Topical Blog Week #7 (Due Thursday)

| 37 Comments


Before you begin this assignment, please go to the following site and read a couple of topical blog posts that were done by students last semester at : http://www.psychologicalscience.com/bmod/2011/11/topical-blog-week-13-due-thursday.html


Next what I would like you to do is to find a topic from what we have covered so far in class that you are interested in and search the internet for material on that topic. You might, for example, find people who are doing research on the topic, you might find web pages that discuss the topic, you might find youtube clips that demonstrate something related to the topic, etc. What you find and use is pretty much up to you at this point. But use at least 3 sources.

Once you have completed your search and explorations, I would like you to say what your topic is, how exactly it fits into the chapter, and why you are interested in it. Next, I would like you to take the information you found related to your topic, integrate/synthesize it, and then write about it. At the end, please include working URLs for the three websites.

Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.

By integrating/synthesizing I mean to take what your read/experienced from the internet search (and from chapter 1 if you like) organize the information into the main themes, issues, info, examples, etc. about your topic and then write about the topic in your own words using that information. This is hard for some people to do - many students write what we refer to as "serial abstracts." They are tempted to talk about the websites rather than the topic proper. They will talk all about website #1, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #2, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #3, and then write some kind of conclusion. Serial means one after the other...This what you DON'T want to do!

At first it is a real challenge to get out of the habit of writing "serial abstracts," but I assure you once you get the hang of it it is much easier to write using the integration method. And besides this is the way researchers and scientists write their technical reports and findings - many of you will have to be able to do this for other classes and for jobs that you may eventually be hired for so now is a good time to learn this skill. At this point don't worry about a grade, worry about doing your best to have fun with the topic and then integrate it into your own words to share what you found and now know. We will work on citing the sources later....

Let me know if you have any questions.

37 Comments

I chose to learn more about effective reinforcement. I lead a workout group of kids once a week. There are two ways I want to use reinforcement to enhance the workout group. I want the kids to do the homework I give them. I also would like the kids to emit a "give it all you got" behavior during the workouts. I chose to look at reinforcement instead of punishment because the workout is optional and I didn't want to elicit a behavior of not coming from the kids.

Reinforcement is talked about in almost all the sections. Section 1.2 and Sections 2.2 are the sections that primarily focus on it.

While looking for reinforcement ideas, I found three articles with three concepts that I want to try, intrinsic rewards, catching good behaviors, and praise.

One of the articles mentioned that sometimes token economics are ineffective. The reason was because the reinforcement achieved wasn't motivating to the kid. The article recommended finding things that the kids value highly. Specifically things that they want to do with their free time. As a consequence of doing well on a workout or doing homework, you get to do your favorite workout. This could be hard with a group of 15 kids, but there should be some similarities between the kids. All the kids enjoy the 2 minute max crunch test. This might be an effective reinforcer for doing well on the max pullup test.

The second concept is the idea of using taking notice and reinforcing during good effort, while ignoring mistakes. This reminded me of Thorndike's law of effect and law of recedency. If you reinforce the kids during hard effort, but ignore the lesser effort then you are making them more likely to emit hard working behaviors. I can apply this to kids that excel at pistols (one-leg squats) but struggle at pullups. By reinforcing one area it will motivate them to try harder. It would be even better to find a specific aspect of the exact movement that they struggle at to find improvement. For example, the technique of the exercise is an area to use reinforcement.

The last idea was my favorite because it is simple and could be very effective. It's called RAP (recognition, appreciation, praise) by John Correll, who coined it. This could be one of the most effective reinforcers because most people don't see the fruits of all the exercise homework that they do behind the scenes. If the trainer says something like, "Sally, I noticed you really excelled at pistols today, I can tell you really worked hard this week. Great job!" it might really make the exercise homework more rewarding. Three other recommendations John Correll has that I want to use are, personalize your praise, give the praise instantly after the behavior, and do it frequently. When you hear your name associated with encouragement/praise it's more reinforcing. Many people say give four compliments for every negative. I will try to beat that ratio by giving praise much more often.

Terms: elicit, emit, behavior, reinforcement, reinforcers, , reinforcing, punishment, consequence

These are the sources:

http://technologyofbehavior.wordpress.com/category/definitions/positive-reinforcement/

http://sparksofgenius.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/train-your-kids-to-do-homework-without-arguing/

http://www.correllconcepts.com/Correll_Comment/2002_Comment/5-02_reinforcement.htm


I choose to research classical conditioning and learn more about how it applies to the real world. I originally choose this topic because I wanted to learn to train my dog. However, after reading most of the material this is not the best route to go about doing that. Classical conditioning comes from the section 3.2 which is all about Ivan Pavlov.

My first website goes hand in hand with the section in the book and recaptures what exactly Ivan Pavlov did in the lab and how he stumbled onto eliciting a conditioned response of drooling from the dogs just by ringing a bell. This specific cite also went on to explain how classical conditioning can be used to cure phobias and desensitize fears by exposure to pleasant things while the aversive phobia/fear is also present. Classical conditioning is also used to help treat anxiety in some situations.

The second website showed even more what classical conditioning can do or help with in today’s society. It explained how drug addictions can be a result of our bodies being conditioned to the drug and how because we get used to that stimulus we go into withdrawal without the drugs. The article also mentioned how the wildlife conservation is currently using taste aversion, which is a form of classical conditioning, to keep lions from eating the cattle in certain areas. They are doing this not so much for the cattle, but so the farmers don’t kill the lions. I thought that was pretty neat.

The last website compared classical conditioning to operant conditioning. Operant conditioning involves reinforcement and punishment for certain behaviors. This is probably what I should have started with when I wanted to look up ways to train my dog. The website was very helpful in explaining how to distinguish from the two types of conditioning. It gave the example that one of the conditionings made the subject emit an involuntary response. This was classical conditioning. If you thing about the dogs drooling to the sound of a bell, they did not know or plan that they were going to drool. The other type of conditioning elicits a voluntary response to avoid or gain a certain consequence.

Terms: classical conditioning, Ivan Pavlov, elicit, conditioned response, aversive, stimulus, operant conditioning, reinforcement, punishment, behaviors, emit, response, consequence

Sources:

http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/classcond.htm

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/2012/01/11/what-is-classical-conditioning-and-why-does-it-matter/

http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/classical-vs-operant-conditioning.htm

I picked the term extinction to write/research. When reading about it in the chapter I didn’t quit understand what it meant and when it was displayed. Upon talking about it in class and looking at videos about it I realized it was a behavior that is displayed almost every day. I know I experience extinction at least once a day and it is usually aversive. It happens when you don’t get reinforced for something that you usually get reinforced for. For example emitting the behavior to turn on the TV usually turns on the TV, but when the TV doesn’t turn on you push other buttons on the remote. If this doesn’t work you might go behind the TV and take the cord out and plug it in again. You go through all these different behaviors to try and get reinforced. It can get very upsetting.
Through researching I have learned that extinction is the best way to deal with undesirable behaviors. For example if every time your child cries, you pick him/her up and hold them, the child is prone to emit a crying behavior anytime it wants attention. If the target behavior is the crying and you want to stop it, it is best not to pick up the child and coddle them every time they emit a crying behavior. When this first occurs the child may cry louder or use different pitches. They do this because they are not getting reinforced for their crying behavior and experience extinction. If you continue to ignore the crying, over time the child will discontinue the behavior. It works even faster if it is rewarded.
You have to be careful when using the extinction technique because a “frustration effect” might take place. Someone who is used to getting rewarded for something is now essentially getting nothing. This can aggravate an individual and tantrums can occur. This could involve throwing things, yelling, or becoming aggressive. This is something to know before using extinction. If this occurs and you still feel safe it is best to just let it occur. If you go back and reinforce the behavior they will know to throw the same fit next time the extinction technique is used.
There is debate on what extinction actually does. Some people say it is a new learning and others say it is unlearning a certain behavior. A lot of extinction research is done with rats or mice at which researchers take a look at their amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. Research is still going on today to determine what exactly occurs in the mind when extinction is put forth and an extinction burst behavior is emitted.
Terms: Extinction, extinction burst, behavior, reinforcement, emit, undesirable, aversive, amygdale, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, target behavior

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_(psychology)
http://specialed.about.com/od/glossary/g/Extinction-Eliminating-Problem-Behaviors.htm
http://animalbehaviour.net/Extintion.htm

The topic I chose to read further into was superstitious behavior. Superstitious behavior was covered in chapter 2.4. Since I found it to be the most interesting topic that has been covered thus far In the book I thought I would do some additional research. I've never been superstitious at all, but I always found it interesting when people were because to me it made no logical sense. Despite not making any sense to me, there are many people around the world that are superstitious and non more so than athletes.

