Please read chapter 3. After reading the chapter, please respond
to the following questions:
Next you will be asked what three things from the chapter that you
found interesting?
1a) What did you find interesting?
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
2a) What did you find interesting?
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
3a) What did you find interesting?
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most
useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the
previous chapters?
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
7b) Why?
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think
about) did you have while reading the chapter?
9)
Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you
used in your post.
Thanks,
--Dr. M
Chapter 3
1a)
The topic of psychophysics and illusions was interesting to me. I was able to relate these topics to my own life experiences.
1b)
Illusions are caused by expectations from our past experiences and occur when one’s perception of reality is actually different from reality. Psychophysics looks at the relationship between physical changes of the world and the psychological experiences linked to these changes. This is interesting because everyone may perceive things differently. Illusions provide insight into how each individual’s perceptual system works. For example, whether we perceive an object close to us as being the same size as the same object that is far away from us may be interrupted different among people.
2a)
The next topic I found interesting was perceptual span and its relation to memory.
2b)
Perceptual span determines how much we can experience from a brief exposure. This interests me as it looks at our short-term memory and what our brains are able to store. Humans use their senses to recall something. For example, it is interesting when we hear a familiar song on the radio for only a brief moment and it soon fades from our memory, but then an hour later we are able to recall that same song in our head. It is fascinating what our perceptual span can do and how our memory allows us to recall things from moments before.
3a)
Another topic from chapter three that I found interesting was the topic of attention and its relation to our levels of consciousness.
3b)
Attention is when we are concentrating on sensory or mental events. I found the issues with attention and our consciousness to be interesting. Humans are selective as to what they are processing because it is difficult for our mind to process everything. We also control what we are reacting to as some times our minds are automatically processing information that does not require our conscious awareness. For example, it may require little conscious to drive to work on the same route every day and therefore, requires little attention. It is interesting what our minds choose to bring our attention to and what things we choose to complete without full consciousness.
4a)
The one thing I found the least interesting was the information on our vision.
4b)
Although our vision is one of our senses that provides the most critical information about our environment, I have read a lot in previous classes about our cornea and lens, retina, and the cones and rods making up the sensory system of our eyes. I have also learned a lot about color blindness. With prior knowledge of this information, I find this least interesting to read about.
5)
The information I read about cognitive neuroscience of attention will be most useful in understanding Cognitive Psychology. The neuroscience of attention discusses where and how our brain processes stimuli and why individuals choose to be selective in their perceiving of information. Cognitive Psychology is most certainly concerned with the ideas of perception, sensations, and memories. The understanding of attention and the human brain will build on our class discussions of Cognitive Psychology.
6)
Chapter three builds on the previous chapters as we look deeper at the brain functioning. From chapter two, we learned about the different regions of the brain. This chapter, however, looked more at how and why we function information in the ways we do and how our attention and memory affects our brain information processing.
7a)
I would like to learn more about selective attention and the different models of selective attention.
7b)
I would like to better understand why we select certain information to process in our brain. I want to learn more about the single-channel theory and the multiple-channel theory and how these theories restrict our information processing by channel capacity. I am curious to know if it is certain stimuli that cause us to process certain information first during a group conversation and if this relates to our senses.
8)
While reading this chapter I was focusing a lot on our sensations. I feel as if our sensations leads us to remember certain things or pay attention to certain things over other items. Our vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch allow us to experience things at a much deeper level. Our senses relate to whether we are going to remember a past experience and place that experience in our short-term memory. They also may cause us to have a higher level conscious of attention to an experience if more of our senses are involved in that experience.
9)
Psychophysics, illusions, perceptual system, reality, perceptual span, memory, senses, attention, consciousness, selective attention, vision, cornea, lens, cones, rods, retina, color blindness, single-channel theory, multiple-channel theory, stimuli, sensations, and short-term memory
1a) Illusions
1b) Thinking that a still image is moving, seeing Jesus on the wall, or trying to catch the moving black dot on an image… How does it work? What is happening in our brains when we see those illusions? There are a few explanations for the Muller-Lyer illusion, where two equal lines appear unequal. Some argue that our past experience influences our perception, and some argue that it is the brain structure that causes the illusion. This topic is interesting to me because most of the time we believe in what we see, but perception is not always accurate. It appears that our brains play tricks when we perceive the world; perhaps to find an explanation of what we see when we encounter unfamiliar stimuli. So is everything we see an illusion?
2a) Attention
2b) It is interesting that something as common as attention is still not fully understood. The textbook defines attention as a process of selecting important information to focus on, and discard other less important information, so the brain does not get overwhelmed with the amount of stimuli we receive. Automatic processing helps explains many things I do, driving home without remember driving is one of them (completely sober). Consciousness explains that when driving home automatically, I can still recognize danger and avoid it (teenage drivers). The bold words example illustrated in the textbook explains where the concept of highlighting important information came from: we automatically pay attention to cues that stand out.
3a) Sensory store
3b) Never have I wonder why I can understand what people say, or why I still remember where things are when I close my eyes; these phenomenon are due to a concept called sensory store. Iconic storage is the visual part of the sensory memory, where pieces of what we see are stored temporarily there so the brain can catch up with processing the information. Echoic storage is the auditory part of the sensory memory, where pieces of what we hear are stored for a very short period of time, so that the brain has time to put them together and comprehend the pieces as a whole. This is incredible because it explains how we comprehend all the cues we perceive every day; and by understanding this concept, maybe we can further understand people with autism disorder, who have difficulty processing every day sensory information.
4a) Vision
4b) To be honest, there is not one thing in this chapter that I do not find interesting, and it was very hard to choose one. Vision was chosen because it is more about how images are perceived with our eyes, and not much about how our brains work to understand the cues is mentioned in this section.
5) I think that sensory storage and perceptual span will be useful in understanding cognitive psychology. Cognitive psychology is about understanding, perception, thinking, and answering; without sensory storage, we will not understand what we perceive, hence losing our ability to think and produce an answer.
6) This chapter builds on chapter two by explaining, in more details, how we perceive the world. It also build on chapter one, which gives us an overall definition of cognitive psychology; chapter three elaborate the process of cognition to support the definition provided in chapter one.
7a) Memory
7b) I would like to learn more about how sensory information is processed and turned into long-term memory. I would also like to learn how brain trauma can lead to amnesia or other memory disorder, as well as any possible treatment in the future.
8) I thought about eyewitness testimony, and how inaccurate it can be. After all, memory does not work like a drawer, where everything you put in there will stay the same, or at all.
9) Illusion, attention, sensory storage, perceptual span, cognitive psychology, memory, eyewitness testimony
1a&b) One concept I found interesting is the Cocktail Party Phenomenon. I particularly was interested in this because it happens to me on an everyday basis. This phenomenon refers to the intrusion of an interesting event that gain’s your attention. The text uses the example of if you are in a conversation and hear a trigger word, like your name, in another conversation you are immediately paying attention to that other conversation even though you weren’t originally listening to it at all. I know this happens to me a lot. I will be speaking with one person but I get distracted a lot, especially if I am already interested in another conversation. I think this was just interesting because I didn’t realize there was a definition to that behavior and I didn’t realize how complex our auditory system is.
2a&b) The second topic I found interesting was the section on illusions. I particularly love illusions and tricking my eyes and brain into seeing or not seeing things. It is interesting to me that our perceptions don’t always match reality and that’s why many illusions are known as perceptual illusions. I remember as a little kid going to my grandma’s house and she would always have these optical illusions on her fridge. I used to pride myself in being able to see past the illusion to the real thing. In fact, I absolutely love taking any tests or doing any activities that are meant to confuse my brain and forcing my brain to get it right. Even more so than the Muller-Lyer illusion, I enjoy the tests where they have a paragraph of writing and they scramble the letters or drastically alter the words and you still have to make sense of it.
3a&b) The third topic I thought was interesting was the Sensory-Brain Disposition section. I enjoyed learning more specifically about what occurs when you “see stars.” I had never really known the reason for this and I have seen stars anywhere from just getting up too quickly to getting hit in the head during a rugby match. The text says that by being hit in the back of the head, or the occipital lobe, you will have the sensation of seeing stars. It doesn’t go into much of an explanation of other reasons why we might be seeing stars. I think it is an interesting subject because our eyes aren’t actually seeing these bright flashes. That seems so strange to me and it is definitely something that I would be interested in learning more about.
4a&b) I think I found the vision section to be the least interesting just because it is pretty basic and I have learned it multiple times. I have a pretty good understanding of how complex and amazing our visual system is and while I do find that interesting I just don’t think it’s as interesting as some of the other topics I read about. I have found that I do like to learn about our biological functions but I prefer to learn about the more specific cognitive topics that really involve areas of our brain, such as illusions.
5) I think this chapter gave me a better understanding of how our five senses are wired to work in our brains. But I think that the section over memory and attention might be very important in understanding cognitive psychology because they play such an instrumental role in how our brains function. If we had no memory we would not be able to have any higher order functions. And if we didn’t pay attention I don’t think we would have a lot to remember. When I think of cognitive psychology I think of the brain, its functions, and also of memory and how our brains take in, store, and use the information it collects.
6) This chapter expanded on psychophysics which was introduced in the first chapter as well as goes into more detail about different sections of our brains and their functions. In the last chapter we discussed the Central Nervous System and in this chapter we dig deeper into the Peripheral Nervous System.
