and situation. A better understanding of personality allows us to better understand human behavior. I believe testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality as it helps to make this complex subject more understandable.
My understanding of personality has greatly increased since reading this chapter. Before reading this chapter I did not know all of the things that have an impact on our personalities. I also had no idea of all of the testing and categorizing that peoples’ personalities were subjected too. I originally thought that your personality was just they way you acted, however I now know personality is a lot more complex.
I found the section on self-esteem very interesting. Self-esteem is simply defined as how we feel about ourselves. From the study detailed in the text, we see that males typically have higher self-esteem than females throughout their entire lives. I found this to be a very interesting fact. I can understand, however, why this is this typically the case. I believe that females feel a lot more pressure throughout their entire lives. Females feel pressure to look a certain way in order to fit in. They also often have an ideal image of how they should look and act. All the pressure created by this can certainly hinder female self-esteem. The chapter also noted that having a very high opinion of oneself has a downside. Bullies, as well as very violent people, often have every high self-esteem. People who have a high self esteem often feel as if they aren’t treated correctly and this leads to them becoming violent and lashing out. I found this section very interesting because I always thought that having high self-esteem was very important. This taught me that while self-esteem is important, too much can sometimes do more harm then good.
The most surprising thing that I read was the Expectancy Theory. In 1954 Julian Rotter developed a theory which stated that our behaviors are a part of our personality. This theory was tied to Locus of Control. Locus of Control is whether or not people control the rewards or punishment. There are two types of locus control; internal and external. People experiencing internal locus of control believe they did well on a test because they studied hard. They believe that their actions created the result that they experience. Those with external locus of control believe their grade on the test was just fate and was determined by their actions.. This was surprising to me because I never thought about how closely our behaviors and personalities are tied. After reading this chapter, the Expectancy Theory made sense to me and I better understand why people believe that they are impacting the results that they are experiencing.
Terms: Personality, Self-esteem, Expectancy Theory, Internal locus control, external locus control
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Everyone has a sense of his or her own personality. Our sense of self includes memories, experiences, personal characteristics, and physical appearance. Our self-schema consists of an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves that is organized as a network of interconnected knowledge about the self. The self-schema helps each of us perceive, organize interpret, and use information about our self. It also helps us filter information so that we are likely to notice things that are relevant to us, such as our own name. Our personality highly reflects our self-esteem. Self-esteem is the affective aspect of our sense of self. We evaluate how we feel about our personal characteristics based on our self-esteem. One’s personality is also affected by biology through genes and the environment. Biologically based tendency to feel or act in certain ways is known as temperament. Life experiences may alter personality traits, but temperaments represent the innate biological structures of personality. Three aspects of temperament are activity level, emotionality, and sociability. Activity level is the overall amount of energy and behavior we exhibit. Some children race around the house, others are less energetic. Emotionality describes the intensity of emotional reactions, such as some children cry often or become frightened easily. Then sociability refers to the general tendency to affiliate with others. For example, children high in sociability prefer to be with others rather than to be alone.
Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because knowing someone’s personality can help us predict someone’s thoughts and behaviors. There are several ways to measure personality. One is projective, which are personality tests that examine unconscious processes by having people interpret ambiguous stimuli. Another is objective, which is a relatively direct assessment of personality, usually based on information gathered through self-report questionnaires or observer ratings. Due to these types of testing and several more, we are now able to categorize personality. Through observational methods, someone might be able to judge your personality by looking at your bedroom and your Facebook profile.
I think testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality, but only to a certain extent. Yes, there are lots of similarities to why people behave the way that they do. However, each situation is different and can affect people. This is known as situationism theory, which believes that behavior is determined, more by situations than by personality traits.
Before reading this chapter I never realized how complex our personality traits are and what affects them. I learned about the five basic personality traits everyone possesses, but on different scales. They are: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. I was able to assess my self on the scale in the book and leaned more about myself also.
The most interesting topic to me was the defense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms are unconscious mental strategies that the mind uses to protect itself from distress. I never realized how many defense mechanisms there were according to psychodynamic theory. A few of them I learned about were sublimation and projection. Sublimation is channeling socially unacceptable impulses into constructive, even admirable, behavior. Projection is attributing unacceptable qualities of the self to someone else. Now when I react to something I will be able to determine what defense mechanism I use.
The most memorable thing I learned about was how identical twins are more similar in personality traits than fraternal twins. They not only have the same genes, same sex, and look the same, but they also carry with them similar personalities. This shows how biology affects our personality, not just environment.
Psychological Terms: personality, self-schema, self-esteem, temperament, activity level, emotionality, sociability, projective measures, objective measures, observational methods, situationism, five-factor theory of personality, defense mechanisms, sublimation, projection
Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. I think personality relates back to the idea of social psychology in the way attitudes are shaped and formed. Everyone one is different and so are personalities. A certain impression of a person influences how you may view them. This idea is focused on how you personally see yourself and how others see you. Everyone sees himself or herself in a specific way. One way we organize this is by our self-schema. This includes interrelated knowledge about ourselves. For example, I would say I am athletic, I love being with my family, and I love being outdoors. These are the behaviors that are important to me and are more prominent in my own self-schema. This is one of many ways we categorize personality. The way we do this is important and allows us to go more in depth in all the types of personalities out there. Testing them gives us a chance to break them down and see what they are really all about. In my eyes this is what psychology is. Researchers study personality in different ways, an example would be trait approaches. This is where we look at behavioral tendencies that are generally consistent over time and across most situations. This leads us into the big five or the five-factor theory of personality. Evidence form testing shows this theory emerges across cultures, among adults and children, even when different questionnaires assess the factors. The same five factors appear whether people rate themselves or rated by others. According to this there are five different traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Each individual ranges from a low to high on each certain personality trait. The ultimate reason why we test these sorts of things is so that we gain more knowledge about them. We are able to develop different theories and concepts that make it easier to categorize certain personality traits. I think doing this is extremely important in finding new information about oneself. After reading this I have learned much more about how I view myself in general. Personality is much more than I made it out to be. It’s more complex in the idea that we use different comparisons such as downward and upward, theories like the sociometer and psychodynamic, and concepts on how we see ones self to find out who we really are. One of the most interesting things in this chapter for me was where it discussed temperament. Temperament is the tendency to feel or act in a certain way. You probably know what sort of a temper you had when you were little. My parents said when I was young I wasn’t very active, hardly ever cried, and had a smile on my face most of the time. My younger sister on the other hand was not that way. She ran all over the house and got mad when she didn’t get her way. Researchers have found a way of predicting behavior based on your temperament at an age such as three. I thought the idea of that was extremely interesting! The most memorable thing I read was about self-esteem. For a while I didn’t always think that great about myself. Now I realize I am my own self and no one can change that. Why think negatively about yourself? There is no reason to. Self-esteem is one thing that we are in compete control of. If we maintain a more positive view about oneself life in general will be a much more positive place. The psychological terms I used were personality, social psychology attitude, self-schema, psychology, trait approaches, five-factor theory, upward and downward comparisons, sociometer theory, psychodynamic theory, temperament, self-esteem.
In chapter twelve, personality is defined as the characteristic thoughts, responses, and behaviors that are present within an individual that were developed overtime and throughout different circumstances. However, personality goes far beyond this simple definition. People’s personalities are based on a sense of self. This sense comes with three aspects, including self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem. Self-schema consists of different pieces of knowledge about oneself. Self-schema contains memories, beliefs, generalizations, etc. The purpose of this is to help one perceive, analyze, and understand information about oneself. The working self-concept reflects how one thinks about themselves at a particular moment. This experience is limited to the amount of information occurring at one moment in time. This can influence one’s behavior, depending on what situation they are in. Self- esteem is the affective aspect of the self. This is when one evaluates how they feel about one’s personal characteristics.
There are different ways to understand personality. Freud’s psychodynamic theory states that unconscious forces determine one’s behavior. Inner conflicts reflect one’s personality. The humanistic approach, like the person-centered approach, states that personalities are influenced by goodness. People seek to live up to their full potential for growth through self-understanding. The expectancy theory and the reciprocal determinism theory state that one’s way of thinking influences the behavior. The five-factor theory and biological trait theory states that personality is based on one’s level on particular dimensions of a trait. I feel like each of these theories are correct and accurate to some degree regarding the background of personality.
Before reading this chapter, I never thought much about personality. I mainly categorized personality as someone being nice, funny, smart, mean, introverted, outgoing, etc. However, now I know that there are more complex aspects that determine personality. Testing and categorizing personality is obviously very important when studying personality. It helps people know themselves better, and it lets people learn who they really are and why they are the way they are. A lot of things are analyzed when determining one’s personality, such as behaviors, feelings, biological factors, physiology, and much more. It is very important to test and categorize personality to discover oneself and to help others understand each other a little better.
An interesting topic to me was the section covering self-esteem and how it is an aspect in personality. I have personally struggled with self-esteem issues throughout my life, as many young ladies do. I evaluate myself pretty harshly because I feel like I do not live up to the standards of society. The sociometer model states that self-esteem could be based on the likelihood of being accepted or rejected. Rejection and abandonment are my worst fears, so I feel that this model is pretty accurate. I found it interesting that self-esteem is an aspect in determining one’s personality.
One of the more memorable topics from this chapter was one of the many ways in which personality is assessed. I personally thought projective measures were really interesting and memorable. Projective measures give insight to one’s personality by letting a person project unconscious thoughts onto images. This process reveals hidden aspects of one’s personality, like wishes, motives, conflicts, etc. I would love to do something of this sort, just to see any hidden or unknown aspects about myself.
Terms: Projective measures, sociometer model, self-esteem, biology, physiology, behaviors, personality, five-factor theory, biological trait theory, Freud’s psychodynamic theory, person-centered approach, self-schema, working self-concept.
Personality is defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Our book states that we are constantly trying to figure out other people-why they behave in certain ways and to predict their behavior.
Testing and categorizing is important because we want to categorize people so they are easier to study. By categorizing people by certain criteria scientists are able to focus on why certain people have those characteristics. This also helps scientists figure out why people act the way that they do. One of the most common methods used to assess personality is called the Rorschach inkblot test. For this test the person looks at an inkblot and describes what they think it is. How the person describes the inkblot is supposed to reveal unconscious conflicts and other problems. Another method that is used to assess personality is the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). In this test the person is shown an image and asked to tell a story about it. The story is scored based on the motivational schemes that emerge. The schemes are assumed to reflect the storyteller’s personal motived. This test is useful in measuring motivational traits-especially those related to achievement, power, and affiliation-and it continues to be used in contemporary research. The TAT test also predicts how interpersonally dependent people are. I believe that testing and categorizing is so important in the study of personality because it helps us understand people more because they are so complex.
My understanding of personality has changed a little since reading this chapter. My understanding has changed a little bit because I did not know all of the things that have such a huge impact on our personality. I used to think that personality was just how we acted day to day but that is incorrect. My understanding also was changed because I had no idea that personality was tested and categorized.
From this reading the topic that was most interesting to me was the five-factor theory. This theory identifies five basic personality traits, which are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. The example given in our book of agreeableness reflects the extent to which a person is trusting and helpful. A person high in openness to experience is imaginative and independent. A person low in this trait is down-to-earth and conformist. For each factor, personality may be anywhere from low to high. People’s ‘scores’ on the five-factor theory traits have been shown to predict a wide variety of behaviors. Their scores have also been shown to predict satisfaction with job, marriage, and life generally.
The most memorable thing I learned about in this reading was definitely the topic of personality stability is influenced by biology and the situation. I learned that genetic makeup can predict people to have certain personality traits or characteristics and whether these genes are expressed depends on the unique circumstances that each child faces during development. Childhood temperament may predict behavioral outcomes in early adulthood. Whether personality is fixed or changeable depends largely on how we define the essential features of personality.
The psychological terms I used were personality, behavior, TAT test, Rorschach inkblot test and five-factor theory.
Personality is thoughts, emotions, characteristics, responses and behaviors that are stable in each individual over time and with each circumstance. Testing and categorizing personalities is very important because everyone is different on how they act and everyone is influenced in different ways to how they gain that type of personality. Therefore, scientists have created many tests and theories in order to distinguish the different personalities and to know how they came about in each person. For example, objective measures is a test that scientist use in order to take assessments of personality’s by gathering information through self-report questionnaires or observer ratings. I think many test should be done in order to see different personalities and where they come from. If we know this information we can understand different cultures and their views and also know how people act the way they do. Since reading this chapter I understand that your personality does not just come from what you want it to be but from cultural and biological factors as well.
The most interesting topic I read about in chapter 12 would be about Freudian’s theory, psychodynamic theory. Here he says unconscious forces determine behavior. Going farther into this theory he talk about id, ego, and superego. Id is a personality that is in the unconscious that is driven by the pleasure principle. Ego is the balance between the id and superego by trying to satisfy the wishes of the id and responding to the superego. Therefore the superego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct.
The most surprising section I read in this chapter would have to be about downward and upward comparisons. Since I have never heard of this terminology before I found it sparingly true that s humans do this. For example, upward comparisons is when a person compares oneself to another person who is in a better situation allowing us to have a low self-esteem. Downward comparisons on the other had is when a person compares themselves to someone in a worse situation in order so that person will have a higher self-esteem.
Key words: personality, objective measures, id, ego, superego, downward comparisons, upward comparisons
Personality described in the book is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. I think personality is how someone acts towards things. How someone acts towards a situation depends on his or her personality. If they have a bad attitude towards a situation that is not supposed to be a big deal, then that somewhat tells you what type of personality they have. Personality is a sense of who we believe we are. It affects how we think, the way we behave, and how you feel.
Testing and categorizing is so important in the study of personality because we now know the working of self-concept, and self-esteem. There is a theory called sociometer theory that argues with that self-esteem is a mechanism for monitoring the likelihood of social exclusion. Without the important study of personality and this theory we would not have found that people have a fundamental, adaptive need to belong, and when we get rejected from a group our self-esteem goes down. Therefore, self-esteem is looked at as a sociometer, which is an internal monitor of social acceptance or rejection.
My understanding of personality has changed since reading this chapter because I now know there is more to it than just thinking personality is the way you act towards things happening around you, and the way you think about them.
The topic I found interesting while reading about personality is when the book talked about self-serving biases, which is the tendency for people to take personal credit for success, but blame failure on external factors. This was interesting to me because it talked about when someone is smart, and they do really good on an exam they keep a positive attitude towards it, and explain to people that it is because of their skills and hard work, rather than when they do bad on an exam they blame their performance on not it not being fair and the obstacles of success, which is being blamed on external factors.
The most surprising thing to me in this chapter was reading about psychodynamic theory, which is Freudian theory that unconscious forces determine behavior. I thought this was surprising to me because he says that a lot of the forces conflicts of drive, we have we are unaware of. An example in the book of something like this would be having the desire to steal something and not knowing why, but having a conflicting behavior of knowing that you would get into huge trouble if you actually did steal that object. This is only a small portion of our brain, according to Freud.
All in all, I found this topic to be very interesting, and fun to learn and read about.
Terms Used: sociometer, self-concept, sociometer theory, self-esteem, self-serving bias, psychodynamic theory,
Personality is defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. I think that personality starts with how you think of yourself because that is what influences how you will behave in certain situations. This can be thought of as self-schema. Self-Schema is the knowledge and beliefs that we have about ourselves. One thing that is important in today’s society when it comes to personality is Self-Esteem. Self-Esteem is the affective aspect of the self. It really evaluates how you feel about yourself. If you have high self-esteem are more likely to not be rejected from others and people with low self-esteem are more likely to be rejected. Not only is personality how you look at yourself but it is also how other people look at you and perceive you as well. One theory that was describes in this chapter that I think has a lot to do with personality was the Reciprocal Determinism theory. This theory states that personality is influenced by three factors. One is environment, the second is person factors, and the third is behavior. I think that all of these have to with personality because each one has to do with the other. Many people have different personalities because each person has had a different experience and not everyone thinks the same. Not only do people not have the same personality but people do not have the same genes. Which also has a lot to do with personality and we call these Basic Tendencies.
I think that categorizing and testing is so important when it comes to studying personality because there are so many different personalities around the world and to not categorize them would be hectic. It is also important to categorize them so that when we go to study these different personalities we can know more about why people act the way they do and know more about what personality really is. If we know more about personality and what it consists of and why then it will be easier to test. The different categorizations are the theories that are discussed in our book. I think the theories are good to have because we don’t really know for sure where personality comes from and different people have very good theories as to what personality is from and it is important to know all the theories because not just one is the right answer. Some ones personality could be the cause of one theory and another person’s personality could be the cause of another. This is why it is important to have different categories when talking about personality.
My understanding about personality has changed a lot since reading this chapter. I really just thought personality just came out of thin air. Reading the different theories made me realize that personality is based on a whole lot of things and not everyone is the same and not everyone’s personality is based off the same things either. It made me also realize that maybe my personality is because of the environment I grew up in, the characteristics that I have and most of all my biological make up. I think I am more on the side of the interactionist. Who are people that believe that behavior is determined jointly by situations and underlying traits. I have also had a better understanding about my working-self-concept which is how I think about myself in a certain situation.
The most interesting topic to me was reading about the Big Five Theory. This theory says that there are just five basic personality traits. These five traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism (OCEAN). In each of these categories there is a place for everyone on a degree from high to low. Each person is placed in each category essentially forming their own personality. Each score that someone has in each category tells us a lot about their many different things in their life. Whether it’s a job, marriage, etc. not only is this the study of human personality but also I thought it was very interesting that psychologist study this for animal personalities as well.
The most surprising and memorable thing that I learned while reading this chapter was the genes part. I thought it was interesting that genes have a lot to do with personality. It is said that identical twins have more of the same personalities than any other siblings do. If people share the same genes like identical twins do then they will have more of the same personality which shows that personality does have to do with genes. Even if the identical twins are raised separate from each other they still show having the same type of personality.
Psychological Terms: Working Self-Concept, interactionist, basic tendencies, self-schema, personality
Chapter 12 was about Self and Personality. Personality is the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual's distinctive character. Every individual has their own personality and has their own sense of who they are. Our sense of self includes memories, experiences, personal characteristics, and physical appearances. Your sense of self influences a person in a lot of ways. It effects how you think, it influences the way we behave, and it influences the way we feel. Our self-esteem plays a big part in our personality. If you have a really low self-esteem then you aren't going to be as happy and your personality is effected a lot. There are many theories about self-esteem and one of them is called reflected appraisal which is based on how we believe others perceive us. I believe in this theory because especially in our society now we are constantly trying to impress other people and we are so focused on our personal image. We look up to people who are famous and want to be just like them that we succumb to peer pressure and are constantly trying to improve ourselves no matter what because we care too much about what other people think about us that we are afraid to actually be ourselves. A topic that I thought was interesting was the psychodynamic theory that unconscious forces determines behavior. In this theory, there are three personality structures: the id, the ego, and the superego. The id is the most basic level, at this level the unconscious operates according to the pleasure principal which means that we seek pleasure and avoid pain. The second structure is the superego, this acts as a break on the id. The superego develops in childhood and is the internalization of parental and societal standards of behavior. This has to do with morality/ conscious. The third structure is the ego. This structure mediates between the id and the superego. The ego operates according to the reality principal which involves rational thought and problem solving. The most memorable thing that I learned was the most common defense mechanisms according to the psychodynamic theory were denial, repression, projections, reaction formation, rationalization, displacement, and sublimation. Defense mechanisms unconscious mental strategies that the mind uses to protect itself from distress. I just thought it was cool that most people use these certain mechanisms and that we all do things to make ourself feel better and that all has to do with our type of personality. Another memorable thing that I learned was on page 431 it had a picture of a guy sitting down with the devil on one shoulder and the angel on the other. The purpose of this picture was to show where the id, ego, and superego go. It was really to understand it being put that way. The id represents the devil, the superego represents the angel, and the ego goes in the middle to solve conflicts between the two. Categorizing and testing is so important in the study of personality because categorizing people helps scientists because it makes these categorized people easier to study. By categorizing people by certain criteria scientists are able to focus on why certain people have those characteristics and can come up with an explanation as to why people do certain things. There are many different tests that help scientists categorize people such as the Rorschach inkblot test or the Thematic Apperception Test. My thoughts have changed a little bit after reading this chapter because I never realized that our personalities were so complex. I don't really put much thought into why I do things the way I do, but its all because of my certain personality.
Some psychological terms that I used were personality, sense, self-esteem, reflected appraisal, personal image, peer pressure, psychodynamic theory, pleasure principal, reality principal, id, ego, superego, defense mechanisms, Rorschach inkblot test, and Thematic Apperception test.
Personality is the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are stable in people over time and across different circumstances. It is essentially how people behave and why they may behave that way. Testing and categorizing personality is important because it allows those studying personality to see the different types of personality and how these personalities relate to one another. It also helps in studying whether our personalities are biological or environmental and if our personalities can change over time. I definitely think that this testing and categorizing is important to those whom are studying personalities because it helps in understanding how people act and behave, but it is less important for those whom are not studying these things. While it is nice to learn about the different categories of personality and to understand them so that you can greater understand your own personality and the actions of those around you, it isn’t as important because the categories can sometimes make you feel as if you must behave only as your personality category tells you that you behave like. My understanding of personality has definitely changed since reading this chapter however, because I have learned a lot more about how our personality traits are stable over time and thus suggesting a biological basis for personality, which I find interesting.
The most interesting topic to me is the dimension of extraversion and introversion and their relationships with the reticular activating system. This theory suggests that extraversion/introversion is related to our own personal levels of arousal and what level of arousal we function best at. Extraverts are typically under-aroused, and so they will engage in more activities to increase this level, while introverts are continually above their optimal levels of arousal and so they seek out quiet solitude with less stimuli to keep their arousal level lower.
The most memorable thing that I learned from chapter 12 is probably the topic of self-esteem and our own views of ourselves or our self-schema. I thought it was interesting when they suggested that our self-esteem is based on the likelihood that we will be accepted or rejected by our peers socially, that our self-esteem lowers or raises in accordance to what we believe others see us as. We also use many different strategies in order to maintain these positive views on ourselves, like downward and upward comparisons and self-serving bias. I really liked reading this part in the chapter and it is very memorable to me because I feel as if it’s important to remember how much we actually are affected by what we believe others think of ourselves, and that sometimes we need to look at things in a different perspective in order to see things the correct way, because we may be altering our own realities by using faulty comparisons.
words used: personality, self-esteem, self-schema, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, self-serving bias.
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. To me personality is something that can make you unique and be different than others. We categorize and test personalities that way we can study them in more depth.The psychodynamic theory which is personality based on is the unconscious wishes that create a problem between id, ego and superego. The humanistic approach is that personality is base on our tendency to fulfill our potential though personal growth. I think people are always trying to fulfill their needs and live up to standards. Cognitive approach is personality is based on how we think. I think this holds true. If you think about doing something, like working hard in school that will get you good grades to get you a good job. You would have a determined personality. The Trait Approach is that personality can be described by our characteristics. I really agree with this. The type of personality that i have comes out through the things i do. I did not realize how many different aspects there really are to personality. I only touched on a few things. It opened my mind up to other things and taught me more about my own personality. I really find the defense mechanisms interesting. There are so many that i did not even realize. I think denial is a big one that everyone experiences. Denial is refusing to acknowledge source of anxiety. I know for me this is a big one because i have such high anxiety problems. Repression goes hand in hand with denial. Repression is when you exclude the source of anxiety from awareness. You see this a lot on child abuse cases where when they are older they push it away to forget out about it so they don't have to deal with it when in reality it just makes it worse. Something memorable to me was interactionist. That is theorists who believe that behavior is determined jointly by situations and underlying traits. I hadn't heard of this and to me i think there is a lot more that goes on that they acknowledge.
Terms: denial defense mechanisms, emotion response humanistic approach, trait approach, cognitive approach, psychodynamic theory, personality, repression, anxiety, interactionist
Personality is defined by the text book as “the characteristic thought, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances.” It is also much more than that. Personality is how a person views themselves and how others view that person. It makes each person different from everyone else. Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because it allows us to understand how and why personalities are and how they come to be. It is rather difficult for us to always act, behave, and simply be the same way we are all the time, so certain aspects of personality are constantly changing, and people want to understand why we tend to hold back. One such aspect of personality is working self-concept. Working self-concept is a here and now version of our experience of the self. In other words, it is how we think of ourselves at the current moment. For example, a blonde woman who works with several brunette women, she might think of herself as a blonde. But if she works with several men, instead of focusing on the color of her hair, she would focus on her gender. Self-esteem is also important to study because it can have significant effects on people, both positive and negative. A person with a low self-esteem usually compares themselves with others who appear to be better than them. This is called upward comparison. Low self-esteem can be psychologically damaging to the person; it could lead to depression. I took AP psych in high school, and one of the things I always struggled to remember correctly is the difference between the id, ego, and superego. Mostly, I could never remember the difference between the ego and superego. The picture on page 431 really helped that click. The superego is the conscience; the angel sitting on your shoulder telling you what is morally and socially acceptable. The id is the desire for pleasure and avoidance of pain, or the little devil trying to get you to do what you want rather than what is right. The ego is you, trying to decide what to do; trying to resolve the conflict. This is probably the most memorable thing from this chapter. The most interesting thing I found in this chapter was the section on working self-concept. It amazes me that just the simple presence of others can have a great effect on how we see ourselves. This makes me think about high school, because so many students change who they are so they can be “cool” or fit in with the popular people. This could be a bad thing, because if a person is constantly surrounded by certain people and acts a certain way and thinks of themselves differently because of it, their entire personality could change and that person could become the stereotypical popular kid instead of being who they really are. I also find Freud’s theories interesting, mostly because a lot of them are just plain silly. An example of this is the Oedipus complex. The whole idea of being jealous of the same-sex parent and wanting to get rid of them to be with the opposite-sex parents is ridiculous, to me anyway. I do not believe that most teenaged girls “hate” their mothers because they are jealous of them and want to be with their dads.
Words used: personality, working self-concept, self, self-esteem, upward comparison, Oedipus complex, id, ego, superego
What is personality? It refers to an individual with differences in character, feelings, behaviors and the way an individual thinks. When different parts of a person comes together as a whole, then it becomes a personality. It shapes us and helps other people understand who we are as a person. When someone is put in a different environment and the way they react is personality. Is that person shy or social, is part of their personality.
Why is testing or categorizing so important in the study of personality is because when we separate people, we can understand different personality better and can go in depth. Everyone is different and everyone one has a different personality. There are multiple things that makes out personality such as self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, and sociometer theory. In self-schema is the way we look at our self. it consists of memories, beliefs, and generalization about our-self. We are more likely to remember things that are about us. In working self-concept, is the way a person thinks about themselves at a certain moment. In self-esteem, how we feel about our personal characteristics. Some has low self-esteem, many has high self-esteem. Having hing self-esteem can lead to happiness, doing good in school and landing a good job, but it could be bad also, people who bully other people they are the ones with high self-esteem, they hurt people with low self-esteem. In sociometer theory, is a mechanism for watching the probability of social exclusion. If you fit in a group with you are more likely to have a high self-esteem and then people who do not.
My understanding has changed a ton, knowing what is personality. I know what that our personality is controlled by our brain, biology and physiology has a lot to do with our personality. There are many factors that contribute and then it becomes a personality. There are many approaches to theory. psychodynamic theory, humanistic approaches, cognitive approaches, and trait approaches. As I was reading I was also thinking about my personality and what is true about me or what category do I fit in when talking about a personality.
The most interesting thing for me was the common defense mechanisms to psychodynamic theory. Defense mechanisms, is when our unconscious mind uses strategies that the mind uses to to protect itself from distress. There are many different types of defense mechanisms such as denial, repression, projection, reaction formation, rationalization, displacement, sublimation. In denial when we refuse to accept the truth. In repression, is when we leave out a source of anxiety form awareness. In projection, when we compare our unacceptable qualities of our self to other people. In reaction formation, warding off an uncomfortable thought by exaggerating its opposite. In rationalization, coming up with a good logical reason for something shameful that you did. In displacement, when we shift our attention of emotions form one object to another, who is a much softer target. In sublimation, is when someone who is doing something that is social unacceptable, but then turns that behavior into something that is very admirable.