Superstition is the belief that there is a connection between an object or behavior to an unrelated outcome. There are many real world effects of people believing in superstitions such as luck and bad luck. For example houses with lucky numbers in them sell at a premium and in Las Vegas many large casino hotels omit floor number 4, 14, 24 and so on because the number 4 is seen as unlucky in Chinese tradition. After some studies were done researchers came up with 3 reasons why people are superstitious. Individuals use superstition to feel more in control of the outcome, to decrease the feeling of helplessness, and it is much easier to rely on superstitions then other coping strategies. People that believe in chance and fate tend to be a lot more superstitious than the alternative. They may have good reasons to be superstitious. Often times individuals are reinforced by superstitious behavior because it elicits them to actually perform better, increases their confidence, and more persistence in pursuing their goals. Almost as if the “lucky socks” they are wearing act as a placebo. Some formidable athletes that are superstitious includes: Michael Jordan who wears his North Carolina shorts under his uniform, Serena Williams wears the same socks all tournament weekend long, and Tiger Woods wears a red shirt every tournament Sunday. In Richard Wiseman’s research on luck he established four principles on how to become “luckier”. You can do this by maximizing chance opportunities by being open to new experiences, listening to your hunches since they hunches are often backed by your bodies perceptual abilities, expecting good fortune, which is much like a self-fulfilling prophecy, and by changing your viewpoint on the work.

Terms: Behavior, Superstitious Behavior, Superstition, Elicits, Reinforced

Sources:
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html
http://lifehacker.com/5944500/how-to-make-yourself-luckier
http://social-cognition.uni-koeln.de/scc4/documents/PsychS21_7.pdf

I choose to write about positive reinforcement because it is constantly happening all around us. It fits into this chapter because positive reinforcement is a type of manipulation. I believe manipulation is a big part of behavior modification. It is important to have a general understanding of reinforcement. I am interested in learning more about this term because it allows me to understand how to emit certain behaviors to influence the frequency of the consequence. Also I can have an understanding of when others are using reinforcement against me. I think it is more pleasant to use reinforcement than using punishment (aversive).

Positive reinforcement is important to behavior modification is brought up in almost all of the sections in the book. Some sections that focus more on positive reinforcement is section 1.2 and sections 2.2.

I found three sources that will help clarify the main theme, issues, and examples.


In operant conditioning, positive reinforcement is presenting a desirable stimulus from emitting a target behavior. The desirable stimulus allows the behavior being emitted to increase the frequency of the response. Which means you will keep emitting that same behavior over and over. The desirable stimulus is considered as a reward which will always be pleasant. Positive reinforcement is known to “strengthen” the outcome of the response. The most important part to positive reinforcement is occurs immediately after the behavior.


Positive reinforcement can be as simple as praising someone for a certain behavior. One could say “nice job” or “excellent work”. This type of positive reinforcement is known as a social reinforcer. Another example of positive reinforcement is using “tokens” for emitting a certain behavior. Teachers are a great example for this type of positive reinforcement. Teachers can use tokens to reinforce students on this correct work. This type of positive reinforcement is known as a token reinforcer. Teachers can also use candy, toys, and etc. to help manipulate their students’ behavior.


However, positive reinforcement sometimes isn’t always a pleasant thing. Sometimes terrible (aversive) behaviors being emitted are reinforced when they should not be. An example of this is parents giving in to their children who are misbehaving in the public eye. This could occur in the super market, the library, or toy store. Parents reinforcing bad behavior could cause multiple issues. It is important to only reinforce pleasant behaviors, which allows you to stay out of trouble.


Positive reinforcement is a great manipulator if you known how to use it correctly. From the video resource provided it shows how entertained the guy knows he is using positive reinforcement towards others. This always shows the reinforcement being done right after the behavior is being emitted.


Terms: behavior modification, behavior, consequence, emit, elicit, pleasant, aversive, positive reinforcement, reinforcement, punishment, target behavior, operant conditioning, desirable stimulus, stimulus, response, and reinforcer

http://www.educateautism.com/behavioural-principles/positive-reinforcement.html

http://psychology.about.com/od/operantconditioning/f/positive-reinforcement.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-63ysqT5nu0&feature=related

Classical conditioning is something I am interested in. I have heard about and mildly discussed this topic in other psychology classes. The only information that was ever really talked about was Pavlov's experiments with the dogs. We never really associated it with real life behavior, and I would like to know how to see it and use it in real life. Classical conditioning is important when trying to find out if a reinforcer or punisher is going to work.

Although classical conditioning is generally associated with animals on article talked about the Little Albert experiment. They used a 9 month old baby, a white rat, and a hammer. They would show the baby the rat and hit the hammer on the steal bar. Eventually the baby figured out that the rat elicited the behavior of the hammer hitting the steal bar. It would cry every time the rat appeared whether or not the beating of the hammer occurred. This article helped me to see that classical conditioning can be applied to humans.

Okay, now that I know it can be applied to humans I would like to know how as a therapist I can use it to help people. One article discussed that it can be used to treat people with anxiety and phobias. It talks about when a anxiety producing stimulus is emitted it can be paired with a positive stimulus. The negative stimulus elicits a usual anxiety provoking behavior to be emitted. However, a positive stimulus paired with the anxiety producing stimulus help to extinct the anxiety attack or fear.

I found a video on www.youtube.com using classical conditioning. In the video a little boy is the subject, the neutral stimulus is the sound of a duck (quack), and the unconditioned stimulus is getting shot with a nerf gun. The experimenter plays the quack then shoots the subject with the nerf gun. He does this about 12 times before the subject learns to duck as soon as it hears the quack. The quack manipulates the kid to duck.

Terms: manipulates, behavior, emit, elicit, positive stimulus, negative stimulus, extinct, neutral stimulus, unconditioned stimulus, stimulus, classical conditioning


http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/classcond.htm

http://www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfTTm-rgFFI

The topic I decided to select come from section 2.4 and is superstitious behaviors. I chose this topic because I find it fascinating that people will do just about anything to get their desired behavior. In just about everything we do you can find someone who is engaging in superstitious behaviors. Just the other day I asked my roommate why she kept walking to one side of the room with her phone. She told me that it was the only place she could get service. But in reality one time she got good service over there so she was convinced she could only get it on that side of the room, so I had her move to all sides of the room with her phone and prove that she was acting with a superstitious behavior.
A superstitious behavior is one emitted because the organism believes that it has a causal relationship with an outcome when in reality the outcome is not related to the behavior and it is related to some other unobserved behavior. A study from Kansas State University has shown that people use these superstitious behaviors for three reasons. They want to gain control, decrease helplessness, and to avoid coping. Life can be very uncertain and people are always seeking ways to have control and seek desirable things and superstitious behaviors are one way to feel that way.
Superstitions can be something like wearing the same socks for every game in a season because you believe the bring you good luck. At one point in time you were reinforced for wearing the socks and now you engage in that behavior to seek that same reinforcement. They have been around for a long time. Ancient peoples engaged in rain dances because they believed that they would bring rain. But in reality the dancing was not the underlying factor to it raining.
In a video on the world series of poker participants tell about the behavior they engage in to help them win big. One man wears his lucky necklace, another lady sets a bill under her chips, another man carries a picture of his daughter. One lady goes so far as to say if she looses bad she will never wear the clothes she was wearing ever again. The possibilities of superstitious behavior are endless. Everyone can have their own unique behavior that is superstitious whether it is to bring something good and prevent something bad. Though we may not always recognize it, it is very easy for people to fall victim to superstitious behavior but there are ways to avoid them.
It is not necessarily a bad thing to have a superstitious behavior. They can make you feel good. But when they continue to fail you could attribute that failure to this unrelated behavior.Something that is inherently neutral could become aversive to you and there are ways to avoid this. To over come a superstition a person must step back from the situation and really look at it. They need to see all the possible causes for what elicited the outcome. A person needs to be logical and really think about what is causing the desired behavior and not just initially attribute it to something unrelated.