7a&b) I am interested in either learning more about the process of “seeing stars” or in the topic of illusions and what part of our brains specifically help in understanding illusions. Both of these topics are very interesting to me because I really enjoy messing with my brain and trying to trick it and illusions definitely are able to do that. I also am very interested in getting a better understanding of the process of “seeing stars” because it happens to me so much and most of the time I have no idea why.
8) I thought a lot about how complex our sensory systems are and I also kept thinking about what it would be like if you lost the ability to see, hear, or smell. Their functions seem so central to our brain and its functions that I can’t imagine losing that whole section of sensory. It gave me a new respect for blind people because the text specifically says that vision is the most important sense because it provides the most critical information.
9) Terminology: Cocktail Party Phenomenon, auditory system, perceptual illusions, Muller-Lyer illusion, optical illusion, Sensory-Brain Disposition, seeing stars, visual system, cognitive psychology, higher order functions, memory, attention, Central nervous system, Peripheral nervous system
1)I found the portion of the chapter about vision to be interesting. I had learned about vision and how it worked in a class last semester but I still feel as though the system has been too complex for me to wrap my mind around and fully understand. It’s interesting to read about it again so that I can think more about the process and see if any new comprehension on the topic is possible. Another interesting part was learning about the fovea. I recall learning about cones and rods and how they react to stimuli, but I don’t recall learning anything about the fovea and how it’s responsible for allowing us to view the world around us in color. I also think it’s interesting that we have a blind spot in our vision, but are brains automatically hide this from being noticed when we’re seeing.
2)I thought reading about attention was interesting. It’s a concept most people are aware exists but rarely give little thought to on a deeper level. We ususally have a vague understanding of what the term means when used in conversation, but don’t have an understanding of what it is on a conceptual level or how our brains actually work in regards to attention. It was interesting to read about how our brains struggle with more than one cognitive task at a time, and how if we are confronted with a cognitive task in the middle of another, we’ll likely have to start the other one over again. It was also neat to learn of channel capacity. This helped explain a bit on why we can only process so much at once, because our brains aren’t designed to understand anything broader at a specific point in time.
3)Reading about automatic processing was really interesting because it’s something we all do daily and usually don’t even realize it. It’s also a bit scary because as the book point it out, we often are so attuned to driving that we can usually still drive successfully while giving parts of our attention to other things. However it is scary because it makes you wonder about how often this process could possibly fail and result in harm to the driver or others. It’s also interesting because it’s really cool that our brain has this ability and that we can use it to train ourselves to automatically react in a life-saving manner when an emergency may arise, such as with the scuba-diver example or in a combat situation.
4)I found the brief paragraph about consciousness to not be very intersting. It talked about Freud and some of his views and the mind and consciousness. At one point in time I would have probably found him and his views to be more intersting, however being in my final semester of psychology I’ve come across him and this basic information on his beliefs that reading about it didn’t catch my interest as other new information in this chapter did.
5)It’s hard to pinpoint a specific piece of information from this chapter that I believe will help in my understanding of cognitive psychology. I feel as though the entire broad theme of the chapter is important to understanding and will help me. I was able to learn about how our brain experiences the world around us and I think this is important information to know when trying to understand cognitive psychology. If we want to know how our brain works and functions, it’s obviously important to consider how it does so in regards to our surroundings we interact with every day.
6)This chapter builds on the previous chapters by yet again expanding what we’ve learned so far about the field of cognitive psychology. We’d already learned about simply what the field is, some of the specifics on the physical brain itself, and now we’ve learned some information on how our brain interprets and processes the world around us. Therefore, it relates to previous chapters simply because it’s still within the realm of cognitive psychology, and it builds on previous chapters because it’s expanding to a new type of processing our brain does as part of our cognitive functions.
7)A topic I would be interested in learning more about is illusions. I’ve always found some of them to be really neat, as I’m sure many other people would agree. I had no idea illusions could actually be used in psychophysics and could be studied as a science. I’d only ever experienced them as a fun pasttime. I would like to learn more about how psychophysicists actually use illusions in studies and what they’ve learned from them.
8)While reading this chapter I was thinking about how it’s really neat to read more deeply about a topic that we are so familiar with and often take forgranted that much deeper knowledge is available. We’ve all learned when we were very young what the five senses are. However, I had never considered how our brain actually processes these things. I kept thinking that it’s interesting that we’re just taught such a basic piece of this vast information and usually not taught much else on the topic, such as how any of these five senses actually work.
9)Vision, cones, rods, fovea, attention, channel capacity, automatic processing, illusion, psychophysics
1)
One thing that I found interesting was looking at sensation and perception. I thought that this was particularly interesting because throughout our daily lives we are often stuck between the physical world and the mental world. The physical world is the sensation that is detected from energy where as perception is where our mental status of a situation. Sensation often refers to a direct stimuli where perception is a interpretation of the things that we sense. Without sensation and perception we would not know anything about the knowledge and the experiences that we have and how each of them relate to our relation to our knowledge of events that go on in the world.
2)
The second thing that I found interesting was vision. I particularly thought that this was interesting because vision is a large part of our everyday life. But what most people don't know is that vision is actually a complex process of life and without it we would not be able to see. Vision is a complex as there are many parts that are used to make the eye work properly. The cornea and lens is used to focuses on the images on the retina, if one of these are damaged then we will not be able to focus on a particular image. The human eye has about 7 million cones which are sensitive to the stimuli and about 125 million rods which are sensitive to poorly illuminated stimuli.
3)
The third thing that I found interesting was processing capacity and selective attention. I found this interesting because we have a lot of things that go through our brain on a daily basis and to know how the processing capacity and selective attention works is something that I feel is very important because if we are not able to pay attention to a particular stimuli. Channel capacity inability to process all sensory cues simultaneously. Selective attention is analogous to shinning a flashlight in a darkened room to see which items are interesting while the other items remain dark. This was interesting to me because you often wonder what make is that particular items more attractive that it gathers our attention rather than other objects.
4)
Something that I didn't find very interesting was the part in the book over illusions. I feel that this was the most boring part of the chapter because it is something that is often talked about a lot in psychology classes and something's that you have learned a lot become boring after learning the same things over and over. Psychophysics are something that we have studied many classes and some of the other classes have went into more greater detail and looked at some particular illusions.
5)
This chapter gave me more intense knowledge about the five senses and how each sense is wired to our brain. I think that this chapter and the section over memory and attention will be very important in understanding cognitive psychology because they play such a vital part in the role of how our brain functions. I think that this chapter was particularly vital to our understanding of the brain and cognitive psychology. If we want to know about how the brain functions we must know about all the parts and how each surrounding we interact with everyday impact this.
6)
THis chapter builds on the pervious chapter by yet again expanding what we have learned so far about the field of cognitive psychology. We have looked at how the world around us has a perception on how we view things but now we are able to relate the information about the senses and to the brain and how each relate to the field of cognitive psychology.
7)
A topic that would be interesting to look farther into would be illusions but not just illusions but to look at actual illusions that have been used as a psychophysics and how that specific study is used in psychophysics. But to know how each illusion effects the brain and how they effect of cognitive information.
8)
While reading this chapter I was thinking about how each of the senses effect our daily life and how each of them are used to effect our brain. I thought about each of the senses like memory and thought and vision. To look at how vision actually works and how they each stimuli had a effect on how we perceive each object.
9)
Vision, cones, attention, rods, channel capacity, illusion, psychophysics, selective attention.
1a) What did you find interesting?
I liked the section ‘Everything we know is wrong.’
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
It was interesting to me, because it highlighted the disparity between the real world and the world that we perceive. I think it’s very interesting that there is so much information in the world around us that we cannot detect, like ultraviolet, infrared, or even subatomic particles. It’s cool to think about how we evolved to have the sensory organs that we do. Also, this inspires some Matrix-like thoughts, and I just think it’s neat.
2a) What did you find interesting?
I actually really liked the reference of the dung fly.
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
The author talked about how a dung fly has advantages of hanging around dung, (nutrition, place to lay eggs, place to find a mate, etc.) so when they see or smell dung, their tiny brain rightfully instructs them to approach it. Whereas we see dung as a source of disease and thus our perception of it is much less enthusiastic than that of the dung fly. I liked the use of this explanation that the same stimulus may lead to different perceptions
3a) What did you find interesting?
I liked the section at the end about the FFA and the PPA.
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
The experiment they referenced wasn’t actually all that interesting. When focusing on the face, whether or not it was moving, the FFA (fusiform face area) was more active, and when focusing on the house whether or not it was moving, the PPA (parahippocampal place area) was more active. I just find it interesting to find new areas of the brain that are associated with specific functions, and although I knew about the FFA, I didn’t know about the PPA and it’s response to places and houses.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? 4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
I thought a lot of the chapter seemed repetitive. After the section on iconic memory was the section on echoic memory, which had a very similar layout and similar experiment. Then the chapter slowly progressed and I found myself reading more about experiments using the dichotic listening task. Some of it was interesting, like Broadbent finding that people could hear a word over other stimulus even after it was broken into segments and sent to other ears. It just seemed pretty repetitive and I definitely got bored reading this chapter.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
I think the understanding of attention that I got from this chapter will probably be the most useful. Even understanding just how complex attention is, and how it is attributed to various parts of the brain, not just the prefrontal cortex.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
This chapter used a lot of models, which were brought up and described in chapter one. The chapter talked about PET scans and attention, and we learned about the PET as well as other various imaging techniques in the last chapter. The section about dichotic listening brought up the contralateral features of the brain, which were described in the last chapter as well.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
I would like to learn more about the exact processes involved in translating sensory information to electrical signals in the brain, specifically about the eye and how it codes visual information from the photons of light that it receives.