The most memorable part for me was how biology and physiology influences our personality. It relays on biological processes that produce our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. It all relays on the dimensions of extravert and introvert. When you are a child your personality will change a little bit, but by the time you become an adult it is very stable. Personality is also impact by the environment that one was raised in. There are two types of personality basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations. In basic personality is greatly determined by biology and is stable over time. In characteristic adaptation, based on the demand of the specific situations.
Psychological terms- self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, sociometer theory, denial, repression, projection, reaction formation, rationalization, displacement, sublimation, psychodynamic theory, humanistic approaches, cognitive approaches, and trait approaches, basic tendencies, and characteristic adaptation.
Chapter 12 was about self and personality. Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Psychologists test and categorize personality through several approaches. The first is the psycho-dynamic theory which states personality is based on our unconscious wishes that create conflict between id (desire of pleasure), superego (what is moral), and ego (resolver of conflict between the other two). These three structures interact and vary in access to consciousness, influencing behavior and can create stress in the person. The second theory is the humanistic approach which is ways of studying personality that emphasize self-actualization. People seek to fulfill their full potential through greater self-understanding. It focusses on a person’s understanding of self and how they perceive others view them. The third is cognitive approach, which believes personality is based on how a person thinks. From this approach spawned the expectancy theory which believes behaviors are part of the personality, and the locus of control which states that people believe they influence the outcomes of a situation. The final on is trait approaches which is ways of studying personality that are based on people’s characteristics and tendencies to act in a certain way over time and across circumstances. There are two theories to this approach, the first being the five-factor theory. This theory identifies five basic personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) ranging from low to high. The second is the biological trait theory which states that personality has three major dimensions, a person’s outgoingness, stability, and constraint. These are associated with the terms introvert/extrovert, stable/unstable, and high/low constraint. Such testing about personality is important so we can discover and come to understand why people act the way they do. If we understand that someone is shy rather than rude, we may be more open to being their friend and getting to know them. Most personality judgments are based on a person’s experience with another rather than testing and categorizing. So while it may be an interesting topic and help people understand others better, it should not be the basis for how people perceive and understand one another. My understanding of personality has grown considerably in this chapter. I always knew personality was the basis for how a person’s acts, but I never considered all the factors that play into developing one and how it affects a person’s responses to stimuli. I now know that personality is a combination of a person’s experiences, desires, and social interactions but can always be apt to change based on their biological makeup and stress.
The topic that was most interesting to me was projective and objective measures. I always found the inkblot test, a projective measure, to be interesting but never fully understood it. I have now learned that though it is an interesting approach, is not all that reliable in its data. Its goal is to uncover unconscious conflicts in a person based on what they believe they see in the picture. This seems pretty similar to the therapeutic approach on recovered memory so it could lead to more problems than good. For the objective measure I learned that it measures what raters believe and observe, not analyzing hidden conflicts. This form of measuring is instead used to predict behavior and targets certain traits through a long standardized test. However, the results from such studies are also questionable for the basis on which they are compared could be skewed.
The most memorable thing from my reading was phallic stage, a period of a child’s interest in genitals. In this stage it is theorized that a child goes through an Oedipus complex where they desire their parent of the opposite gender and wish to get rid of their parent of the same gender. It is theorized they want the opposite parent as their own but push down such desires by identifying with the same sex parent. I found this to be very interesting for I am learning about the same thing in my sociology class. Though I do not necessarily believe it, I find the theory fascinating. In my sociology class, we learned that the son decides that he will never be a suitable partner for his mother and a daughter learns she can never love her mother the way her father does, but becomes delighted when she learns she too can have a baby. This theory, however, developed by Freud, really only applies to boys and overall is not supported by sufficient data.
Self, personality, behavior, psycho-dynamic theory, id, ego, superego, humanistic approach, cognitive approach, expectancy theory, five-factor theory, biological trait theory, projective/objective measures, inkblot, phallic stage, Oedipus complex
Personality, according to the book definition, consists of typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people and across circumstances. Since everyone has their own personality it is important to test and categorize, for each individual sees themselves differently than what psychologists would consider them to be. A lot of one’s behavior is based on working self-concept and self-esteem. In addition, we naturally try to maintain a positive sense of ourselves. It seems common for someone to not be attracted to someone who does not like himself or herself. However, when judging others what one person thinks, or says about other is based on their self-esteem. If someone has a high self-esteem then it will be a downward comparison, in similar manner if someone has low self-esteem the comparison is upward. My understanding of personality has changed from reading the chapter in a way that I now have a deeper meaning of what personality is,, as well as why people behave in certain ways that others might think is a bit odd, or weird.
From the reading, the topic that was most interesting to me was the section on self-serving bias. Self-serving bias is described as the tendency to credit or blame their success, or failure on different things. For example, if a student does well on an exam he credits his hard work and study habits, but if one does poorly on the exam it is blamed on the way the test is worded, wasn’t talked about in class, etc.
The most surprising thing I read was about the Biological trait theory. The chart really helped to see how personality traits make up a person. It all seemed to work perfectly, for I decided to try it out on a couple of friends who were in my room as I was reading the chapter and just seeing the differences in personality was really interesting to me.
Terms: Personality, self-concept, self-esteem, downward comparison, upward comparison, behavior, psychologists, self-serving bias, biological trait theory.
I am a math major, so I looked at the definition given by our textbook in a mathematical sense. So I would describe personality by saying that it is how a person acts/behaves, thinks, and feels on average throughout their life. This basically means the way they act the majority of the time. Our personality plays a huge role in who we are and how we grow and develop. We are constantly trying to “find” ourselves. Just like many other psychological things, there are a large number of things that factor into our personality. For example, genes/biology, culture, sex, education, etc can all have an influence on your personality. I think it important to study personalities to help better identify who you are. It can be used to your advantage to know how to handle things to the best of your ability, or for future career options. Some people may be better at dealing with others than the next, and if you are one of those people that do not like to interact with others, you can avoid that in job/career searching. There is virtually no two personalities are alike. This is part of the reason why we need to categorize them. With all the different types and subcategories it can get overwhelming. Self schema is how you think about yourself. This is kind of similar to self esteem. However, self schema also includes memories and beliefs about one’s self too. Self esteem takes those things and is how you feel about yourself. A positive self esteem is a great attribute. The in depth analysis of personalities is something that I have never really dived into. It is interesting to see how we can study something so diverse and exact as personality. However, there is still much to learn, and we will continue to study it.
It was extremely interesting how we favored letters in our initials more than other letters in our name. And the letters in our name were favored over letters that were not in our name. It is something that is completely irrelevant and this study done asked people to rate letters based on their attractiveness. The data came back just as I stated. The most attractive letters seemed to be our initials, followed by other letters in our name, and lastly letters not in our name. This again is something that is solely based on our personality.
I found it surprising how eastern cultures like to be similar. This is different from westerners who like to highlight individualism. It makes perfect sense though. The eastern people like to funnel people through the same system and perfect them. In America, we like to be more different. If someone has the same clothes as you, you may get upset. We seem to have a more diverse population.
terms: personality, biology, categorize, testing, self-schema, self esteem, individualism,
Personality is the differences between people’s emotions, cognitive thoughts and behavior. Personality makes up a lot of different components. There are more things involved in personality then I ever thought. It is very important to test and categorize personality because everyone in the world is different. We need to be able to understand people and why they do things. We need to be able to understand that very high self-esteem is seen in criminals. It is important to understand the differences in everybody and their self-schemas so that we can do a better job of teaching as well. College students are often related to gender, age, student status, interpersonal style, personal characteristics and body image. These categories are the most important to college students and what they do.
My understanding of personality has changed a lot after reading this chapter. I now know the real meaning of superego. This is like your angel on your shoulder. It is your morals and beliefs that effect the decisions you make. The superego is a part of the three structures of personality. The first part is the id. This is like the devil on your shoulder that wants you to do something exciting to satisfy a desire and avoid pain. Your superego is the second part of this structure. The last part of the structure is your ego. This is the part that resolves the conflict between your id and your superego. I also learned about the three temperaments and how they are genetic. Activity level is the first one, and it is the amount of activity a child has. A child might run around a lot, or they might be much less aggressive. The second one is emotionality, and this is how intense of a reaction a kid has to things. The third one is sociability, and this the amount that a child associates with other people. It says that your temperament has long-term effects. Your personality of your adult hood can be accurately predicted by your temperament as a child.
The most interesting thing from the reading is locus of control. People with an internal locus of control think well about themselves. They believe that the things that get are solely based on the things they worked for. External locus of control is when people think that things higher than them are the reason that something happened to them. They might think that something happened to them because of luck or something like that.
The most memorable thing from the chapter is that personality affects our genes. There are certain genes that directly correlate to your personality. Even though you have genes that effect you personality you still have to live in an environment that bring out those genes. If you are adventurous you have to live in an environment that helps you be more adventurous.
Key terms: emotions, cognitive, thoughts, behavior, personality, self-esteem, self-schema, superego, ego, id, temperaments, aggressive, locus of control, and genes.
There are many different aspects of personality. Such as emotion, thoughts, behaviors, and what we do as humans each day to make us unique. How we use emotion each day makes up our personality because if we are happy everyday then we are typically always in a good mood, and try to make others happy as well. On the contrary, if we are sad or angry all day, every day, then our personality would be negative and leave a negative thought on those who are around us each day. Besides what others think of us, everyone has a sense of self-schema. This is the concept of the memories, beliefs, and generalizations that we think of ourselves. Some examples of this would be height, sex, athletic, genetic makeup, etc. This is what we know ourselves to be, not what others can make up about us because it is obviously true. Another concept of this is the working self-concept. This is what we think of our self at a certain point in time. The final concept is the one of self-esteem. This is what we think of our self in order to make us feel better. An example of this would be if you are smart or dumb. If you keep failing tests, you would lean more to the dumb side of things, but if you look back and you don’t study, you aren’t necessarily stupid, you just need to study, build up the self-esteem so you are more confident going into the next test, and then get a good grade.
Something that I found memorable and interesting is figure 12.12. I find this interesting because it shows the ideas of conscious, preconscious, and unconscious as water, and the ego, superego, and ID as an iceberg. I find this interesting because our ego is out the water and it is what people see us as. If we have a big ego and act like we know everything people will judge us, or make assumptions about us. But if we keep it on the superego side of things then it is underwater, which people can’t see, and won’t be so fast on being judgmental. The final part of the iceberg is our identification. This is what we see our self as, but have to display it in a way that everyone else can see it. It is the unconscious part of us because not everyone can see who we are from the outside, it takes some getting to know in order to know the real person.
Terms: Personality, emotion, self-esteem, ego, conscious, preconscious, unconscious, superego, identification
Personality is a rather complex concept because every person in the world displays their own unique style of personality. Personality by definition consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. There are two ways in which we view personality. One is by looking at ourselves and our sense of self. This means that we can define our own personality and learn about ourselves to understand who we really are. Everyone needs to know who they are and what type of person they are. We use self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem to help in learning our personality. Self-esteem is a controversial subject in terms of personality because many people in the world struggle with their self-image and how they see themselves. This goes in to part with outside influence on self-concept and how people compare other people’s opinions and critique themselves. Many teens commit suicide due to low self-esteem because they worry too much about how others see them instead of looking at themselves and actually seeing the potential within them and how they can succeed in life and persevere past the negativity. Self-schema is the key factor to these scenarios because it has to do with what you think of yourself. This makes me think about when I hang out with people that I used to talk to in high school and they talk about how they hate school and think school is pointless. I start to debate whether school is for me as well and feel like the outcast in the “cool kids” group. The first month of school was difficult for me because I didn’t believe college was for me but then I realized that being the outcast or being different was better than being like the other people.
The most interesting part of the chapter was Sigmund Freud and his theory on Psychodynamics. Something that really interested me was his use of an iceberg to explain his theory. Is it broken down in to different sections of our personality and thinking. The ice that sticks out of the water is considered the conscious, what is seen and understood. The next is the preconscious is the closest before going above the water’s surface. It has consists of the information and content that is not, at this time, in our awareness but it could be brought to our awareness. The finally section of the structure is the bottom of the iceberg, showing the unconscious portion of our thinking. This is the information that cannot simply be retrieved and located in our minds. It also shows the three other parts of the iceberg: Ego, superego, and ID.
The most surprising section of the chapter was when it discussed personality and how cleanliness creates different relationships between roommates. The reason this was surprising was that I have a roommate that I hate because of his uncleanliness and disgusting habits. I was raised to be a rather clean person who always keeps things neat. His parents must not have cared because he is the complete opposite of me. The surprising part of this section was that at first I didn’t believe that his uncleanliness was going to be a large affect because I thought that I could either shrug it off or that I could compromise with him in order to keep the room clean. The chapter made me realize that there is no way of compromising because his personality makes it so that he cannot follow my instructions in order to maintain a clean environment.
Terminology: Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, psychodynamic theory, conscious, preconscious, unconscious, ego, superego, ID
Personality is a rather complex concept because every person in the world displays their own unique style of personality. Personality by definition consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. There are two ways in which we view personality. One is by looking at ourselves and our sense of self. This means that we can define our own personality and learn about ourselves to understand who we really are. Everyone needs to know who they are and what type of person they are. We use self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem to help in learning our personality. Self-esteem is a controversial subject in terms of personality because many people in the world struggle with their self-image and how they see themselves. This goes in to part with outside influence on self-concept and how people compare other people’s opinions and critique themselves. Many teens commit suicide due to low self-esteem because they worry too much about how others see them instead of looking at themselves and actually seeing the potential within them and how they can succeed in life and persevere past the negativity. Self-schema is the key factor to these scenarios because it has to do with what you think of yourself. This makes me think about when I hang out with people that I used to talk to in high school and they talk about how they hate school and think school is pointless. I start to debate whether school is for me as well and feel like the outcast in the “cool kids” group. The first month of school was difficult for me because I didn’t believe college was for me but then I realized that being the outcast or being different was better than being like the other people.
The most interesting part of the chapter was Sigmund Freud and his theory on Psychodynamics. Something that really interested me was his use of an iceberg to explain his theory. Is it broken down in to different sections of our personality and thinking. The ice that sticks out of the water is considered the conscious, what is seen and understood. The next is the preconscious is the closest before going above the water’s surface. It has consists of the information and content that is not, at this time, in our awareness but it could be brought to our awareness. The finally section of the structure is the bottom of the iceberg, showing the unconscious portion of our thinking. This is the information that cannot simply be retrieved and located in our minds. It also shows the three other parts of the iceberg: Ego, superego, and ID.
The most surprising section of the chapter was when it discussed personality and how cleanliness creates different relationships between roommates. The reason this was surprising was that I have a roommate that I hate because of his uncleanliness and disgusting habits. I was raised to be a rather clean person who always keeps things neat. His parents must not have cared because he is the complete opposite of me. The surprising part of this section was that at first I didn’t believe that his uncleanliness was going to be a large affect because I thought that I could either shrug it off or that I could compromise with him in order to keep the room clean. The chapter made me realize that there is no way of compromising because his personality makes it so that he cannot follow my instructions in order to maintain a clean environment.
Terminology: Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, psychodynamic theory, conscious, preconscious, unconscious, ego, superego, ID
Personality is defined as the characteristics thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Personality is the way we describe ourselves, or someone else that we know. I have been told my personality is outgoing, funny, personable, and independent. I think personality depends on who the person is, because no two people are going to have the same opinions or views on everything. It is very important to test and categorize people’s personalities because we can learn a lot from them. I think it’s a good idea that there are a lot of different tests to determine someone’s personality because they can validate what type of person someone is fall under the same category on two different tests. To first be able understand someone else's personality we have to first understand our own, and there are a lot of different elements that determine our personality. Self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. Our self-schema helps us use and filter information that we are likely to notice thing at are relevant to us, like our names. Working self-concept is how a person thinks of himself in a certain moment. This is different from self-esteem because it only pertains to the amount of personal information that is being processed in that moment of time and self-esteem is how we feel about our personal characteristics. Understanding and categorizing personalities is really important in schools. If you have a couple shy kids who are afraid of trying to make friends teachers can put them in groups and although opposites attract, they may realize they have a lot in common. If the teacher were to put a shy child with a person who was really outgoing the shy child may make upward comparisons, because the outgoing child is comfortable with being able to talk and be itself. From this reading I now understand that our personality is based on more than just how we act. I never knew that self-esteem was involved and there is even some biological affects on personality too.
The most interesting thing I read was the section on how personality can be affected by genes and the environment. My sister are technically half-sisters because we don’t have the same dad, and we are also ten years apart. My mom tells me all the time that when I was growing up she saw so many similarities between the two of us personality wise. We both must have the same basic tendencies. This section just really stood out to me because it was something I could really relate too and find out why people may be saying we act so much alike, even with the age difference. For the interview blog post we did I interviewed both my mom and my sister because my sister would watch my brother and I a lot while my parents were at work. I remember asking her what my temperament was when I was a kid and she said that I always wanted the attention on me and not my brother. When I asked my mom that question she said pretty much the same thing that I would always put on shows, but also too that I reminded her of how my sister was because she wanted to be the center of attention too. Maybe why we are so alike now, is because we had a similar temperament when we were growing up.
The most surprising thing in this chapter was about the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). The reason it is so surprising to me is because I asked my roommate to look at the TAT example given in the book and to tell me what the picture portrays. When I looked at the picture I immediately thought of a girlfriend and boyfriend fighting and the girl is trying to get the man back or get her point across. When my roommate answered she said that it was a nurse talking to a patient with a mental illness and that she is trying to console him. Our answers are completely different, but they reflect exactly what is going on with our lives. I am currently in a fight with my boyfriend and it makes sense why I see the girl trying to get her point across because that’s me. My roommate on the other hand has a little sister who has down syndrome and is having a major surgery next week that she can’t get off her mind. In my psychology class in highschool we were taught that these pictures and what we take from them can be related back to something happening in our lives. Both mine and my roommates answer’s prove this theory.
Terms: Personality, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Upward Comparisons, Basic Tendencies, Temperament, Thematic Apperception Test.
According to the text, personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Personality test measure human character or disposition. Personality is all about understanding ourselves and other people, so psychologists developed assessment that allowed people to understand personality. Personally, I think personality testing and categorizing are important in both psychological study and everyday life used because it defines differences in individuals and the results used in ways that are significant to us and others around us. For example, a leader might want to understand her team members of the group so she can used the most effective ways in leading and communicating with them. Before reading this chapter, I was not understand what is personality really about in psychology. As reading the chapter, there are many eye-opening topic to me and I understand more about personality. For instance, I did not know that there are many methods that can be used to assess personality.
There are several methods including projective measures, objective measure, personality in everyday life, and observational methods. But to me projective and objective studies were the most interesting methods. Projective measures explore the unconscious by having people describe or tell stories about stimulus items that are ambiguous. In other words, it is used to assess a hidden aspect of a person’s personality such as wishes, motives, etc. Objective measures are direct assessments of personality, usually based on information gathered through self report questionnaires or observer ratings. However, I learned that it doesn’t work sometimes because people won’t report the truth, therefore it is much harder for psychologists to get the accurate results.
Out of all topics in this chapter, I was most surprised by section 3 about how biology affects personality. I know that personality traits could come from traits, but I didn’t know it could be affected by the environment. Environment can affect personality in many ways, but mostly it can shape a person toward a personality trait such that a person was raised in a encouraged and supported environment, they will likely to become the type of person that were supported by the environment. Personality is also influenced by psychology.
By psychology, it refers to the processes that produce our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. From chapter 9, each person prefers some level of arousal that is optimal for them. And each person will function best at that level of arousal. Eysenck mentioned that extroverts and introverts are the two types of people. Extroverts are the people who are under-aroused relative to their optimal level of arousal. They will likely have to participate in activities that will increase their arousal. In contrast, introverts are the people who are above their optimal level of arousal. Because they do not want anymore arousal, they seek out quiet solitude with few stimuli.
More than environment and psychological factors, personality can also be influenced by biology and situation. In other words, it can also be described as a child’s personality will changed or stable depend upon the circumstances that child faced during development. Many people can also change their personality during early years of adulthood, after that, it becomes stable. People who seek out for a better life spends grants on books, lessons, therapy sessions, but not everyone will able to change personality because the definition of trait.
Terms: personality, personality test, characteristic, emotional response, disposition, projective measure, unconscious, stimulus, motives, arousal, extrovert, introvert, development.
“Who am I?” That question concerning me was very easy until I read way I say those things. Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses and behaviors that are stable in us over time and across circumstances. Theories such as Humanistic, Cognitive and Trait are categories of the study of personality. Without testing and categorizing we would be able to go further in depth about personality. We can pay a lot more attention to how and why traits developed based on the ability to see personality traits and common characteristics. Testing is the same in that while testing it gives us the ability to evaluate ones personality/personalities. If there was a situation in which one aspect of personality had a problem the study could help. The whole topic on sense of self was very interesting in that it gave me terminology to what I kind of knew. “Your sense of self involves your mental representations of your personal experiences”. This was given with an example that when college student ask themselves “Who am I” they typically name their gender age, student status, and body image this all determines or contributes to your sense of self. Working self-concept also caught my attention. Working self-concept reflects how a person thinks of him/herself at a certain moment. An example for this is let’s say a woman is working with a group of all women this make the person answer the question “Who am I”? “I’m a female”. If that same person is in a room with all African Americans they would answer the question by saying “I’m Caucasian. These are both examples of working self-concept. Most surprising to me was that “Self-esteem may be less important than is commonly believed. For example a person that is attractive, has high self-esteem, and consider themselves smarter do not necessarily have better IQ’s than anyone else.
Terms: Personality, Thoughts, Emotional Responses, Behavior, Humanistic, Cognitive, Trait, Sense of Self, Working Self-Concept, Self-esteem
The definition of personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In layman’s terms its what makes us, us. There are many things that factor into our personality, such as gender, environment, genes, education, etc. College student’s sense of self typically includes gender, age, student status, interpersonal style, personal characteristics, and body image. Testing and categorizing of personalities is important in the study of personality because that why psychologists can understand why people are the way they are. One of the most common tests is the Rorschach inkblot test; the person looks at an inkblot and describes what they see. This is supposed to reveal unconscious conflicts and other problems. Other test is the Thematic Apperception Test. In this the person is shown an image and asked to tell a story about it. My understanding of personality has changed a lot. I thought personality was just how we acted, but there is so much more to it. I didn’t know there was the five-factor theory of personality. There are five personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Each person rages from high to low on each personality trait. Openness determines whether you are imaginative vs. down-to-earth and independent vs. conforming. Conscientiousness determines if you are organized vs. disorganized and careful vs. carless. And extraversion determines if you’re social vs. retiring, affectionate vs. reserved. Agreeableness is softhearted vs. ruthless, helpful vs. uncooperative. And neuroticism is worried vs. calm and insecure vs. secure.
The most memorable thing to me was about Id, Ego, and Superego. Id in psychodynamic theory is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle. This is the little devil on your shoulder telling you to do bad things. Ego is the component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. Superego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. This is the angel on you shoulder.
The most surprising topic to me was about the college students living together relationship. Researchers found that personality similarity between roommates was positively correlated with both relationship satisfaction and intent to live together the following year. Which is crazy because one of my roommates we can’t really stand living with doesn’t do her dishes or help clean the apartment like the rest of us do. And the three of us that do get along are planning on living together next as well.
Terms: personality, Rorschach inkblot, Thematic Apperception Test, five-factor theory of personality, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, id, ego, superego
Personality is basically the relatively stable way in which a person thinks and how a person reacts in various situations. While personality can change over time, it is mostly stable. Few people with go from being completely introverted at the age of 37 to being an extrovert at the age of 38. However, small changes are possible. Not only can personality change over time, it can change in the situation. However, personality is mostly stable. This is due to basic tendencies. These personality traits are mostly due to one’s biological makeup and are partly responsible for just how stable a person’s personality is throughout their life.
It is important to categorize and test personality because it is so complex. In order to understand why people act and behave the way that they do, there needs to be some sort of system of analysis to apply to people’s behaviors. Take for example, the psychodynamic theory. This theory states that personality is based on things residing in our unconscious mind. While this theory is widely unaccepted in current day psychology, it set up a system of ideas that psychologists could use to analyze personality. These ideas are that of the id, superego, and ego. These three components of personality, while it is difficult to prove that they are there, are still used today in the study of personality simply because they laid down the groundwork of personality.
My understanding of personality has been altered because I did not realize how many aspects of a person’s life affect his or her personality. For example, I did not realize that an infant’s temperament can be an accurate predictor of how that person will behave late in life. I also did not realize just how stable a person’s personality is. It is strange to think that a person will think the same way for their entire life. Of course there is change, I certainly do not think the same way that I though in sixth grade. However, my character is the same for the most part. That is pretty strange to think about.
Another thing that I found interesting was how self-esteem can affect personality. I have heard things about criminals being highly narcissistic, but it seems strange that people can be so self-confident that they are led to crime. I believe that I have pretty high self-esteem. I now am looking at all aspects of my life and seeing how it has affected me. I do not think that it is to the point where I am narcissistic or aggressive towards people who do not like me, so I would like to think that it is a healthy amount of self-confidence.
Terms: personality, basic tendencies, temperament, introverted, extrovert, psychodynamic theory, id, superego, ego, self-esteem, narcissistic
The definition of personality is: the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Now what does that mean? Long story short your personality is how you think and react consistently when you are in a situation. Our personality is affected by our self-esteem. Self-esteem affects our personality because if we do not see ourselves as fitting in with a group then we may be upset and if this is a constant factor then we will see more negative characteristics in our personalities. Same in the vice versa. I think that it is important to categorize and test personalities so that we can see the relationships between them. The nice thing about categorizing is that there doesn’t necessarily have to be tests done to throw general personalities in a group together. We are a curious species and the easiest way to see the relationships between them is to do tests and to also categorize. This way we will have the data and be able back up our statements with facts. We also can categorize to show relationships of untested traits to be able to set predictions and set up future tests. The main thing that I would say that has changed my understanding of personality after reading this chapter would be what a personality is all influenced by. I guess I had no clue that physiology, biology, and the environment all had an impact on the personality. The topics that interested me most was the stuff about Sigmund Freud and his psychodynamic theory. I found it intriguing that unconscious factors such as the id and superego; can have such a big impact on the decisions we make. I know we reason and this is really the extreme basics of how we reason and it is basically done unconsciously. The most memorable thing from the Chapter 12 reading was once again about Freud; this time about the Oedipus complex. I think that this is quite a stretch for a theory but it also makes sense in a way. When you look at who people marry they often represent their parent of opposite sex. Most often it is not in how they look but in how they act. The personality of the significant other is close to that of the parent.
The psychological terms that I used were; personality, self-esteem, psychodynamic theory, id, superego, Oedipus complex.
Personality is defined in the book as “the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances.” Personality to me is how we act, think, and behave. Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality and I think it should be because it is important to learn how and why we have the personalities that we have. Some traits can be genetic. I find it interesting how much we value ourselves and think of ourselves in positive ways. Projective measures are one way that we test personalities by presenting a picture or situation and having a person describe it. The words they use and the ways the person describes the picture or situation is incorporated to finding out what kind of personality that person has. The way we think about ourselves is our self-schema. I find it hard to describe my personality because I think some of us as humans don’t want people to think we are all about ourselves. I can definitely describe many personality traits that my close friends have but it’s harder to describe my own. My understanding of personality has changed since reading this chapter because I don’t think we incorporate all the different ways we think about ourselves, like the picture of the black man in the groups. His working self-concept of himself when he was with all women was that he was a man. This changed when he was with all white people because then he thought of himself as black. I find it very interesting that we categorize ourselves by our traits when grouped up with different people. The most interesting topic to me in this chapter was the self-serving bias. The self-serving bias explains how people with self-esteem can “take credit for success but blame failure on outside forces”. I find this interesting because it is so true. When we think highly about ourselves or something we have done and something isn’t right, we start to make up stupid scenarios that what went wrong wasn’t our own fault. The most memorable thing I learned in this reading was how much culture influences our personality. There is an example in the book of how some people in other cultures dress alike and that is how they like it and live while in our own culture we like to be independent and different from others.