Terms: Elicited, emitted, reinforcement, superstitious, behavior, aversive

http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html

http://www.essortment.com/superstitious-behavior-cause-cure-36002.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m-k18MvSwM

Reinforcement is something I am interested in. I've learned about positive and negative reinforcement way back in my high school psychology class,but the concept never stuck with me. I always had a difficult time understanding what reinforcement is because it was explained so different throughout my years of taking psychology classes. While in your class I believe you've explained what reinforcement is in a very understandable and helpful way. I want to learn a little more on how to emit reinforcement in my life and others.

I found a video on YouTube that demonstrates positive reinforcement in the classroom. This video discussed the program at Alexander Elementary School. They call this program STARS. This program list several behaviors that should be followed. When the students follow these rules consistently they get STAR punched on their card. Once this card is filled up they are rewarded, praised, and celebratory surprise phone call to their parents. This program has reduced the refferal rate by 75%. This is a great example of what positive reinforcement can to for behavior.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNW05PRpPUY

The next video I found used a very useful example of how you can enforce positive reinforcement. The video is of a young boy that, like other young boys never lift the seat to the toilet. The researcher demonstrated how to reinforce the boy for eliciting the behavior of lifting the seat and peeing in the toilet. He made it a fun process for the young boy. He drew a picture and taped it to the back of the toilet seat also taping a music sticker underneath the picture. This helped the boy lift the seat cause he would have the enjoyment of lifting the seat and peeing in the toilet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcQMTVF82yY

The article I read discussed how positive reinforcement works really good on employees. The author listed to types of reinforcement for employees. Extrinsic rewards consist of pay raises, promotions, and other symbols of recognition. And Intrinsic rewards are not given by someone in management, but relate to the job itself and the pleasure and sense of accomplishment that it gives the employee.Rewards must be tied directly to behavior that the manager wants repeated. The employees must know rewards are available and know how to get them. Rewards should be administered as soon as desired behavior is present. And employees should be rewarded only for what they themselves have done. I think this help me understand my own experienced in the work place. I feel that if my work place demonstrated this technique more of my co-workers would enjoy working there and my mangers and bosses would enjoy working with them.
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/positive.html

Terminology: Rewards,Intrinsic,Extrinsic,Positive Reinforcement,Reinforce,Elicit,Emit,Behavior

The topic I chose to learn more about was superstitious behavior because I feel like this is something that I see all the time when I am at sporting events and other activities. This type of behavior was in chapter two section four. Superstitious behavior can be emitted by anyone. Everyone has some type of superstition. A superstition is a behavior that when emitted it isn’t reinforced right away. This is my topic because I see it occurring every Sunday when I go home for the weekend.

For example, my brother is a huge Chiefs fan and every Sunday everyone in the family has to where red. There was even a point when we played the raiders that my brother made our black and white cat put on red because he believed that if we weren’t wearing red our team would lose. I doubt we are the only family with this type of superstition. Also when the game is about to start we all have what we call a kick off cookie. This cookie is only allowed to be eaten when either the chiefs kick the ball, or catch it on the opening kickoff. If you elicit the behavior of eating the cookie too early and the Chiefs lose the game then the consequence to your actions is that the loss will be blamed on you. These may sound ridiculous, but to me it is entertaining and creates the football atmosphere.
When researching this topic I came across a few articles that went into detail about this type of behavior. Superstitious behavior is seen throughout all sports, but it is more defined in some sports then others. For example it has been seen that gymnasts have more superstitious rituals then football or basketball players. It has also been determined that females have more superstitious behaviors then males. In one of the articles that I read written by Kevin L. Burke he said that a pre-performance ritual is different compared to a superstitious ritual. To me I think that he is wrong because I feel like they overlap quite a bit. I feel like athletes pre-performance rituals area type of superstitious because what they do before the game isn’t going to be reinforced right away, and in the end it may not ever be reinforced. Sports are not the only place where this type of behavior is used.

Another example of when this type of behavior has been used is with the rain dance. The rain dance was basically created when someone was dancing a certain way and then it started to rain thus making the person think that it was their behavior that caused it. The superstitious behavior could then be strengthened based on the fact that if they did this dance multiple times and it rained a good percentage of the time then the people would most likely continue to do the dance when they wanted rain. I find this a funny example because I can remember when I was little that my mother would tell me and my friends to go outside and do the rain dance, and us not really knowing what it meant went outside and danced .

It isn’t only humans that portray superstitious behavior but other organisms do as well. B.F. Skinner was able to find out that animals had superstitious behaviors. He used pigeons a lot in his research and was able to get these birds to emit superstitious behaviors by putting them into an operant chamber. The pigeon would emit multiple behaviors and then the bird would get reinforced with food, but once the food was taken away the pigeon would go back through the most recent behaviors until he got the right one which would allow him to get food. The bird’s behavior would soon seem to be a superstitious behavior. In another example of animals using superstitious behavior you can just watch your pets. For example, my cat will open the cabinet door and then let it slam shut. When he emits that behavior he is usually rewarded with food shortly after. Another example could be when my dog hits the treat cupboard that she will get a treat.

I don’t think that it is a bad thing to have a superstitious behavior I actually think that it is a good thing. I think that it is good because if can kind of be treated like a placebo effect. If you believe that this certain behavior or charm will get you the results you want then you may be able to convince yourself that you can do it.

Terms: Superstitious behavior, superstition, emitted, elicit, behavior, reinforced, consequence, organisms, B.F Skinner, operant chamber, emit,

http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol8Iss2/Superstition.htm

http://www.essortment.com/superstitious-behavior-cause-cure-36002.html

http://www.globalanimal.org/2011/06/13/are-animals-superstitious/42083/

Week 7 Thursday Blog

I would like to focus on positive reinforcement of self-regulation and self-control. These three articles explore the potential benefits of social support techniques and small group processing as reinforcement for self-regulatory behavior in physical activity, academic success, on-task behavior, and other desired behaviors. These studies identify the emotional positive reinforcement that sense of self-regulatory success can emit in a person to predict further attempts and values of success in self-regulation of these desired behaviors, especially in school.

These articles offer some different strategies for positively reinforcing personal health choices as well as provision of attention and individual leadership. Through examining and trying these measures, one can possibly discover how to facilitate efficient emotional, interpersonal support to positively reinforce self-regulatory behavior amongst young persons, and also create seeking this emotional, interpersonal support as a conditioned response when one identifies or encounters self-regulatory failures to reduce the potential ‘downward spiral’ one failure can have on predicted near future failures. This is very exciting to me as a manner of motivating individuals to seek treatment that provides positive reinforcement for healthy behavior is a crucial part of raising awareness and reducing stigma of self-identified failures, which can be emotionally detrimental to opportunities of present and near future adaptations for success. Thanks!! –ebs- 10/4/12 @ 1421hrs. CentricTime

http://www.library.uni.edu/

Merritt, E. , Wanless, S. , Rimm-Kaufman, S. , Cameron, C. , & Peugh, J. (2012). The contribution of teachers' emotional support to children's social behaviors and self-regulatory skills in first grade. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 141.

Sharma, L. , Teret, S. , & Brownell, K. (2010). The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 240.

Lemberger, M. , & Clemens, E. (2012). Connectedness and self-regulation as constructs of the student success skills program in inner-city african american elementary school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(4), 450.

The subject I picked was reinforcement, specifically positive reinforcement. These three websites explore how positive reinforcement works, how it’s used in everyday life and multiple ways to use positive reinforcement. I’m interested in these findings because everyone likes getting what they want from others.
The websites all had slightly different approaches, but they all included some sort of reward system. These rewards can be absolutely anything, as long as they increase the probability of the target behavior being emitted again. A reward can be anything from a monetary tip from a customer to a being able to watch tv after finishing your homework to being able to splurge on a new pair of shoes because you worked a little overtime. All three of these websites have something to do with rewards. They also had similar ways of telling you how to reinforce someone to do something. “Peer punishment” was mentioned in one article because it was thought that it was more effective then positive reinforcement. This was also refuted in another article saying that punishment will just lead to fatigue, blame and resistance to do whatever they were punished for again. I really liked the last article I read (also the last one listed) about moms showing their kids more love in order for them to do better in remembering their lunches, homework and a variety of other things. It showed that a reward can be something very simple and that it doesn’t always have to be something complex, or even tangible. I like that it also supported the fact that punishment is least effective when you want someone to do something the way you want them to do it. In this articles case, more punishment and less reinforcement and encouragement from any type of caregiver meant that a child would grow to have a hippocampus over 9% smaller than a child who received more reinforcement. These articles were very interesting in the fact that they had actual facts that reinforcement, whether it be positive or negative, is more effective than punishment could ever be.