7b) Why?
I think it’s fascinating that all of cognition happens in the brain, as electrical signals, and I would love to understand how information from the outside world undergoes the process of sensation and perception to become electrical signals in the brain.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
As I was reading this, I thought about how little we can perceive, and how we cannot perceive things so little. I would like to understand more about perception, why we cannot see atoms, why we cannot see air, and why we can see the visible spectrum that we can. I would also very much like to understand all of this at the molecular level.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
Sensory, perception, fusiform face area (FFA), parahippocampal place area (PPA), iconic memory, echoic memory, dichotic listening task, attention,
1.A. Prior Knowledge.
B. The text discuses the ways in which prior knowledge can influence what one sees. The text uses an example of an archeologist believing huts were made out of a specific shape and then being more likely to see that shape while excavating. I found this interesting because of it’s role in explaining why people tend to confirm stereotypes they have about others. Prior knowledge influencing current perception does not appear to be entirely bad however. The text uses the example of learning how to read to demonstrate how past experiences can be very useful in our day to day lives.
2.A. Iconic Storage
B. Our text describes iconic storage as being the “persistence of visual impressions” and also goes on to note that these persisting impressions can be further processed by the brain. This is hypothesized to allow the brain to catch up when trying to process visual information rapidly. I found this interesting because it made me curious about if the persistence was an adaptation of the eye or if the brain had adapted to process the image. In other words it made me wonder if in the beginning the persistence was a defect similar to how we think about image retention on a TV.
3.A. Saccades.
B. Saccades relate to how people read. Saccades are “jumps” that the eye makes from one anchor point to another. Despite notions about the eye gliding across a line of text, this hopping from one anchor point to another is how people seem to read. I found this very interesting as I have difficulty reading, and I have not ever read about how the majority of people read I therefore had no idea of how reading happens for most people. I am sometimes somewhat surprised at how fast an average reader reads something and to know that they make jumps/saccades and still read as efficiently as they do is interesting to me.
4.A. Vision.
B. The discussion of vision was what I found least interesting in the chapter. I did not find it interesting, like other things from past chapters, because it has been covered so much in other classes. Also having had to memorize so many characteristics of the eye in a previous courses makes me instantly much less interested in any discussion of ganglion cells or ciliary muscles. It may have been more interesting to me if it was much more in depth and more examples of how everything it was describing functioned.
5. I believe prior knowledge will be the most useful construct in trying to understand cognitive psychology. If it is not the most useful I believe it would at least be very useful as it sounds like something that could be manipulated easily in an experiment. If something is easy to experimentally manipulate such as priming someone with a sentence to give an expectation of something then there is likely a substantial amount of research on this topic. With more published research comes more knowledge about this topic and by proxy cognitive science.
6. This chapter builds on the previous chapter about cognitive neuroscience. In this chapter, the main focus is how specific body parts/senses allow us to experience sensation, perception and attention. The chapter discuses how these body parts are related to the brain’s processing of the information it receives from them. The occipital lobe was discussed in the last chapter and here the third chapter the describes how it and not they eye it self is responsible for human’s seeing color. Another example of this chapter building on the previous chapter’s discussion of the brain is labeled lines in the brain and their relationship to sensory function.
7. Saccades. I would like to learn more about Saccades. My biggest reason for wanting to learn more about saccades is that there was not very much information on it in the chapter. What information that was present was interesting but it could have been more in depth. It could have compared and contrasted the saccades of people with and without reading disorders. Or it could have related saccades to some other portion of the chapter that was relevant to saccades. Instead the section it was in focused largely on other matters. Although like anything in these chapters there would be an enormous body of literature on each matter being too large to fit into an undergraduate textbook.
8. While reading the chapter I thought a lot about how experiences can influence perception. Building off my older posts I wondered about how early life stressors may effect perception. For example perhaps being stressed out a lot now or in the past leads one to be ‘looking for’ stressors in their environment. I also wondered how membership in a minority group could influence perception. For example, a historically oppressed group is likely better at identifying discriminatory/oppressive actions against members of their in-group than out-group members are.
9. Perception, saccades, cognitive neuroscience, sensation, attention, eye, ganglion cells, ciliary muscle, labeled lines, brain, occipital lobe, iconic storage, vision, in-group, out-group
1. One of the things I found really interesting in Chapter 3 was the brief discussion on sensation and perception. Right now I’m in the sensation and perception class offered at UNI, but we haven’t gotten very far, and are obviously taking it in much greater detail. However, I have never considered just how far a perception goes. This chapter states that not only is it what you eat (the stimulus), but where (what kind of restaurant, what neighborhood, what city, what state, what country), and with who that all affect how you will perceive the event. All of information given to you about the world through the myriad of stimuli you experience in any given situation, no matter how simple or complex that actually contribute to your feelings or perception about the event.
2. Another topic I found really fascinating, that goes along the same lines with sensation and perception is the idea of prior knowledge and how it effects your perception. One of the examples that book gives is the archeologist who expects that the huts of the people he is studying will be rectangular. Based on this prior knowledge, he will then start to select certain stimuli in the environment to support his hypothesis. I find this really interesting especially if you consider the historical implications on our perception. The chapter uses a simple example, but if you expand that. Humans have been studying and recording history long before we understood the perceptual process, and we probably don’t fully understand it now. I wonder how much of what we learn all through our lives, is incorrect because the researchers were acting on prior knowledge. Also, how many research studies today are partially biased based on prior knowledge because researches almost always have a hypothesis going into a study.
3. Something else I found interesting to read about was iconic storage and echoic storage. The idea that we able to still process and “see” or “hear” information even after it has passed, or if we only experience it very briefly is extremely interesting. The book talks about the evolutionary benefits of both, especially in echoic storage with language, which seems very plausible to me. The ability to store the specific sounds and even facial expressions of a person as they spoke to you is extremely valuable when you consider the development of deception as a skill, or sarcasm. If you weren’t able to store a slight difference in tone, and essentially “hear” it again before responding, the social consequences could be dire. As well as, just in the development of language its self, learning a new language would be nearly impossible if you couldn’t review what you just heard in your head before responding or repeating it.
4. I found attention to be least interesting. All of the models, especially the one for vision was extremely complex and surprisingly uninteresting. It was simply annoying to read. I had to force myself to keep going and fight through it. I understand why it is important to study and how it could be helpful to cognition, but I was not impressed.
5. I think the most important part of the chapter in relation to cognitive psychology is all of the information on sensation and perception. Mostly because, without any stimuli from the world, the brain has nothing to process, and if we didn’t perceive things, then we would have no need for a brain because we wouldn’t store anything. Also, I think that we use our perceptions as a main and valuable mechanism for studying cognition. Before MRIs and other imaging technology short of cutting open the brain and poking at it, what we report seeing compared to the stimulus we are presented provided us with the best insight into cognitive processes.
6. In chapter 2 we learned a lot about the basic physical structure of the brain, where in chapter 3 we’ve expanded to learning more about the functions and how that relates back to the physical set up.
7. Something I would like to learn more about is illusions. I know that they are many different kinds and types, but I don’t know much about they work or how they are created.
8. I had a lot of questions while reading the “Everything we know is wrong” section. I’ve always wondered if how we perceive the world is actually accurate. And how different our world would be if we saw in a different light.
9. sensation and perception, the stimulus, perceive, expects, prior knowledge, iconic storage and echoic storage, process, attention, cognition, MRIs, imaging technology, cognitive processes,
1a) The first thing I found interesting in this chapter was the definitions of sensation and perception.
1b) This was interesting to me because they are two terms that are commonly used in our vocabulary. Given this, I never really thought I would have to learn the actual definitions because they seem so simple. To me sensation means how we feel and experience things, and perception is how we perceive them/what we think about them. The book, however, gives a different definition sensation refers to the initial detection of energy from the physical world and deals with the structure and processes of the sensory mechanism and the stimuli that affect them while perception involves a higher order cognition in the interpretation of the sensory information. This definition feels way too wordy but the next part gives a better understanding: sensation= the initial detection of stimuli; perception= an interpretation of the things we sense.
2a) The next thing I found interesting was the concept of illusions.
2b) This was interesting to me because I find it crazy how easy it is to trick our brains. In the picture of the young/old women I sat and I stared for a good five minutes before I could actually make out the old woman's face. Illusions occur when our perception is different than reality, but they can provide insight into how our perceptual system works. It is also interesting to read about how our prior knowledge, previous hypotheses/prejudices, and our sensory signals have a different effect on this too. The example of the teacher telling us to find the animal was a good example and helped me to better understand what this all meant.
3a) The last thing I found interesting was the concept of automatic processing.
3b) This again was something that I originally would think of as a common sense topic, but the more I read into it the more I was intrigued by it. I really liked the example they gave regarding to the scuba person practicing taking off their gear over and over again so that in a time of emergency this would become an automatic process, they wouldn’t panic or think twice, this would just come as the natural reaction to the circumstances.
4a) All in all I found this chapter as a whole disinteresting, particularly the section on attention.