Terms: personality, projective measures, self-schema, working self-concept, self-serving bias, culture
According to the definition in the book, personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Personality is kind of like our sense of ourselves. Our sense influences us in several ways. The sense of self typically for a college kid is based on gender, age, student status, body image, etc. It affects how we think, how we feel, and how we behave. An example is if we think we are optimistic, then we can easily bounce back from a poor grade. Self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. It helps us perceive, organize, interpret, and use information about our self. Working self-concept reflects how a person thinks of herself at a certain moment. Your self-descriptions depend on which memories you retrieve, which situation you are in, which people you are with, and your role in that situation. An example of this is how you act at a person. If you think you tend to be more shy, than you won’t be one of those crazy drunks at the party. Self-esteem is the affective aspect of the self. We evaluate how we feel about our personal characteristics. There are theories that think that self-esteem is based on how we believe others perceive us. This is also known as reflected appraisal.
There are three structures to personality. Id is the first one. Id is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle. The pleasure principle pushes us to seek pleasure and avoid pain. The second structure is superego. Superego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. The third structure is ego. Ego is the component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the Id while being responsive to the superego.
My understanding of personality has changed slightly since reading this chapter. I say this because I didn’t realize of all the different subjects or sections that make up personality.
It was interesting/memorable to read that they are four approaches to personality. They are Psychodynamic theory, humanistic approach, cognitive approach, and trait approach. The psychodynamic theory is based on our unconscious wishes that create conflict between the Id, ego, and superego. The humanistic approach is based on our tendency to fulfill our potential through personal growth. The cognitive approach is based on how we think. The Trait approach can be described by our characteristics.
Psychological terms: Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, reflected appraisal, Id, ego, superego, Psychodynamic theory, humanistic approach, cognitive approach, trait approach
Personality is defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In my own words, I would say personality is the thing that sets us apart from one another. It is made up of characteristics, behaviors, qualities, and other things that help differentiate us from others. I definitely think that testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because it helps us understand each individual trait on a deeper level. It generally gives us a reason for why we act the way we do. For example, Freud’s psychodynamic theory claims that unconscious forces are what determines our behaviors. Also with this theory, Freud introduces the id, ego, and superego which are the three interacting structures that make up our personality. The id is our unconscious efforts to either maximize pain or avoid pleasure, also called the pleasure principle. The superego is like our conscience. It is also unconscious and develops during our childhood. It is basically our internal set of standards based on how we were raised, and the society we grew up in. Then we have the ego, which balances the id and the superego and uses problem solving and rational thinking to determine the behavior. Freud also identifies the psychosexual stages and talks about how children unconsciously aim to satisfy the libidinal urges because they bring us pleasure. He claims that these stages have a huge impact on our personality because if we become fixated, or stuck, on a certain stage, it will very likely cause us to have a certain trait or behaviors as adults, usually negative. Freud is a huge name in the study of psychology, so although some of his theories may have been altered a bit nowadays, his studies from testing observing were pretty much the basis of personality. I also think that testing and categorizing should continue to be an important aspect of personality studies because it helps us in so many ways. It can help new parents raising a child decide how strict or not to be about certain things, like potty training. Also it is important to understand what causes our behaviors, and personality theories help to do this.
My understanding of personality has not changed necessarily but it has become much clearer than before. A lot of the stuff I read about I had previously heard of but now I understand it on a deeper level. For instance, Freud’s id, ego, and superego. I have studied those before and just now they are starting to actually make sense.
The topic most interesting to me is all of Freud’s theories in this chapter because I studied these in high school and never actually understood it, but now I am starting to which makes it more interesting. Freud’s theory of the Oedipus complex is definitely intriguing. The outcome of this theory, young boys identifying more strongly with their father, makes me think about the traditional views of a man being tough and strong and a woman cooking and taking care of everyone. I feel like Freud’s theory leads to this traditional view of a man being mentally tough and not sharing any womanly traits.
The most surprising thing that I read throughout the chapter was the part about a study done on two adopted, not biologically related, siblings. They found that even though the two siblings grew up in the same household, they were not any more alike than two random people you picked from a crowd. I still have doubts in this claim. I always have thought that a person’s upbringing was so important to their overall personality.
Terms: personality, Freud, psychodynamic theory, id, ego, superego, pleasure principle, psychosexual stages, libidinal urges, fixated, theory of the Oedipus complex.
When we think of a person’s personality we may think of the characteristics that make them who they are. The book describes personality as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time a across circumstances. I found one of the main headings in section one interesting. The heading is “Our sense of self is who we believe we are.” I believe this is partly true. If a person believes they are caring and are a helper in the community, chances are this trait will be shown in the person. If a person is always told they are a failure and they start to believe it, then this trait will be shown. I believe that our personality is also partly based off of our past experiences. My birth mother walked out on my dad, brother and I when I was eight and I had to learn to do things on my own. Since I was the only girl in the house I did most of cleaning and made sure that things got done. I learned that in order for me to learn how to cook, start laundry, put up my hair, or save money I had to figure it out on my own. My dad would help with some stuff but he was not very good at putting up my hair. I needed my birth mother when I was younger but since she was not there for me, I learned not to depend on other people to succeed in life. After reading the chapter I realized that my working self-concept changes a lot. When I first entered high school I was shy because of how many new people were in my classes. This made me not talk a lot in class or to the people around me because I was afraid of what they would say to me. I guess I was afraid of being made fun of. When I graduated high school I knew my working self concept changed. I knew that the under-classmen looked up to me and I began to help others out. Personality can be affected by our self-esteem. If we do really well on a test we may high self-esteem and be more approachable to others. However, if we don’t do so well on a test our self- esteem may be low. We might be mad at ourselves and other people might not want to talk to us.
It is important to test and study personality because everyone is different. One person may have certain traits that make up their personality, but another person may not. Each person has a different personality that makes them unique. If everyone had the same personality we would feel like we are talking to ourselves and get bored. DIfferent personalities make for new connections with people. We may be able to tell what type of personality a person has by just having a conversation with them. I think that it is important to test different personalities because of how people connect with each other. When people look for a mate they tend to look for someone who has the characteristics and interest as them. I’ve heard that opposites attract, but I feel that if you have more things that differ, the relationship might not last. I have been in relationships where this has happened and my relationship did not last that long. I feel that you can really connect with other person when you have a lot in common with them.
One topic that was very interesting to me was on temperament. The book describes temperament as a biologically based tendency to act or feel a certain way. Everytime I hear this word I think of kids misbehaving and throwing a tantrum. I was surprised that it can also be a person being extremely happy and smiling a lot.
I was very surprised that the opener talk about a guy trying to find a girl he liked. When he using the internet for a dating site I was really surprised because most people I know would frown upon it. Since technology is improving, I know that more and more people will turn to the internet for dating in hopes of finding a perfect match.
Terms used: personality, working self-concept, self-esteem
According to this textbook, personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In my understanding of the word after reading this chapter, it is how a person acts and thinks the majority of the time. It is important to test and categorize our personalities and other’s personalities because of many different reasons. It lets us know who ourselves are. We use self-schemas to categorize our self, which can really show our interest in things. We also see how we can better benefit our self and others by doing things we enjoy or by not doing things we don’t enjoy. Categorizing and testing our personality is also important because it can show our goals and how we can reach them. It can also help us because it can tell the influence of how people think, which is a study of personality called cognitive approaches. I believe studying personality is beneficial in some aspects. It can really help a student like myself find what kind of a person I am so I know possible job careers I may want to take. If I am calm I would be able to work with people especially children. If I were not a calm person, I would probably be more benefiting if I worked by myself. However, sometimes our personality doesn’t always match up with our interest. People then think differently of themselves, which they shouldn’t because everyone is different.
I always enjoyed taking personality tests to see what ‘color’ I am or what kind of ‘animal’ I am. I know my interest for the most part, but it is fun to see what kind of person I am. When I was younger I always looked at someone and compared myself to them. I made an downward comparison and looked at them lowly so I would feel better about myself. I didn’t know more people did this. Reading it in the book it is such a harsh and mean thing to do to another person and yourself. My personality has changed because I feel more confident about who I am and how I can be better person where I don’t have to upward compare or downward compare myself to anyone.
The most interesting subject I read was about the ego, super ego, and ID. It helped to see a picture of the iceberg picture to think about it. The whole study was based on Freud and he said that unconscious forces determine behaviors, which is called psychodynamic theory. As I already we, we have a conscious, preconscious, and unconscious state of minds. In the conscious state of mind we have our ego. Ego is the component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. In the preconscious is the superego. The super ego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards to conduct. It helps us make good, moral choices in life and not get too crazy. Then in the unconscious mind is the ID. The ID is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle. This is for our desires and what we actually really want to do whether it is morally acceptable or not. I now psychologically understand the devil and angel on people’s shoulders now.
The most memorable I learned while reading this chapter was that temperament has three stages. They are activity level, emotionality, and sociability. Activity level is the overall amount of energy and behavior we exhibit. This is when we have a lot of energy so we sing and dance in the car. Emotionality describes the intensity of emotional reactions. Such as if our parents yell at us for doing something we weren’t suppose to and we cry. Sociability is refers to the general tendency to affiliate with others. I have a higher sociability and I like to be with other people.
Key Terms: Personality, self-schema, cognitive approaches, upward comparison, downward comparison, psychodynamic theory, ego, ID, and superego, and temperament.
Personality is the differences between people’s emotions, behavior, and cognitive thoughts. There are a ton of components that personality makes up. I had no idea how many things were involved in personality, but this chapter truly gave me an idea. How we use emotion each day makes up our personality because if we are happy everyday, we’re typically always in a good mood. This can make others happy as well. However, if we are sad or angry a lot of the time, this results in having a negative, Debbie Downer type personality can leave a negative thought on those who are around us for a long period of time. It’s very important to test and categorize personality because absolutely everyone in the world is different from eachother. We need to be able to understand other human beings, as well as why they do things. Besides of what others think of us, everyone has their own self-schema. This is the concept of memories, generalizations, and beliefs that we think of ourselves individually. Some examples could be genetic makeup and athleticism. This is what we know ourselves to be, and it is the obvious truth. This goes into part with outside influence on self-concept and how people compare other people’s opinions and critique themselves. You then have self-esteem, which is a controversial subject in terms of personality because many people in the world struggle with their self-image and how they see themselves. Many suicides occur due to a lack of this concept, especially in teens, because they worry too much about how others see them instead of looking at themselves and seeing the true potential they have within them, as well as how they can succeed in life and persevere through the tough, judgemental times. This is what many students coming into college go through too. They just want to fit in, but their self-esteem can be very affected by people all around them, especially the fact that he/she is in a new environment where they don’t know what type of people they will meet. Once you give it time however, you then realize that being the outcast or being different can possibly be better than being like the people.
The most interesting part of the chapter that I found was Sigmund Freud and the Psychodynamic Theory. What really interested me was his use of an iceberg to explain his theory. The ice that sticks out of the water is considered conscious, or in other words, what is seen and understood. The next is the preconscious, which is the closest before going above the water’s surface. It consists of the information and content that is not in our awareness, but it could be soon brought to our awareness. Finally, the section of the structure is the bottom of the structure, which is unseen from the view above water. It describes the unconscious portion of our thinking. This is the information that can’t be retrieved and located in our minds. It also involves three other parts of the iceberg, which are superego, ego, and ID.
The most memorable thing to me was that personality is affected by genes and the environment. Research has shown that certain genes can be linked with personality traits, but even if someone does not have a certain link, this doesn’t mean they can’t perform certain acts of personality. An example could be a person who likes to go out and try to be a trouble maker. This is most likely a person who was raised in a household that allowed this behavior and had certain morals that was common with the person
Terms Used: personality, self-schema, self-esteem, self-concept, Psychodynamic Theory, conscious, preconscious, superego, ego, ID
In this chapter it was all about self and personality. The subject of personality has always interested me because I wonder what makes a person they way they are, like why are some nice, why are some egotistical, and why are some shy while others are loud and outgoing? After reading this chapter, I have a slightly better understanding as to what makes us tick and what makes us the way we are. Personality is really the characteristic of thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. It’s the way we act not only externally but internally as well. When it comes to the subject of personality, testing and categorizing are so important because it’s so broad it there are so many subcategories and information when it comes down to it. For humans it’s easier when stuff is neatly organized, we don’t deal with chaos well. We’re always to trying to make sense of what makes us, us and we always want to know more. So by making all these categorizes and with all the testing we hope to make sense of who we are. I think by making categories it’s easier to break down everything, but I don’t think that they should be as important as they are. Personally, I love to know and learn as much as possible, but I don’t need to make sense of everything around me and by having tests and categorizing everything we’re just organizing chaos and I just say let chaos be chaos and not change it.
After reading this chapter there was many things that I found to be quite interesting. One section was the section over the different theories. One theory was the psychodynamic theory which was the Freudian theory that unconscious forces determine behavior. There are three factors to this theory which is the conscious, preconscious, and the unconscious. When it comes to the conscious level it the mental activity that we are aware of, which is also our ego. With the preconscious level its material that we aren’t currently aware of but can be brought to our awareness which is our superego. And finally the unconscious which contains material that our mind cannot easily retrieve such as memories, wishes, desires, and motives which also includes id. Another theory is the expectancy theory which is that our behaviors are a part of our personality. This theory lead to propose that people’s personalities are based on their locus of control which means that whether people control the rewards and the punishments that they experience. The third theory was the reciprocal determinism. In this theory, there are three factors that influence how a person acts. The first is the person’s environment. The second is a multitude of person factors such as the person’s characteristics, self-confidence, and expectation. And the third and final factor is the behavior itself. When all three of these factors interact with each other, the result is your personality. And the final theory was the big five, or the five-factor theory. With this theory the five factors are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism and with each factor on may be anywhere on a continuum from low to high. This one seems to have the most evidence because it shows across, adults and children, cultures, and in different parts of the world.
Terms: personality, psychodynamic theory, unconscious, preconscious, conscious, ego, superego, id, expectancy theory, locus of control, reciprocal determinism, five-factor theory
"Sense of Self" is defined as a general conscious awareness your of your own identity. My sense of self, (as I have come to understand the term) is essentially what defines me and makes me unique. This could be a certain look, attitude, or personality trait. It could also be the way I view a certain person, thing or subject. Perhaps, my sense of self could even be my purpose in life? If that's the case, I would argue that my sense of self is something that has changed over time and will continue to evolve as I get older and my life is influenced by people, places and events. Personally, emotional experiences have had the largest impact on developing my sense of self. Good or bad, I have learned that when you are pushed to your limits, you get a better understanding of who you are. Specifically, I have learned from family and friends just how feelings can be used as a tool to help determine my needs or desires. Personality and aptitude tests (psychometrics) are helpful for managing people and for understanding yourself. You should also consider using personality and aptitude tests if you are recruiting or developing people. Even though the question types and personality categorization differ from test to test, they provide insight into the human psyche. The Briggs Myers test is an example of a personality test. Many psychologists have proposed theories that try to explain the origins of personality. One highly influential set of theories stems from the work of Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud, who first proposed the theory of psychoanalysis. Collectively, these theories are known as psychodynamic theories. In psychology, a psychodynamic theory is a view that explains personality in terms of conscious and unconscious forces, such as unconscious desires and beliefs. In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud proposed a psychodynamic theory according to which personality consists of the id (responsible for instincts and pleasure-seeking), the superego (which attempts to obey the rules of parents and society), and the ego (which mediates between them according to the demands of reality). Psychodynamic theories commonly hold that childhood experiences shape personality. Such theories are associated with psychoanalysis, a type of therapy that attempts to reveal unconscious thoughts and desires. Not all psychologists accept psychodynamic theories, and critics claim the theories lack supporting scientific data. Other theories of personality include behavioral and humanist theories. Personality is a set of characteristics or traits that reflect in one’s cognitive, affective and behavioural states. Personality may be based on many factors. It may be based on innate or learned experience, or latent or manifest. But, the focus of this essay will be whether a person’s personality is based on the magnitude of genetic or an environmental influence. Personality can be divided into two categories, innate or acquired characteristics. Heritability is a statistical measure that expresses the proportion of the observed variability in a trait that is a direct result of genetic variability. Environmental influences can be divided into two classes, shared and non-shared environment. Both heredity and environment contribute to personality traits and that the degree of their individual contributions cannot be specified for any traits. Although a person’s environment plays an important part in their personality development, heredity factors play a larger role in deciding disposition of this environment. I now have a better understanding of personalities and that we all have varied and complex set of them. I most surprising part of this chapter was Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory because I believe that it explains the most about development in our lives. Terms: Sense of self, personality trait, Briggs Myers, Psyche, Psychoanalysis, Psychodynamic Theory, id, ego superego, genetics, Heritability, environment.
Cassandra Rutledge
Chapter 12 Blog
11/10/2014
Personalities are the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across. The reason for testing and categorizing personality is for the ability to be able to find out what kind of person you are, and match you with people who are different from yourself. The match up with someone different is to make sure to minimize the amount of fight if you both are competitive or even neat freaks. This is important and is needed to make life easier and less stressful. This chapter was easy for me to understand because have taken a psychology class that we learned about personality, so some of the information is new while other stuff is new.
Surprising to me, but I really like reading about all of the theories that are on psychology. The many theories or approaches that are mentioned in the chapter. The theory that caught my attention is the psycho-dynamic theory which is Freudian theory that unconscious forces determine behavior. This can be related to lucid dreaming in a sense because when you are unconscious you still have the control of your dreams. This allows your behaviors you would not show in reality to come out. In the unconscious stage you have parts of your ID and Superego start to show through your behaviors. ID is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle.
The approaches that are mentioned in this chapter are humanistic approach, cognitive approach, and trait approach. The first one, humanistic approach, is when personality is based on our unconscious wishes that create conflict between the Id, ego, and superego.This is related to whether you are conscious or unconscious. The next one is cognitive approach which is based on how we think. This is related to when in college and knowing if you work hard you will earn good scores. The last one is trait approach, which is when personality can be described by our characteristics. This approach relates to how one is in the world through their personality and actions they take during reality.
Terms: personality, psychology, behaviors, characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, theories, approaches, Psycho-dynamic theory, humanistic approaches, cognitive approaches, trait approaches, unconscious forces, reality, lucid dreaming, ID, superego, pleasure principle, conscious,
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. That is the books definition of personality. It is important to do studies on personality so that we understand the things that make us the people other people see us as. Personality is important to study because it shows what kinds of people we are towards certain groups of people or items of interest and disinterest.
People have all kinds of personalities, and they are all like finger prints in the sense that no two are the same. Since reading the chapter I have learned that personality is made up of multiple things. Such as the approaches to personality. I never knew that there were different approaches to personality. Our personality will change throughout our daily lives. Temperament is to feel or act in different ways. There are three types of temperament; activity level, emotionality, and sociability. All of these things will make us react in different ways or make us feel something different. Usually we have a basic tendency to feel a certain way for an extended period of time. Such things that can determine basic tendencies like characteristic adaptions. This is when we experience behavioral changes based on certain situations. An example would be like a birthday party and a funeral. We will feel happier at a birthday party situation rather than a funeral. These are characteristic adaptions that can change our moods.
One thing that I find very interesting is all the different ways that personalities can be changed and what causes them to change. After reading this chapter it has made me understand the different personalities of certain people and really trying to dig deep to understand why it is like that. I find it interesting how two people that are almost identical in interests could still have different personalities because of what they know and what they’ve learned. I have always notice peoples personalities change when in different situations but never really understood why, except for the fact of the situation.
Key terms: characteristic adaptions, basic tendencies, temperament, activity level, emotionally, sociability, personality
Your personality would be your own characteristic emotional, responses, thoughts, and behaviors that are usually constant over different circumstances or stable. Testing and categorizing for personality is because there are so many types of personality. Everyone’s personalities are different, but there are some way the personally may be the same too. Although I do not think we should have tests for personality. Projective measures tests the unconscious stuff from cloudy stimulus. To me we really should try to figure out what’s in the unconscious, only because you could create something that’s not really true. If it’s in the unconscious, then they aren’t bothered from it, so why go looking for it. If they bothered from it, then you can probably find a way by being distracted and eventually forgetting about it. Even without measuring the unconscious with objective measure, I still don’t think it’s a good idea. Asking you to basically rate yourself for personally is unreliable. When someone thinks there a 5 for being shy, to someone else it could be totally different, it’s all how they think of it as. Also we tend to score better then what we really are because we don’t have to objective standards to rate ourselves against. My understanding of personality hasn’t changed that much sense reading this chapter only because I realized that personality who you are and everything that goes with it, which over all it basically what the chapter is saying with all the different sections. The most interesting section for me was about how personality are changed by genes and environment. The most obvious is that personally is changed by genes. You can tell this by your family, or other families, some families are more hot headed and others are so sweet you can’t handle it. What you may not realize it that the environment is involved too. You could be adopted into a family like the sweet family and be super sweet like them too, because of the environment you grew up in was always friendly. What was memorable in this chapter was an image of the man with the devil on one side and the angel on the other. This really helped me understand the three of them, mostly because I’m a visual learner. In the learning tip picture on page 431, the devil on the left is shown as the id. This is saying how id is the wants and desire for pleasure, but stay away from pain. It the devil because this is what you want, which is not always the right thing to do. In the middle is ego. On the right is an angel witch it for superego because it’s what you should do because it is morally right or is socially acceptable. Ego is in the middle because I involves both id and superego and resolves the conflict between the two.
Terms: projective measures, objective measure, id, ego, superego
I think personality can be summed up by ones actions, feeling, and thoughts. There are several ways to define personality and parts to our personalities. For example there is self-schema, working self-concept, and the Freudian psychodynamic, and the biological trait theory. Self-schema is the assumption and memories that we hold about ourselves. We see ourselves as many things and all of them fall under this category. The next concept, working self-concept, is how you think or are aware of yourself at any given moment. This is constantly changing as the environment around us does as well. The textbook example did a really good job of explaining this to me. Freud came up with another theory to explain human personality. It has three main parts which are the id, which is completely unconscious; the superego, which relates to understanding of morals and society pressures; and the ego, which is the conscious part and is the middle man to the other two. The last theory is that of biological traits. The idea here is that all traits fall somewhere between stable or unstable and introverted or extraverted. The more one leans to introverted and stable traits the less psychotic they are likely to be, and the more unstable and extraverted ones traits are the more likely that individual is to be psychotic.
I think it is important to categorize personality’s better because it is fundamental to humans understand or at least thinking they understand who they are. If I had never heard the words like conceded and bigoted then I would never know if I carry those traits or not. Better categorizing also leads to better testing. With improved detail on who is what as far as personality goes it becomes easier to make more in depth test that target certain personality types.
The most surprising thing to me was just how much of my personality was effected by the environment or culture. I never really knew that growing up in an individualistic culture had shaped me so much. This may be going pretty far, but it may be why I don’t like group sports that much. I have nothing against working in a team, but when it comes to athletics I am very competitive and unique so I can’t get behind the whole group thing. When I had a foreign exchange student from Japan stay at my house for a year he only played team sports. Needless to say we didn’t go out for the same ones. It makes sense too, because Japan, according to the text book, is a collectivist culture.
The most interesting topic to me was Freud’s psychosexual development. To sum up how I feel: wow! The book doesn’t mention any so I wonder if there have been any studies to prove his theories. The two most interesting and odd parts to it were the anal stage and the Oedipus complex. The anal stage is what all kids, according to Freud, go through during the ages of two and three. Around this time they start to toddy train out of an unconscious desire to pleasure the anus. I don’t know if I completely can get behind it. The Oedipus complex is observed of boys who, again unconsciously, want to kill their fathers so they can win over their mothers. I can’t say I remember ever wanting to off my dad, but hey who knows!
Terms Oedipus complex, anal stage, collectivist culture, individualistic culture, superego, ego, id, personality, self-schema, working self-concept, Freudian psychodynamic theory, biological trait theory
In the beginning of the chapter I it talked about how many people decide to take psychology classes in order to see what it is that makes people tick. I have been interested in why people do the things that they do, and what could be going through their heads at the time while they’re doing it. An important factor of doing this is determining what the personality of that person is. Personality consist of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. Self-concept is a big part of our personality it can affect you thoughts, behaviors, and feelings. Working self-concept is the immediate experience of the self in the here and now. For example if you think of your as a shy person when put into a group setting you are more likely to act shy because that is what you believe that you are. Self-esteem is how we feel or evaluate are personal characteristic. These evaluations can be either good or bad. Those who are confident in themselves and tend to look at themselves in a good light most of the time can be said to have a high self-esteem.These people will tend to use downward comparisons when comparing themselves to other people. A downward comparison is when you compare yourself to someone who is inferior to you. By doing this we tend to make ourselves feel better and gain more self-esteem. Those who are not confident in themselves can be considered to have low self-esteem. Those who have low self-esteem will use upward comparison which is when you tend to compare yourself to those that are superior to them. There is no real definition of what personality is, but there are a few theories to it. There is Freud’s theory in which it is in three parts. In this the id, is the unconscious push to seek pleasure and avoid pain. The superego is your unconscious it is the brake on your id, and is largely influenced by society. Lastly there is the ego which is the mediation between the two and is ultimately what your personality is personified as. There are more such as the expectancy theory and reciprocal determinism. A big describer of personality is the personality traits. A common approach to this is the five-factor theory which states that the traits can be separated into five categories: Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. Ultimately I do think it is important that we study the personality of people. By doing this we can better understand what shapes personality and the common characteristics of personality as well as being better able to distinguish people who may have personality disorders. The thing that I found to be interesting is that online dating is the second most popular form of meeting someone. The most memorable thing in the chapter is how some personality traits can be biological, that’s memorable to me because you don’t really think of someone’s personality as being genetic and being passed down through their parents.
Psychological Terms: Personality, Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, downward comparison, upward comparison, id, superego, ego, expectancy theory, reciprocal determinism, five-factor theory
Personality is a mixture of many different things. The book definition of personality is the characterizes, thoughts, emotional response and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances, but many factors go into personality. There are four different approaches to personality. The first one is psychodynamic theory, this the personality based on our unconscious wishes that create conflict between the id, ego, and superego. The next one is humanistic approach which is personality based on our tendency to fulfill our potential through personal growth. The third one is the cognitive approach, this is personality based on how we think. The last one is trait approach this is personality that can be described by our characteristics. Also personalities come from our parents and also things we catch on from, from our everyday life. First, some of our personalities come from our parents, it is just how life is, you get handed down a lot of things from your parents, For example my mom is super outgoing and my dad could care less to talk to random people. My brother and I are like my mom very outgoing and my sister is like my dad, she wouldn’t want to go up to a complete stranger and just start talking to them. Personality also comes from things we pick up on for example, if I surround myself with pessimistic people I will most likely be a pessimistic person, but if I surround myself with optimistic people I will be likely become optimistic.
There are several ways to Asses personality. One ways is projective measures and that is a personality test that examines the unconscious process by having people interpret ambiguous stimuli. Another one is Thematic Apperception Test, someone is shown a picture during this test and you have to describe the photo, by doing this brings up different parts of your personality. Objective measures of personality are straightforward assessments that do not assume unconscious influences. For example the NEO personality inventory, that is designed to assess the five-factor theory personality traits. These are important because it measure your personality from your genetics or the environment, even what type of person you are. I do not think your personality can be measured because they cannot know everyone parts of people’s personalities.
My understanding of personality changed because it is more than what you inherit from your parents. I always believed that my personality is half my mom and half my dad, which in my case is mostly true, but there are also environmental factors that go along with personality. I also never knew personality could be measured, I think that helps with criminals or people in mental hospitals but not people who are not a criminal or in a mental hospital.
My favorite topic was the ego or conscious mind, the superego or preconscious mind and the id the unconscious mind. The conscious level consists of the thoughts that we are aware of. The preconscious level consists of contents that is not currently in our awareness but that could be brought to our awareness. The unconscious level contains material that the mind cannot easily retrieve, like hidden memories, wishes, or desires.