Terms: Reinforcement, Punishment, Positive, Negative, Reward, Emit, Target Behavior

http://www.inspired-personal-development.com/positive-reinforcement.html

http://psychcentral.com/news/2009/09/04/positive-reinforcement-aids-the-common-good/8182.html

http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/health-med-fit/fitness/positive-reinforcement-may-boost-kids-brains/article_70b9f46a-81b0-5ae7-bba6-8d1a1d0b1f15.html

I chose to talk about punishment because, I just found it interesting. The interesting thing about punishment is that, as I know of, there are two types of punishment. There is positive punishment and negative punishment. I won’t go into depth with that, but I will mention them briefly but focus on punishment itself and the effectiveness of it. As define in the UIOWA link, Punishment is “a consequence that follows an operant response that decreases (or attempts to decrease) the likelihood of that response occurring in the future." In order word, punishment tends to make a behavior extinct. It tends to distinguish whether a behavior will keep reoccurring or not. Positive punishment is an effort to decrease the likelihood of a behavior occurring in the future, an operant response is followed by the presentation of an aversive stimulus. An example with this will be, if you pull a dog tail, it might attempt to bit you. Negative punishment is defined as an effort to reduce the likelihood of a behavior occurring in the near future. For example, if a child talks back to their parent, they can lose the privilege of driving or going to that particular place they like. Punishment can be effective sometimes, and the reason I say sometimes is that, some people who come from jail, keeps on committing crime over and over again once they are released from jail. The reason for this is that, it has been shown that jail sentences are far apart from the time the crime was committed. So if you want to stop a behavior, you have to do it right away after the behavior. Another is the inconsistency of the behavior. People who get tickets for speeding, emit that behavior again due to the cops not always on the road to stop them consistently. To demonstrate this more, I have listed a video about punishment with immigration. The video is about Mexicans being return back to Mexico because they are considered illegal. This is an act of punishment because, they are being punished for not having documentary to prove their legalization, therefore are sent back to Mexico. Learning about this has increased my knowledge into distinguishing what punishment is. I have used a lot of punishment in my life that I was not aware of. I myself have learned the consequences of behavior. It has been shown that family who spank their children at home, those kids tends to be anti-social and aggressive towards others. So there are ways you can punish to reduce a behavior.

Below are my sources and terms used.

http://psychology.about.com/od/operantconditioning/f/punishment.htm
http://www.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/wasserman/glossary/punishment.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/faultlines/2012/04/201241081117980874.html


Terms used

Positive punishment
Negative punishment
Punishment
Reoccurring
Extinct
Distinguish
Inconsistency
Emit
Distinguishing
Anti-Social
Aggressive

A topic that we have covered so far in class that I am interested in is superstitious behavior. It fits into Chapter 2.4, which we have already covered, and I am interested in the topic because of the fact that I find it intriguing that people believe in things like lucky charms or wearing certain clothes to ace a test or win a game. It seems kind of crazy to me, so I wanted to learn more about it than what was shared within the confines of the textbook.

According to the textbook, superstitious behaviors are emitted when an organism comes to believe that reinforcement occurs at seemingly random instances. From the Internet search, I found a plethora of information discussing superstitious behavior and what it entails. I found a few main concepts from the sources I used that I really wanted to focus on. These concepts are: relating superstitious behavior to OCD, the driving forces of superstitious behavior, tips to avoid superstitious behavior, and superstitious behavior seen in animals.

The first concept of focus is relating superstitious behavior to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). OCD is a disorder that stems from anxiety. People who suffer from OCD often have compulsions to do certain rituals over and over again, and these rituals have a tendency to interfere with their everyday life. A lot of the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder can definitely mimic superstitious behavior, yet experts in the field say that there really is not enough evidence to connect the two. Superstitious behavior does not occur due to an anxiety disorder. It is simply a form of irrational thinking, yet the dividing line between superstitious behavior and obsessive-compulsive disorder may sometimes be hard to put your finger on.

The next concept that I wanted to focus on was all about the driving forces of superstitious behavior. According to psychologists, wanting more control or certainty is the leading driving force behind it. People find some kind of false certainty to help them explain why things happen. People do not realize that things can still happen outside of their control even if they are wearing their lucky shirt or their lucky necklace. Yet superstitions tend to give people the sense that they are doing something to ensure a specific outcome that they want. Researchers from Kansas State University developed three reasons for superstitious behavior. They included: to gain control over uncertainty, to decrease feelings of helplessness, and because it is easier to rely on superstition instead of coping strategies. It was discovered that people who believe that chance and fate control their lives are more likely to be superstitious.

My next concept to focus on would be tips to avoid superstitious behavior. One tip would be to not believe in bad luck and to take some ownership over the control that you do have. Our locus of control is definitely a factor that contributes to whether or not we are superstitious. An internal locus of control allows one to believe that they are in charge of everything and that they are the masters of their fate. An external locus of control, on the other hand, is kind of the opposite of an internal locus; it means that the environment is somehow in control of your fate instead of you being the sole decider. A second tip is to be decisive and proactive. The less decisive you are, the more superstitious you are likely to be. People who are proactive are less superstitious. This tip basically tells us that we do not need to rely on certain objects or behaviors to get us through a challenging or scary event. We need to take things into our own hands and be aware that we are able to make decisions for ourselves without relying on anything else. A final tip would be to not put yourself in a situation where you have to rely on bad luck. Use the bad situations as a coping mechanism instead of attributing it to a superstitious behavior.

The final concept that I wanted to focus on was superstitious behavior in animals. Like humans, animals have also been known to participate in superstitious behaviors, although theirs sometimes make more sense than humans’. Animals often fall under the trap of superstitious behavior through misunderstandings when they are being trained. They learn to associate their reinforcement with a random behavior, and then end up emitting that behavior repeatedly because they think that is what is getting them their reinforcer. It is interesting that even simple animals pick up the attributes of superstitious behavior. Looking at behavior in animals has definitely opened up the eyes of humans in terms of the fact that we really are not all that different from the other creatures that roam this earth.

http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/psychology-of-superstition
http://www.k-state.edu/media/newsreleases/sept10/superstition90210.html
http://www.globalanimal.org/2011/06/13/are-animals-superstitious/42083/

I learned quite a bit more from the sources that I found than just the information that was in the textbook. I am happy that I chose superstitious behavior to be my topic, because I feel as though I can apply what I learned to life and I will remember it and use it more in class and my assignments. I was eager to do this assignment because I enjoyed the fact that we were able to focus on a topic of our choice. I hope to see more assignments like this in the weeks to come!

Terms: superstitious behavior, emit, reinforcement, internal locus of control, external locus of control, behavior, reinforcer

The topic I chose is learned helplessness. I remember learning about it in the past when we would talk about Seligman and how he would train dogs to emit the behavior of learned helplessness, and in the chapter we just read it was mentioned briefly in the Pavlov chapter. It interests me, because after thinking about the topic more it can really be applied outside of just a research perspective. I emit this behavior when I get discouraged and just want to quit when I might be about to succeed. I’m hoping in the future chapters we go over this topic more in detail, which might be another reason why I chose this since it wasn’t something we’ve learned about much.

Learned helplessness can be shown easily in many situations dealing with students. For example the video I found is a teacher applying the concept in a class. She has the students re-write words on a paper by rearranging the letters of the word to create a new word. Half the class gets two easy words to begin with and the other half gets really hard words. The last word is the same in both groups, but only the group with the easy words are able to complete it. The other is of an article about young adolescents who are overweight and they were feeling pretty down about trying to reach their target behavior of being healthy and in shape because they had tried many unsuccessful diet and exercise plans.