4b) I thought that this chapter was way to densely packed with vocabulary terms and definitions. It wasn’t a fun read at all, I found myself getting bored very easily and I had a hard time following what each section was getting at. I didn’t like the section on attention just because of how long it was. I thought things dragged on quite a bit, and also I felt as if the way the text described certain topics was to elaborate for what its actual meanings were (I thought some things were pretty common sense like the pop out effect).
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
Overall I think that the most important information I learned in this chapter would be the definition of computational brain. This will have a very important definition along the road of learning about cognitive psychology because of the nature of the term’s definition: the mind is what the brain does-it processes information. This idea further branches out into sensation and perception, and has an umbrella effect with all other terminology used.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
I noticed several different topics brought up in chapter three that have already been mentioned in previous chapters. One of the firsts was psychophysics as it relates to illusions, which we talked about in chapter one. Also in chapter 1 we learned about models used in cognitive psychology and this was brought up again pertaining to selective attention. Finally chapter three gave an example of how PET scans, which we discussed in chapter 2, are used when studying attention.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
I would like to learn more about different types of illusions and how they are used in different types of settings.
7b) Why?
I thought that out of everything in this chapter illusions were one of the most interesting things. I found myself getting caught up trying to figure out the second picture, and it really just made me curious to learn more.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
When I was reading about sight and light and they started talking about how different life would be if all we could see was infra red light, I just started wondering about all of the different components of light and thought about how differently blind people perceive the world. Next when they were talking about attention overload and asked the question of is this what happens in children with ADD? I was really curious about this because it seems to make sense.
9) Terms: Computational brain, attention, illusions, PET scans, models, psychophysics, sensation, perception, pop-out effect, automatic processing
1) Attention was interesting because our brain is only able to process a very small amount of stimulus, therefore successful attention can only happen with a manageable amount of stimulus. We are able to selectively give our attention to only some of the cues we receive and tune out the rest. There was an example in the book in which it is hard to listen to the person you are talking to, if you hear something really interesting from another conversation nearby. However, you do have control of what you are paying attention to.
The Filter Model formulated by Broadbent was the first real model on attention. His model for attention is based on the idea that information processing is restricted by channel capacity. When we receive a stimulus, they are carried to our brain by nerve fibers depending on the kind of stimulus it is transferred by different fibers. This signal would then be carried on for extra information and processed by the limited capacity channel. Channels will then change in an effort to stop information overload. What this means is that switching our attention between several things at once tends to lead to decreased amount of memory. While there have been several other models of attention developed, Broadbent’s has been used as a base model for many other findings.
2) Illusions have always fanscinated me when looking at them. What we see and what the brain perceives can be two different things, but why is it like this? Past experiences can lead our brain to perceive a stimulus a certain way. Our brain is also wired to perceive things a certain way, as well. The ability to perceive a stimulus is also related to our sensory system.
3) Perception span and the broad idea of perception I find to be really interesting, so it made me think a lot about it when I read this section of our chapter. Opening our eyes in the morning is the beginning of a new set of stimuli that will continue throughout the day. How much we can perceive and understand if something that has led psychologists to come to different conclusions. Perception span can be especially applied to reading, as there are only so many words we as readers can understand at one given time. We simply cannot understand everything we see.
4) The one thing that I found to be the most uninteresting to me would have to be the explanation of the anatomy of the eye. Similar to what I have mentioned on previous blogs I could not focus very well while reading it because I have read it several times, or have learned about it in other psychology classes.
5)I think it is important to understand the limitations of what our brains can process at one given time and that there are limits to the amount of attention we have. As we move forward into a time when technology becomes a bigger part of our day to day lives, there is an inevitable shift in what people are willing to pay attention to. It’s rather easy for me to spend endless hours on stuff rather unimportant, but find it hard to sit in a lecture for 50 minutes without my mind wandering. I think research into what technology has done to our attention span is important in psychology, as well.
6) Builds more on the parts of the brain involved in memory, as well as the process for attention and perception.
7) One thing I think I would like to learn more about is our memory and how we are able to process and store the stimulus we experience every day.
8) I though about how hard our brain has to work at all times to receive, interpret, and output all of the stimuli throughout the day.
Terms: Attention, channel capacity, perception, perception span, sensation, Filter Model, illusions, Broadbent.
After reading chapter three there were some things that I found interesting. The first thing that I found interesting was the section on iconic storage/memory. I had learned about this in another psychology class, but was not completely familiar with the topic, so it was nice to gain further knowledge. The second thing that I liked from the chapter was the section on echoic memory. Kind of like Iconic memory, but it deals with auditory memory. These two topics are fairly similar in the way that we remember information. The third thing that I enjoyed from this chapter was the cocktail party effect. I liked this section because it is something that I could relate to. I have experienced this effect several times before, so it is nice to learn about the topic and understand what is happening. The thing that I did not find interesting in this chapter was the section the filter model. I do not know that I did not like it because it was interesting, but there really was not anything to terrible in this chapter. I will also talk about how this chapter relates to cognitive psychology, how this chapter builds off the last, what topic I would like to learn more about, and what ideas I had while reading this chapter.
The first that I liked was the section on iconic memory storage. This section talked about how well we remember things that we see, and how long they stay in our memory. The example that the book gave was a study that showed participants nine letters, and had them recall as many letters as they could. When asked to recall the numbers the participants could only recall about 4 or 5 letters. The experiment was manipulated when a tone was matched with the set of letters. The participants then found it easier to recall the letters. Recall increased significantly to almost 100%. The study found that when the amount of time the tone was introduced after the letters were shown the worse the recall of the letters. After about .5 seconds after letters were introduced to participants the amount of letters they recalled dropped and continued to do so with increased time in between. I remember doing an experiment like this in Butlers class a couple years ago. The test was familiar to the one the study did to its participants. I wonder if this is the same as the +-2 rule that I have learned about.
The next thing that I enjoyed from the chapter was the section on echoic storage. Echoic memory is the same as iconic memory in the sense that information is stored for a very short time. Actually I find echoic memory somewhat boring to talk about, so I will talk about something more interesting such as channel capacity and selective attention. Channel capacity is our inability to process everything around us. Since there is so much stimuli that can occur in a given setting, our brains find it hard to record and analyze all of the information. When this happens our brains will short circuit because of the overload. What the brain does in this situation is bottleneck the amount of information that we allow to the brain. This is called selective attention. Selective attention is like using a flashlight in a dark room. The amount of information that we can process is the amount of light that is shining in the room. This experiment pertains to me in the case of ADHD. I had to do some tests like the color one that the books talks about to see if I had the disorder The test shows you the names of colors on a piece of paper, but the color will be filled in with a different color that is not the same color as the name portrays. This can be a very difficult task for someone with ADHD because of the cognitive interference that the task creates.
The third that I found interesting in the chapter was the section on the cocktail party effect. I liked this section because it was something that I could relate to most in the chapter. Having experiences this effect multiple times I had never understood the real meaning behind the effect. You experience this effect when you are engaged in conversation in a busy room, and then all of a sudden you hear your name across the room. You immediately turn your head to listen to what is being said about you. The happens because of shadowing. Shadowing allows us to be focused on one set of information while tuning out other information that is going on around us. The one circumstance that happens when this is interrupted is when the stimuli is something that is important to the person such as their name. This was interesting to me to learn about because it is something that occurs on a daily basis, so it makes it fun to learn about in the textbook.
One thing that I was still interesting to me, but not as much as the other three was the filter model. The theory states that information is restricted to channel capacity. Messages traveling along a specific nerve can differ either according to which nerve fibers they stimulate or according to the number of nerve impulses they produce. To make sure that all information is recorded by the brain we have to make sure that there is not an overload of the system. The filter model allows us to switch from channel to channel to extract information that is presented to us. The book gives an example of a study the broadbent did. When participants were asked to repeat what they had heard they should have said gibberish because the information came from one channel. Except what really happened was that participants said the numbers in order because they had switched from channel to channel to understand the sequence of the numbers being presented to them.
I think that the section on the cocktail party effect helped me understand cognitive psychology more because it was something that I enjoyed reading about. I have had this happen to me before so it was cool to actually learn about it and now know what my brain is doing when I am in a crowded room and suddenly my attention is drawn from conversation because I heard my name. I think that when you are interested in the information from the text that it not only makes it more interesting to read about, but that it will also make it easier to remember when the topic is brought up again in the future.
I think that this chapter build off the last chapter because now we learned about some of the different areas of the brain that use memory and how that memory is stored. In the last chapter we read about the lobotomies and the discovery of the different areas of the brain. In this chapter it goes deeper and I learned about the areas of the brain and the functions that they have when it comes to memory storage. This book goes a good job of building off the last chapters.
Something that I would like to learn more about would be the section on the cocktail party effect. I think that I would like to learn more about it because it was interesting for me to read about. Also I did not really talk about the shadow aspect of the theory a lot, so I would like to did a little deeper in to that aspect of the theory. Since I found it so easy to read about, I think that doing more research on the topic would be easy to do and fun to learn about new information on the area.