The most interesting thing I read was about high self-esteem, that it always isn’t the best thing to have a super high self-esteem. People always want to look the best and do their best but high self-esteem is linked with bullies and criminals because they thing that no one can touch them. That surprised me, because I always thought it was good to have a high self-esteem and be proud of who you are.
Self-esteem, Psychodynamic Theory, Humanistic Approach, Cognitive approach, Trait approach, Conscious, Preconscious, Unconscious, Ego, Superego, Id, Projective measures, Thematic Apperception Test objective measures, NEO personality inventory
Personality is described as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relativity stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. But to me, personality is how an individual acts in their every day life. Are they mostly optimistic or pessimistic? Shy or friendly? These are the questions you should even as yourself to figure out who you really are. Self-schemas are a way to evaluate yourself based on your memories, beliefs, and generalization of you. For example, I am a brunette, a daughter and a sister, a student, an athlete, short, and outgoing. Self-schemas are an important way to look at yourself to find out who you are and if that’s who you want to be. Looking into personalities is important because it affects our own self-esteem, or how we see ourselves whether it is good or bad. One way self-esteem can be measured is by using a sociometer, which is an internal monitor of social acceptance or rejection. Although self-esteem isn’t the most important thing in the world, it is something that relates to our everyday lives and affects how we live and act towards others.
A topic that was interesting to me was Freud’s structures of personality theory. In this, Freud states that there are three structures of how your personality is organized. The first structure, Id, deals with your unconscious thinking and focuses on the pleasure principle, which pushes oneself to seek pleasure and avoid pain. The second structure is the superego, which acts as a break on the Id. The superego is largely submerged in your unconscious mind and acts as your conscience, reminding you of what is right and wrong. The third and final structure is the ego, which acts as the mediator between the id and the superego. The ego tries to balance out the needs of the id, while also thinking of the superego. This is one thing that made sense to me out of all of Freud’s theories.
Something that was memorable to me was topic focusing on the three aspects of temperaments in babies. Temperament is described as the general tendency to feel or act in certain ways. One aspect is the activity level, which is the amount of energy and behaviors the child shows. Some can be bouncing of the walls while others can be quite calm. The second aspect is emotionality, which describes the intensity of emotional reactions. While some children cry easily, others can be angered, or become happy very easily. The last aspect is sociability, which is the tendency to interact with others. Some may like to play on their own, while others need to be occupied with many others to play with. I knew that all babies don’t act the same and temperament can explain why, and how the main personality traits are based on the child’s genes.
The psychological terms I used were: personality, optimistic, pessimistic, self-schemas, self-esteem, sociometer, Freud’s structures of personality, Id, pleasure principle, superego, unconscious mind, conscience, ego, temperament, activity level, emotionality, sociability
Personality is the characteristics thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances as it is defined in the chapter. We use several different ways to test personality. One way is the projective measures. These are personality tests that examine unconscious processes by having people interpret ambiguous stimuli. We also use objective measures. Testing is important in the study of personality to figure out what different circumstances lead to common characteristics in different personalities. I definitely think that the study is important because it helps us know what environments, circumstances and events causes people to be the way that they are: what makes you? My understanding of personality has not, per say, changed, but it has been enhanced and my knowledge has expanded. I’ve learned a lot more about personality than what I had previously known.
A lot of this reading was really interesting to me because I’ve been taught the basic definitions of all of these concepts, such as self-esteem, self-concept and others. I always thought self-esteem was the way we see ourselves, which it is according to the book. Working self-concept is the reflection of how a person thinks of herself at a certain moment. I always saw those two as synonymous. I think self-serving bias is really interesting to me. Self-serving bias is the tendency for people to take personal credit for success but blame failure on external factors. I feel like this happens way more than what people want to accept and admit. I feel like people try really hard to not do this, but it comes so natural that it happens without them meaning for it to. We blame success on hard work, and failure on prejudice. I feel like this is directly related to defense mechanisms. We use these to make our failure situations seem less negative than what they really are.
Self-schema is a new word to me which is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. It helps us to perceive, organize, interpret and use information about our self. For never knowing this word was even a thing, I now realize how much it affects me in the everyday life and how real and true it is. I definitely recognize and am drawn to things that are very relevant to me and my life. It states that self-schema can increase memory for information that is relevant to me, which is very true as well, I seem to remember other girls better when they have the same name as me, or if we have something is common that I would regularly associate myself with. Another thing that was memorable to me was the basic tendencies and the characteristic adaptations. Basic tendencies are the personality traits that are largely determined by biology and are stable over time. Characteristic adaptations are the changes in behavioral expression of basic tendencies based on the demands of specific situations. These were memorable to me because I didn’t realize they existed as well, I just thought that we did things because that’s what we did and were used to.
Terms: self-esteem, self- schema, working self-concept, self-servicing bias, defense mechanisms, projective measures, objective measures, basic tendencies, characteristic adaptations
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. It is important for us to test and categorize them because ever single of us has a different variation of a personality, but we have to categorize them so we can study each one and learn more and more about it. Every individual has a different view on their own self-schema, their working self-concept, and we all have different levels of self esteem. Some people might be way more self confident and are able to get over their mistakes easily, while others might struggle greatly to view themselves as anything but bad and never forgive themselves from mistakes. Two very different personalities, but why? This is why we need to test and categorize personalities.
Before reading this chapter I thought of personality of basically just how an individual acts. There is so much more to personality to that! Our personality has a lot to do with how we feel about ourselves and our past choices. Which explains a lot of the personalities you see; two easy examples cocky people vs humble people. I also thought personality was not something you could change. I viewed it as something that you were “born like” and that’s how it was going to be for the rest of your life. Personality is something we most definitely have control over however. For example we can stop comparing ourselves to others, a lot easier said than done, but it would help one’s personality I think. There are downward comparisons and upward comparisons, while downward comparisons protects one’s self esteem because they are better off than the person they are comparing their self too it is still downgrading someone else and that says a lot about your personality.
The most surprising thing to me in chapter 12 was reading about the id, ego, and superego. The id is the desire for pleasure and the avoidance of pain. The superego is the conscience for what is socially acceptable and moral. The ego resolves the conflict between the id and the superego. I thought this was just a pretend thing in movies!! I would have never guessed we actually had this going on in our brains. Sometimes we do have to choose wether to do something that will be fun, but most likely have consequences, or choose to stay home and watch a movie or something less rebellious. It was interesting to look at Freud’s psychodynamic theory of personality. Often we are unconsciously making our ID choices, and more conscious when we are making our superego choices… which was pretty obvious.
The most interesting thing to me in chapter 12 was the simple personality test where you looked at a picture and told what you were seeing. The picture was just a black blob, but I saw a butterfly in it. The book told the things most people saw when the looked at it; an angry fox, the body parts of a person, or a butterfly. I feel like this is an odd way to test someone’s personality, and probably not the most accurate. It just surprised me that something so simple was used to test such a complex idea like personality.
Words I used: personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self esteem, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, ID, ego, superego, conscious, unconscious
Personality can be defined as how you are; what makes you, you! It consists of ones thoughts, emotions, and behaviors a person adapts over time. There are so many factors that contribute to somebody's personality starting with how one sees themselves otherwise known as a self schema which would be memories and beliefs that we have about ourselves. This relates to a person’s woking self concept and self esteem. All three of these have a say in how a person’s personality develop. Also not only is perception of oneself contribute to somebody’s personality, but comparisons with others play a big role. There are many types of comparisons like downward which would be like comparing yourself to somebody who would be considered beneath them or on the opposite side, there is upward comparisons where you would have a role model or somebody you looked up to who you would consider to be superior to you.
Testing is important because it helps understand how people think and why they do all the things you do. All the theories about personality such as psychodynamic theory might explain peoples actions. If a person was extremely dedicated to do something, they would be driven by their id, ego, and superego to get whatever they want. Freud’s theory helps people understand why people may become defensive. We all have our own way of defending ourselves and we don’t realize how common all these mechanisms are. We all experience things like denial, repression, sublimation, and plenty more.
I think it should be, it gives people a better understanding on why and how we do all the things we do. Like when we all experience displacement, taking our anger out on others or rationalization where we conform and do things simply because other people do them we notice how all people go through these things and this makes us feel more comfortable.
After reading the chapter I understood more about personality and what it takes to create ones personality. It doesn't just depend on how you grew up, your genes, or your temperaments, it is greatly affected by a number of different things; especially how you view yourself so that is why self esteem is so important.
I thought reading how narcissism has increased in American college students was interesting to read about, in our generation you notice how growing up adults put a lot of emphasis on how special we all are. Is makes you wonder if maybe growing up we were praised too much for “being special.” I’ve noticed that grades younger and younger are becoming more narcissistic, as in thinking they are better than others. This topic also related to the “better than average” effect where people tend to rate themselves as above average in most categories. In the textbook it talked about people saying they are better than average drivers… are you kidding me? I wouldn’t dare say that, I’m an awful driver and I’m not afraid to say it and I know plenty of my friends who would hopefully say the same things.
The most memorable thing I read about in chapter 12 was the chapter about “The Big Five.” I thought it was interesting to look at the different traits and see which one’s I related to the most and what categories I would personally put myself in. It was interesting to figure out which type of personality I fit into more.
Terms: Personality, self schema, narcissistic, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, perception, psychodynamic theory, ego, superego, id, conform, rationalization, displacement, temperaments, the big five
According to chapter 12 in the book that I just read, personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Before reading this chapter I would describe personality as a term that determines a certain type of person. For example if a person that smile all the time seem to be approachable I would consider that person has an awesome personality, friendly and happy would be the traits of that person personality. As a human being, out personality developed as we grows and it will become stable around our 20’s. Basically if you have all the good traits in your personality, people will like you more. In my opinion, I think testing and categorizing is very important in study of personality, because by doing testing it allow you to gather a lot more information and put those information into an accurate category if we can see the similarities from all of the different types of characteristics among people then it is going to be more easy for us to focus on that one group and learn all about the cause and effect of that one group and add more to it as you do more research. It’s an effective and organized way for the study of personality, and we could dig deeper to get out all of the information that we could. After reading this chapter my understanding did not change much, I just learned some new vocabularies such as working self-concept which means it reflect on how a person think about themselves at a certain moment. For example when you drop a vase to the ground and it breaks into small pieces, you will feel clumsy for not hold on to it tight enough. I have a really low self-esteem. I always find myself into an upward comparison where I would compare myself to someone that is sitting next to me and judging myself for not looking as decent as the person sitting next to me. From the reading of chapter 12 the most interesting topic to me was the personality is affected by genes and the environment when they show a research of 2 pair of twins, one is identical one is fraternal. The identical ones tend to be similar in personality than the fraternal. I always thought that twins are supposed to have similar personality. The most memorable thing I have learned about this reading was Our Temperaments are Innate and the three aspects of temperaments such as activity level which is how we act when we have a lot of energy inside, emotionality is means we over reacting to a certain situation, and sociability is type of people who prefer to be in a group instead of spending time alone.
Terms: personality, working self-concept, self-esteem, upward comparison, temperaments
Alberto Sveum
Personality is how an individual is perceived to be, either by the self or others, in behavior and other characteristics. Much of what are considered important traits people posses are from basic tendencies. Basic tendencies seem to determine a lot of what is adapted throughout personhood. I recall similar studies dealing with alcoholism and genetics that showed a tendency for people to drink, even if they were adopted, if the tendency was inherited. I think no matter what characteristic adaptation occurs, biological tendencies will be difficult to override.
Testing and grouping of various personalities occurs to help understand how and why people operate the way they do. Studying personality and creating groups helps to better adjust every day life to how people are in actuality. For example, if someone is identified at a young age to likely have suicidal tendencies, it may be paramount that this is addressed. I remember one personal experience with being studied for my personality occurred when I was in elementary. The teachers and supervisors noticed I was a slower reader and I typically struggled when it came to reading aloud or silently, because my behavior was noted, I was placed in a guided reading class to help me overcome this obstacle. I think that the greatest thing personality studies can do is to better help our young children learn. The study and grouping of personality should definitely be continued, for it has aided us in so many fields.
I always find it really strange when reading or learning a bit of information that majorly deals with how I operate as a person. This chapter really makes me reflect on how my personality has changed. When the book discussed the fact that early behaviors strongly correlate to later traits, I tried to recall how I was as a kid. My self-schema isn't exactly rich with things that alarm me, but I might just be bias to my own opinion.
I was quite surprised that defense mechanisms were a concept at all. I think it makes perfect sense. It kind of reminds me of the film Inception when the subconscious fights off trespassers. I don't know how I feel about Freud, but I think the idea of repressed thoughts and subliminal feelings is quite intriguing.
I never considered the fact that situationism could really manipulate a person's natural tendencies so much. Obviously, social norms and setting weighs on how we act, but I just never considered the fact that there is probably a lot more, for better or worse, actions that would be occurring if it wasn't for this sort of self-control. The study of what makes us act how we do is definitely important. I found this surprising and thought back to Lord Of The Flies. If we lacked such rules as the kids did on that book, lord only knows what would happen.
Psychological terms: basic tendencies, characteristic adaptation, self-schema, defense mechanisms, situationism
Personality is a variety of many things. It ranges from our thoughts to emotions to behaviors. Our personality is who we consistently are. It is our sense of self, if we think of ourselves in a certain way; we are influenced to be that way. It is natural that the way that we view ourselves is generally the way others view us. This is why self-esteem plays a huge role in our mind and in whom and what we enjoy to be around. Another major idea in the realm of personality is our self-concept. How we identify ourselves is a key factor in every aspect of our lives. We identify ourselves differently based on the situations we are put into. It is no surprise that culture plays a role on how we view ourselves. We often compare ourselves to other people, whether it is to celebrities or our neighbors, and this alters our sense of self. Having a positive outlook on our sense of self is crucial to success, so this trend in culture can be very destructive. There are many theories to personality, but one of the most popular is Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory of Personality. It ties in our conscious, preconscious, and unconscious states together to create who we are. Personality is literally who we are. This makes it a really important factor, so there are many tests available to assess different personalities and traits. You can measure using projective measures, which includes measuring personality based off of different people’s interpretations or objective measures, which include self-surveys or questionnaires. I think that personality tests are interesting, but I do not think the use of them in everyday life is crucial; however, I think in certain settings they can be helpful. For example, we recently took the Meyer-Briggs personality test in one of my classes. My professor wanted us to see what our strengths and weaknesses are before we worked on a large project. If you are aware, you can overcome these disadvantages. I thought that it was interesting looking at the results. The test was very accurate and helpful. I think that when you are testing personality it is important that you use multiple types of testing methods and situations because of situationism. One situation that I think personality testing is important in is when you are finding roommate. I read in this chapter that it if you are similar to your roommate you get along better, and I think that roommate situations are really important. In college especially, your relationship with your roommate lays down a foundation for your college experience. I can say this from experience. My roommate and I have very similar personalities, and she has become one of my best friends. I honestly did not know that there were so many factors that went into personality before reading this chapter. I thought that the most interesting thing in this chapter was self-esteem and how big of a role it plays in who you are. I did not realize that what you think about yourself genuinely lays down the foundation to who you are. The most memorable thing from this chapter was humanistic approaches. I thought it was interesting how conditions of worth played a role in the long run. Overall, I thought that this chapter was interesting and I feel like I took a lot of things away that I can apply to my own life.
Terms: Personality, Sense of Self, Self-Esteem, Self-Concept, Culture, Positive Sense of Self, Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory of Personality, Conscious, Preconscious, Unconscious, Projective, Objective, Situationsim, Humanistic Approaches, Conditions of Worth
Ricardo Garza
Personality by definition is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. But in my own words, personality is the way someone portrays themselves as an individual. Some people have different personalities such as outgoing or depressing. It is simply the vibe that you give off to others. The testing and categorizing is important to the study of personality because with these studies we can have a better approach to the study of personality. With this we can have a better understanding of the different categories within personality. As a whole, my perspective of psychology has changed. One way that my perspective changed was by the fact that I learned about self-schemas and the working self-concept. These two terms were terms that I had no idea about. They changed my perspective because they have such a big impact on how we perceive ourselves. A self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves. These beliefs give us the idea in our brains that makes us think that we have a form of personality rather than a different one. Working self-concept reflects how a person thinks of themselves at a certain moment. For example if a guy was in a basketball game and he plays his first game ever and misses every single shot he shoots and makes terrible passes, he may be thinking to himself that he is a terrible basketball player. He tells himself this because of how he thinks of himself at that certain moment, but he knows deep down that he is a decent basketball player.
The topic that I found to be most interesting to me was the topic that talked about the three structures of personality. I found this topic interesting because it dealt with ego, superego, and id, these are the three structures of personality. The id is basically the structure of personality that exists at the most basic level and is completely involved in the unconscious portion of the brain. Superego is the structure that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. The last structure is ego, this structure of personality deals with the trial of satisfying the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. I think that this topic, to me, was most interesting because I thought it was interesting that ego, superego and id all interconnect to develop the personality differences.
The most memorable thing that I found in the chapter was the idea of personality in everyday life. I think that this was memorable because of the sole purpose of pursuing a career in psychology. Personally I want a career that deals with the depth in the personalities and lives of people in the world. So this tropic taught me that our environment predicts our personality. So if we are hot and uncomfortable, then we give off the personality of being aggravated or annoyed. With this in mind we can see the importance of psychology in our own lives.
Terms: Psychology, personality, ego, id, superego, internalization, societal standards, parental standards, self-schema, memories, self-concept
Personality, according to the book, consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. Several different parts make up personality and how we act towards others and ourselves. Some of these concepts include self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem. Self-schema is when people process information about themselves entirely, deeply, and automatically. Working self concept is the immediate experience. Self esteem is the affective aspect of people’s sense of self. I think it’s important testings are done about personality because everyone is different is affected by other’s personalities in different ways. Throughout the chapter I learned the several different parts that make up our personality and what types of situations can affect our personality. For example, I learned more about how our sense of self can be extremely influenced by cultural factors, how the environment has a big impact on our personality, how thoughts affect personality, different theories and more. One interesting section I thought was interesting was the section talking about the psychodynamic theory. The psychodynamic states a person’s wishes, desires, and hidden memories determine their behavior. This theory, however, doesn’t have enough evidence to back it up. This theory has three different levels. The first level is the conscious level. This level consists of the thoughts which we are aware of. The second level is the preconscious level. This level consists of content that is not recently in our awareness but they, however, could be brought to our awareness. This could be considered our long term memory. The third and last one is the unconscious level. This level has the information that the mind has a hard time retrieving. The hidden feelings are most of the time in conflict. Sometimes these hidden feelings can leak into the conscious level. Freud believed this is what happens when you say one word when you meant to say another. Another part that goes along with Freud’s theory is id, superego, and ego. Id is what pushes us to get pleasure and avoid pain. The Id belongs to the unconscious level. The superego is like the brake to the desires given off by the id. The superego belongs to the preconscious level. Ego mediates between both the id and superego. The ego tries to please both of these. The ego is then a part of the conscious level. Another interesting topic in this chapter was how personality is affected by our genes and the environment. In this section it states identical twins are more alike than fraternal twins. One memorable fact from this section was if two siblings were not related but raised in the same household are no more alike in their personality traits than random strangers. This is because their environment still differ from one another.
Terms- Personality, self esteem, self concept, self schema, conscious level, preconscious level, unconscious level, long term memory, Ego, Superego, id
Personality is, in my opinion, what gives people their liveliness. Without having a personality, it would be as if we were the walking dead, wandering around the earth aimlessly. Last year I did a lot of soul searching to find out more information for my self-schema. This helped me understand myself better because that is the one person you need to know more than anyone else, yourself. One can never make judgment of others when they don't even understand themselves fully. That soul searching I did for a long time is also known as working self-concept, except soul searching sounds much better. For years and years I have building my self-esteem because that is an important aspect of being confident in life. One thing that I am sure everyone is guilty of in life is self-serving bias, which is taking credit for success, but never taking credit for blame. We want to avoid blame because that brings on stress, so we come up with multiple ways to to avoid distress. I choose to listen to music while walking to classes because that helps me ignore the crappy weather that Iowa has, and I also use it to ignore annoying people around me. Some days I really don't want to talk to anyone, so that helps me avoid any human interaction. I have my own kind of defense mechanisms in order to live the best possible life I can because the less stress the better. It hurts my ego when I answer questions in class and end up being wrong, of course I know I just made a mistake, but sometimes I feel like I am less intelligible than the people who answer correctly. That is one area I struggle with in class, having confidence in my knowledge and how much I actually know is correct. The approach I take to understanding myself is definitely a humanistic approach because I believe everything I put into the universe will come back to me, so in other words, if I put greatness into the universe I will receive greatness back. That is how my personality works, I give my best attitude and hope for the best in return. I used to have a really bad temperament because I would quickly snap at people for being unreasonably stupid and ignorant. I would end up lashing out at those people and tear them down just to make them stop talking, and later in my years I realized that was not doing any good. I was being downright negative, and couldn't look past people's exterior to see their interior. Testing and categorizing in psychology is pretty important because they need to understand people better in order to understand their minds better. The more they understand a person, the better chances they have of dissecting the mind of a that person. Personality is a large part of the mind and gives people more of an identity. I think the testing and categorizing of people is not so awful, so why not test people's personalities? It may not be entirely accurate, but most of the time I figure it would be mostly accurate tests. The topic that interested me the most reading this chapter was discussing the personalities of twins. Their DNA blueprints are almost exactly identical, but personalities can obviously be different. This also brought the thought of clones in my mind, but that is a discussion for another time. They often have moments of extreme similarities, but mostly like different things and do things differently. They want to be seen as individuals, so of course they try to act different from each other because they look identical to each other. The study of twins is really intriguing in general because if they were separated at birth they may do some things differently, but they do still do certain things exactly like the other twin. I don't know what this phenomenon is called exactly, but is an interesting study. The most surprising was how our characteristics never really go away, they just adapt to the situation. I never really thought of it until now, but I have always been into gaming, and it has grown and evolved itself as much as I have. I started out with a gameboy, and worked my way up to a Playstation 4, and that is light years ahead from my old gameboy. It got me pondering about the future and what my future self will be like. Will I still be into the same music I am now? It is not that I don't listen to the music that I used to, but my music taste has definitely evolved since my junior high years. During my junior high school years I listened to nothing but rock and metal. I used to think that was the only form of real music, but then I started branching out to different sounds and now listen to nearly every type of music. My appreciation for music has grown a lot more than when I was a younger kid.
terms: personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, self-serving bias, ego, defense mechanisms, humanistic approaches, temperament, characteristic adaptations
The book defines personality as, “the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors of an individual over time and across circumstances”. Our personality is basically what makes us individuals socially, emotionally, and psychologically, but its more complex than that. Our personalities are connected to our self-perception as well as how we interact with our environment and the people in it. It reaches across many scientific concepts and approaches. The book discusses four main approaches to understanding personality, which highlight how our personalities are influenced by unconscious thoughts, sought for personal full potential, conscious thoughts, and traits/characteristics. Our personalities are strongly connected to our self-esteem and our constant working self-concept. According to the book, our self-esteem is strongly connected to our likelihood of social acceptance, which I find sad. How we perceive ourselves is generally projected into our behavior and is reflective on life outcomes, because of this we generally try to maintain a positive sense of self, which can lead to self-serving tendencies.
Not all researchers agree on the best method of studying personality. From what I found in my reading I could gather that it’s relatively difficult to determine concepts of individual personalities, because people are so much more complex than one simple method can determine. Testing and categorizing can be used as tools for better understanding individuals and the human condition, a researcher can test or observe aspects of a person to determine what personality category they may fit into best. There is a fine line between categorizing and stereotyping.
After reading this chapter I feel I have a better scientific understanding of personality. It opened my eyes to more theories on personality that I wasn’t aware of before as well as improving my knowledge on ones I was initially vaguely familiar with. One theory in particular that I had some previous basic knowledge of was the five-factor theory. As I read the section I developed a more in depth understanding on approaches to personality that deal with traits. I found the Biological trait theory to be interesting and slightly confusing as to the broad division of the different traits.
What I found to be most interesting was the section on the theory of situationism vs. personality, the debate between whether or not behavior is more situational or related to our personalities. This debate has come to an agreement that has led to many trait researchers being interactionists. They believe that behavior is influenced jointly by both personality and the situation. What I found to be most memorable was the last section on how the five basic traits are culturally universal, but there are still some minor differences between cultures. I found this section memorable because I was surprised that research has indeed proven that there are slivers of truth behind some gender trait stereotypes.
Psychology terms: personality, self-esteem, working self-concept, five-factor theory, biological-trait theory, situationism, interactionists, stereotypes
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in individuals over an amount of time and for many circumstances. Every individual is different from one another so it is extremely important to test and categorize personality. An individual’s personality is made up of self-schema, working self-concept, and self esteem. Self-schema is an individual’s integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about themselves. Working self-concept is how people reflects and sees themself at a particular moment. Self esteem is and individual’s affective aspect of themselves. After reading this chapter, to me it seems that personality is more of a personal more than social thing. Our personality is created by events and situations we experience to created our beliefs thus influencing our actions and choices. Also our self-image or how we see ourselves affects our self-esteem and decisions as well. I know that when I don’t work out and stay fit I get very self-conscious about how I look and how others see me. Also all of my friends are more naturally fit so being around them at times makes me more self conscious about how I look and how others see me. Since this affects my self esteem and gives motivation for me to change my behavior (eating healthier, going on runs, working out, etc.) and become fit and physically active. So after reading this chapter I definitely understand personality a lot more and how it influences our lives.
The most interesting part of this chapter for me was the section about how we maintain a positive sense of self. I found it interesting how we use social comparisons to evaluate our actions, abilities, and beliefs by comparing and contrasting them with others. One of these comparisons we use are downward comparisons where we compare our self to someone that we find to be less competent or in a worse situation leading to the protection of our high self esteem. We also use upward comparisons where we compare our self to someone who we see as more competent or in a better situation than our self to confirm our low self-esteem. Self serving bias is another way that we maintain a positive sense of self by taking personal credit for events or situations leading to success but blaming any failure on external factors that we cannot control.
The most memorable thing from this chapter was the opening section about Internet dating for Marc and Christine. I have always been so interested in how online dating/matchmaking actually works. I had no idea how much psychology actually influenced the people who you are matched with. It was also interesting how well their surveys and questionnaire’s can show peoples personality and see what they are looking for in a match. In that section they showed images of Marc and Christine as children and found it interesting how they were showing personality traits that they still show today. This shows that we develop our personalities at a young age and that individuals can show a wide range of personality traits. As the biological trait theory suggests there are two dimensions our personality can have such as introversion and extraversion and whether an individual is stable or unstable. Introversion would be how shy or reserved an individual is while extraversion refers to how outgoing or bold a person is. The stable and unstable dimensions show how stable or consistent individuals moods and behaviors are while unstable shows how frequent and changing their moods and behaviors can be. This is really fascinating how they can categorize so many personality traits in individuals to help them find matches on online dating sites.
Terms Used: Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self esteem, motivation, behavior, social comparisons, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, self serving bias, biological trait theory, introversion, extraversion, stable, unstable
Personality or how we act like, a more specific answer would be our responses to the environment via how we feel, our thoughts and our emotional
reply to actions and scenarios all while keeping consistent to past choices over time and similar decisions to different scenarios. I think personality
is more for the individual then for everyone to witness as we choose who we want to be and it's not uncommon to see people change their personalities when they
enter a different environment. While it is true no two people are the same I believe that testing personality and each category and can be beneficial but I would think
it would be quite difficult to do so. You may get a general idea about what a person is like but only they truly know who they are when it comes to tests like this people
change their answers all the time even if they do not mean to. Self esteem, self schema and having a working self concept all make up a person's personality. Self schema makes up
a set long stable memories that outline a persons beliefs, experiences and other behaviors that make up their self. Self-esteem on the other hand is how a person views their worth to them-self the best way to put it is how a person judges them-self whether they think high of them-self or lowly. Finally we arrive at a working self concept which is in a lot of ways like self-esteem but it is how a person views them-self at a certain moment. Reading about personality in this chapter helped shed light on how a person acts the way he does and why some people
might be more willing to do certain things than others.