The students in class thought that they couldn’t do the last word because they couldn’t figure out the first two, but the other half of the students did it with ease because they were reinforced by the first two that they could figure these kind of puzzles out. I am able to put this more in perspective because things like this happen socially as well. For example if a boy gets turned down by a girl he asks to the dance, this might elicit him to experience learned helplessness and he won’t try again even if the next girl he would ask would say yes. Another example is if a girl is new to school and gets shuts down by various friend groups when she is trying to make friends. She might have thought that she was good at making friends and now that she is not she could go through a period of extinction and learned helplessness and not try to make anymore friends. I liked how the teacher in the example was able to teach her students about this concept, it was engaging and made it fun to learn instead of just lecturing. Learned helplessness can be an aversive consequence to lot with students, and hopefully teachers and other faculty members make an effort to encourage students to not give up.

The last article I read about had a very different topic then the first two. It is about Mexico and that there have been many dead bodies being found because of drug-related killings. It has come to the point where people are not even trying to stop it. They are experiencing learned helplessness because nothing is being done, so they have given up to even try to stop it. This ties in with the other things because like students, these people have given up on trying to take a stand and do something about it. This article shows a good example of how learned helplessness can happen in many situations, and often times really serious ones.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTqBP-x3yR0

http://journals.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/SiteName/Documents/DocumentItem/17221.pdf

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/world/americas/mexicans-unflinching-in-face-of-drug-wars-carnage.html?pagewanted=all

Terms: learned helplessness, Seligman, Pavlov, emit, behavior, reinforced, extinction, elicit, target behavior, consequence, aversive

I chose to research more information about reinforcement. I think it's important to use reinforcement in our lives. I thought that learning for about reinforcement would be a good topic to search. Its always fun to look at things and know that that person in being reinforced or maybe you are being reinforced with something. I was curious about this term and I would like to know more about it.

When I was searching information about reinforcement I came across a website that talked about autism. I was really interested so I decided to see what the correlation between the two would be. It turned out to be that many parents or teachers use reinforcement on autistic kids to help them learn and even pay attention. I found that very interesting because in a show that I watched called Parenthood they have a kid that has autism and his teacher is always reinforcing him after he does something well.

http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/reinforcement

Another source that I found was a video of positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement. In this video from family guy the dad was asked to drink a beer so he did and another man came up to him and said that he won and he asked what he won and the guy said another beer. So he was positively reinforced with another beer. Then a negative reinforcement in this video was the son had bad grades so he wasn’t allowed to watch TV till his grades improved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_9ZZaPDtPk

This last website that I found was an article that talks about how parents can parent their children using reinforcement. It helps the children learn behavior and be better behaved.

http://www.positivereinforcementforkids.com/

Terms: reinforcement, positive, negative, correlation

I chose to learn more about the schedules of reinforcement because they are going to be a great deal of importance in my future career as a speech pathologist. I need to be able to decide what the best approach is when working with clients. The information I found helped me get an idea of when certain schedules should more or less likely be used and factors that could affect results.

Continuous reinforcement is a type of schedule where the response is reinforced every time. This approach is best when using punishment but research has found that positive reinforcement is the most powerful. From what I learned, this type of schedule has its problems. If I decided to use this reinforcement, I may not always be present when a desired behavior occurs or may not be able to apply the punishment.

Fixed ratio is a type of schedule where a certain number of responses must be produced before a reinforcement is given. All three sources say this produces a high, steady rate of responding with only a brief pause after the delivery of the reinforcer. While working in a clinic, this would most likely be the best approach for a client with a speech disorder.

Fixed interval is a type of schedule where a certain amount of time must pass before a reinforcement is given. This type produces a high rate of responding but near the end of the interval with a slower response after the delivery of the reinforcer. This would not work as well in my settings because I will already have a set time to even work with my client.

Variable ratio is a type of schedule where the response is reinforced after a variable or unpredictable number of responses. In agreement, the sources state that this type produces a high, steady rate of responding and is the best approach for reinforcing rather than punishing. For example, gambling is a variable ratio schedule and the reinforcer sucks a person in. A person will not always know when he/she will be reinforced or with how much reward.

Variable interval is a type of schedule where the response is reinforced after a variable or unpredictable amount of time. This schedule produces a slow, steady rate of responding and is the best approach to result in more consistent behaviors, but it may not be true for punishment because consistency matters a great deal.

When I decide to reinforce a behavior, a number of factors contribute to my decision. In cases where I'll be specifically trying to teach a new behavior (sound), continuous reinforcement is a good choice. However, reinforcing a behavior every time can be difficult and require a lot of attention. Once the behavior is learned, switching to another schedule is preferable which will help keep my client from becoming satiated. If the reinforcer is no longer desirable, my client may stop producing the desired behavior.

These sources helped me have a better idea on which reinforcement schedules will better equip my goals I want to reach with my clients. In the future, I hope I will be able to use this knowledge to succeed in my field of work.

Terms: Reinforcement Schedule, Behavior, Desirable, Reinforce, Punish, Punishment, Responses, Fixed Ratio, Fixed Interval, Variable Ratio, and Variable Interval

Sources:
1.) http://allpsych.com/psychology101/reinforcement.html
2.) http://www.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/wasserman/glossary/schedules.html
3.) http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/schedules.htm

The thing I am really interested in so far is classical conditioning. I chose this because the experiments that Pavlov did are very interesting to me. The experiment where he studied the salivation of the dogs was incredible. I think it is interesting how he thought of how that would work and created an experiment to show it.

In the first article I read I learned more about this topic. I learned that there needs to be a neutral signal before the natural reflex. It talked about all of the basics that are in classical conditioning. The unconditioned stimulus is the one that has nothing to do with any previous experiments. The unconditioned response is an unlearned response. Another term mentioned in this article was conditioned stimulus which is where there was a previously neutral stimulus. And with the conditioned stimulus comes the conditioned response which is the learned response. I thought this article did a good job of explaining the basic principles of classical conditioning.

http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/classcond.htm

In the second article I read had more terms that are involved with classical conditioning. Acquisition is when the behavior is first learned. Extinction is one of the most interesting of these terms to me. Extinction is where a conditioned response is reduced or eliminated. I think the extinction process is a very interesting one. Discrimination is another interesting term. It is the ability to be able to distinguish between different things. This article helped me to improve my understanding of these concepts. The more I think about these terms the more comfortable I feel about my understanding of them.

http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/classcondbasics.htmt

The third source I found was a YouTube Video about Pavlov's experiment with the dogs and how they salivate. This experiment is one of his most famous experiments. I find this experiment fascinating because he trains the dogs to salivate at the thought of food. He used all sorts of stimuli to produce the response of salivation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhqumfpxuzI

Classical conditioning fits into what we have been learning in class because we have been studying Pavlov's classical conditioning and his experiments with the salivary glands of dogs. I have learned a lot more about this topic now that I have read some articles about it.

Terms: Pavlov, classical conditioning, reinforce, extinction, conditioned response, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, unconditioned stimulus, and discrimination.

I am going to focus on positive reinforcement through praise, specifically, the use of the phrase, “good job.” This seems to be one of the most commonly used form of praise children receive from their parents and teachers; however, some research suggests that children are “over-praised” for emitting mediocre work, causing the well intended “good job” to lose value as an effective reinforcer.

In 2001, Alfie Kohn wrote an article on five reasons why people should quit saying “good job” when children do things. Some of these reasons include: manipulation, creating “praise junkies,” causing kids to become less interested in the task, and even causing them to produce lower quality work. Kohn explains that when children are continuously praised with “good job,” they learn to associate the praise with simply the completion of a task, regardless of the time and effort they put into it. Some children might even become so attached to receiving a “good job,” that they need to hear it every time they do something or the begin to feel inferior. Kohn suggests several things that could reinforce children without simply saying “good job.” For example, instead of instant verbal praise, Kohn advises asking some questions about the work and showing interest. This allows the child to explain some of the things they did and how they came about completing the task. Talking about it can be intrinsically reinforcing to the child instead of receiving a simple “good job” regardless of the difficulty.

Although Kohn provides compelling reasons to limit or even eliminate the use of the term “good job,” some researchers, like Strain and Joseph (2001) of the University of Colorado in Denver, disagree. They argue that Kohn is illogical and that praise is a necessary form of positive reinforcement that parents and teachers should be using, especially as guidance for young children. Kohn strongly believed that children would lose interest in certain behaviors when the verbal praise started to lose its value. Strain and Joseph argue the opposite that praise increases the likelihood that a certain behavior will occur in the future, despite the specific terminology. Furthermore, Strain and Joseph point out that parents and teachers are under enough stress and pressure as it is, so suggesting that verbal praise is ineffective in reinforcing children only causes extra unnecessary stress.