Thoughts that I had while reading the chapter had to do with the most interesting thing that I liked about the chapter, and that was the cocktail party effect. The book said has this ever happened to you, and I began to think of times when this did happen to me. I was at a party and was talking to a friend and then I heard the name of my roommate. I looked to the direction of the name and began to listen to what was being said by the persons, so I could get information. The person was very far across the room, so I was amazed that I even heard it when I was in such deep conversation with my friend.
terms: iconic storage, iconic memory, echoic storage/memory, filter model, cocktail party phenomenon, shadowing, channel capacity, selective attention, Broadbent, ADHD,
1.
a. I found the part on illusion interesting, from this chapter.
b. I found the illusion part interesting because our brains can see what isn’t actually there. Our brains thinks that it is really seeing things , and believes that they are really there, even when they are not there. Everyone has seen some type of illusion in their life time. I find it interesting that the brain can distort what we see. So that an illusion takes the place of what we see in actuality. Even the human mind in its great prowess with its processing skills has its issues when it is processing things. You could also use what you see as an illusion to figure out what your brain is trying to tell you about. Brains are a complex system of neurons that are trying to keep up with the real world, there is bound to be a time when our brains see something that isn’t really there. So for the brain to make us see illusions should be something that is natural for us. I remember my most vivid illusion, like it happened yesterday. I was riding home with my dad and we were turning on our road to get to our house. Well there was a car turning away from us and inside the car is where I saw my illusion. In this car I saw three people… or so I thought that there were three people. The person in the back seat turned towards me and smiled. Now in normal situations that’s an okay thing to do to people when you see them when driving in my area, yet when the person has three rows of teeth that are razor sharp teeth it isn’t all that cool. Then with a blink of my eyes there were only two people in the car.
2.
a. I liked the canonic perspective.
b. It shows that the brain can recall things as an image so that we can see them through the “mind’s eye.” To be able to see the item that we are thinking of in multiple ways and angles. Our minds are very powerful things that can show us things we never thought possible. But by using canonic perspective you can see the object in question as many ways as you can think of. You can use the images that you think up as a way to be able to draw out what you are seeing in your mind. The picture may be horrible, but you will get your point across of what you are thinking of. There are endless things you can think of to change your perspective of what you are seeing.
3.
a. I liked the part on pattern recognition, even though it was very small.
b. I think that pattern recognition is important to cognitive psychology. Each person will recognize different patterns, and each pattern is special to the person that perceives it. Patterns are in our everyday lives. We use them to read. We see the patterns of letters, numbers, and pictures. Patterns are everywhere in this world.
4.
a. I didn’t like the Bottom-up verses Top-down processing part.
b. The text was kind of hard to understand the first time through. When I finally got through with rereading it, I understood that there are two different processing systems. They can work independently as two different systems, yet they can also work together. Each type of processing system has its own ups and downs. They work together and they can work apart so they can be interesting systems.
5. I think that pattern recognition is the most important to cognitive psychology. I think this because if we didn’t realize patterns we wouldn’t be able to do very much. Our world is made up of patterns, and with those patterns we see how our world works. Our world is vast and that means so are the patterns that we see.
6. You can relate back to sensory store. All information, even patterns must be stored. You can also use saccades, because we see visual patterns all around us. With being able to store and see our patterns in life we can get through life a lot easier.
7. I want to learn more about pattern recognition. I want to know what patterns are more recognizable than other patterns. Our minds see things as patterns so I want to know how they affect our cognitive thoughts.
8. I thought about all the things that we see in a day and what patterns that they create for our minds. I think that with more knowledge on what we see in the day we can get through the world a little easier.
9. Sensory store, saccades, Bottom-up processing, Top-down processing, pattern recognition, canonic perspective
The first section that I found interesting was the one on prior knowledge. This is where the relationship between perception and your prior knowledge of the world influences what you see and how you interpret things. Our perception is based on previous knowledge that we have, as well as our prejudices and sensory signals. I liked this section because there were optical illusions that went along with it. I enjoy looking at things and trying to find both pictures. Sometimes it is very hard for me to see the second picture that exists. This section also brought up the interesting point that our perceptions are based on our past experiences. Without the prior knowledge that we all have, doing almost anything would be impossible. This is something that we don't often think about, but we, as humans, have learned so much more than we are even aware of.
Another section that I enjoyed was the one that discussed the perceptual span. Our perceptual span is how much we can experience in a brief exposure. Each person has a sensory store that holds on to a sensation for a few seconds after we have it. This does not last, however. Emile Javal was a professor who discovered that we do not read things by following a line and continuing line by line down a page, we read by jumping around to different words. The jumps are called saccades. This indicated that only four or five random letters could be gathered at one time. This section interested me because I never thought about how I can still see things for a second after they happen, and I never pay attention to how I read, unless I am in a hurry or am reading something that doesn't interest me.
The last thing I found interesting was the one on attention. When it is talked about it cognitive psychology, attention refers to the ability to block out the things around you that do not pertain to what you are doing. It is the ability to focus on one task and block everything else out. It is interesting to think that there are thousands of external stimuli present in every situation, but that is the case. If we were not able to block out 99% of the stimuli we would not be able to focus well enough to complete any tasks. It is interesting for me to think about, because I have a hard time focusing on homework or reading my textbook when there are other things going on around me. I have to turn the TV off and cannot play any music. When I am working, however, I am able to listen to one person while doing a task for another and sometimes I can even juggle a third or fourth activity in there as well. This might just be selectiveness on my part.
One section I did not find very interesting was the part on vision. I have taken biology classes and sensation and perception. Because of this I am well aware of how the eye transfers information to the brain. Light rays enter through the cornea and lens, which then transfer the image to the retina. I also know that an eye has both rods and cones in it, and that rods are sensitive to things that are well lit, while cones are located in the fovea and are sensitive to things that are not.
I think that this chapter will be helpful in understanding cognitive psychology in that sensations and perceptions make up a large part of cognitive psychology. If we were not aware of what we saw or heard, we would not be able to do nearly as much as we can now. We would miss a lot of information in our environment and might as well be blind and deaf.
This chapter builds on the previous chapters in that the last chapter talked about neuroscience, and a lot of the information from this chapter was probably discovered using some neuroscientific methods, such as MRI's and PET scans.
I would like to learn more about illusions and how they are made and discovered. I always wondered how they come around; do people make these images on purpose or are they accidental?
While reading this chapter I thought a lot about my experiences with perception. I also thought about my memory and language class that I took, because we talk about transferring vision to memory in that class. I also thought about optical illusions that I have seen and how they effected me.
terms:
prior knowledge, perception, sensory signals, optical illusions, perceptual span, Emile Javal, saccades, cognitive psychology, attention, external stimuli, selectiveness, vision, cornea, lens, fovea, cones, rods, retina, neuroscience
1) I found the topic of illusions to be interesting. As I was reading it started to make sense, when it talked about psychophysics. They are the study of relationships between both the physical changes and psychological experiences. I feel like illusions happen a lot, depending on a person’s perception. Everyone sees things differently, so friends maybe in the same place and in the same situation, but their perception of what is going on is going to be different, the way they experience the situation will be different. One of the friends could be telling someone else the story and about what happened and the other person could not remember it happening that way.
2) Another section I found to be interesting was Everything We Know Is Wrong. I found this section interesting because it talked about receptors and sensory system limited and because of this the text talked about our knowledge basically being restricted. It talked about how people overemphasize the importance of the physical universe’s features. And what we do not perceive is being under emphasized. To me this made me also think of illusions. I thought the examples they gave were also interesting because it talked about how we see what is reality to us, but what if we could see the infrared radiation and not what we normally see. Would day and night be switched for us? It would be cool to experience what is actually going on rather than just seeing what our vision can see.
3) I also found the attention topic interesting. We concentrate on mental events and it also affects our sensory. Our brain automatically processes information, so it has to be selective, because you can’t process everything. When thinking about attention people think about making a person is paying attention to what is going on, yet stuff will be missed so their experiences are still different and one might not remember something, because they were focused on something else.
4) One thing I found to be the least interesting was the section on senses and vision. The reason I found this least interesting was because I have read a lot about it, so out of this chapter that would be what I would consider the least interesting.
5) I think that perceptual span will be the most helpful in understanding cognitive psychology, because cognitive psych is about understanding peoples perception, and how the brain processes information.
6) It builds on from other chapters by continuing on how people perceive the world. It also continued talking about psychophysics which was talked about briefly in the first chapter, so the terms are continuing over, and as well as when we get further we are expanding on some of the topics that have been previously been briefly discussed.
7) I think I would like to learn more about illusions, because I find it interesting how we see the world, which is basically just a cover of what is actually going on. Like the saying goes “there is more to that meets the eye.” Also I would like to check out more about optical illusions, because it is the seeing of something that doesn’t exist or it is different than it appears.
8) While reading this chapter I thought a lot about my own experiences and how my friends see things different than I do so it shows that we experience the same situation or place differently, and we may not remember the same things because of what our brain can process.
9) vision, illusion, attention, psychophysics, sensory, perceptual span, perception
1a. I found the section on iconic storage to be pretty interesting. When we see something the image becomes stored for a short amount of time in our ICONIC MEMORY. Iconic memory is independent of higher order processing and is essentially made up snapshots of what we have just seen. The images are short lived lasting only about a second and gives the brain a chance to catch up with the visual stimulus it receives from the eye.