Topics that interested me the most was learning about all the different theories first you have the Sociometer theory which is "The theory that argues that self-esteem is a mechanism for
monitoring the likelihood of social exclusion." after that we arrive at the Psycho-dynamic theory which I found to be interesting because it involves Sigmund Freud the theory is that
"unconscious mental activity can result in conflict between the three personality structures the id, ego and the superego." basically a conflict between these three structures which led me into learning
more about the two different types of egos. Ego which I already knew about is "The component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego."
the Superego however is "The component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conflict." The id is the first structure of the three which serves as the pleasure principle
its what makes us want to seek out pleasure for ourselves. finally I learned more about defense mechanisms, which is the unconscious mental strategies that the mind uses to protect itself from distress.
Terms Used: Personality, Self esteem, self schema, working self concept, Sociometer Theory, id, superego, ego, defense mechanisms, psycho-dynamic theory
Personality is understood to be the individual differences in characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. It is thought to be who a person is. Personality is difficult to fully understand and the study of personality is a very big field. The study of personality focuses on the individual differences in personality characteristics and how the various parts of come together in a person. Studying personality is very important because it can help us understand ourselves and others better. It also helps identify the personality disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder and borderline personality disorder. I think it’s very important to study, test and categorize personality because it can help explain a lot about human behavior. The most interesting part about personality is what causes it. The temperament that we’re born with has a lot to do with our personality type. Studies have shown how active infants are in the womb will transfer to their personality type. The type of environment we are brought up in also determines personality type. Parents will nurture the personality traits they favor and discourage traits they don’t want in their children. Society tries to do the same thing but sometimes personality traits aren’t necessary negative as deemed as the unwanted one. For example, extroversion is deemed to be better than introversion. People who are more introvert would feel the need to act more like extroverts. By social comparison theory, they would make an up-ward comparison. Our self-schema has a big influence on our behavior. The way we view ourselves will determine which personality trait is the strongest. For example, if we see ourselves to be outgoing, we’d be more likely to go up to other people in public or at parties and reinforce the idea of being outgoing.
My understanding of personality has changed after reading chapter because it has made me look at my personality traits more and how they were formed. It also made to think about how others would perceive my personality. Because personality is really hard to measure, it’s impossible to know who has the correct understanding of it.
The most interesting thing I’ve read in this chapter would have to be the different types of personality tests. The Rorschach Ink Blot test was really interesting to read about because it crazy to think that a blot of ink can determine someone’s personality.
Psychological terms used: personality, behavior, temperament, environment, nurture, personality traits, extroversion, introversion, social comparison theory, self-schema, Rorschach Ink Blot test
Personality is “the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances”. I feel that personality is a trait that everyone carries and expresses naturally. Personality to me is developed by environment, such as work, interests, family and friends. There are so many different aspects of personality, studying a person’s personality is effective and not effective because there are broad aspects of a personality that people can study in an individual but when trying to characterize a person’s entire personality with others I feel is impossible. When reading this chapter I was very interested in our sense of self. Everyone has a representation of who we think we are. This develops as we develop a better understanding of ourselves, such as our bodies, experiences, memories and appearances. In an overview the concept of how we perceive ourselves is called self-concept. This part of the chapter really made me think of who I am, how I’d like to change myself, and the things I truly do like about myself. The concept of self-esteem in the chapter is interesting because there is much more to it than I ever imagined. I always perceived the concept of self-esteem as people either having a high self-esteem, meaning a person is confident, and may think highly of themselves. A person with a low self-esteem is one that thinks low of themselves such as a young teenage female who is not confident in her looks or body. I saw this as being the only factor to self-esteem but the book states that a person who has a high self-esteem usually makes a downward comparisons, meaning that they contrast themselves with people inferior to themselves in the characteristic they are evaluating. People with a low self-esteem usually makes a general judgment of upward comparisons, meaning they contrast themselves with people superior to them. When I read about the psychodynamic theory it was interesting to read that we have a conscious, preconscious, and unconscious mind. Ego falls into the conscious, superego is in the preconscious, and ID is in the unconscious. ID is the desire for pleasure and avoidance of pain, superego is the conscience for what is socially acceptable and moral and ego resolves the conflict between the id and superego. I personally feel that superego can be put on stand-by when a person is inebriated such as being drunk. The desire for what a person wants appears to rise, the ID appears to become more present and the superego seems to be less and can be nonexistence.
Personality- your sense of self- self-concept- psychodynamic theory- ID-ego-superego-self-esteem
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. We make our own opinions about people based off their personality. Different things/people can affect how someone acts. Different kinds of personality make us different from others around us. Some might be shy and quiet while others are sociable and outgoing. I don’t think people should be based on these things. It only helps to make assumptions on who people are but you never know their true personality until you get to know someone.
The most interesting topic to me was the section on Our Sense of Self Is Who We Believe We Are. When you refer to “yourself,” you think about who you are in mental representations, along with physical body and your conscious awareness of belief in who you are. When you hear someone say your name from across the room, that information is part of our self-schema. Self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. Then you have the side that you refer to the immediate experience of the self in the here and now. This is work self-concept. Work self-concept reflects how a person thinks of themselves at a certain moment. After that you have the concept of what we think of our self. This is self-esteem. Self-esteem is the affective aspect of the self. You get a good insight of who you are and what you want to be. You get to see the real you that you are putting out there to judge for your personality. No matter what, people are always going to judge you on what you say and do. Along with this, there is one theory that argues self-esteem is a mechanism for monitoring the likelihood of social exclusion. Everyone has a thing called the sociometer. High possibility of rejection = low self-esteem.
The most memorable topic to me was social comparisons. When we compare ourselves as we evaluate our own actions, abilities, and beliefs to others, social comparison occurs. People with high self-esteem, the make downward comparisons. Downward comparisons is when you are comparing oneself to another person who is less competent or in a worse situation, which tends to protect a person’s high self-esteem. Another form of downward comparison is temporal comparison. People with low self-esteem, they make upward comparisons. Upward comparisons is when you are comparing oneself to another person who is more competent or in a better situation, which tends to confirm a person’s low self-esteem.
terms: personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, sociometer, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, temporal comparison
I think personality affects our life greatly. Personality influences in various aspects in our life, such as how we behave in a specific situation, how we interact with people and how we resolve problems, etc. In our textbook, personality is defined that personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. We need to test and categorize personality because each person have unique own personality and thoughts. Therefore, it is very important because we can know ourselves well, we can understand how people behave in specific circumstance and we can predict person’s thoughts and behaviors by categorizing personality. It enables people to adapt well and interact with people in the complex structure of society. Our personality is formed from self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem. Our self-schema consists of an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves, thus it affects each of us to perceive, organize, interpret and use information about our self. Secondly, working self-concept is reflecting how we think of ourselves at a certain moment. It will influence our behavior in various circumstances. For example, if I think of myself as intelligent, I participate in actively in the discussion. In contrast, if I think of myself as fun-loving, I can excitingly play in the party to act in ways that show I am fun. That is, the working self-concept guides specific behavior. Finally, self-esteem is the affective aspect of our sense of self. We evaluate how we feel about our personal characteristics. And according to sociometer theory, our self-esteem is greatly affected by people’s perception, such as acceptance or rejection. After reading this chapter, I can understand well about the basic concept of personality and realize which factors affect the forming of the personality.
The most interesting to me in this chapter is that our sense of self is influenced by cultural factors. When at first I go to class after coming to America, I was so surprised that students in class express their opinion freely and talk with professor easily. Also, each person has their unique styles like pink hair. In contrast, in my country, South Korea, talking with professor and expressing my opinion during class is very rare because we don’t like to stand out in class. As well as, most people wear similar style clothes. That is, my country belongs to the collective cultures with China, Japan, etc. Collectivist cultures emphasize connections to family, social groups, and ethnic groups; conformity to societal norms; and group cohesiveness. In contrast, individualist cultures that I am experiencing now emphasize rights and freedoms, self-expression and diversity. While staying in America, everything that I experience every day is new and fresh for me. Until going back to my country, I wish to feel freedom more and express my individuality freely while I don’t mind people’s eyes.
Terms: self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, sociometer theory, Collectivist cultures, individualist cultures
According to the Psychology Book, personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. Testing and categorizing is so important in the study of personality because it helps with self-identification such as self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, sociometer theory, and self-esteem and life outcomes. We are people who like to have something to hold onto. We like to have family, culture, and most importantly an identity which is why testing and categorizing is a big part in personality. We shouldn’t need to cling to these standard ideas of personality but it’s in our nature and it’s human to want to belong so in that respect I guess it is a good thing to test personalities and try to feel belonging as long as it doesn’t hinder our abilities as individuals. My understanding of personality has changed after reading this chapter because I didn’t realize how influential personality can be in how we live our lives. I knew in part that people act differently because of their demeanor but I didn’t know that it can be the cause of certain events. From the reading, the most interesting thing to me was the part about self-esteem. Apparently, as the book says, self-esteem is us internalizing how others view us and adopting those views as our own. We can have high and low self-esteem according to the people around us which is why it is important to carefully choose who you surround yourself with. However, some people are better at shielding themselves from this wavering of emotions or beliefs better than others. The most memorable thing to me was that we naturally/biologically try to shield ourselves from rejection and gravitate towards the positives. Of course that makes sense but I didn’t realize that we had a biological need to belong and we gage our abilities to do so by using our sociometer. Some of the psychological terms I used were typical thoughts, emotional responses, behaviors, testing and categorizing, self-identification, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, sociometer theory, life out comes, identity, personality, individuals, demeanor, internalizing, naturally, biologically, and rejection.
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In the study of personality, the testing and categorizing is so important to keep order.
Personality can be different depending on the situation you're in or the people and things you're surrounded by. Self Esteem also is a contributing factor. When looking at yourself in a judging manner you are viewing your self- schema. This can always be different because of the working self-concept. It can change a persons self-schema at any given moment depending on surroundings or situation. When around others we tend to use Upward and downward comparisons. These are wen we tend to compare ourselves to others that we see to be better than us or worse off than us. Other factors than can change our personality are relationships or traumatic events. These things can alter the way we think and ultimately change our personalities.
I do believe that the testing and categorizing should be important to keep order of different things. More statistics and test results can be used when everything is organized. Information is also more likely to be realistic.
After reading this chapter my understanding of personality has changed. I never realized all of the different ways our personality can be effected or how much we use our personality on a day to day basis. It is the reason we like the people we like and so the things we do. We are our personalities.
The most interesting topic in this chapter to me was the three structures of personality; Id, ego, and superego. The id of a person is the most basic level of structure. It is the level that pushes for us to seek pleasure and avoid pain. The second level is the superego. The superego is a brake for the id. It helps us to realize the social standards so we don't take our pleasure seeking too far. The third structure, the ego, helps balance the id and superego. It satisfies our needs within the social limits. To me this was the most interesting topic in the chapter.
The most surprising or memorable thing I will take from this chapter is defense mechanisms. This is how our bodies cope with anxiety. They are unconscious mental strategies that help protect our mind from distress. These are what cause us to blame certain situations for making us feel a certain way or find excuses to keep us from feeling guilty, or bad. I will remember this because as a young teen I faced many problems with anxiety and my sister and father still do to this day. I was able to overcome it as I am a very mentally strong person. I think differently from a lot of people, my thoughts are organized, and I put my trust in God. This is why defense mechanisms really stuck out to me.
I really enjoyed this chapter, there is a lot to say about personalities because everyone is different.
Terms Used: Personality, Self-esteem, Self-schema, Working self-concept, Upward comparisons, Downward comparisons, Id, Ego, Superego, Defense mechanisms
11/11/14
The textbook defines personality as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Personality to me means much more than that. Personality is what makes individuals unique. It’s what makes people so interesting. In the study of personality it is important to test and categorize. Doing so allows an extensive understanding. Since there are so many types of personalities found in the people of the world it would be absurd to assume same results from all people. Testing and categorizing may not always be accurate since everybody has a unique personality of their own however I believe that it should happen. Since reading this chapter my understanding of personality has changed. I now understand the “big five”. The big five is a theory largely accepted by many personality psychologists. Also called the five-factor theory, this theory focuses on five basic personality traits. These traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Individuals differ in ranges of high and low for each personality trait. I also now understand another trait approach that also describes characteristics. The biological trait theory explains that personality has traits in three dimensions. The first dimension extraversion/introversion reflects differences in biology. The second dimension unstable/stable reflects variability in moods and emotions. The third dimension high constraint/low constraint reflects a mix of aggression, poor impulse control, self-centeredness, or a lack of empathy. High constraint (low psychoticism) means that one is peaceful, even-tempered, passive, ect. and low constraint (high psychoticism) is the opposite.
The most interesting topic in the reading was cultural and sex differences in personality. It never seemed to me that people are very similar around the world. Stereotypes tell me things about someone from another culture or sex. Is it possible for these to ever be true? Why did this stereotype come into play? Apparently people from East Asia rated themselves much lower on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness than people from Africa rated themselves. Women also report being rated as more empathetic and agreeable than men.
Most surprising to me was that identical twins have similar personalities. Having the same genes, sex and look results in very similar personalities. Fraternal twins do not share near the same personalities as identical twins. Studies on identical twins raised separately still result in more similarities than fraternal twins raised together.
Psychological terms: personality, biological trait theory, five-factory theory.
The book defines personality as “the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances”. To me, a person’s personality is the way that they carry themselves through the usages of emotions, attitudes, verbal and non-verbal communication and outlooks. With these things combined, they create the aspect of human life that makes everyone different through their own sense of self (what is experiences, memories, characteristics and appearances that give you the sense of who you are). Without personalities, humans would be very dull, boring and have low self-esteems. Since personalities are so important in our world, I feel like it is needed to study personalities through social psychology to show how people interact with them.
Testing and categorizing is so important in the study of personality because, you need to look into each of these aspects in psychology very closely. If we are able to go in depth with our studies in the psychological science world, then it will lead to a better understanding of human nature and how and why humans act and interact with certain things or people.
When we look into the study of personalities, we find that there are a few different ways to approach it (through theories). The theories are the psychodynamic theory (where our personalities are based off of our unconscious wishes), the humanistic approach (where it’s based off of our tendency to fulfill our potential through personal growth), the cognitive approach (our personalities are based on how we think), and finally the trait approach (which is that our personalities are described by our characteristics). With the knowledge of these traits, we are more than likely able to help a person who with themselves mentally when dealing with either their own or someone else’s personality. These could really help when dealing with one’s superego, ego or defense mechanisms. It’s also very important to study the fact that our personalities are affected by our genes and the environment as well. With the understanding of that influence, we can understand one’s temperament, basic tendencies (personality traits that are influenced by biology and are stable for a long time), and characteristic adaptions (the changes of behavior expression based on specific situations with certain demands).
My perception of personality has changed in a sense of me questioning where I get my own personality from. It makes me wonder what influenced me more when I was growing up. It also makes me wonder what my personality and life would be like if I was influenced differently when growing up. It also makes me change my perception of how people act. This chapter made it clear to me that their personalities are strongly influenced by third party factors.
The topic that was the most interesting to me was the page about if personalities matter in roommate relationships. With the page about the roommate, I felt that it was very interesting because I could connect them to my own life. I looked at the level of cleanliness scale and I compared my answers to what my past roommate would say. I felt that we were very compatible as roommates. When I think back to when she was my roommate, I feel like our personalities were what made us get along so well. I also think back to my friends and their first roommates, they absolutely hated them. There personalities did not mesh at all. That’s why I am glad that the university does have a program that you can select your own roommate and get to know them beforehand.
I found this to be surprising because it said that every 1 out of 5 couples have met online. To me, it would be hard to get a personal connection with someone over the internet via questions. I feel like I would need to get to know the person in a very different situation before I could commit.
TERMS: Personality, emotions, verbal communication, nonverbal communication, perception, sense of self, low self-esteems, social psychology, psychology, psychological, theories, psychodynamic theory, humanistic approach, cognitive approach, trait approach, tendency, personal growth, temperament, ego, superego, defense mechanisms, genes, environment, basic tendencies, and characteristic adaptions.
The true definition of personality is the characteristics, thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In more understandable terms it is the things that make you you. Your thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and responses to things outside of you. Personality encompases so many things and is hard for many people to truly pin down what exactly it is. That is why it is important to test and categorize personality. The more we test and categorize it, the more we can further our understanding of it. There are so many benefits that come with this deeper understanding. It would help us understand how we interact and react to and with others with similar and different personalities. It might also help us understand what types of jobs we would fit into better than other. What changed my understanding of personality was the concept of the big five. I have always thought about personality as one thing. Just how you act and think makes you who you are. It is much more complex than this as the five factor theory shows us. It break personality into five factors; openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. There is a range from low to high for each factor. The most interesting part of this chapter was the three structures of personality; id, ego, and superego. Id operates in accordance with the pain and pleasure principle. The superego acts in terms of standards of behavior and morality. It puts a brake on the id. The ego tries to satisfy the id while responding to the superego. What if found really memorable was the diagram that was used to show at what level of consciousness these three structures of personality operate at. While the id is completely unconscious, the superego is mostly unconscious and somewhat conscious. Both the ego and superego are both conscious and unconscious.
Psychological Terms; personality, the big five, five factor theory, structures of personality, id, ego, superego, pain and pleasure principle, morality, consciousness, unconscious
Well, if we're to go by the definition provided in the book, then personality 'really' is the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that are relatively consistent across one's range of experiences and lifespan. Personally I believe the fact that there is a substantial number of theories as to how personality works, is very telling of the need to test and categorize various factors, as well it should. I firmly believe that having a grasp on the inner workings of various personality traits is essential to things such as... how to tell if someone is a potential psychotic. I can certainly say I learned quite a bit in this chapter. A psychology course I took in High School had already enlightened me Sigmund Freud's Psychodynamic theory, as well as a dip into the concept of the Oedipus Complex. Beyond that, it was pretty much new territory. In fact, I was rather surprised to discover that most people's personalities wound remain consistent over the years. In stuck out to me, as I've grown up constantly exposed to the sentiment 'People change.”
What really interested me in this chapter is the sizable chunk devoted to Self-Esteem. Anyone who's gone to public schools has had the importance of self-esteem drilled into their heads from year one, so the book kinda surprised me when it revealed just how little I knew about the concept. In particular I was amused at the notion that having a high self-esteem isn't necessarily a good thing, with it being commonly attributed to people with histories of violence, and bullying. I guess one could say I enjoyed it since it sort of flips a school's idealized notion of self-esteem on it's head. Self-serving bias is also a curious concept. To think, we're predisposed to having this egotistical self-view that plays up our successes, no matter how trivial, and disowns our failures, chalking them up to external factors. It seems very telling of our species.
The most memorable part of this chapter was probably Eysenck's Biological Trait Theory of personality. The book mentions that it's one of the theories with the greatest amount of evidence backing it up, and out of all the theories mentioned in this chapter, it was this one that I felt was the most relatable. I wager this is because I personally describe myself as an introvert. I feel I match most of the criteria and this theory does a great deal to validate my position on the matter. Incidentally, according to the chart, I seem to fall more into the stable end of the spectrum, or at least somewhere close to the middle. I found this to be amusing and slightly comforting.
The keywords are: personality, psychodynamic theory, Oedipus complex, self-esteem, self-serving bias, Biological Trait Theory, and introvert.
Personality is characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that relatively stable in someone. I think testing personalities is important to the study because everyone is so different. There are so many ways that can affect your personality in its developing stage. It can be made by environment, genes, physiology, biology, and situation. An example for environment is I have two friends who have kids that are one years old. They both live in different environments, one lives in a high where they just sit around and watch what they want and spoil the child. The other one years house they watch kid appropriate shows, are always active, and the baby isn’t too spoiled. An example of genes would be anything that is a strong trait from your parents you might get as well. They do this testing because they want to know what factors played a role in the making of your personalities. My understanding changed when so much goes into how someone develops a personality. Any little thing can make a difference in your personality. When I was younger I lived in the “ghetto” of our city so seeing a lot of diversity in people I was use to. My roommates have not been exposed to that environment so they don’t know how to act when we are in areas or people in those situations.
What I was most interested in and what was most memorable to me was id, ego, and the super ego. I really liked the picture that went with it because it was easier for me to understand. The picture was a person with a devil on his left shoulder and an angle on his right shoulder. The id is the “devil” and that stand for the desire for pleasure and avoidance of pain. The superego is the “angle and that is the conscience for what is socially acceptable and moral. Then last one is you as a person and that’s ego. Ego is the one who resolves conflict between the other two. An example could be someone having an affair they are conflicted with the pleasure they get from it(id), but also conflicted with that it is wrong (superego).
Terms: environment, genes, physiology, biology, and situation, id, ego, superego
After reading this chapter I believe that personality has a lot of different of things to take account in what makes you. Personality is actually defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. In my personal opinion I believe that self esteem takes a huge role in your personality. Self esteem is the affective aspect of life. So I think that if a person has high self esteem they are a more outgoing person. Also working self concept plays a pretty big role in personality. It reflects how a person thinks of herself at a certain moment. Figure 12.4 did a very good job at explaining this subject I think. In 12.4 A: There is a guy at his desk it says, “who am I?” And then there is a little thought bubble that says I am male. Which is what he defines himself as. Then in figure 12.4 B the same question is answered but this time the thought bubble says “I am black”. The example that they gave is that he is working with a group of white people, so his work self concept might focus on the awareness that he is black.
My understanding of personality has changed since reading this chapter because, now I understand there are way more concepts that affect your personality. Before being aware I guess I just thought that you had a certain personality and thats the way you were. Which is not the case at all. There are so many factors that affect your personality.
Somethings in this chapter that I found interesting would be downward comparisons. Which is defined as comparing oneself to another person who is less competent or in a worse situation, which tends to protect a person's high self esteem. Which is so true lately when I am having a bad a thing, “ could things get much worse?”. I will go on twitter and see Amanda Bynes tweeting up a storm and I realize I don’t have it as bad as some people. Upward comparisons is another topic in this chapter that I found very interesting. Which is comparing oneself to another person who is more competent or in a better situation which will often confirm a person's low self esteem.
A really important part of this chapter I think would be the psychodynamic theory which is defined as Freudian theory that unconscious forces determine behavior. Also in figure 12.5 Rotter says personality is influenced by expectations which can lead to having internal locus of control or an external locus of control.
Temperaments are aspects of the personality that are more determined by biology. There are three temperaments, which are based on the degree of a child's activity level, emotional level, sociability level.
personality, working self concept, self esteem, downward comparisons, psychodynamic theory,temperaments,
The book and this chapter specifically describe personality as the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are consistent in a person over time and any circumstances. The reason it is so important to study and and have the ability to categorize personality is so we can better understand all personalities and be able to study the human brain and humans in general all together. Also, if we test personalities we can learn more about ourselves and how we will react in certain situations. I believe studying personalities is very important and I think studying it is a very good idea. We should always be trying to learn all we can about us, meaning people. The more we know about ourselves the better. I did not know there were so many different ideas and types of personality. That was something that I was glad I learned because I now think I will be able to better understand people and their personality because I read this chapter.
The topic I found the most interesting was how a person’s personality can change as they age and the difference between a male and a female’s self esteem. People experience low self esteem when they are in their twenties and teens which I agree with because that’s a time in a person’s life when they are trying to figure out who they are. That’s a very important part in a person’s life. People experience a high self esteem when they are in their sixties which kind of surprised me because I thought it would be more around the time of a person’s thirties or possibly their forties. It was a big surprise to me to see how people’s self esteem changes throughout their life.
The most memorable thing I learned from this chapter is how identical twins have similar personalities. I had always thought that even though they could look alike they would have different personalities. I think it would be very weird to look identical to someone and also have the same personality as them. You would never be able to feel like you are your own person and I find that very hard to deal with but that is just my opinion. This whole chapter was very interesting and I’m looking forward to learn more about personality.
Terms: personality, self esteem, identical twins
The book definition of personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. However, I feel that it’s a set of qualities that make a person distinct from another. Personality is made up of self-schema, working self-concept, and self-esteem. It’s important to test and categorize personalities because each person is different from anyone else. We categorize types of personalities so that we can study them more in depth. When we are able to see common characteristics and personality traits within human groups, then we can focus our attention on why and how these traits develop. The same goes for testing, if we are able to come up with evaluation assessments of people’s personalities, we will be able to understand that person’s personality and therefore give them more effective advice for how they should handle that type of personality.
The most interesting part of this chapter was the different approaches that describe our personality, such as humanistic approaches. These approaches emphasize the goodness in people. This way of studying personalities that emphasizes self-actualization, where people seek to full-fill their potential through greater self-understanding. For example, in the person-centered approach there are two issues which are crucial in the development of personality. The first issue is our personal understanding of our lives and the second is how others see us and evaluate us. The interesting part about this approach is that this theory shows how parents can affect our personality development. Most parents provide life and support to their children. Parents’ love their children on the condition that the children do what the parents wants them to do and live up to the parents’ standards. This condition creates a discrepancy between a child’s self and how parents evaluate him/her, which leads to development of a personality based on conditions of worth. Thus, children’s desires, wishes, and feelings will depend on approval from their parents. Children will act and show only those traits that elicit parents’ love and support. Children make play on musical instruments only because it makes his parents happy. It shows how children depend on positive regard from their parents.
The most surprising thing that I read about was the Expectancy Theory. In 1954, Julian Rotter developed a theory which stated that our behaviors are a part of our personality. This theory was tied to Locus of Control. Locus of Control is whether or not people control the rewards or punishment. There are two types of locus control; internal and external. People experiencing internal locus of control believe they did well on a test because they studied hard. They believe that their actions created the result that they experience. Those with external locus of control believe their grade on the test was just fate and was determined by their actions. This was surprising to me because I never thought about how closely our behaviors and personalities are tied. The Expectancy Theory made a lot of sense to me and now I have a better understanding of why people believe that they are impacting the results that they are experiencing.
Key Terms: Personality, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Locus of Control, Humanistic Approach, Self-Actualization
Personality is the thoughts, emotions, behaviors that are stable in a person’s life and across circumstances. Testing and categorizing is important to the study of personality because then researchers can see exactly how people react in certain situations and in normal everyday tasks. Every person is different in their own way, but there are people who have a better sense of being their own individual. I think it is good to categorize and test different people, because then we can have more of a visualization of our selves. It can be good to research and test to find out why people are more likely to do something especially if it is violent, or if they already have a mental disability. My understanding of personality hasn’t change a lot, because I think that people are always being researched or are interested in themselves and how they act. We can be a little narcissistic with our selves. Some of the things I learned was what I had noticed before, but could never put a name or an idea too. For example: Cultures help mold out personality. I knew that different places people believed or acted a certain way. I have a friend from California who says Iowans are a lot nicer and friendlier than Californians. I have even seen that certain people from different areas in Iowa have different personalities. For example: I am from Oskaloosa and there is a town called Pella, which is a Dutch community. People who are from this region of Iowa have noticed that Pella people can be a lot more conservative, and even a little selfish. They are known for being not as sportsmen like in games, and extremely strict with how their community looks. I am not saying that everyone from Pella is mean or rude. I guess that comes with some stereotyping as well, but Pella’s personality is a little more noticeable. One thing I found really interesting was the difference between Western and Eastern Cultures, Western cultures can be a lot more individualistic, and Eastern cultures are more likely to have masses of people with similar personalities. Another thing I found interesting was that people take a good portion of their lives to find out who they are. People like to take humanistic approaches to help them find a greater understanding of who they are. I took the personality test and I think that is was pretty accurate. For three of the factors I got about average, and those three factors were Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. I knew I would probably be in the middle, because I have a good mixture of accurate and inaccurate answers. I scored relatively low in Openness, I like art, but I would rather experience the natural beauty of being outside. I also scored relatively high in Neuroticism, that I was not surprised with either, because I tend to get stressed easily and overthink and dwell on things way too often. I was not surprised with any of my scores, which I like to test myself on how well I know myself.
The terms I used was: Personality, Humanistic Approach.