Perhaps both of these arguments have some validity. Lauren Lowery Hanen, speech and language pathologist and writer, offers a different perspective on the use of praise. She suggests that we should be considering how children should be praised, not whether or not they should be or not. She says that children should be praised based on the level of difficulty.
These studies on positive reinforcement through praise match up with section 2.2 with the context and value of the reinforcement.

Terms: positive reinforcement, behavior, reinforcer, emitting, manipulation, intrinsic

http://www.alfiekohn.org/parenting/gj.htm

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnhcebis.seresc.net%2Fdocument%2Ffilename%2F354%2FThe_Use_of_Praise_-_A_Response_to_Kohn.pdf&ei=-1VuUL7ZG8TfyQHev4DACg&usg=AFQjCNGXWq1Jvpw3nDtTPx05iBsCKlgRYQ

http://www.hanen.org/Helpful-Info/Articles/Good-job!-Is-Praising-Young-Children-a-Good-idea.aspx

The topic I chose is operant behavior. This term was first introduced in Section 1.4, and I am interested in the topic because I did not understand the explanation in the text. I searched the Internet for explanations with more details.

The concept of operant behavior was inspired by Thorndike's Law of Effect. As we have seen in Chapter 3, the cat in the puzzle box learns which actions allow it to escape. Those effective actions are reinforced by the food outside the box. This learning process over a period of time shows that animals have some kind of mind capacity. This phenomenon led to Skinner's famous discovery of operant conditioning.

The key element that makes Skinner's theory unique is the ability to differentiate. Animals can learn through the conditioning process because they can discriminate different stimuli and then associate them with different consequences. In other words, for reinforcement or punishment to work, the organism must be able to tell the differences in the antecedents and consequences. When different consequences are detected, an animal associates the specific behavior preceding the consequences. It then repeats the behavior that leads to a pleasurable consequence, which we call the reinforcer.

This process is called operant conditioning because the animal learns through emitting the behavior. The word operant means the requirement of action, so the animal must act first before it can learn from its action. In Skinner's writing he also used the word to refer to any element in the chain of actions. Thus the term operant behavior becomes a generalized label for all three elements in the conditioning process, namely antecedent, behavior, and consequence. This also reflects Skinner's view that the whole process is based on interactions between the organism and the environment. The behavior of one animal can be the antecedent for another animal, and a consequence in the environment can elicit another behavior. This is why operant behavior refers to a network of actions.

Links:
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-operant-behavior.htm
http://www.bfskinner.org/bfskinner/SurveyOperantBehavior.html
http://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html

Terms: operant behavior, Law of Effect, reinforce, consequences, reinforcement, punishment, antecedent, reinforcer, emit, elicit

The topic I've chosen to learn more about is Superstitious behavior which was introduced in section 2.4. I'm really interested in the idea of superstitions and how people can truly believe in them and that they can truly change an outcome.
Superstition in my opinion is the belief in some object or action that can influence the outcome of something in reality whether its positive or negative.

In the first article I read the idea of superstition was taken to task by a study to see why people believed in these superstitions. It was found that people used it to have some sense of control in their life (a continuing trend in the rest of the articles). People feel the need to control the unknown, so it would make sense when johnny down the way wants his promotion ; he'll wear that horseshoe on his neck and look for a four leaf clover etc.. it gives him the belief that he can control his life. Interesting enough the second part to the study asked a different group about death and superstitions. Surprisingly they felt that superstitious behavior wouldn't help death and actully led more people to disbelieve in such notions!
The second article I read also mentioned the previous research as well but listed reasons as to why people actually believe in these behaviors. They listed a need for control, something to pass blame on (or a crutch if you will) and a way to get rid of the helpless feelings in life. The common theme to all these points seems to be having a negative outlook on life. When you have this outlook your going to look to anything to make it better; and if your someone who can't help themselves than some ritual or random object fits perfectly into helping solve that problem.
The third article is from web md and raises many of the same points as the previous two articles have. The difference he is this article gets to some important points of who seems to be affected (to believe in) superstious behaviors the most. Most of the time belief in these behaviors stems from anxieties of some sort. So it would make sense that to reduce that anxiety that we want to control it somehow thus the rabbits foot. The article also claims that most superstitions aren't all that bad and have even become a part of everyday life on some scale or another.
Superstitious behavior fits into class at this moment because we've been learning about classical conditioning. When we pair two stimulus lets say.. crossing your fingers and the lottery and the consequence is you win the lottery (if only it were so..) you would believe that every time you cross your fingers good luck would happen and life would be grand.

The topic I chose is classical conditioning. I find it very interesting that people could be conditioned to emit a certain response by using such a simple procedure. Classical conditioning involves taking an unconditioned stimulus that has an unconditioned response and pairing it with a neutral stimulus, which will later become the conditioned stimulus. After a certain amount of exposure to this conditioning, the neutral stimulus will elicit the response that the unconditioned stimulus did previously. This changed the neutral stimulus into the newly conditioned stimulus and the previously unconditioned response becomes the conditioned response. I found three videos that demonstrate this process. In the videos, various unconditioned stimuli are presented (being shot with something for two of the videos and having a puff of air hit the persons eye for the other) which are followed by the unconditioned response (jumping from being shot or blinking from the puff of air). The neutral stimulus is then paired with the unconditioned stimulus (the quack sound, the “that was easy” button sound, and a tapping pencil). The neutral stimulus is eventually paired effectively enough with the unconditioned stimulus and the unconditioned response that it can be presented and still elicit the unconditioned response, even without the unconditioned stimulus being presented. It is at this point that the neutral stimulus has become a conditioned stimulus and the previously unconditioned response has become the conditioned response.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfTTm-rgFFI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo7jcI8fAuI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xg3WuvCrIZg

Terms: emit, classical conditioning, conditioned, unconditioned stimulus, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, conditioned response, neutral stimulus, elicit

I decided to look up more information about punishment because so far in class, we seem to focus more on reinforcement and many of the behavioral researchers that we have learned about so far are all focused on the outcome of reinforcement rather than punishment. The only chapter section that went into any detail about positive punishment and negative punishment was 2.3, and it was fairly short. I am interested in this topic because there are so many debates and opinions about the healthy/acceptable amouunt of punishment that should be allowed in any given social environment. Many behavioral researchers have tried to argue that punishment in any form should be avoided completely and that in order to get another person's behavior to change, positive reinforcement is always the best option. I understand this viewpoint, and have found examples that address the debate over punishing behaviors.

The first article I read was on a psychology website and it was written by a family/marriage therapist named Keren Clark in 2011. She talked about how she feels America is a culture that believes in punishment and uses punishment too much. In every relationship, we emit punishing behavior towards others even when we don't notice it. Also, she claimed that as Americans, we assume that by continuously using punishment we not only will be able to decrease the frequency of undesired behaviors, but that at the same time, desired behaviors will occur naturally as a result to avoid more punishment. This however isn't true and the author did an experiment on her own daughter with positive reinforcement and no longer has to use punishment to help elicit her daughter's cleaning behaviors.

The second article that I found on another psychology website discussed a brief overview about the effectiveness of punishment. The author, Kendra Cherry, claimed that punishment is only efffective in certain situations, such as: immediately after an aversive behavior is emitted, a temporary fix out of convenience that is only short-term, and when it is consistently applied. The author of this article defined punishment as "any change that occurs after a behavior that reduces the likelihood that that behavior will occur again in the future." However, one really big drawback to a constant use of punishment is that there can sometimes be other unintended consequences since about 3 out of 4 parents in the US spank their children as an example.

Finally, the third source I decided to use was a short youtube video about the use of corporal punishment in schools. Although the report was done in 2007, there are 20 states in America that still consider corporal punishment in schools legal with the use of a wooden padel. The advocates that were supporting a total ban of corporal punishment in every school of every state were going off the notion that by causing students to fear punishment like that, they would consider school as a violent environment and wouldn't increase desired behaviors. On the other hand, the people who supported corporal punishment in schools claim that when students partake in aversive behaviors, they deserve to be punished so that later on if they consider getting involved in another "bad" behavior, they will remind themselves of the paddle and become punishment-avoidant. Unfortunately, some unintended consequences that resulted from corporal punishment in schools are: nearly a quarter of a million kids were hit in the 2006-2007 school year, boys were 3x more likely to be hit, racial minorities were more likely to be hit, and students with disabilities were more likely to be hit. It can be understood then that a lot of people are upset and want to ban corporal punishment in schools, especially since it has already been banned for home use everywhere, and the research suggests that when home was an antecedent, and corporal punishment was used to control an aversive behavior, the consequences led to increased instances of delinquency, avoidant personality, and sometimes, even severe physical damage. Reinforcement for desirable behavior is definately a better option.