2a. I found this interesting because they were actually able to demonstrate this phenomena through experimentation. In the experiment participants were shown 9 letters each in rows of three. Each row has a corresponding tone. The top row would be a high pitch, the middle a medium pitch, etc. The participant would be briefly shown the letters and then hear a tone. When the tone was played immediately with the flashing image participants’ recall would be very precise. When the tone was delayed by a second or more recall of the letters in that row diminished greatly. This showed that we do indeed have iconic memory of images that fades rapidly after seeing the stimulus.
1b. Reading about ILLUSIONS was very interesting. Illusions occur when reality and our perception of it do not align. Illusions are partly the result of using our past experiences to interpret the stimulus in way that might not match reality. The book also mentions that illusions may occur because of invariant structures in our brains. I find it very interesting that when shown illusions that depict a picture that could be multiple things, such as a picture that could be seen as a rabbit or a duck we only see it one way at first, then after some time we may be able to see the alternative picture, but we can never interpret both images at once.
2b. I found illusions interesting because unlike other concepts in the chapter the concept of illusions was easily demonstrated in different ways in the chapter.
3a. I found the concept of LABELED LINES to be interesting. Labeled lines refer to different nerves in the body corresponding to specific sensory functions. It explains the phenomena of seeing stars when taking a blow to the back of the head. Getting hit in the back of the head damages the occipital lobe which is responsible for visual processing. When it gets hit it produces the image of “stars” in our visual field even though we are not physically seeing the stars in our environment.
3b. I found this concept interesting because there have been many times I have seen “stars” after being really light headed or taking a blow to the head. I never thought to question why this might occur, and it is pretty interesting to now learn why it is that happens.
4a. I found the very first section on vision to be uninteresting.
4b. It tries to describe the process of seeing something and introduces the different structures of the eye. I just found it to be a pretty rushed explanation and it could have benefited from more models or illustrations of the process to help visualize the process.
5. I think that the sections on sensory stores and sensory memory systems will be very beneficial to know. Cognitive psychology seems to deal a lot with both memory and sensory perceptions, getting to know the basics on these topics, I feel, will give me a good base to learn more detailed information later.
6. This chapter continues to build our base knowledge about what all cognitive psychology deals with. While the previous two chapters were a little more broad in scope, this chapter goes deeper into explaining different cognitive processes.
7a. I would like to learn more about our CHANNEL CAPACITY. Channel capacity refers to how many sensory events we can attend to at one time. Apparently there is an upward limit that has to do with our neurological limitations.
7b. I would like to know what that limit of our capacity is and if it could possibly be increased, maybe through some kind SELECTIVE ATTENTION training where we practice being more aware of our environment.
8. While reading the chapter I thought a lot about the sensory perceptions I feel and how I have experienced a lot of the things they were talking about. It was interesting to relate what I have experienced to the science behind what is I experienced.
9.Iconic memory, illusions, labeled lines, channel capacity, selective attention.
1. One thing that I found interesting from this chapter was that we have snapshot storage independent from higher-order processes for both visual and auditory stimuli. These storage systems allow for the mind to catch up and piece together all of the necessary stimuli that is presented to each. Due to the fact that there are far too many stimuli from our lives for our brain to process these storage systems allow for our senses to keep up. The information that is held in these systems are raw information that has yet to be processed or analyzed. The visual storage system is known as iconic memory. There have been studies done to show that information stays in the iconic memory no longer than one second until it disappears. The same type of system occurs with auditory stimuli and is called echoic memory. This is extremely important in allowing for the fractions of dialog we hear and being able to put the pieces into the correct context so that we are able to understand the meaning. I find it amazing how fast our brains process the vast amount of information that is taken to it and is able to create a perception of everything around us.
2. I found it interesting how out perceptions are influenced by a number of different factors. The brain has a predisposition to perceive some sensory information in a certain way. Past experiences and prejudices also influences how we perceive sensory stimuli. The power of wanting to see something can be far stronger than one would think. Psychophysics has shown that our perception of the world doesn't always match reality. Our prejudices and wants can mold the stimuli that we take in to perceive what it is we want to see. Our past experiences helps to organize incoming stimuli and even helps to determine what is important and worth processing and what is not. We are able to process stimuli into correct contexts due to past knowledge and experiences. Without past experiences acting as a factor we would continually have to relearn and categorize every piece of information that is processed. It is extremely interesting to realize that what we see and perceive as the world around us is not truly all that is there, but rather just what our senses and brain activity have processed to be important.
3. I also found automatic processing in the brain to be interesting from this chapter. The fact that we can train ourselves to manipulate our attention allocation is pretty amazing. When information or a process is new it must be rehearsed or reused in order from the brain multiple times in order to create a direct line between that stimulus and the stored information. Building this connection allows for it to be made at almost the exact same time as the introduction of the stimulus which means that it takes very little attention to recall that information or perform that process. Automatic processes use very little to no conscious resources therefor requires very little to no attention allocation. Automatic processes can take place without any intention to do so and are many times processed in the unconscious.
4. I found the entire chapter to be very interesting and full of a lot of important information. I found least interesting the detailed information given about the process and structures of the eye. I didn't feel that the specifics such as the definitions of the cones and rods were necessary in explaining the basic process of stimuli to perception. Though it was relative information it was information that if it had been left out would not have effected my overall understanding of the processes of stimuli to perception through the eye.
5. I think the most useful part of this chapter for understanding cognitive psychology was distinguishing between sensation and perception. It is important to understand that sensations are the stimuli that are gathered from the world around us and perception is how the brain takes in those stimuli and processes them to get the picture of the world that we see. It is important to understand that perceptions do not always equal reality. To understand that concept you must understand where we get perceptions from and that is essentially from the sensory stimuli. It can be easy for people to use the two words interchangeably which leads to a false impression of how we see the world around us.
6. The models of selective attention show that the models serve as a guideline and an organization tool that which lead to different possible theories and hypothesis which was introduced in the first chapter. There are multiple models and theories that attempt to explain how selective attention works and they provide the organization to have theories and hypothesis focus on specific aspects of the model and explain why they do what they do.
Another aspect of this chapter that builds on to previous material is the section that covers what areas of the brain are active during attention processes. The section talks about the different techniques used which were learned about in the previous chapters and shows that there are multiple areas throughout the brain that function with regards to specific aspects of attention which goes along with idea that many processes are not specialized to one specific area of the brain but rather spread to multiple areas.
7. I would like to have the models of selective attention explained to me in person. After reading through the two sections I think I have the basic understanding of the two models but I have a number of different questions about how the believed the work and what is strongly believed today. It was a section of the book that I had trouble keeping clear in my head what was happening as I read through it. I think it is an important processes for cognitive psychology and would like to make sure that I had a good grasp on it.
8. While reading this chapter I also had the tv on and people talking around me. This made me think about how these other factors were effecting my intake of the stimuli of the book and my comprehension of the material. It made me wonder if reading the chapter in a different environment would be a more effective way to have all of the stimuli processed that is important from the reading. It also made me think about how I was using selective attention and what stimuli I was taking in without even realizing it. It takes more attention allocation to read a textbook and comprehend all of the information it holds than it does when just reading for leisure or reading posts from a social media site. The latter activities require less attention allocation and therefore more attention can be used for things such as talking to friends or noticing the smell of lunch.
9. Terms used- higher order process, iconic memory, echoic memory, perception, sensory, psychophysics, automatic processing, attention, stimulus, conscious, unconscious, sensation, model, selective attention, cognitive psychology
1a) What did you find interesting?
Psychophysics
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
Psychophysics was interesting to me because it uses different measures to try and determine our ability to perceive and how our perceptual system works. One way psychophysicists have been able to measure our perceptual abilities is through the use of illusions. These are cases when reality and perception do not match, sometimes the illusion might be influenced by our past experiences or possibly something even deeper within the structures of the brain.
2a) What did you find interesting?
Sensory Store
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
This was interesting to me because while I was reading the section I could easily relate to how our perceptual span lasts for moments after a stimulus. Anytime you close your eyes you can still see the images that were just right in front of you but they soon fade away, this is something that has always intrigued me. Most data suggests the information gathered in a single exposure usually lasts anywhere from 4-6 seconds.
3a) What did you find interesting?
Subliminal perception.
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
I found this interesting because I’ve always heard of subliminal messages and how they can theoretically be used to suggest a person to do something. Subliminal refers to stimuli that is just below the sensory threshold and actually unable to perceive. Subliminal perception has been used by advertisers since the 50s as an effort to increase sales of varies goods. While the effects of subliminal messaging has never been fully proven it has shown to be somewhat suggestive, it is however regarded among most as a pseudoscience.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
Attention
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
I actually found most of this chapter to be very interesting but the section that took me the longest to read through was the one covering attention. While I was interested in William James’s work with attention deficit the rest of the section was pretty dry.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
This chapter did a good job of explaining how many of the processes we use in our daily lives work. Every day we must navigate a world with tons of stimuli and without a finely tuned perceptual ability we might all be lost, having a better understanding of these systems will be helpful.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
This chapter continued where the previous left off in that it continued to talk about the separate functions of the brain and how we use each one of those to manage our lives. This chapter went more in depth about the eye development and vision.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
Subliminal messages
7b) Why?
These have been used in propaganda around the world as well as in marketing by many ad campaigns to help sell products. I would like to know more about how they work and if they are effective.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
While I was reading this chapter it kept reminding me of the show Braingames on national geographic, the show deals with different ways to trick your brain…or rather how your brain can trick you. It is a great show that aims to educate the public on all the uncertainty but new discoveries about the brain.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
-perceptual span, sensory store, illusion, psychophysics, sensation, stimuli, subliminal perception, subliminal message, William James, attention
1a) What did you find interesting?