Personality can be defined as the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. In other words, our personality is who we personally are and how we see ourselves. How we react in situations, how our mind usually thinks and works, and what our behavior is like on a day to day basis. Self-Schema is your knowledge about yourself and how personally you relate it to yourself. Certain concepts are more closely related to one's identity of himself or herself than others, these are the primary concepts that shape your self-schema. Our immediate experience of self in the here and now is described as working self-concept. This is our limited amount of experience that is being processed at one time, so depending on the situation we may see ourselves differently and therefore act differently. Self-esteem is the affective aspect of our sense of self. We evaluate how we feel about ourselves and our personal characteristics. You can either have a high or low self-esteem, based on your view of yourself. Also, your self-esteem may be based on what others think of you, this is known as rejected appraisal. The sociometer theory describes our likelihood of social exclusion and how it is related to our self-esteem. Our personality is based on biological factors as well. It is very important for scientists to test personality so that we can understand what makes us “us”. If we know who we are then maybe we can help somebody else understand himself or herself better. My understanding for personality has grown quite a bit from reading this chapter. I was not near as knowledgeable before this.
The reading that I found to be the most interesting was the section on the three structures of personality. The three structures consist of id, ego, and superego. ID is the most basic level, it is completely submerged in the unconscious. It operates according to the pleasure principle, this pushes us to seek pleasure and to avoid pain. Freud described it as acting upon impulses and desires. The superego is second. It acts as a break or a barrier to the id. It is the rigid structure of morality or conscience. It stops us from completely giving in to our id. Lastly is the ego. Ego mediates between id and superego. It tries to please the id while following the rules of the superego. It can be classified as operating according to the reality principle. This means it uses rational thought and problem solving to mediate between id and superego. Conflicts between the id and superego can lead to anxiety. The ego deals with this through defense mechanisms, such as blaming the situation that you were in. I found this interesting because I now understand the whole devil and angel sitting on your shoulder idea.
What I found surprising or memorable was the topic on projective measures. Projective measures explore the unconscious by having people describe or tell stories about stimulus items that are ambiguous. In other words, they will project their mental ideas on an item, in turn revealing hidden aspects of personality. These can be motives, wishes and unconscious conflicts.
Key Terms: Personality, Working Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Sociometer Theory, id, Ego, Superego, Reality Principle, Defense Mechanism, Projective Measures
Chapter 12:
This chapter talked about yourself and the pros/cons that are intertwined with the daily battles we sometimes face. Personality is an individual difference between people’s emotions, cognitive thoughts and behavior. I have learned over the years that everyone is different and sees themselves differently as well. Growing up, high school taught me a lot about self-image and looking the looking “normal” and trying to fit in. After years of trying to look the part, I finally decided that I should dress the way I want and be myself. As college students we are categorized by our gender and year in the social groups that we have on campus, It takes me back to high school, but only by the stereotypes and gender roles. Each section that I read talked about something that was personal to me or reminded me of something. There are four different types of approaches: psychodynamic theory, id, ego, and superego. Psychodynamic theory is a personality based on unconscious that creates conflict on id, ego, and superego. This reminded me of my psychology class in high school and the ways that id, ego, and superego are useful and important.
Self-esteem has always been a struggle for me because of my insecurities and the way I saw myself growing up. I felt that a lot of young women can relate to having body issues and internal/external problems they face, just like me. Cognitive approaches are personality based on the way we think and the traits that are based on our characteristics. Life is all about finding out who you are and the purpose for being on being in the world. Our beliefs and the ideas of ourselves that can be related by psychodynamic theory. This information was somewhat confusing, but I learned to be more open-minded with the knowledge that was given to me in this chapter. The visual pictures that were in the book gave me a clear understanding of what was said and convinced me to use the information in the future.
Terms: Personality, Self-esteem, cognitive, self-image, gender, stereotypes, psychodynamic theory, id, ego, and superego.
By definition personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Although personality includes all of these, generally most people usually think of behaviors as a persons personality. We usually do not consider everything that could be affecting their behavior and we typically just generalize that as their personality. For example, someone could be having a horrible day the first time you meet them and they are being short and blunt with you. Even though we had only met them once if someone was to ask us if we knew that person we would say the response we got for them when we met them, which in this case could be that they were a little rude. Most people would give this type of generalization because we based it on their behavior that day but perhaps they aren’t a rude person they were just having a terrible day. I believe many times a person's true personality shows through in children. I believe this because this is when they are not old enough to have big influences from others. Yes, their parents impact them to a certain extent while they are growing up, but each child still grows its own personality through the years from childhood to adulthood.
Testing and categorizing are so important in the study of personality because personality is a broad concept that can vary, therefore testing and categorizing are key in understanding it. As stated before, behavior is a big aspect of personality. Behavior is said to be determined by unconscious forces according to the psychodynamic theory that was developed by Sigmund Freud. It is said that there are three structures of personality. The first structure is id. Id is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operates according to the pleasure principle. The id is like an infant, crying to be fed whenever hungry. The second structure in the psychodynamic theory is superego. Superego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal or parental standards of conduct. The third structure is the ego. The ego is the component of personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. According to the psychodynamic theory, unique interactions of the id, superego, and ego produce individual difference in personality (p.430). Cognitive approaches are also studied to figure out how thoughts shape personality. cognitive approaches are ways of studying personality that recognize the influence of how people think. One main theory of cognitive approaches is the expectancy theory. The expectancy theory proposes that people’s personalities are based on their locus of control. Locus of control is the idea that personality is based on a person’s perception of whether she controls the rewards and punishments she experiences or does not control them. A person with an internal locus of control believe that they themselves influence outcomes. A person with an external locus of control believe that outcomes result from forces beyond their control.
My understanding of personality have changed after reading this chapter in the fact that i think more of a person’s personality comes from genes than I believed before. before reading this chapter I knew that the environment affected a person’s personality because the way people are raised influences personality which deals with the environment they grew up in. I also knew that I acted a great deal like both of my parents but I always figured it was just because of the fact that they raised me and it was just the influences they have had on me. Although that concept is true, I didn’t know that genes had such a big impact on personality. This chapter showed me that personality stability is influenced by biology and situation. Basic tendencies are personality traits that are largely determined by biology and are stable over time. Characteristic adaptations are changes in behavioral expression of basic tendencies based on the demands of specific situations. For example, someone could be a very daring person which would be a basic tendency but getting old causes him to change that things that he is allowed to do which would be a characteristic adaptation.
The section on genes influencing personality was also the part that was most interesting thing to me because I didn’t know your genes had a big influence on personality. I knew that genes influenced what people looked like but I didn’t even imagine them affecting my characteristics that still stick with me everyday.
I found the three aspects of temperament to be memorable to me. First off temperament is the biologically based tendency to feel or act in certain ways. The three aspects of temperament are activity level which if the overall amount of energy and behavior we exhibit. The second aspect is emotionality which describes the intensity of emotional reactions. The third aspect is sociability which refers to the general tendency to affiliate with others. I found these memorable because they really clicked in my brain which helped me to understand why we feel and act in certain ways.
Psychological terms used: characteristic adaptations, basic tendencies, genes, id, superego, ego, locus of control, external locus of control, internal locus of control, behaviors, expectancy theory, psychodynamic theory, personality, sociability, emotionality, activity level
What I got from the reading is that personality is a combination of our biological hardwiring and learned traits and characteristics that influence our actions and thoughts towards situations/events. This is a very vague definition, but I think it covers most of what a personality is. The book referenced sets of identical twins having very similar personalities. To me this is a clear indicator that biology plays a large part in what our personality will be. It also talked about how children displayed certain temperaments naturally, and the three different temperaments, activity level, emotionality, and sociability were carried throughout their entire lives. There is more to personality than just the biological side though.
I think that there were two theories that made sense out of the four provided to us in the text; the Cognitive approach and the Trait Approach. The cognitive approach looks to how a person thinks and then attributes different personality traits to different styles of thinking. People look at different choices they are faced with in a logical manner and then determine which they will choose based on their personality. It’s kind of like a pros and cons system that they develop for making choices, but they assign different weights to the types of pros and cons based on their personality. The other type that made sense was the trait approach to personality. The trait approach looks at how people react to certain situations on average and then assign different traits based on the actions taken. There are five major categories which determine a person’s personality overall.
The most interesting section for me was Freud’s theory with the weird psychosexual undertones. I think the guy is a little bit nuts. Maybe I understood it wrong, but I don’t quite agree with his assessment that people develop in three regions based on sexual desires. That was definitely the strangest thing I’ve read in a while.
My understanding of personality changed only a little bit. I still think that it is mostly biological, but after reading it looks like our environment or social situation may play a larger role thank I thought.
Terms: Personality, Trait Approach, Cognitive approach, logical, temperaments, emotionality, sociability, psychosexual
Personality is one of the most important, if not the most important features about a person. Personality is the balance between emotions, behaviors and thoughts. Personality is something that we cannot see or measure though; it is just something we can experience by being around others and ourselves. Everything we do and experience shapes our personality even though we might not recognize that. Social personality has to do with how we present ourselves to others through what we say, our actions, and our mannerisms. Self-schema is a very important part of our personality. This has to do with our knowledge and beliefs about ourselves. How we understand ourselves deals with how we present ourselves, which is in turn our personality. Our self-esteem is also tied closely with our personality. This is how we feel about ourselves. If a person feels good about himself or herself you will see it in their personality and view about life, same for a person with a bad self-esteem.
Testing and categorizing so important in the study of personality because everybody is different, no two people have the same personality. But because there are so many different people with different personality it is nice to be able to group them into categories. If we know what type of personality we have and want to look into it we can, and by researching it we can understand ourselves a little better. I think that it is important to test and categorize personality because of this. It allows those who are researching to understand different personality types and those types of people, but it also allows people to understand relationships between people based on their personality types.
My knowledge of personality has really changed after reading this chapter. I before thought personality was just how we presented ourselves to other, and crazy Type A people. But after reading this chapter I learned about everything that makes up ones personality. How everything we do is driven by our personality and shapes our personality. I learned that our personality is the core to who we are and what we do.
The most interesting thing from the chapter was the scale and Five-Factor Theory. This is a theory that is based on a scale of 5 personality traits. The traits can be ranging from low to high and can help determine the type of person you are. The traits are openness o experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Behaviors can be predicted based on how a person in ranked for each trait.
The most memorable thing from the chapter was the aspect of our personality and the argument of nature vs. nurture. How do we get our personality, is it genetic or is it something that we develop as we live, or a combination of both? In the chapter we learned that identical twins show more common personality traits than fraternal twins showing that biology, nature, has an impact. But we also learned in the book that our everyday actions affect our personality. I know from experience that I have many common personality traits as my mom, dad and brothers but are those something I have genetically inherited or is it something that I have learned and developed from spending so much quality time with them?
Self-schema, Self-esteem, Social personality, Type A personality, Five Factor Theory, Behavior, nature vs. nurture, genetically inherited
When you think of personality you usually think of how someone acts, if they are more shy or funny. When I think of my personality I think of easy going, can talk an ear off, and very loud. After reading the chapter I learned more in depth about personality, and how it’s not just what characteristics fit us but how they do, and how we and other people reflects themselves.
Personality consists of typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. We get personality why finding how why people behave a certain way. Then that leads us into our sense of self. Who we think we are. Your sense of self affects you in many ways. How you think, how you guide you your attention to information, and how you behave. Due to all of these self affects it builds up thoughts and behavior that make up your personality. Psychologist refer to the experience of the self as the working self-concept. It is how a person reflects thinks of themselves at the time. When people start to think of themselves you come up with different factors that make us distinct from others. Who am I? Is the most common, then thinking of this causes self-esteem. When I think of self-esteem I think of confidence. It is similar to that, it is the affective aspect of the self. When you evaluate yourself you are either good or bad, worthy or unworthy.
Related to self-esteem are three different comparisons that you make about yourself that effect personality. There is the downward comparison that is when you compare yourself to someone who is in a worse situation, which tends to protect a person’s high self-esteem. Upward is when you compare yourself to one who is more competent or in a better situation which tends to confirm a person’s low self-esteem. Then there is self-observing bias is the tendency for people to take personal credit for success and blame failure on external factors. All of these are what make up your personality and can have different effects on you and how you view yourself.
I think categorizing is important because it defines who you are, and how you are made up of different classifications. It shows how different aspects, different behaviors that make up how you view yourself and how other people view you. I think it is important and personality should categorized. The most interesting think I read was about twins. Identical twins are more similar than non-identical twins in personality. Even if the twins are raised apart, the ones who are identical with have the same personality or be similar than twins that are together and non-identical. I find that so interesting and crazy that if you share almost the exact same genes you can almost replicate someone.
The most memorable think I read was the five-factor theory of personality that asses the factors of how people rate themselves, or are rated by others. Today the five-factor study dominates how psychologist use to describe personality in studies.
Terms: Personality, self-esteem, downward comparison, upward comparison, self-serving bias, working self-concept
Personality is, the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. My interpretation of this definition is, individuals develop their own way of acting and responding to social situations but also in a more private setting. Your personality helps define you and how others, including you as well, view yourself. There are tests and studies done on personality for the same reason people research anything else. Researchers want to know more about it and how it relates to psychology. I think that our personality is a huge part of who we are and has a huge effect on our social psychology. I support the tests and research done on personality because I only see it as furthering our knowledge about each individual. My knowledge on personality has changed in the sense that I know all of our life leading up to where we are now has influenced our personality.
The most interesting section was on self-schema. Each of us has multiple positions or roles to uphold. For example, I am a daughter, sister, student, etc. All of these roles influence who I am as a person and what personality I’ve developed over the years. Our self-schema helps us relate all aspects and concepts of ourselves to show who we are. Know who we are helps us decide which factors we let influence us and to what depth. I don’t know how many people actually take the time to create their own self-schema to evaluate their personality, but I think it would be very helpful. This could help people identify who they are versus whom they want to become. On top of that, it doesn’t hurt to be able to pinpoint which roles you should fulfill and which are more of a top priority.
The most memorable section was on Eysenck’s Biological Trait Theory of Personality. He was able to create three dimensions of personality traits, them being: extraversion/introversion, unstable/stable, and high constraint/low constraint. His theory allowed researchers to categorize personalities and study them further. It also allowed individuals to have some type of separation from one another. Everyone wasn’t grouped together, and there were definite “lines” between people. Even after Eysenck’s theory came out, more theories were developed on top of it to help describe the separation between personalities and personality traits. His diagram can be easily read so anyone could find which personality traits they obtain the most. There are many tests on personality and the type of person you are, but this is a very simple “test” if you will to give you the idea of who you are.
Psychology Terms: Personality, emotional responses, behavior, social psychology, self-schema, extraversion, introversion, unstable, stable, high constraint, low constraint, separation, personality traits
Personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. Everyone is aware at least a little of what their personality is, and a lot of it can come from looking at our self-schema. Self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. This set of memories can be like relationships with other people or what activities we are involved in, and it helps us use and filter information that could be about us. It can be hard to determine how to describe your personality because of the working self-concept. This is when we reflect how we think of ourselves at a certain moment, and retrieve memories from one moment to assess how we normally act in the moment. Self-esteem plays into personality in how we look at and assess ourselves, and also how other people see us. Whether your self-esteem is high or low can be based on social factors and personal factors. If you know other people like and respect you, or if you are satisfied with who you are as a person, you will typically have a high self-esteem. If you often face rejection or pain or you are not satisfied with who you are or your body image, low self-esteem will be a big problem. A lot of self-esteem issues come from comparisons we make with other people. Upward comparisons are way to easy to make with how media and society praise wealth, power, and certain types of body images. When a person looks at those standards, they are just confirming their low self-esteem. Downward comparisons can be made as well. This would be comparing oneself to another person who is less competent or in a worse situation, which tends to protect a person’s high self-esteem.
What I found interesting was Freud’s proposed model of how personality is organized. This is based around the id, ego, and superego. In the psychodynamic theory, the id is the component of personality that is completely submerged in the unconscious and operated according to the pleasure principle. The superego is the component of personality that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct and the ego is the part of the personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the superego. This is really easy to see in my own life where my id is urging me on the unconscious level to seek pleasures and personal gain. My superego is telling me what is socially acceptable and moral, and my ego is left with the conflict between the id and superego, and must choose between what I want and what is right if there is a conflict.
Terms: Personality, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Upward Comparison, Downward Comparison, Id, Superego, Ego
Chapter 12
Reading this chapter gave me a much deeper understanding of personality. Personality is defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. What we think about our self can be seen with a self-schema. A self-schema is basically a combined set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about one’s self. Categorizing while studying personality is important when using this type of thing. We are subconsciously aware of when something in our schema is heard or seen. This can be shown like if we hear our name called in the middle of a crowed, noisy room. An interesting topic I learned about in this chapter was about self-esteem and the sense of self. I enjoyed reading about this because the topic of self-esteem has always interested me and I never truly understood it. Some theories about self-esteem relate it to how we believe other people view us, while another theory is that self-esteem is more like a mechanism that monitors the probability of being excluded. Honestly, I think either of these theories makes sense. Being appraised by others that we value, are influential in the way we think about ourselves, and this explains the reflected appraisal. While the theory of the mechanism makes a lot of sense too. It explains how the self-esteem is a ‘sociometer’ which shows how if we feel that we will get rejected then we will have a lower sense of self-esteem, while if we feel we will be accepted our self-esteem will be much higher. Something that surprised me was that although we think that high self-esteem is the key to being successful, psychology shows that it is less important than we believe. Studies have shown that some people who have high self-esteem are not thought of in the way they think about themselves by others. You could also either have high self-esteem and get good grades because of it, or gain self-esteem due to your good grades. But even if you have lower self-esteem, that does not mean you cannot have a successful life. People can succeed whether or not they high self-esteem.
Key Terms: personality, self-schema, high self-esteem, low self-esteem
Personality is the individual differences in behaviors and emotions that occur in daily life. Personality testing and categorizing is very important in the study of personality. It is very important because personality is based on individual behaviors and emotions, and that each individual is different from anyone else. These tests can help differentiate differences between individuals. For example the projective measure is a personality test that explores the unconscious by having people describe or tell a story about the stimulus item. This test can help decide a person’s personality traits based on what they describe in the story and can set apart differences between their personality traits and others. Two other personality tests are the Rorschach Inkblot Test and the Thematic Apperception Test. I think that these tests should be important because it can help figure out different personality traits that someone illustrates and it can also help an individual’s perception of their self.
My understanding of personality has changed a little bit after reading this chapter. I already knew about the different tests that can categorize personality traits. The one thing that I did learn about personality and that helped my understanding was the Five Factor Theory. The Five Factor Theory is a theory that identifies the five basic personality traits that each person has. The five basic traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. This changed my understanding because I also think that each person has at least one factor in each of these traits. For example with the trait of neuroticism there are three factors, which are worried vs. calm, insecure vs. secure, and self-pitying vs. self-satisfied. In this example each person has at least one of these factors in them, for myself the worried vs. calm factor I am more in the worried column. This shows that one of my traits is that I worry about things rather than being calm. My understanding of personality has also changed with how biology can affect personality as well.
The most interesting topics that I read was how our self is influenced by cultural factors and how each country is different, for example the United States is and individualist culture while Japan is a collectivist culture. Another interesting topic was the three structures of personality; id, ego, and superego.
The most memorable thing that I learned in this reading was with the opening of the chapter. It was very surprising how Marc, who was dating this woman for over a decade and decided to break up with her. After breaking up with her Marc went onto an online dating site and met a woman named Christine. This match was made in heaven. I thought it was weird how just one match can change your life and how Marc and Christine were so compatible, especially with their interests and personality.
Psychological Terms: Personality, Projective Measure, Traits, Rorschach Inkblot Test, Thematic Apperception Test, Five Factory Theory, Self, Individualist Culture, Collectivist Culture, Id, Ego, and Superego.
Personality is basically combinations of many characteristics/qualities like typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that form a person’s own way to be therefore no one’s personality is exactly the same. Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because it’s more organized and grouped separately especially since there’s three categories that are different. The first being id which is at the bottom (basic level) and means unconscious and makes us look for pleasure and avoid pain. The second is superego which develops during consciousness. The third one is called ego and this component of personality tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while still being responsive and superego. Should it be categorized? Honestly, for me it isn’t such a big deal if it is or not just because it isn’t such a big deal for me if it’s categorized or not. But I do think having it categorized makes it better to understand and more organized. My understanding of personality after reading this chapter has made me realize that personality is a lot more than just how a person is and acts and or how they behave. It is so much more than that. The most interesting and memorable thing I got out of this chapter was the part about three aspects of temperament. The first being called the activity level and this is where the overall amount of energy and behavior we exhibit. Second is called emotionality which is the intensity of emotional reactions. The third aspect is called sociability which refers to the tendency to affiliate and just be with each other. Temperament is the general likelihood to feel or act in certain ways.
Personality, id, unconscious, superego, ego, activity level, emotionality, sociability, temperament.
Chapter 12 discussed the topic of personality very well. From reading it, I learned many new things. Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. Each person has their own personality which makes everyone different. I believe that testing and categorizing personalities is a very good idea because by studying personalities and then testing and categorizing them, we are getting a better idea of how humans differ in their thought processes. I believe that by testing and categorizing it will help us be able to understand many more different types of situations people have because we will know more about them and how their thought process works. It even says in the book that we constantly try to figure out other people—to understand why they behave in certain ways and to predict their behavior. The first step of having a personality is knowing ourselves. Our sense of self is who we believe we are which means we can think of ourselves in a positive and a negative way as well. Our sense of self influences us in a few ways. It affects how we think, by guiding our attention to information relevant to us, it also influences the way we behave as well as impacting how we feel. Self-esteem is the word we use to describe our sense of self. Self-esteem is evaluating how we feel about our personal characteristics. My understanding of personality has changed very much since reading the chapter. I thought personality was simply the way we act because of how we feel about ourselves and others. I never realized that there are so many different factors that play into the role of personality. I never realized how complex the study of personality was until reading the chapter. For example, I had no idea that personality could be related to genetic traits. I thought that was very interesting. Personality is a very interesting thing and people interact with others in different ways based on their personalities. Humanistic approaches was something I thought to be very important that I learned. Humanistic approaches emphasize how the unique goodness in a person, his or her own growth, and self-understanding all influence personality. I have learned the importance of having a positive attitude towards ourselves and others is crucially important.
I thought that Sigmond Freud’s development of the psychodynamic theory was very interesting to me. The central idea of his theory is that unconscious forces—such as wishes, desires, and hidden memories—determine behavior. Freud emphasized that we are typically unaware of those forces or their conflicts. Along with his theory, he also proposed a model of how personality is organized. In his model, personality consists of here interacting structures, and these structures vary in their access to consciousness. The first structure, the id, exists at the most basic level: completely submerged in the unconscious. The id operates according to the pleasure principle, which pushes us to seek pleasure and avoid pain. The next structure, the superego, acts as a brake on the id. The superego develops in childhood and is the internalization of parental and societal standards of behavior. It is a rigid structure of morality, or conscience. The last structure, the ego, mediates between the id and the superego. The ego tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to the rules of the superego. If the id and superego conflict, it may lead to anxiety. The ego then copes with anxiety through various defense mechanisms which are unconscious mental strategies that the mind uses to protects itself from distress.
The most memorable thing that also surprised me was that biology does affect personality. I never would have thought that genes could affect a person’s thought process of how they view themselves. I always thought that genes were only related to a person’s physical traits. According to the textbook, research has shown that certain genes can be linked with some personality traits. The term basic tendencies explain it a lot. Basic tendencies are traits determined largely by biological processes that are very stable. There is actually a gene that regulates one particular dopamine receptor which has been associated with novelty seeking. I thought it was interesting that people who have one form of this gene may be deficient in dopamine, therefore, tend to seek out novel experiences to increase the release of dopamine. These people are often referred to as adventure seekers. The gene that causes this, along with thousands of others contribute to specific traits that are part of a person’s overall personality. I thought it was interesting how they said that even if you have a genetic tendency toward being an adventure seeker, you will only become this type of person in you are raises in an environment where this trait is encouraged and supported.
Terms: personality, self-esteem, Sigmond Freud, psychodynamic theory, id, superego, ego, defense mechanisms, humanistic approaches, basic tendencies
Chapter 12 Blog Post
This chapter was so interesting because of all the different views and ideas on personality. By our book’s definition personality is “The characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances” (418). I interpreted this as the way someone may interact with him/herself and other people consciously and unconsciously. In school and in conversations we talk about personality traits quite a bit, and I have discovered while reading through the chapter that personality has much more to do with than just, traits. I thought it was interesting that the book addressed the never-ending question of “Who Am I?” I feel like this is a question that people ask their self-everyday and no one actually knows. I did like how the book said that the self is difficult to define. I agree with that completely and it was nice to see that in writing. The one question I had during this reading in the beginning of the chapter is if our sense of self is how we act and behave unconsciously or how we act and want to be portrayed as. The book than touches on this idea of Self Schema, Working-Self Conflict, and Self-Esteem, and than I start to understand the concept of “sense of self” a little better. Self-Schema was something that I have heard before and is basically general ideas that you have about yourself. We talk about self-schema in my writing class often and it was nice to see some of my classes overlapping in content. The next idea that the book talked about was working self-concept. Working self-concept is the idea of how a person thinks about him/herself at any that moment in time. At first I confused working self-concept and self-schema because they are similar but after I read further I understood that working self-concept is a more directed term that is usually used to describe a certain part of the self in a certain moment in life. Self-Esteem was also talked about and I think it was almost funny to read about this topic in a psychology textbook. Self-esteem is the evaluation of how we feel about our character. I also really liked the idea of the sociometer and how self esteem plays into that. I never looked at self-esteem in terms of rejection, but I can recall times where I felt down on myself because of a certain social interaction that may have made me feel rejected.
Testing personality and categorizing is sort of controversial for me. Sometimes I think putting labels on different types of personalities puts people in a “box” and sometimes doesn’t allow people to change and grow as people. This is my thought from a perspective from a test such as Strengths Quest. I do love strengths quest a lot but when people discuss it, they limit theirs selves to their top 10 traits and maybe forget about the traits in their life that may be beneficial or harmful. While I was reading the methods of assessing personality I found myself really interested in the projective measure. I like the idea of exploring someone’s unconscious processes because it might say something about a person that they are unaware of. I am not sure about the validity of showing ambiguous pictures to people to fully test their unconscious processes, but I think it would be a good start to understanding the way you interact with yourself and others. The thing that I was unsure about was the objective measures. I think the self-reporting personality quizzes that are credible are great and do say something about the person’s personality, but I can relate it back to the Working Self-concept by saying that the personality quiz may only reflect how the person is feeling that particular instance. I do ultimately see the importance of studying and categorizing personalities because when people better understand their self, they can find what they like in other people. For example, if I understand that way that my personality fits in with my co-workers, our jobs will be easier since we understand each other better. I think the assessment of personality is great, but I do wish there were more concrete and credible ways to do it.
My understanding of personality has changed in a few ways. When I thought of personality I never remembered to relate it back to biology as well and I think that is one of the ways my thinking has changed on personality. I found the section of temperament really interesting. Temperament is the idea that we all have an innate sense to feel and act in a certain way and this is related to our biology. It is interesting because personality can be affected by our environment and different events over time, but when you think about a baby, they seem to have a way that they act without experiencing much of anything. That is why I thought this section was so interesting, and it was new to me. It is a different type of biological personality that I am not used to thinking about.
I was interested in most of this chapter because I really like thinking about the “human experience” and what the sense of self is. The idea that I found most interesting during the chapter was the idea of the psychosexual stages. The stages are the Oral Stage, Anal Stage, Phallic Stage, Latency Stage, and the Genital Stage. I have never heard of this before and it was interesting to think about the idea of pleasure and how to fulfill that beginning at birth. This is the idea that also spurs the conversation about the Oedipus complex and that is always interesting to hear about. I think it is interesting that children at the age of 3-5 would focus their libidinal energies without sexual intent. It is just a weird concept that I am still having troubles wrapping my mind around, but I think it was still interesting and in some sense the psychosexual stages all makes a lot of sense.