Links:
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2011/02/15/punishment-a-cultural-phenomenon/
http://psychology.about.com/od/operantconditioning/f/punishment.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPADltNd-_o

Terminology: punishment, reinforcement, positive punishment, negative punishment, positive reinforcement, emit, frequency, elicit, aversive, consequences, punishment-avoidant, antecedent, behavior


I chose to research extinction and the extinction burst. Formally, extinction is the reduction of a conditioned response when a conditioned stimulus is repeatedly presented in the absence of the previously paired unconditioned stimulus. Using the example of Pavlov's dogs, extinction is the decrease of response (salivating) from the bell (conditioned stimulus) when meat is not given (unconditioned stimulus).

The extinction burst is more related to short-term instances of behavior. The burst is during the extinction phase, when a behavior does not elicit a reinforcement. The subject will then keep trying the behavior more frequently in order to test whether not being reinforced was only a single instance. Skinner's pigeons can be used as an example of extinction burst. If Skinner gave the pigeons food only if they pecked at a lever, then the pigeons would learn that every time they plucked at the lever, they would get food. If after some time of learning, Skinner stopped feeding the pigeons after they plucked the lever, extinction would start to occur. Before any extinction would take place, however, the pigeon would pluck more rapidly at the lever, trying to get food. If the numbers of plucking of a pigeon was plotted on a graph, it would be steadily rising throughout learning, peak at an extinction burst, and then decrease throughout extinction.

Terms: behavior, elicit, extinction, extinction burst, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned stimulus, conditioned response, unconditioned response, Pavlov, Skinner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_%28psychology%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_%28psychology%29#Extinction_burst
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGazyH6fQQ4

The term I chose to look into further was learned helplessness. We went over it in class today briefly and it was introduced prior to class in section 3.2. I chose this topic because I find Pavlov to be one of the most interesting psychologist and his research really does fascinate me. While others may get sick of hearing about Pavlov, I truly enjoy learning new ideas and procedures that Pavlov used to further his research in the pschology field.

The first source I found was an article called "You Are Not So Smart: A Celebration of Self Delusion". It's primary focus was on learned helplessness. Right away the article started out with pointing out that the misconception of learned helplessness is that if you are in a bad situation, you will do whatever you can to escape it. We know this to be false because you talked about Pavlov today in class and about how when the dog would get shocked, he may give up and just continue to lay on the bars and get electracuted because he doesn't know what to do. The arcicle went over Seligman's work with this, as well as covering Pavlov. The dog is emitting the behavior of not moving because he doesn't know what he is suppossed to do. However you talked about we can teach the dog to do what we'd like by picking him up and moving him to the other side of the box, where he wouldn't get shocked. You asked the question why do people stay in an abusive relationship? The answer I got from this article was that they accept their fate because they've been in the negative situation for so long.

The second source I found was from the virutal psychology classroom. This article goes over how the term became about, Pavlov's work with digestion, and also covers Segilman's work. It's goes over the shuttler box, but more importantly how they experimented with humans. The scientist emitted a loud noise and told the human subject if they solved a puzzle the loud noise would be omitted. The group that got presented with a puzzle that didn't have an actual solution aquired learned helplessness after a few tries because they gave up, like the dogs did with the shuttle box. Perception is the key in people elicing learned helplessness or not.

The third source I found was on how to overcome learned helpelssness. It breifly went over what learned helplessness is and than went on to talk about how awareness plays an important part in overcoming learned helplessness. They said since the helplessness is learned, a person who wishes to overcome it must decondition themselves and unlearn it. They gave the example of a person being afraid to talk to the opposite sex and how they can overcome it. It actually was a interesting article and one that made me realize that learned helplessness happens in everyday, normal sitations that most people take for granted. Like talking to the opposite sex. That's not a big deal for most people, but for some it can be terrifying. It kind of made me open up my eyes and realize learned helplessness doesn't have to come from a severe sitation, like abuse.

Terms used: bevavior,elicit, omit, emit, learned helplessness, Pavlov, Shuttle Box, Seligman.


Links
http://youarenotsosmart.com/2009/11/11/learned-helplessness/

http://allpsych.com/personalitysynopsis/learned_helplessness.html

http://blog.moodr.org/2008/08/how-to-overcome-learned-helplessness.html

The topic I researched was the Law of Effect coined by Thorndike. I chose this topic because the idea of the puzzle boxes and determining intelligence via learning was an intriguing concept.

Trial and Error Learning:
In figuring out how to work the puzzle boxes the cats in Thorndike’s experiments would go through many different ways of trying to get out of the box. This type of learning is by accident and not actually knowing that something will happen, but then when reinforcement is gained by the behavior the behavior becomes learned. By simply trying and either failing or succeeding the cats would figure out if their behavior was resulting in getting out of the box. This plays a key role in human learning also as we figure out what will get us rewarded/reinforced versus punished, especially as children this can be a primary vehicle of learning. The Puzzle box was an important component on establishing exactly how learning took place in an animal.

Stamping In Learning:
In relation to ‘Trial and Error’ learning, “stamping in” is the result of trying and succeeding and thus the result is basically memorized. So basically the stimuli was then connected to the behavior for the cat which then the next time elicited the cat to emit the same behavior knowing that the certain result would follow thus taking less time.

Gaging Intelligence from Learning:
After the cats used ‘trial and error’ to ‘stamp in’ the association the time that it took them to complete the puzzle and get out of the box was decreased as the cat went through each time. From that information Thorndike concluded that not only were they learning but he could assess their intelligence based on how long it took them to complete the tasks each time, and how much difference there was from trial to trial. He then used the ‘learning curves’ to establish certain learning levels and thus intelligence. Thorndike applied his experiment to humans and determining intelligence when he came up with the CAVD.

Stimulus-Response-
In Classical Conditioning they use different terminology to describe learning by use of Stimulus (S) and Response (R). The way I understood this best was by an example from the puzzle box scenario. When a cat is in the puzzle box and is in a certain position (the stimulus) and that leads to the door opening/them escaping (the response) the association is strengthened aka stamped in.(http://faculty.coe.uh.edu/smcneil/cuin6373/idhistory/thorndike_extra.html)

http://www.psychology.sbc.edu/Thorndike%20and%20Watson.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fanm--WyQJo

http://faculty.coe.uh.edu/smcneil/cuin6373/idhistory/thorndike_extra.html


....
This video wasn’t really for learning about the Law of Effect but really funny and completely valid to what we are discussing in class http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy_mIEnnlF4&feature=related

I am going to look at how Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and how it fits into our behavior. I will consider different behaviors I emit or ones which I observe other people emit. I will talk about how it fits into his model. I really liked this model because it incorperates every aspect of the human experience. Certain motivations elicit certain behaviors and these behaviors act in ways to fulfill the requirements explained in Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.