I thought the section on illusions was interesting.
1b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought this was interesting because it is cool to think that you could look at something and what you are seeing is not completely real. I also liked that it gave us a few examples to look at. It is crazy to look at the snake illusion and to see the circles moving when they’re really not moving. I also thought the reason why they are interesting to Psychophysicists was interesting. Illusions are of no importance to me, they are just fun to look at, but to a Psychophysicist they are important because they provide insight into how our perceptual system works.
2a) What did you find interesting?
I also thought the idea of channel capacity was interesting.
2b) Why was it interesting to you?
Channel capacity is our inability to process all sensory cues simultaneously. I liked this because I liked the comparison between are brain and the different kitchen appliances. It is interesting how only certain parts of the brain can be working at one time.
3a) What did you find interesting?
I found the section on selective attention interesting.
3b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought this section was interesting because I liked the different examples it gave. I thought the cocktail party phenomenon was interesting because it has happened to me numerous times. I am sure this happens to most people but when somebody mentions my name it always makes me turn no matter what conversation I am having because you assume somebody wants your attention. I also thought the example with the bold words was interesting. It was cool to see how selective attention works.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting?
I thought the section on vision was the least interesting.
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
I didn’t think this section was interesting because I don’t find facts about the eye interesting. I know that this information is important when learning about Cognitive Psychology but I had a hard time staying intrigued while reading this section. There were certain parts of this section that I found interesting, such as how many cones there are in the human eye as well as how many rods there are in the human eye. Even though I found that interesting, I did not think it was as interesting as the sections on illusions and perceptual span.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
I think the most useful part of this chapter was the section on attention. I think this is the most useful section in this chapter because it took up the majority of the chapter. I also think it is the most useful information in this chapter because it talked about the different types of attention and how it relates to a lot of our cognitive processes.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
This chapter built on chapter 2 a lot. This chapter talked about vision which chapter 2 also focused on. Chapter 3 also briefly mentioned fMRI’s and more imaging techniques, which were mentioned at the end of chapter 2. The chapters are doing a good job of building on each other. Chapter 1 told us what Cognitive Psychology was, chapter 2 provided information on the brain, and chapter 3 provided information on specifics of the brain, such as visual and auditory information.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about?
I would like to learn more about perceptual span.
7b) Why?
I thought learning about how much information can be detected in a moment’s glance sounded interesting. However, when I read about it, I did not find it extremely interesting. This is the topic that I would choose to learn more about because I think it seems interesting but the section that I read in the book did not interest me so it would be nice to see if different information would interest me.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
While I was reading this chapter, I thought about how the cocktail party phenomenon has affected me. The reading on vision also makes me think about my own vision. I am legally blind in my right eye, so even though I did not think the vision section was the most interesting, I would be interested in what is wrong with my eye to make me legally blind in one of my eyes.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
Illusions, Psychophysicists, Channel Capacity, Selective Attention, Cocktail Party Phenomenon, Cognitive Psychology, Perceptual Span, Cones, Rods, fMRI
1. The first thing that I found interesting in the chapter was the section devoted to vision and the stucture of the eye. The subject has come up in previous classes such as biopsychology and I remembered most of the information presented but not all of it. Things such as the cornea,retina, rods and cones were easy to remember, along with their individual functions in the eye, but I couldn't recall ganglion cells or the lateral geniculate nucleus. I was surprised that these two terms couldn't be remembered considering their important contribution in transmitting visual data to the visual cortex, especially since ganglion cells are what travel through the blind spot in the back of the eye, which is a subject that has interesting me for a long time. I was also interested in the small section discussing the attempts to emulate human vision with computers by constructing an artificial eye. I was disappointed that this point wasn't discussed in more detail but was glad to see that it will be mentioned later in chapter 15.
2. The second thing that I found interesting in the chapter was the discussion of illusions. Reading through the previous posts, I could see that my interest in this subject is shared by a lot of my classmates, which is understandable. Illusions are something that we have all encountered at some point, either in our everyday life or in psychology classes. The various figures presented in this section were all things that I had been exposed to previously at some point but I still found them interesting. It was nice to have a psychological explanation for why some of the various illusions work. The rotating snakes illusion and others like it are something that I have seen a lot and I enjoyed having the explanation presented that it's because the luminance changes in the pattern and the periphery of our vision interperets this as movement. The explanation that we are hard-wired to perceive the world in a certain way and that is further influenced by past experiences to shape our perception of things was also interesting and relates well to how various people perceive illusions such as Figure 3.5a and b.
3. The third thing that I found particularly interesting in the chapter was the subject of processing capacity and selective attention. This is also something that I have been exposed to previously in other classes and I have always found it interesting. I had never heard of the term channel capacity, which is the inability to process all sensory cues simulaneously. This is a term that I figured I would have been exposed to previously since it explains how the bottlenecking limit on the ability to process information works so concisely. Selective attention is also something that has interested me for a long time and I always relate it to my first experience with the subject, which involved a moonwalking bear. What I am talking about is a video in which two teams of 4 each throw a basketball around, with one team dressed in white and another in black. You are instructed to count how many times the team in white passes the ball and while the chaos is going on and you are trying to focus on the assigned task, a man in a bear costume enters the frame, pauses in the middle to do a little dance, and then moonwalks offscreen. Many people don't see the moonwalking bear because they are so focused on counting the number of passes.
4. I don't think that I found anything in this chapter to be uninteresting. If anything, I found it difficult to select the top 3 subjects that interested me the most to write about.
5. I think that the limit on sensory information storage and how attention helps filter that information will be the most useful information in understanding cognitive psychology. Although all of the information presented in the chapter is important and interesting. This seems to be the most relatable to everyday life and also important to the topic of cognitive psych. It helps to explain how people can remember things differently and why we perceive events differently from someone else.
6. Chapter 3 helps build on the previous chapters by further explaining things such as psychophysics from chapter 1 and expanding upon how our brain helps us interperet various sensory information. It also relates vision and the eye to various structures in the brain explained in chapter 2.
7. I would like to learn more about various things involving visual attention. Things like the pop-out effect and pattern recognition seem very interesting.
8. The main idea that I had related to the chapter was my recollection of the moonwalking bear test. The subject of eyewitness testimony also came to mind many times as I read through the chapter. Some of the subjects addressed in the chapter were also brought up in my Psych & Law class and much of the information in the chapter can be related to the subject.
Terms: vision, cornea, retina, rods, cones, ganglion cells, lateral geniculate nucleus, visual cortex, blind spot, illusions, luminance, processing capacity, channel capacity, selective attention, psychophysics, pattern recognition
1a) What did you find interesting? I found the effect that one’s prior knowledge has on their perceptions to be an intriguing aspect of the chapter.
1b) Why was it interesting to you? The fact that our brains draw perceptions from sensory signals in fractions of a second is not particularly interesting or mind-blowing. But when figuring in the fact that as we perceive these signals, we also automatically sift through all of our brains available previous knowledge related to that initial sensation in order to create a more complete overall perception. The utilization of prior knowledge shows that the brain is like a gigantic storage bank of information that is added to everyday through sensations and experiences. The book uses a good example that without employing prior knowledge in drawing perceptions, our brain would be unable to form letters into words and words into sentences and it would be impossible to decipher meaning from them.
2a) What did you find interesting? The inter-connectedness of all aspects relating to vision; the retina, cornea, lens, visual cortex, cones, rods, and so on.
2b) Why was it interesting to you? I found interesting how all these different factors relating to vision help perceive a portion of an image that when combined with all the other factors provides our brain a complete picture of what is seen. For example, the cornea and lens focus light rays on the retina, but only in a black-and-white, two-dimensional form. With the help of the eyes cones and rods, the impulses are then sent to the visual cortex, which feeds this information to the cerebral cortex to its correct. The fact that so many different aspects of the brain play their own part in putting an image together piece by piece like a puzzle is astonishing. It’s incredible to think about the amount of visual perception and different mental processes used just to look at a picture of a friend, for example.
3a) What did you find interesting? The ability of our mental-processing to so quickly determine the appropriate information that warrants additional processing versus forgetting non-pertinent information.
3b) Why was it interesting to you? The introduction of channel capacity helped show me how little we actually process when compared to how much we sense. The book’s example of channel capacity being similar to internet bandwidth helps enforce the need for selective attention; our brain has to discern quickly which information to store and process and which to forget. It helps to explain how we can have a conversation at a party, but at the same time pick up on auditory cues from across the room when the current conversation is unable to hold our attention
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? I found the section dealing with auditory signals and the different models of selective attention to be a little confusing and less clearly explained compared to the rest of the chapter.