The idea that I found to be the most important of memorable to me was the subchapter on humanistic approaches. The idea of studying personality that focuses on the self is really neat. As I said earlier in the blog that I really like studying the idea of the “human experience” and this goes hand in hand together. I think personality is so interesting, but you have to be able to understand it for yourself to make it a really fulfilling experience. The idea of Cognitive approaches also goes well with the humanistic approach. I feel like these two ideas are synonymous in ways and I like that and think they were a very important part of the chapter.
Terms: personality, self, self-schema, working self-concept, self esteem, sociometer, psychosexual stages, oral stage, anal stage, phallic stage, latency stage, genital stage, humanistic approach, cognitive approach.
Personality can be described as the traits that define and effect each human’s behaviors differently. Testing personality is a very important test because it can predict things like how well a person might do in a certain work environment, in a marriage, or in many different aspects of human life. Every human is different, so while this task of testing personality could be difficult, it would be worth while to see why we as people, do what we do.
Self schema is the way we view ourselves such as our “gender, age, student status, interpersonal style, personal characteristics, and body image.” Our sense of self can impact various areas of life like how we interpret information or how we will behave in a given situation. Our self concept is also affected when we are surrounded by individuals. We think of distinctive identities whether that might be physical or internal that make us different from the people around us. If I am in a group of people I presume to be straight, I will probably act or be more attached to my gay identity.
I think the most interesting part of this chapter and the one thing that really changed my perceptions about personality is the talk of the “Big Five”. I had never heard of this before, but I am fairly fascinated about it. The Big Five are the comparison of Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. It was interesting to see the differences between cultures and it made me wonder why some people in cultures like East Asia have higher levels of Neuroticism than other places in the world.
Personality has always interested me ever since I took the Jung Typology Test. I believe I am an ESFP, or The Performer. Although I would not picture myself as the one who is always the certain of attention as I can be fairly shy at first in a social setting, but once I know the people, I generally do take the role as the “performer.” It would be interesting to see a bar graph indicating what is the most popular type of personality in this class.
Psychological terms: personality, behavior, self schema, self concept, The Big Five
According to the text book, personality isn’t just simply defined as how someone acts but is actually made up of three interacting structures proposed by Sigmund Freud. The first structure, the id, which exist at the most basic level: completely submerged in the unconscious. The id operates according to the pleasure principle which wants us to seek pleasure and reject pain. The second structure is the superego, which acts as a brake for the id. It is the personality that reflects the societal and parental standards of conduct. Your superego also acts as a conscience or a structure of morality. The third and final structure is the ego, the personality that tries to satisfy the wishes of the id while being responsive to superego. Your ego operates according to the reality principle which uses rational thought and problem solving. According to the psychodynamic theory unique interactions of the id, superego, and ego can produce individual differences in personality.
The reason why testing and categorizing is so important to the study of personality is because it helps us to start to understand it. I think that testing people’s personalities is important because it helps us make decisions such as picking roommates. For example Carli and colleagues in a 1991 study examined the correlation between personality similarity and relationship satisfaction among 30 college students. What they found was that the closer in personality the better the relationship satisfaction was at the end of six months of living together. Most colleges have you fill out a questionnaire to determine who would best fit your living style and personality. My roommate and I really lucked out on this because neither of us filled one out. It just so happened that my roommate and I were in the same tour group, on the same day, at the same time. It’s funny because when picking a roommate or filling out a questionnaire it can feel like you are on eHarmony looking for a potential lifelong partner. In a way it is because you have to live with this person for a year and you don’t want to dread coming back from class to your room.
After reading this chapter my understanding of personality shifted a bit. I used to think that personality was just how a person acted around certain people and it is but it is also much more than that. Personality is how we perceive ourselves and other, how we make decisions, how we live and interact with others. Personality is a wide variety of different structures that come together to make up one whole to help us understand personality.
Terms: id, superego, ego, morality, conscience, reality principle, pleasure principle, rational thought, problem solving, personality
The textbook definition of personality is, the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. To simplify that definition I think of personality as: how a person acts or thinks on a consistent basis regardless of the circumstances. Before people can fully understand what they want in another person's personality they have to be able to fully underestand their own personality. It is difficult to know our own personality. One way we begin to understand who we really are is through our self schema, self schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self. Different items can have different levels of impact on a person's self schema; for example, me being a good student has a much greater impact on my self-schema than not liking a certain food. How we perceive ourselves strongly influences our self-esteem which is the affective aspect of our sense of self. Our self esteem is basically how confident we are in certain situations, many people believe that self esteem is based on what we believe other people think of us. Self esteem affects us because we start to think of ourselves the same way we think people think of us, which could hide our true personalities. Before reading this chapter I thought personalities were completely dependent on the individual, and had nothing to do with what people around them or their surroundings did. I thought that a person can choose to change their own personality, but it couldn't be altered just by being around other people or scenarios. I now understand that the opinions and attitudes of the important people in your life not only affect you, but they can also change your personality.
Because so many people hide their true personalities it is very important that we have and use personality tests to identify our true characteristics. There are many different ways to test personalities and none are better than the others, researchers ususally use a test that is in line with their theoretical orientation. Projective measures test are tests that try to have people project their thoughts and ideas onto something with no real meaning, one projective test is an ink blot test. Objective measures are tests that are straightforward tests that aren't trying to understand the unconscious influences, they are usually tests where you rate how strongly traits influence you. Personality in everyday life is where a person is observed in their everyday life to see how their personality emerges. One specific test of this is the EAR, during this people wear a device that records interactions by listening to snippets of conversations. Obvservational methods are when a researcher comes in to a person's life and observe some interactions or behaviors. This could be conducted by looking at how someone keeps their room or by viewing their facebook page. I think each of these personality tests have their strengths and they all do the job of understanding a person's true personality, and they are necessary for a person to be able to truly understand themselves.
The most memorable part of the chapter, to me is the section where it explains the psychosexual stages of development. Although there isn't much evidence to back up Freud's theories about psychosexual development, parts of them still make sense to me. It seems to me that all babies prefer to be with their mother, so I disagree that children want an exclusive relationship with the opposite sex parent because even baby girls usually prefer the mother. I do think that children do have a certain attraction to parents of the opposite gender which causes the child to bond with the same-sex parent because they want to learn to get a partner like their parent.
The part of the chapter that surprised me the most was when the first section about self-esteem discussed reflected appraisal. Reflected appraisal is when we internalize the values and beliefs expressed by people who are important in our life, we adopt those attitudes and behaviors as our own. It basically says when people around us make decisions or their opinions known we are inclined to accept these as our own values. This concept surprises me because it shows that people around us can influence our own personalities, which goes against what I thought of personality before reading this chapter.
Psychological terms: personality, self-schema, the self, personality tests, theoretical orientation, projective measures, objective measures, unconscious, personality in everyday life, EAR, observational methods, psychosexual development, reflected appraisal
Personality is the thoughts, emotional problems, and behaviors that a person continually repeats over time. It may also be described as how you perceive, and how people around, perceive you. There are many ways to evaluate personality. The internet has many options just within itself, but the most common form of evaluation is the personality test. Psychologists use personality tests to help the client, but to also further the understanding of it for themselves, as well as the field of psychology in general.
Psychologists must diagnose personalities and behaviors in order to understand and help heal the ones that may be hurt. Negative diseases and behaviors may keep someone from reaching their full potential, so the help of the psychologist is needed. Although the study of personality may not be important to some, the fact that it is beneficial to others in making themselves better people seem to outweigh the reluctance. Although you may think you understand yourself as a person, the person next to you might not and could use guidance to start becoming the person they want to, and should, be.
After reading through this chapter, I was surprised at the complexity of the personality and self. There are many influencing factors that determine how we act, and who we are a person. The way in which you were raised greatly factors how you may feel about yourself in terms of self-esteem. I was also surprised when I read about self-schema (An integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about the self) and how biased people are towards their actions, and the actions and behaviors of others. In other words, my understanding of personality was quite enhanced after the reading of this chapter.
The most interesting portion of the reading to me seemed to be the section about social comparisons. I thought it was odd how natural it is for humans to compare themselves with those around them. The result from the comparison would then have a direct effect on the self esteem of the comparer. I think it is odd and interesting how we do this, regardless of the negative effects it may have. Whether it’s an upwards or downwards comparison, I don’t know if it is healthy for people to always think twice about themselves. Because your personality and uniqueness make you who you are.
Psychological Terms: Personality, Thoughts, Behavior, Psychologists, Psychology, Client, Complex, Self-esteem, Self-Schema, Social Comparisons
Personality as defined in the book is consisting of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. In my head, I think of personality being what makes up a person. To me, in a way, personality is why someone is the way that they are. There are countless amounts of personalities because no one is alike, and there are billions of people in this world. Going along with personality, there are different aspects that go into it. The first of those aspects is self-schema. Self-schema consists of sets of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves. Self-schema basically is just how we perceive ourselves, which plays a big role in our personality as a whole. Next is working self-concept, which is how we view ourselves at a certain moment. Working self-concept takes place at a certain places of in a situation, therefore; a person’s personality will change depending on that certain situation her or she is in. A common, well-known aspects of personality is self-esteem. Self-esteem is defined in the book as the affective aspect of our sense of self. A person’s self-esteem can tell someone a lot about that person. If they have a high self-esteem, they are probably outgoing, comfortable in their skin and happy most of the time. If someone has a low self-esteem, they are more likely to be more sad and shy. All of these factors play major roles in making up a person’s personality. There are several methods used to test personality. There are projective measures, objective measures, personality in everyday life and observational methods. I think testing and categorizing people’s personalities is important, but only to a certain extent. Let people live their life without being categorized into their respective groups. Sure, it can be good to know who fits into which personality areas, but does it really matter that much? I felt like I knew a good amount about personality, however; I did learn additional aspects while reading this chapter. For example, did not know about the several different methods used to assess personality. The most memorable thing I learned while reading this chapter was the unconscious conflicts, and the iceberg chart that went along with it. I was surprised to learn that our conscious awareness is only a very small piece of our mental activity. I was interested learning that our unconscious level contains material that we cannot easily retrieve because those memories being us anxiety or discomfort. I was most interested by the different kinds of methods used to measure one’s personality, mostly because I was unaware of all of those different methods. Terms: personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, projective measures, objective measures, observational methods, unconscious conflicts,
Personality is generally who we are on a normal day, how a person normally thinks, feels and acts. I think it is important to study because it varies because no two people are quite the same and it can reveal answers to why a person acts the way they do which can make it interesting to study, or how personalities change throughout the generations to see whether it can connect to what is going on in the world or the environment. My understanding has changed because I did not realize how much went into personality or how it affected other traits people have.
I think the self traits were most interesting because we all act that without always realizing it, then after reading over it, I realized moments in my life where it applies. I think self-schema plays a big part in personality and makes us who we are. We all have different memories, beliefs and thoughts about ourselves causing us to think the way we do and have different opinions on situations. It is something that makes us all unique, personal experiences have a big role in those actions and thoughts. I’ve always just found that interesting, you are surrounded by people with way different life experiences and opinions yet can still get a long and have your personalities line up. It is also weird how you can see yourself full of negativity, feel worthless but have people think you’re an amazing person who deserves the best in life. I feel like working self concept goes a lot with self-esteem, if you have a lower self-esteem the thoughts about yourself will be more negative toward yourself, same with higher self-esteem gives you more positive feelings about yourself, which could be perceived as having an ego to some people.
I think the section “How we assess personality” was most memorable, especially the section on roommates, the majority of college students are all dealing with that. I think it is a very important factor. I have learned in the last few months, that I am one of those people who can’t always get along with someone who is exactly like me all that well so I do think it is important to factor that you need compatible personalities to make life easier. Which changed the idea of what my personality is.
I also liked the section where they stated behavior is influenced by personality and situations. I personally agree with situationism because if someone is having an off day and snaps on somebody, that doesn’t necessarily say they are a bad person, it is just whatever they are dealing with in life. I’ve had people think I was mean when I snap just because I am not in the mood to handle a situation or just having an off day, that doesn’t have much to do with my personality most of the time. People tend to react to things in different ways and have different behaviors causing multiple theories like the chapter stated.
I personally find it all interesting and relatable since personality is a big part of who we are and how people see us as. I think it is an important part of psychology that needs to be studied and is probably one of the few things that won’t change when it comes to people, personalities will probably always be a factor in who someone is throughout the generations.
Terms used- self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, situationism, personality
Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. We know ourselves through what we believe. Self-schema is an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalized about the self. These are concepts that are most strongly related to a person’s sense of self. The working self-concept reflects how a person thinks of themselves at a certain moment. This depends on which aspect of the self is most relevant at the moment. Locus of control is the idea that personality is based on a person’s perception of whether a person's controls the rewards and punishments that they experience or does not control.
Testing and categorizing personality is important for psychologists to be able to understand personality from an objective psychological perspective and to be able to assess what we are talking about. There are several ways to assess personality. Projective measures is a personality test that examine unconscious processes by having people interpret ambiguous stimuli. Objective measures is relatively direct assessments of personality, usually based on information gathered through self-report questionnaires or observer ratings. Another method of assessing personality is through observational methods, this is judging a person’s personality by looking at their things and observing their behavior.
The most interesting part of this chapter for me was the about temperament. This is the biologically based tendency to feel or act in certain ways. There are three aspects of this. Activity level is the overall amount of energy and behavior we exhibit. The next aspect is emotionality which describes the intensity of emotional reactions. The third aspect is sociability which refers to the general tendency to affiliate with others. This is interesting to me because early childhood temperament appears to influence behavior and personality significantly throughout a person’s development. Although it isn't completely conclusive of adult behavior extensive studies have been done to predict adult behavior by looking at the person’s childhood personality. An example of this is my sister. As a child she was quite, careful, and organized. Now she works very hard in school, a clean freak and tends to be rather shy.
The most memorable part of this chapter self esteem and life outcomes. As a student I have sat in many different seminars talking about having a positive attitude and loving yourself and everything will be okay. Although people with high self esteem report to be much happier but it is weakly related to objective life outcomes. The chapter indicates that an inflated self-esteem can actually cause some downsides. Violent criminals commonly have very high self esteem and some people become violent when they think others are not treating them with an appropriate level of respect. One characteristics associated with a high self-esteem is narcissism. People who are described this way are self-centered, view themselves in grandiose terms, feel entitled to special treatment and are manipulative. A young man I graduated with hard an extremely hard time making friends because he was a narcissist. He was rude, unwilling to think of other people, and couldn’t maintain a healthy friendship. This ultimately lead to him being unhappy. This narcissism can derive from social media, grade inflation, and programs aimed to increase self-esteem.
Psych terms: Personality, behaviors, thoughts, emotional responses, Self-schema, memories, sense of self, working self-concept, Locus of control, psychological perspective, Projective measures, unconscious processes, ambiguous stimuli, Objective measures, observational methods, temperament, emotionality, sociability, development, self esteem, life outcomes, narcissism
Personality is the behaviors and attitude that stays constant in a person’s life; it can be influenced by personal biological make up and the surrounding environment that the person grew up in and lives in daily. Something that I noticed from reading the chapter this week is that personality has a lot to do with perceptions. Our sense of self is based off of how we perceive ourselves and how other people perceive us. From those perceptions stems a person’s self-schema, self-esteem, and how we interact with the world. A self-schema is all the memories and beliefs that a person has about himself. That information gives him an insight to what he will enjoy or what tasks will be hard for him. The schema can also help in building up self-esteem or breaking it down. Self-esteem is how we feel about our behaviors and attitudes. If someone does not feel comfortable climbing latters she will probably have a low self-esteem in believing she can go bungee jumping. Both self-schema and self-esteem impact how a person decides how to live in the world. Based on personal information from the past a person will know what or what not to do in the day while self-esteem will also determine if someone would do something or not.
What was most surprising was how Freud was accredited as a psychologist for so many years with all his weird theories that normally have to do with sex. It was disturbing to read that children grow up wanting to fight their same sex parent for the love of the father or mother. It also did not make any sense. However, I could understand see that there could be unconscious forces trying to determine behavior. In the previous chapter it talked about stereotypes and in another chapter it talked about schemas. The information accumulated by both can be recognized in the unconscious mind and a person can quickly act out a behavior without even thinking about it because of the information from stereotypes or schemas. The interesting part of the chapter was how we don’t know for sure if humans can change personality.
Terms used: personality, self-schema, self-esteem, behaviors, attitudes, unconscious, stereotypes
“Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances” (418). However, people approach determining why a personality is what it is in different ways.
There is the psychodynamic theory, for example, which suggests that one’s personality is determined by subconscious aspects of a person, such as their id. However, the superego takes social norms into account, and the ego takes both the id and the superego into consideration when determining behavior. Thus, these aspects form what some may determine to be one’s personality.
The humanistic approach to determining personality focuses on “how the unique goodness in a person, his or her own growth, and self-understanding all influence personality” (432). In this theory, personality development is determined by our sense of self and how others see us. For example, the amount of affection one receives as a child. This topic may have been the most memorable for me, because in a sense, it gives an insight into the ways that parents raise their children: a child’s personality will be more likely to be based on conditions of worth if the parent only gives a child affection when he or she approves of the child’s behavior, and the personality will be based on unconditional positive regard if the parent provides affection unconditionally, with the second resulting in a child with a higher sense of self-esteem and, consequently, a personality reflecting their “true selves”.
Personality may also be determined by cognitive approaches, or how we think. For example, if a personal thinks that they have control over the outcomes of situations, their personality is based on an internal locus of control, rather than an external locus of control. Reciprocal determinism is also a cognitive approach to analyzing personality, and explains behavior based on our environment, person factors, and our behavior.
Finally, most determine personality based on trait approaches. This has largely been through the Big Five (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) or through the biological trait theory (based on one’s level of stability, extroversion/introversion, and constraint). The Big Five, which is more prominent today, can be used to predict behaviors and satisfaction in various aspects of one’s life.
In addition to these theories, other factors are accepted as playing roles in personality. For example, temperaments, unlike personality traits, are not impacted by life experiences, and instead “represent the innate biological structures of personality” (441). Also, the situation can influence one’s personality, so one must be careful to distinguish between one’s basic tendencies and one’s characteristic adaptations when attempting to determine personality.
Ultimately, in my mind, personality is how one thinks and behaves, as impacted by temperament, situationalism, and their ego. Although testing and categorizing personality may produce useful data, which may allow for prediction of behavior, it would appear that there are so many exceptions that we are a long way from being able to predict someone’s behavior with complete accuracy. Therefore, I don't see a lot of benefit in testing and categorizing personality, though it is very interesting to read about.
My understanding of personality has gotten a lot deeper, though, of course, I can think of examples within my own behaviors for each theory and description I’ve now become exposed to. The main change in my concept of personality, however, would be that though I might not before have considered much other than one’s behavior as their personality, this chapter makes me consider one’s thoughts more. (Actually, there is an episode of House in which a husband becomes unable to lie to his wife, and when he returns to normal, she has virtually fallen out of love with him, believing him to be a different person than she originally thought he was. When I first saw this, I cared much more about his ego than his id, but with a deeper understanding and more examples, I can understand the wife’s side.)
It was interesting for me to read about self-concept and working self-concept, and how they are affected by our self-schema (what we know about ourselves), our self-esteem (which is impacted by our reflected appraisal), and the theorized internal sociometer (how the perceived probability of rejection inversely correlates with one’s level of self-esteem). Additionally it was amusing to read about downward and upward comparisons, the self-serving bias, and the better-than-average effect.
Personality, psychodynamic theory, id, superego, social norms, humanistic approach, conditions of worth, unconditional positive regard, cognitive approaches, internal locus of control, external locus of control, reciprocal determinism, trait approaches, the Big Five, biological trait theory, temperaments, basic tendencies, characteristic adaptations, situationalism, self-concept, working self-concept, self-schema, self-esteem, reflected appraisal, sociometer theory, downward comparisons, upward comparisons, self-serving bias, better-than-average effect
Personality is how we come to know ourselves through typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors. In all people the categories in our personalities are for the most part pretty stable or consistent throughout our lives. In my cornerstone class last year we did a short test over our personalities. This was important to the class, but I think it is also important in general for the same reasons. The main reason for the test was to choose groups for a project, but why was the test necessary? The test was necessary to put people of different personality types into a group to make sure we worked well together and so we did not have more than one person who had the same personality type in a group to keep away from potential risks. Because of this I do think that testing and categorizing should be important. This way you can know your employees better and know whom they would work well with or around. My understanding of personality has changed some but not dramatically. I did not know that the emotions had a role in the personality of someone. The fact that emotions do play a role in someone’s personality is clearer and I understand why it is now. I found the topic on the three structures of personality to me the most interesting to me. The three structures of personality are ID, superego and ego. The first structure is ID, which is in our unconscious thoughts. The book says that ID operates according to the pleasure principle, which is what makes us seek pleasure or pain. Sigmund Freud said that what drives the pleasure principle is the libido. The libido is the energy that makes us look for pleasure and acts on impulses and desires. The superego is also in our unconscious thoughts or behaviors. The superego is developed in our childhoods and is developed by the standards of society and our parents. The superego in other words knows what society and our parents expect from us, which is why we cannot always do what we want. Our ego tries to make both our ID’s and out superego happy. Our Ego tries to make us happy or pleasured but at the same time has to understand the superego and the standards of society and our parents. Ego also reacts on the reality principle, which is rational thought and problem solving. What I found very interesting however was that they used an ice burg to show the conscious and unconscious of the ego, id, and superego. I do not know why they used an ice burg but it made me think of and relate it to the Titanic. Everyone saw the iceberg, just like how everyone sees who you are. But you do not know what their personality is like until you run into them multiple times and get to know them. Like the iceberg, they just saw the top, or outside of it, but what the people and captain of the titanic did not know, was that there was much more to the iceberg then what they could see.
Terms: Pleasure Principle, Id, Ego, superego, reality principle, personalities, behaviors,
Personalities, to me, are ever changing factors about a person that make someone who they are. The book definition of personality states that personality is, “relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances.” This part of the definition I believe is incorrect. Personality is not stable in people. For example how I would respond to something now is not how I would have responded to something just two or three years ago. Another example is that for a while I was quite the girly girl, and now I’m very much a tomboy and some days I literally feel as if I am a boy. I suppose the testing and categorizing is not something that I think should be SO important. What have we really become when we base our personalities off a question and a score? I suppose if you are actually studying personality it would be useful but for the everyday person, its not the best thing in the world. It has changed, just a bit. Most of it I had my mind pretty well wrapped around. That and we went over personality for almost two months in my high school class. Something that I actually found rather interesting in this chapter was the diagram helping to explain Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory of Personality, or the picture on 429 of the iceberg. It kind of put things in a weird perspective that made sense to me and I thought it was just really interesting. The most memorable thing I learned, though, was the section of projective measures. I loved the book definition of it because it was an overly fancy way of saying, “How we feel about any form of art,” or “What we see in a painting.” But being the daughter of an elementary art teacher this part would be really cool for me. How disorders are found by looking at blobs of paint. It can’t help but make me wonder if those kinds of things are really accurate or not.
Terms: Personality, Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory of Personality, Projective measures
Personality is three things. There is what we think, how we respond to a situation, how we usually behave. What we think is our self-esteem. Your self-esteem is a big part on what you think. Self-esteem affects what you think about yourself. It is not what you think about other people. Reflected appraisal is when you let your self-esteem be affected by what other people think. This is what makes self-esteem so strange. It does not affect what you think about other people, but it is affected by what other people think. Comparing to other people can also affect what we think. I know that when I go to Ultimate practice I thought I was not that good. It was a big change from high school because I thought I was pretty good in high school. The reason I though I was not good because I was comparing. I had an upward comparison. I was comparing me to some of the people who have more college experience than me. Comparing also affects how we respond. When I felt like I was not good at practice I was thinking what happened. I was kind of thinking what was going on. Then I realized that there is more to Ultimate than just what was in high school. How we behave can be affected by our biology. The book talks about the biological trait theory. This talks about how our biology affects if we are introverted or extraverted. It also talks about how it affects how stable or unstable we are. This makes sense to me because when I was growing up I was an introvert and I was kind of told that I was an introvert.
We need to test people’s personality so they know what they are like. This is important for me because I am not good at telling things about myself. This is good for me so I can know what I am. It should be important so people can know what they are like.
What I think about personality changed. I am not sure what I thought about it. It makes it easier to understand when you think about it in parts. I understand also why people usually do not change.
This most interesting thing that I read was about comparing and the bias. These were interesting to me because it made sense to me. I did these things. I will blame what happens on other things.
The thing that surprised me was that you could tell what someone is going to be like when they are really young. We usually do not change. That is surprising that you can do this.
Personality, self-esteem, reflected appraisal, upward comparison, biological trait theory, introverted, extraverted, stable, and unstable
From reading chapter 12 of our textbook, personality is a group of characteristics of our thoughts behaviors, feelings and emotions that make one unique. Categorizing and testing are so important of personality is because there are a variety of different categories would could be under and the only way to find out where our true personality lies is from testing and categorizing our key points to our personalities. From reading this chapter my understanding of personality has changed I always judge people who are rude and mean all the time but now I think maybe they can change how they are because they have grown up like that all along and that’s what makes them so different from others. From this reading the topic I thought was most interesting to me was the psychosexual development. Psychological doctor of the name Freudian thought our child hood experiences on the development of your personality. He believed children aimed to satisfy libidinal urges to experience pleasure. On children’s interest of these satisfactions they go threw different kinds of developmental stages that correspond to curtain urges. I find this fascinating how one can change its personality just because of a pleasure. There are 3 stages he focused on the mouth, the anus and the genitals. First off the mouth, which in this case is called the oral stage that last from the day, you are born to 18 months. With in that time period newborns are looking to pleasure themselves by mouth. The reasoning is because infants find breast-feeding to be relaxing and find pleasure by sucking of the nipple. The next stage is the anal stage. This stage first starts around the ages of 2 to 3. This is due to toilet training as they learn to control their bowel movements. The next stage is the phallic stage. During the phallic stage they direct their arousal towards the genitals. They now discover their pleasure of rubbing of the genitals. The next stage is called Latency stage in this stage found pleasure doing schoolwork and finding friends to be around. Lastly the genital stage when they go through adolescence and find pleasure through sexual contact with another person. From these developmental stages is where its believed from Freudians theory that personality can be altered on how you bring about your self to these stages. One memorable thing I learned from this chapter was collective and individualist cultures. I found this appealing because eastern cultures value more on a group and masses of people together and the western cultures such as use rely on individualism and an independent standpoint.
Terms: Phallic stage, Anal stage, Oral stage, Psychosexual stages, arousal, Latency, genital stage, individualism, categorizing, personality.
The book defines personality as “what is consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances.” I believe testing and categorizing is important to the study of personality in psychology because it allows psychologists and researchers to have a basis in which to begin their studies from. Otherwise there would be a much too broad, extensive, and nonspecific answer for any question regarding personality or the self. No one would be able to achieve a more clear answer about other people if there were no categories or tests. Sure, we could imagine how and why a certain person might or might not do something, or why the act the way they do, but we would have nowhere to go with it. I think that it definitely be a part of this study because it allows for psychologists to get a pretty accurate insight into someone’s personality without directly asking someone about it. This is important because people have their own biases about themselves, and can lie about certain aspects of themselves to be more presentable in their minds. By using for example, the TAT or Thematic Apperception Test, psychologists can find out who someone is clearly without any influence. My understanding of personality has changed after reading the chapter though extending what I already believed about certain aspects of the topic. I knew a few more in depth things about personality, but the chapter really expanded on all of them, and included things that I’ve never really thought about before. I was always really interested in the psychological tests because I have had a few friends ask me questions, or they would ask me to describe a series of things. Through that they would be able to psychoanalyze me, which was always really cool and freaky at the same time. I was excited to read about some of those tests because I could finally see how they work, and what’s behind them. The tests were definitely the most interesting thing to me because you can find out so much about a person by asking them peripheral style questions, which often give you a better answer than if you would have just asked them something straightforward. The most surprising thing that I read in the chapter was about common defense mechanisms according to Psychodynamic Theory. I was surprised to learn about how many different ways people react to uncomfortable situations.