4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you? It was just harder to decipher the intricacies of each model. This might have been just because it was more confusing than the section related to vision. I think the way we use our left and right ear more independently than we do our eyes makes the experiments of playing messages through only one or both of the ears makes it tougher to conceptualize for the reader.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology? What I think will be most important from the chapter is the information learned about our different memory processes (perceptual span, sensory store, iconic memory) and how they all play their own part in aiding people to recognize, filter, and process information from the five senses in a matter of a few seconds. I think it will be vital to understand how memory interacts with our senses to filter and discern what information is important and worth retaining and what is non-pertinent and can be discarded. Our senses and our memory play a role in basically every aspect of a person’s life and thus will most certainly be touched on throughout the semester. And even just looking ahead at the name of some of the later chapters in the book (Memory Models, Memory Theories, Forgetting and Remembering, The Visual Representation of Knowledge) it seems pretty clear that memory, the sensory system, and their roles in cognitive psychology will be a large portion of the curricula for the semester
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters? It expands on the aspect of the “mind-body issue” introduced in chapter two. The convergence of our senses and how our mind sorts and interprets them is a great example of the mind-body split. A lot of the neuroscientific terms introduced in chapter two help to explain how our senses connect to and communicate with our brain, like how the different hemispheres and different lobes of the brain each have certain areas they help monitor and control. It also builds off of chapter one by employing the use of multiple models, which do help to explain how what we see and what we hear is processed and either used or discarded by the brain.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about? I would like to learn more about the relationship that prior knowledge has with perception and how much of an effect this knowledge has on how we interpret our perceptions.
7b) Why? I just am fascinated that we can look at something for just a few seconds and within that time we can go back into the recesses of our brains memory and use what we already know to help improve our perception of what we are sensing. I believe that role of previous knowledge in cognitive psychology is likely underestimated, because every time we sense anything, our brain uses what we already know to help get the best perception possible of what
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter? I was very interested in the collaboration of our various sensory perceptions (vision, smell, taste, vision). It is incredible how they all operate independently and have their own physical structures, but for cognition and especially memory, they are required to partner with each other to help give our brain a more complete idea of where we are, what we are seeing, etc. I believe this relates to how people who lose a sense (vision, hearing, etc.) and how the other senses compensate or adapt to help make up for that loss. This sensory plasticity (?) is an interesting concept I would like to touch on later in class.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post. Perception, Sensation, cornea, lens, retina, cones, rods, visual cortex, cerebral cortex, prior knowledge, perceptual span, sensory store, iconic memory, auditory signals, channel capacity
Chapter 3
The first thing that I found really interesting in chapter 3 was the information about illusions. I have always found illusions fascinating. The book says that illusions happen when perception and reality do not match. This means that what you think you are seeing is not really what is there. Or maybe it’s both. There are a lot of good examples in the book of different illusions. When I look at these illusions, I see one thing, and then the book points out another thing that is there. It’s really strange how your eyes can deceive you. Or is it your mind that is deceiving you? I also wonder if certain people see illusions differently.
The book also states that perception can be shaped by a person’s prior learning. So this means that illusions, to certain people, are shaped differently due to the person’s prior knowledge. People see illusions differently. For example, there is a picture in the book that looks like a young girl, but it also looks like an elder woman. It was simple for me to see the young girl, but it was very difficult for me to see the elderly woman. In someone else’s eyes, they might see the elder woman first, and the young girl second. But neither of us will see them at the same time. This was also very interesting to me.
The second thing that I found interesting from chapter 3 was the section that was titled “Everything We Know is Wrong”. This caught my eye instantly. This section in the chapter is about how we perceive things, and how there are so many other ways to perceive things. There are many things that we cannot see. The example the book gives is of infrared radiation. If we could see infrared radiation, we would view everything differently. It would be the same with any sort of wavelengths that we cannot see. Just a few examples would be x-rays, gamma rays, or even waves of radar. There are only certain things that we can see. And this is why everyone’s perception is different. I think of someone who is color blind. They perceive things completely different than someone who is not color blind. Or I think of someone who has to wear glasses because they have bad vision. If they were without their glasses, they would perceive things much differently than someone who has 20/20 vision.
The third thing that I found interesting about chapter 3 was selective attention. My mother always tells my father that he has “selective hearing”, which really helped me relate to this part in the reading. I think what my mother really meant was that my father has selective attention. The example the book gives says that selective attention is like shining a flashlight in a dark room. You can only see certain things at a time. If you have selective attention, you only concentrate on specific things at a certain time. Everything else seems to be in the distance/background. I think that this is very interesting. But I think that it also makes sense. You can’t really concentrate on everything at once. This kind of goes back to the idea of illusions. When you see an illusion, you can’t see both of them at once. You can only see one of the images at a time.
What I found least interesting was the information about attention and neuroscience. I have never really been interested in neuroscience. I really like learning about how the mind works and why we think and do the things we do. That’s why I have become a psychology major. But I have never really enjoyed learning about the parts of the brain and the different functions of the brain. It’s something that I have discussed and been taught in many of my college courses. But it is also something that I have a hard time wrapping my mind around. Whenever I come across a chapter on the physiology of the brain and the structures and functions of the brain, I have to re-read the information multiple times before I can soak any of it in.
I think all of this will be useful in my learning about cognitive psychology. This chapter is all about sensation, perception, and attention. These are 3 main things concerning the subject of cognitive psychology. Cognitive psychology is all about mental processes and how we perceive information. I think that chapter 3 will be very detrimental to my learning in this cognitive psychology course.
Chapter 3 builds on the previous chapters because we have already discussed the basic concepts of cognitive psychology and we have discussed neuroscience. Chapter 3 looks deeper into these concepts and teaches us about how we perceive certain things. So far I feel that we have just been skimming the surface. And I feel that now we are starting to get down to the smaller details.
I would really like to do further research on the concept of illusions. I enjoyed reading about illusions and how they are perceived. All of the information makes sense when I read it, but I have never thought about it in this way before. I would like to know if there is something certain that makes people perceive illusions differently. I also would like to know what it is inside everyone’s brains that makes things seem like illusions. There must be something specific that makes us see illusions. I would also like to see if certain people can see though illusions better than others. I believe this to be true, but I would like to see for sure.
In all honesty, when I read this chapter, I thought a lot about my own thoughts. I was thinking mostly about the way that I perceive things. I was thinking about my attention and the sensations that I experience. In that way, it was easier for me to relate to the chapter and really learn the terms that were presented to me.
Terms: Illusions, Perception, Reality, Selective Attention, Attention, Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology
1a) What did you find interesting? 1b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought the ideal of physical energy being converted into neural energy by way of cognitive processing was interesting. This is interesting to me because I had never really considered sensation and perception as an exchange of energy. It’s interesting to think about something as pulling your hand away from something hot as an exchange of energy. The heat is the energy that is transferred to your nerves which causes reactions that eventually give you the energy to pull your hand away from the hot object.
2a) What did you find interesting? 2b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought it was interesting the recognition of a pattern is represented as a two-dimensional form and without color on the retina. This is interesting to me because the brain does a lot of work in perceiving objects with very limited information from the eyes. It is interesting to me that our eyes are so limited and faulty when vision is such an important sense for survival.
3a) What did you find interesting? 3b) Why was it interesting to you?
I thought it was interesting that we overemphasize what we are able to detect. This was interesting to me because what we are able to detect dictates our lives. It would be interesting to see how things would change if we were able to detect things outside of our sensory perception now. It would also be interesting to know if people in the future will have different sensory abilities.
4a) What one (1) thing did you find the least interesting? 4b) Why wasn't it interesting to you?
I thought the anatomy of the eye such as the ganglion cells and the lateral geniculate nucleus was least interesting. I thought it was interesting that the brain has to process such limited information from the eye but the parts of the eye were not interesting. This information involved memorization rather information that I could easily connect to my daily life so it was harder to focus on.
5) What did you read in the chapter that you think will be most useful to in understanding Cognitive Psychology?
I think the distinction between sensation and perception is useful in understanding cognitive psychology. It is important to understand the differences between the two so that you are able to understand the different areas of the brain involved in each process and the different function of the two processes.
6) How, in what ways, does this chapter relate (build on) to the previous chapters?
This chapter builds on other chapters by discussing the mechanisms by which we sense and perceive our physical world. It also introduces the idea that our sensory systems and perception are not perfect and we often make perceptual mistakes.
7a) What topic would you like to learn more about? 7b) Why?
I would like to know more about illusions because I just read an article that cited some studies where some illusions only existed in certain cultures. I would like to know more about why illusions exist and how different environments make us more or less susceptible to illusions.
8) What ideas related to what you were reading (what did you think about) did you have while reading the chapter?
I thought about how we don’t perceive our world based on sensory stimuli alone. It is interesting to me that even perception of external sensory stimuli is susceptible to individual bias. Factors such as where we grew, our perceptions of our self, and our perception of others can influence our perception of the external world.
9) Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.
Ganglion cells, illusion, lateral geniculate nuclear, perception, sensation, vision
1)the part about attention caught my attention. this is something that i do have trouble with. i like that we can give our attention to whatever we want and block out the rest. the one example that i am fimilar with is how it is hard to pay attention or listen to someone that you are talking to if something nearby sounds better.
2) i like looking at the illusions they are just neat. i like it when you look at something for so long and then it just comes to you and then you cant stop seeing it. i think that our brains are wired to see things only one way but we can change it look past it and see it all in a different way.
3) i like reading about preception as well. i know for a fact that there are only a few people that precive things the same way that i do. which i think is neat and also makes me feel weird sometimes about the things that i say. but a lot of crazy people that saw things differntly made a lot of new discoveries in the field of psychology.
4) i like it all.
5)for me i think perception and attention
6) how the brain works with preceptiong and attention.
7) memory how does it work and why do we remember somethings one way and others that we try hard to remember just isn't there
8) about how hard the brain works and all the cool stuff it does.