Terms: Defense Mechanisms, Psychodynamic Theory, Psychoanalyze, Thematic Apperception Test, Personality.
The book’s definition of personality is, the characteristics thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. This definition basically says that everything you do or think, adds up to your personality. I think that everything about a person, defines their personality. Every person has some sense of who they are as a person and this sense of self really contributes to our personality. The way we describe ourselves and our mental representations and personal experiences give insight into our personality. Our self-awareness is not just mentally, but also in our sense of self of the physical body and conscious awareness of being different from everyone else. When we picture ourselves or must describe ourselves to someone else, we dive into our self-schema. The self-schema consists of integrated memories, beliefs, and generalizations of ourselves. A self-schema is like a box inside of our heads filled with things about ourselves like being a daughter, or a good student. Aspects about ourselves that we find most important are prominent in our self-schemas. How we think about ourselves affects how we think, the way we behave, and how we feel.
All the many factors that add to a person’s personality are studied through testing and categorizing. There is no way to fully understand personality, because it is such a broad topic, if it isn’t tested in some way. One theory that has tested personality is the psychodynamic theory by Sigmund Freud. His theory stated that unconscious forces determine behavior, such as desires, wishes, and hidden memories. Although this theory may not be correct, it led to a different understanding of personality and more and more studies being done to better understand the concept. Others studies done about different aspects of personality are the humanistic approach, sociometer theory, and cognitive theory.
I’ve always thought personality was interesting and wanted to learn more. I’ve wondered how people are all so different and thought it was mainly on the culture they were raised in, but is influenced on much more. The way I always thought about personality was just things that define us; my culture, my sense of humor, my moods, or even like with social psychology, the way I communicate with others, etc. I didn’t think that the way I saw myself actually contributed to my overall personality. I never thought there were so many aspects that would add up to different personalities.
I think the most interesting or most memorable topic of this chapter was about self-serving bias. Self-serving bias is the tendency for people to take personal credit for success but blame failure on external factors. I think this topic was so interesting to me because it is so true, I know I do it all the time and have noticed when others do it. If I do well on a test I think, ‘wow, I studied so hard, I’m smart’, but if I fail the test I will sometimes think, ‘I failed that test because the teacher didn’t teach us that information or that wasn’t fair’. The reason we do this is to boost our self-esteem. If I think I did really bad on that test because I didn’t study or I’m not that smart, I’m not going to feel very good about myself. I think we also do this, but in the opposite way when thinking about our people. If my brother failed a test I would say it was because he didn’t study, giving him personal credit for the failure instead of an outside source.
Psych Terms: personality, self-schema, social psychology, memories, theory, psychodynamic theory, humanistic approach, cognitive theory, sociometer theory, self-serving bias, self-esteem
Chapter twelve taught me a lot about personality. Personality consists of many different things. I did not realize how many different things there were that tied into our personality. Some of the things that the book talk about are emotional responses, personal thoughts, self-concept, self-schemas, and temperament. Our emotional responses to situations give a lot away about our personality. Our different emotions towards different things can help identify specific tendencies in our personalities. If a person is shyer and embarrassed all of the time, their self-confidence is probably pretty low. Having little confidence, or even a lot of confidence in oneself, can be a huge factor in personality and self-perception. Our personal thoughts sort of play into our emotional responses as well. Our perceptions of what goes on around us come from personal experiences and memories. If our memories are of good experiences before, we are more likely to do these things again and interact with the same people, but if we remember an uncomfortable situation, where maybe people weren’t very friendly towards us, we are less likely to partake in the experience again. Acceptance is a huge contributor to confidence and self-esteem. As humans we seek pleasure. We have three structures of personality, and the first is id, which is the part that operates according to the pleasure principle. The second structure is the superego. The superego is kind of what keeps our id in check. It doesn’t allow us to make crazy decisions. The third structure is our ego. Our ego is kind of defined as a need to be satisfied. It tries to satisfy our wishes in a way that still follows what the superego allows us to do.
I found the part about libido to be the most interesting part of personality. I always imagined libido as a sort of sexual term. It can be used in a sexual meaning, but that is not the only thing. Libido in general, describes the energy that we have for pleasure seeking. Libido is what drives us to do a lot of things. It can be a major motivator because it helps boost our egos, and raise our self-esteem by giving us goals to drive at. When we reach those goals, our overall well-being improves.
Terms: Temperament, self-concept, self-schema, emotional responses, id, ego, superego, self-esteem, libido
Personality can be defined as the characteristics thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively unstable in an individual over time and across circumstances.It isa important to test and catergorize personalities to better understand them. Yes, it is and always will be important because it makes up each individual. Individually every person has a different personality, but we group them together into certain categories to give them a label.
I don’t think my understanding of personality has changed since reading this chapter, It however has improved.I now know how the traits are grouped. This chapter did help me better understand the trait approaches that describe characteristics. The Big Five seem to play an important role in distinguishing personality types. Openness to experience is the appreciation for art, emotion and adventure, very curious people. Conscientiousness thed tendency to be organized and dependable, these types of people aim for achievement. Extraversion give positive energy and emotion, they are talkative and tend to seek stimulation from other. Agreeableness are the type of people who tend to be cooperative and compassionate towards others. Neuroticism tend to experience unpleasant emotions such as anger, sadness, depression etc. these people tend to be emotionally unstable.
The most interesting thing was the section about Ego, Superego and ID. ID is the most basic level:completely submerged in the unconscious. First off I was unaware that our brain still has thoughts that we personally dont know about. I understand that we are not conscious of everything that we do but I thought we had it under control for the most part. The ID section operates according to the pleasure principle; which seeks pleasure. Superego is the second structure and acts as a brake on the ID. Superego is a psychodynamic theory that reflects the internalization of societal and parental standards of conduct. The tip of it all is our Ego, mediates between the id and the superego. It tries to satisfy our wishes while being responsive to our superego. After reading this my understanding of our ego is that it mellows us out; most of us anyways.
The most memorable thing was the working self-concept, reflects how a person thinks of herself at a certain moment. I found that the working self concepts guides your behavior and how you view things in certain environments very interesting. It has a small control over your self esteem. I believe for girls it plays a major role. If you do not feel a certain way at a certain place that could cause you to act a bit out of character.
Terms used: personality, ID, superego, ego, psychodynamic theory, compassion, agreeable, neuroticism,emotional, openness to experiences, Conscientiousness, extroversion, individual, characteristics, working self-concept, self esteem
This chapter was about what self and personality actually means and how you can be defined by it. Personality consists of the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time. Understanding your personality is difficult because people are so complex and different. There are three aspects that make up our self, self-schema, working self- concept, and self-esteem. Our self-schema consists of an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves. Our working self-concept is limited to the amount of personal information that is being processed at one moment in time. These self descriptions depends on which memories you retrieve, which situation you are in, which people you are with, and your role in the situation. Self-esteem is the affective aspect of our sense of self. We can objectively believe good things about ourselves and still have low self esteem. The most interesting part of this chapter was how Freud developed the psychodynamic theory of personality. It is interesting how that theory says our personality is based on our unconscious wishes that create conflict between the id, ego, and superego.
Terms: Personality, self, self-schema, working self-concept, self esteem, memories, psychodynamic theory, low self-esteem, Id, ego, superego, unconscious.
Personality in the book says it is a relative stable pattern of behaving, feeling, and thinking that distinguishes one person from another. I agree with this definition of personality because I think it is how someone acts and how someone thinks. Testing and categorizing the study of personality is important because we can compare how we are to other people. This can help us learn on why someone acts the way they do and if there is a problem with one’s personality we can see what is different and help them fix it. I don’t think testing and categorizing someone’s personality should be important but I can see why it is if you want to help that person if there is a problem with their personality. My understanding of personality has changed in the way that I didn’t know people tested and categorized people’s personalities. The most interesting thing I read in this chapter was Eysenck saying you can describe personality in three basic traits: extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism. Neuroticism consists of traits such as anxiety, guilt feelings, low self-esteem, and shyness. Psychoticism consists of traits such as aggressiveness, impulsivity, and lack of empathy. Lastly extraversion consists of being an extreme extrovert to extreme introvert. The most surprising thing to me in this chapter was about body types. A psychologists with medical training, suggested that the shape of one’s body determined one’s personality. He developed three body types: Endomorphs are round, mesomorphs are rectangular, and ectomorphs are thin. Endomorphs love comfort and are outgoing, mesomorphs are assertive and energetic, and ectomorphs are restrained and lonely. Terms used: personality, self-esteem.
From this chapter we learn that personality is the characteristic thoughts, emotions, responses and behaviours that we consistently express over time. This chapter spoke a lot about our self and self-esteem. Testing and categorizing is important because it allows scientists to find an understanding of why people are the way they are. It helps to figure out why people are the way they are.
While I feel that this chapter really just enforced my understanding of personality, I did not truly realise the extent, the number of factors in personality. To me personally, I feel like my personality changes a lot, I know the way I would want myself to react in a situation but that doesn't mean I act that way. I believe that is due to the fact that I am trying to change, I know that I can be a dick sometimes, but the problem is I don't realise when its happening. Because of this I make an effort to be aware of my actions and their consequences. I took the big five personality test and got RACUI. This means, reserved, accommodating, calm, unstructured, and inquisitive. While these are not really the traits I would use to describe myself, I would not say that they are incorrect. Most of these traits are not things I would even focus on. This shows me that the trait approach may be helpful for understanding yourself but it may not reflect the way you see yourself.
The most interesting thing to me was the study of self-esteem and the problems you can have with both low, and high esteem. I found it interesting that there seem to be more serious problems with high self-esteem, such as narcissism, which worsens your relationships with other people and makes you manipulative. Though low self-esteem can lead to depression which can lead to suicide (though most likely other factors would need to come into play), people with lower self esteem tend to want to make other people happy more.
Terms: Personality, self-esteem, trait approach, narcissism, depression
Chapter 12 describes personality as: the characteristics thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual across circumstances. So how a person acts, feels, and thinks makes up their personality. There are a few factors within this chapter that also effect an individuals personality. Self-schema and working self-concept are ways that an individual thinks about oneself overall and at a given moment. These factors contribute to a bigger factor of our personalities which is self-esteem. Self-esteem can be high or low, and depending on how others look at us, or how we think they do, we think of ourselves in that way and in turn can get a high or low self esteem.
Testing and categorizing of personalities is important because it gives a more accurate understanding of ourselves and others. There are many ways used to help gain this important information about individuals such as projective and objective measures. Projective explores the unconscious and objective explores the conscious influences on our personalities. There are several other ways that help in the process of gaining accurate intuition on personality like a device that records interactions with people, or just by observing things in a persons life like their room.
I think that if all the testing that is done involving personality has helped psychologists this much up til this point, then yes i do believe that it should be considered important to have personality tests so that we can further understand our minds.
I found it interesting that our personalities become stable and tend not to change too much after childhood, because with all the interactions and people that we meet in college it would seem like our personalities would continue to change at least through college and maybe into the first few years after while we are out looking for jobs and getting settled down.
The most memorable thing in this chapter to me was about identical twins and how they have similar personalities. I noticed this in my friends that are twins for as long as I've known them. They were always attached at the hip and no matter what one was going to do so was the other. They were very similar and reading this helps me understand why.
Psych Terms: Personality, self-schema, working self-concept, self-esteem, projective measures, objective measures.
Personality is defined by the text as typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively in people over time and across different circumstances. I think that personality is very broad and can sometimes be difficult to describe. The reason that I feel this way is because the idea of ones self is so circumstantial and difficult to pin point. I think that categorizing and addressing different personality types is important because I think that knowing ones personality is important to understanding who you really are and what drives your behavior.
I also think that it is important when it comes to helping understand mental disorders like depression or anxiety. I know this because I have been diagnosed with anxiety disorder since I have been very young and I have found that understanding my personality type has a lot to do with understanding how it affects my behavior and my anxiety.
The most memorable thing in this chapter was the topic of Sociometer Theory. This theory is a mechanism for monitoring the likelihood of social exclusion. This theory depicts the likelihood of self esteem lowering when rejection is present. It states that when rejection is present self esteem will lower. AN example of this would be picking out a pair of pants that you think are too small and them putting them on and they are indeed too small.
The most interesting thing for this chapter was the concept of how self esteem affects life outcomes. In western culture it would seem that self esteem would make for positive outcomes in life but studies have shown that this is actually not the case and even though people have shown to be happier when they have a higher self esteem it does not mean they have any more of successful lives.
psychological terms: self esteem sociometer theory, personality, anxiety, depression,
Personality is the collection of thoughts, emotions and behaviors that make us unique and are attributed to us for a long period of me. When I think of personality, I think of how individuals act on an everyday basis. I don’t believe that there is a certain measurable way in which we can or should measure personality. Personality, to me, is something that shouldn’t be measured and tested on. Our personalities make us unique among other human beings. Every single person has a drastically varied personality than the people around them. Some people can have similar aspects in common with each other but they never hold the same personality. My understanding of personality has changed in that they are much more detailed than just what you see on the outside. Personalities have a deep impact upon the way we think and feel, not just the way we act and behave. For the most part, we never really get to see anyone’s true personality because we can never think and feel what they think and feel. We can only learn from what they tell us which may not always be accurate. The individual may try to make excuses for some actions or they may even repress what they feel and think because they think that other individuals may judge them harshly which is an aspect of social anxiety disorder
The most interesting topic for me in this chapter was the section on self-esteem. Self-esteem, as the book puts it, is the affective aspect of our sense of self. Self-esteem measures how we feel about ourselves such as whether we view ourselves as good or bad. I thought reflected appraisal was surprising in that self-esteem may be based on how other perceive us or how we think others perceive us. If we think that other people don’t like our hair, then we tend to think that our hair style is stupid, even though we actually liked it. We may start feeling as though we aren’t as good as other. On the contrary, we may look at certain situations an receive a positive effect on our self-esteem such as feeling good about making the game winning shot and getting hugged by all of your teammates. It’s also interesting that self-esteem can be considered what psychologists call a sociometer. A sociometer is an internal monitor that measures social acceptance. The theory goes that in a situation of low possible rejection, your self-esteem will be high while in a high rejection situation, your self-esteem may be low. This also shows that there is a correlation between low self-esteem and social anxiety, which from experience, I can definitely vouch for.
Terms: Personality, thoughts, emotions, behaviors, social anxiety disorder, self-esteem, reflected appraisal, sociometer, rejection,
Personality in chapter 12 is defined as the characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances. I agree and disagree with bits and pieces of that definition. Your personality is who you are, and who you’ve become throughout your life. It’s how we have shaped ourselves as individuals. We have events in our life and we learn things that affect and can change our personality. Not a single person in this world has the same personality as you, we all shape and change our personality differently from one another.
Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because of how different everyone is from one another. If we can study and break people down into groups on how they act, think, and their personality overall, than maybe we can discover something that we once did not know. In our own minds, we use self-schema and working self-concept to determine ourselves in our own minds. I think that it should be as important as it is right now, if not more. We really don’t have a full grasp of knowledge on how peoples personality work, and people have been trying and trying to figure that out. If we can figure out more about this, than who knows all the things we can discover not only with personality, but with the overall study of the brain and psychology.
My understanding of personality changed right away while reading chapter 12. I thought I knew what personality meant, but I was only partially right. The definition really helped me grow in the knowledge of learning who I am, and how I got to where I am today. Learning about psychodynamic theory really changed my understanding the most personally. The definition says, Freudian theory that unconscious forces determine behavior. These things such as wishes, desires, and hidden memories determine our behavior. I never knew that and thought that was so cool!
The topic that was most interesting to me was the section on how our temperaments are innate. Temperament is a biologically based tendency to feel or act in certain ways. There are 3 levels of temperament, which are activity level, such as our amount of energy, and behavior we show. Our Emotionality level, which is the intensity of our emotional reactions, and finally our sociability level.
The most surprising and memorable thing I read from this chapter overall, was mainly just how my full understanding of personality and what it really is changed so much. Learning of how we change overall, and why and how we do it.
Terms: Personality, Self-Schema, Working Self-Concept, Psychodynamic Theory, Temperament, Activity Level, Emotionality Level, Sociability Level,
The textbook defines personality as, “The characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances.” Even from this definition, it is easy to see that personality is a broad subject. It includes everything that a person does, thinks or feels. Personality is very closely linked to self-esteem, or how we think about ourselves. A good example of this is the self-schema. It uses memories, thoughts or beliefs to see how one views themselves. Something that I thought was very interesting was Figure 12.6, which showed the self-esteem across the life span. Males and females generally followed the same curve, but the females were consistently lower from the ages of 12-80. The females’ self-esteem only matched males when they were young (under 12) or very old (above 80.) I think it was interesting that the self-esteem peaked around 60. I wonder why that is? Is it because this is when they start getting all the discounts at restaurants or is because this is the point when they can see that they had a good life, and get to spend the rest of their time enjoying it?
Understanding and categorizing personality is very important because it help us understand why people act the way they do. For example, if we see that a child has a personality similar to one of their parents, the parent might be able to reach the child better. The humanistic approach studies personality by emphasizing the idea that people seek to fulfill their potential by understanding themselves better. Carl Rogers used this theory to help explain how important parents’ love and approval are for a child. Other ways to understand personality look at how thoughts shape personality. The locus of control looks at how a person’s view about if he or she controls the rewards or punishments that they experience. If a person does believe that they control their rewards or punishment, they are noted as having an internal locus of control. However, if a person does not believe that they control their rewards or punishments, they are noted as having an external locus of control. People with the external locus of control can be looked at as leaving things up to fate.
Overall, I think it is important to understand and categorize personality, but there can be a downside to it. If a person believes that they have personality number 1, which can lead to laziness, they may start to believe that they are lazy and there is nothing they can do about it. Even though biology does affect personality, a lot of it is learned through the environment. This goes back to the nature versus nurture debate.
The most interesting thing for me was reading about the common defense mechanisms according to the psychodynamic theory. At first I notice that some of the mechanisms could be categorized as fight-or-flight responses, while other may not. I tried to figure out which one I was most likely to do, and I think it is either repression or sublimation. It really just depends how bad it is.
Terms: Personality, self-schema, self-esteem, psychodynamic theory, defense mechanisms, locus of control, fight-or-flight
Personality is “The characteristic thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual over time and across circumstances”. It is what sets us apart from other humans; it is our ‘soul’. Everything from eating habits to mating ritual has to do with personality; it is what makes us thrive as a species. Testing and categorizing a personality helps psychologists better understand what drives certain actions, or find if one may carry a higher risk for violent actions and things such as that. After reading the chapter I now wonder what personality traits caused me to become friends of some of my buddies. It also makes me want to take a look at how our personalities have changed together and if that explains why we are all so similar and have the same humor. It seems all it took was the similar self-schema of not really caring about being in a ‘group’ or something of the sort, we are our own group.
I found the most interesting part of reading to be the part on Sigmund Freud and his theory on psychodynamics. He used an iceberg to explain it, and I realized that I have seen this comparison everywhere. He came up with Ego, Superego, and ID. The topic that surprised me the most was that on the two adopted children who grew up in the same house most all their lives, but ended up completely different people who did not even seem to be related. This shows that a lot of personality is actually biological, and less formed by the environment, but still effected nevertheless.
The personality test was extremely accurate and explained things I would not have noticed before about my personality. It was very interesting and worth the 5 or so minutes to sort out what button was for what line.
Words: Personality, emotional response, behavior, psychologists, self-schema, Sigmund Freud, theory, psychodynamics, Ego, Superego, ID, biological, personality test.
The textbook’s definition of personality is the typical thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in people over time and across circumstances. Everyone has a different personality, meaning everyone has different ways of dealing with certain situations and learning how to react to them in a way that suits them. One of the ways we determine our own personality is by having a sense of self. Having a sense of self includes your mental representations of personal experiences. These can be brought on by your memories and perceptions of a circumstance. As we learned in chapter five, everyone has different memories and perceptions. Two people can experience a situation or memory together, but the way they perceive the memory is completely different from one another. This helps determine our personalities. Having a sense of self is very important because it impacts our lives in lots of ways. It affects the way we think, behave, and feel. Another important aspect of determining our personality is our self-schema. According to our textbook, self-schema an integrated set of memories, beliefs, and generalizations about ourselves. In other words, self-schema helps us to view ourselves. Self-schema goes along with self-esteem because self esteem is where we evaluate how we feel about our personal characteristics. Sometimes, we have a negative sense of self. People who have high self-esteem make downward comparisons, which means, they contrast themselves with people who are inferior to themselves. Whereas people with low self-esteem make upward comparisons, which means, they contrast themselves with people who are superior to themselves. Making social comparisons can be dangerous, because it can give people a clouded sense of self. For example, if a person compares themselves to another person who is much more attractive, they will start to feel like they aren’t as good. This can lead to an even lower self-esteem. We understand personality by measuring it. We do this so that we can understand how people can live such similar lives and behave or react much differently. There are three structures of personality: id, ego, and superego. The id focuses of on pleasurable principle, which causes us to search for things of pleasure and escape things of pain. The superego focuses on the morality or conscience. The superego is the exact opposite of the id. And the ego, mediates between the two. I think that it is definitely necessary to test and categorize based on personality. Personality helps us to determine how a person thinks and behaves, and if we can further test or categorize then I don’t see the harm. Since reading this chapter, I learned that a lot of different factors lead to the determination of our personalities. Whenever I have thought about the word personality I have associated it with the words bubbly, outgoing, shy, introverted, ect. I never deepened my understanding of why people are bubbly or shy. I think that the most interesting section in this chapter was the section about personality being affected by genes and the environment. They did a study on identical versus fraternal twins and found that fraternal twins have no more genes in common than do any two other siblings. They also found that identical twins are more similar in personality than fraternal twins. The most memorable thing in this reading for me, was the part about the sex differences in personality. It’s kind of self explanatory that women and men have different personality traits, but reading about them was fascinating. Women are typically reported as more empathetic and agreeable than men, but also tend to be more neurotic and concerned about feelings. Men are typically reported as being more assertive. I think that anyone would agree that these ratings have been proven to be true in our society today.
Terms: personality, behaviors, sense of self, mental representations, personal experiences, perceptions, self-schema, self-esteem, upward comparisons, downward comparisons, id, ego, superego, genes, environment
According to the text book personality are the characteristic of thoughts, emotional responses, and behaviors that are relatively stable in an individual overtime throughout circumstances. We often make opinions about other people based on their personalities. Trying to figure out and understand other peoples personalities is an everyday task for people. This is because each person has their own and very unique different personalities. For example some people can be quite and to themselves while others love attention and people around them and can be very loud. When observing a person in a group you can figure out peoples personalities very easily because they usually surround themselves with people that are like them. But that makes sense because why would a shy and quite person want to be around people that are loud and talk about themselves a lot? That does not make sense, they would have not very much in common. For me personality is all factors and characteristic that can best describe us and how we differ from all others around of us.
We all have our own sense of self, or other wise know as self-schema. This self-schema helps us understand our own personalities and integrates knowledge about ourselves to do that. We also usually use mental representation of our self-schema from our experiences, appearance, memories and conscious awareness. All of this is important because it helps us understand ourselves by helping organize, interpret and perceive and use information on our self. It shows us why we act like we do and how we differ from everyone around us.
Another part of personality is how we understand it. There are quite a few approaches in the second section of the chapter that explain how psychologist approach it. One big one is the humanistic approach. The humanistic approach is considered the person central approach, it involves our sense of self and how others precieve and evaluate us. This main humanistic approach is also considered the person centered approach. It usually emphasizes the unique goodness in a person, the growth and self understanding of all influences of personality. The other approach is the cognitive approach, this goes along with the expectancy theory. The expectancy theory states that our behavior is apart of our personality, you decide if the rewards and punishments are worth it and that shapes your personality. The last approach it talks about was the trait approach, this deals with the theory of the big five theory. It says that personality is affect by openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism
Testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality because knowing someones personality can help predict their behavior and thoughts, there are several ways to predict someone's to measure personality. One way to is projective, there are personality test that examine our unconscious process by having people interpret stimuli. Another way is objective, with is more or less a direct assessment of personality usually based on info gathered thorough self- report questionnaire or observer rating. Due to these and a few more types of testing we are now able to categorize personality. I think that testing and categorizing is important in the study of personality but only to a certain extent. Yest were do have lots of similarities to why people behaving the way they do but in each situation you never really know how exactly they are going to act because they effect people differently. This is knows as the situationism theory, which as my example above shows, behavior is effected by situation more than personality traits at times.
Before reading I never actually realized how complex our personality traits were and how much actually affected them, I found this to be very intresting. It talked about the the five basic personality traits everyone possesses, but on different scales. They are: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Its crazy that those fixe things we all possess but we are all so different because we show different amounts of them. I was able to asses what I had with each of these and it came out how I thought it would. My understanding of personality has changed since reading this chapter because now I know there is more that goes into it than just the way you act towards things around you.
Personality, Sense of Self, Self-Schema, Humanistic Approach, Person-Centered Approach, Cognitive Approach, Expectancy Theory,
Personality is how a person behaves,thinks and reacts in a certain way to situations. people have different personalities shaped by experiences they have faced in their life. Personality cannot be measured since it is not a number but it exists and it is how your perceive yourselves and others perceive you. We find it very easy to find out the personalities of people such as if they are social and loud, their group is usually the same way.
A quiet person would be easy to spot out as well.
there are certain tests to figure out your personality according to your genes but i do not think that would work. i think experiences and learning influence personality. Before reading this chapter i had about the same idea of personality as they taught us, Personality is thought of as the person's way of reaction to things in different ways.
The most interesting thing to me this chapter is that genes do affect your personality in ways. i thought that everyone's personality formed after birth but people can have their personalities checked by genes.
A memorable thing was the psycho dynamic theory by Freud that unconscious aspects of our brain affect our personality such as wanting to steal something but knowing you would get into trouble if you do it. There are many such things in the brain according to Freud.
Terms: Psychodynamic theory, Experiences, influence, Brain, genes, unconscious
This episode of This American Life gave me mixed feelings about the whole situation of the children getting switched at birth. The episode made me feel sad, upset, and many more feelings. It also gave me quite a bit of confusion. This episode really shocked me because Prairie Du Chien is significant in my life. I grew up in northeast Iowa about thirty minutes from Prairie Du Chien and I was even born in the hospital there. I was mainly shocked because I think of switching children at birth to be a very unusual thing but I feel like it would’ve been broadcasted more than it was. With that being said I think that people from around my area would’ve heard more about it. It also really makes me think because I am assuming both of the girls that got switched at birth were also born in the same hospital I was born in. It makes it very strange to think about. I think about what these two families had to have gone through dealing with their children being switched. The confusion was brought on by thinking about how shocking and weird the news had to have been to both of the girls. It also made me mad and frustrated about how the mother who knew all along dealt with the situation.
According to what I know about the scientific aspects of nature and nurture I believe they both were influential in this situation. Although, I believe both were influential I believe that nature was the most influential in this situation. One of the reasons I believe that nature is the most influential because I believe that nature has to do with the genes that each child had. Nature is influential in different factors such as: what the girls look like, how they act, and other things like that are influenced by nature. Although I do think that nature was the most influential I also believe that nurture had an impact too. I believe that the impact nurture had on the two girls had to deal with the traits that the girls learned from their families that raised them even though they were not biological. I believe that the psychodynamic theory which deals with the unconscious forces that determine behavior deals with both nurture and nature. I think that personality would be the part that is influenced greatly by nature and nurture.
These people’s personalities were greatly affected by this switch. Obviously in this situation I think anyone’s personalities would change. I think a main reason that things changed was because of the shock and changes that all of the sudden had to have been thrown at these people. Between both of the families they had to have underwent. Personality is influenced by situation and I believe that this situation would’ve had a great impact on people’s personalities. Not only did this switch have a drastic influence on people’s personalities but it also altered their behaviors. Personality is greatly influenced by many things but psychology is can have a big influence on personality.
This episode of This American Life is gave me multiple feelings and it made me think greatly about everything that would come with the switching of children at birth. It was just a very interesting episode to me and was astonishing and intriguing to listen to.
Psychology terms used: personality, behavior, psychodynamic theory, nature, nurture