I found a clip from Youtube breaking down the levels with examples found in the movie "Up". Although this is an animated children's film, the needs are fulfilled through certain behaviors. Besides the examples in this clip I think about the reasons we do certain acts. For example, why people join clubs and organizations. They emit this behavior to fulfill the the belongingness and love level of the hierarchy. This fulfilment is reinforcing as well because it is part of reaching a new level of development. These behaviors are elicited by a need in the self to reach these level of development. Here is the link for that : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iucf76E-R2s&feature=related

The behaviors that occur within each level include topics we have talked about in class so far such as extinction, operant conditioning, reinforcement, and punishment prodecures. Those topics involve every part of life and therefore go hand in hand with Maslow's hierarchy. An example of a punishment procedure involving searching for safety (housing) would include a person who established bad credit being told they cannot get a loan for a house. This would be aversive and would be a case of negative punishment because because the reinforcing approval for a loan is taken away consequently punishing them for havig established such bad credit. This will reduce any behavior which is harmful to their credit. This fits into Maslow's Hierarchy because in this process they are trying to fulfill the safety need in Maslow's Hierarchy.

terms: positive punishment, emit, aversive,reinforcing, extinction, operant conditioning, elicit

My topic that I chose was positive reinforcement. I felt that this topic would be good to talk about because it is in every day life. Look at how people get children to do job around the house or to get them to be good, we "bribe" children into doing things we need them to do with something that they like.
One situation is when a child needs to clean their room. "If you clean your room, you will get a snack after supper." This then will reinforce the child to emit the behavior of cleaning their room in order to be reinforced with the snack.
I feel that it is hard to tell the difference between the Negative and the positive reinforcement, so I found a video that explains the differences very clearly with great examples.
The next video that I have is an Autism training video using reinforcement. This video is a great learning tool. When we were watching with the autistic girl and the glass of milk was a great example of how to reinforce a child with something that they like. The man in the video was trying to get the little girl to sit down when being told. When she sat down, she got a drink of milk. This video shows the good things about reinforcing their behaviors with tokens, food, drinks, play, touch, etc.
The last video that I have is about a school that is creating a program that uses positive reinforcement to emit a good behavior that can help them in the future. This STARS program is hoping to have good behavior that goes on for a long time. This has been shown to decrease the negative behaviors when the rules are posted for the students to see and that they are clear and consistent. If a student happens to emit an aversive behavior, they then have clear rules and regulations for those types of behaviors. The STARS program is said to have made the students to want to be good.
The positive behaviors have translated into the community also. Some of the teachers have seen students outside of school walk with their hands behind their backs like they are doing in school.
I feel that positive reinforcement will cut down on the negative behaviors coming from the students and could possibly help them in the future to become law abiding citizens.
In all of these youtube videos, I feel that they have the same thoughts at had with different situations. I feel that reinforcing any child with something that is positive will make them want to be good because of the good feeling they have when doing good. No matter if the child is Autistic or according to society's "normal" they like that feeling of getting positively reinforced.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=wfraBsz9gX4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=crFjZlWWZo0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNW05PRpPUY

The topic that I chose was Experimental Neurosis. It fits into the chapter of 3.2 when talking about Ivan Pavlov and his discovery of Classical Conditioning. Experimental Neurosis is the state of the subject when it is taken under control of inhibitory or excitatory neorons. It relates to a subjects confusion when given a discriminative stimulus that elicits a certain behavior that the subject cannot discriminate from. I am interested in it to see how the state can affect behavior modification. The additional information I found introduced an synonym of sorts for Experimental Neurosis known as learned helplessness. The learned helplessness comes from the inability of a subject to discriminate between positive and negative reinforcement. In one study I looked at, the subject was rewarded for a certain behavior, and then after awhile it was punished for a that same behavior. When the behavior is emitted and then punished, the animals reaction goes from, hey I'm getting fed, to hey I'm getting shocked please help. The subject then emit's a behavior in response to the aversive establishing operation. This behavior is then punished again, throwing the subject into a state of confusion. This state is characterized by irregular behavior that can either be shown by failing to show any reaction whatsoever no mattter what the stimulus is, or by the subject throwing a tantrum and emitting irregular bursts of aggressive behavior due to the confusion. The subject also at times show extinction bursts, where it tries to get the reinforcement again and again only being met with punishment. An interesting thing that I learned is that this term is studied in hopes of finding some origin to the development of behavioral disorders. They think that behavioral disorders are in someway a form of learned helplessness, or experimental neurosis, because people can be conditioned into experimental neurosis as the youtube video shows with the students. These studies suggest that the abnormal behavior is a form of experimental neurosis.

http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/1/2/293.abstract
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/com/28/1/39.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTqBP-x3yR0

experimental neurosis, classical conditioning, discrimninative stimulus, elicit, emit, positive/negative reinforcement, aversive, establishing operation, Aggressive behavior, Extinction Bursts,

The topic that I chose was positive reinforcement found throughout the book but defined in section 2.2.

Positive reinforcement is interesting because it can be used in classrooms, at home, in the work place, out to dinner, etc. This tool in behavior modification focuses on good behaviors and encouraging the rate to which one chooses to emit the behavior more often.
There are several types of reinforcers. Natural reinforcers encourages a positive out come as a result of a direct behavior. Token and tangible are used to reward a behavior, such as, teaching a dog a new trick or giving a child a gold star. Social reinforcers are used to reinforce what is considered socially acceptable. For example, a manager thanking you verbally for a good presentation. Positive reinforcement to elicit a healthier lifestyle in children can use various reinforcement techniques. Providing a positive dining experience by rewarding children that try new vegetables with an extra active play time. Positive reinforcement is helpful when in the workplace because it increases the employee moral. Instead of worrying whether or not you will be punished the next day, you are working hard on the next big project and excited for it's unveiling. Positive reinforcement has a lasting effect, especially with children and teaching them right from wrong, then punishment.

http://psychology.about.com/od/operantconditioning/f/positive-reinforcement.htm
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-the-cycle/
http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/junkfood.aspx

Terms:Positive reinforcement, behavior modification, emit, natural reinforcers, token reinforcer, tangible reinforcer, social reinforcer, elicit

I decided to write about manipulation and whether punishment or reinforcement is the best way to deal with things. Many educators are taught to use punishment as a use deal with students, but it does not create motivation in the classroom, so has been shown to be less effective. Also even though we like rewards sometimes they still have an aversive effect on students because no one likes the idea on being controlled. We need to praise children and do the three Cs of motivation: content, community, and choice. We should be focusing more on praising children and trying to manipulate their mood to be positive. By giving someone praise and telling them they did a good job on an emitted behavior it not only improves their ability the area, but also gives them happy, positive feelings towards it. Generally psychology is seen as trying to understand, predict, and control behaviors. The truth is we manipulate behaviors every day without even knowing it most of the time; it really is kind of in our nature as human being to a degree. I have attached a link to a video that shows part of the blue eyes, brown eyes experiment that an Iowa teacher did in a classroom many years ago. Most people who have seen this video have because it is shown as an example of discrimination. But after taking this course I see it more as way of using manipulation and learning how much easier it is to manipulate a child versus an adult, though this exercise has been done on adults in a different context. Child more easily elicit the behavior we want to see.

Terms: emitted behavior, punishment, reinforcement, manipulation, control behaviors, elicit

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172672?seq=2
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1970/JASA3-70Collins.html
http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/pbracwak.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bWlTZZN3DY

After emitting a behavior of reading section 2.5, I became more interested in the different types of reinforcements particularly in continuous reinforcement. I wanted to find out how it was connected to fixed variable schedules and variable ratio schedules. It also crossed my mind if their was any negative possibilities when using continuous reinforcement and if the positive out weighed the negative.
The first website I came across was just a simple definition of continuous reinforcement which goes hand in hand with the explanation of continuous reinforcement in our textbook.
Continuous reinforcement is a form of operant conditioning principle in which every time an organism provides the appropriate operant response the researcher reinforces the organism usually with a positive reinforcement. For example, in the past youtube videos we have watched with B.F Skinner, he used this principle to teach pigeons to press a lever to get food. The biggest concern with this reinforcement is saturation for example if the pigeon gets full and no longer hungry. It is easy to control for this type of saturation with deprivation (having the pigeons on a strict diet). The second website I found not only had the definitions of continuous reinforcement but also had the definitions to partial reinforcement it was easy to distinguished between both reinforcements seeing them side by side. Partial reinforcement is when the organism emits the operational condition and is reinforced part of the time. this website also goes into detail of the four different types of schedules of partial reinforcements: fixed-ratio schedules, variable-ratio schedules, fixed-interval schedules and variable-interval schedules.The third website I came across is actually a peer reviewed article called Using Stimulus Variation to Increase Reinforce Efficacy of Low Preference Stimuli. This article describes a study at University of Nevada in this study they used different variations of continuous reinforcements: low and high preference stimuli and which has the ability increase and maintain response. The experiment involves two children with autism and or related disorders, the procedures involved sitting at a table and discrete trial analysis. Results reviled that their was higher levels of correct responds with lower preference stimuli.


Emitting
reinforcements
continuous reinforcements
fixed variable
ratio schedules
fixed-interval schedules
variable interval schedules
positive reinforcements
saturation
deprivation
partial reinforcements

http://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Continuous%20Reinforcement

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.199/pdf

http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/schedules.htm

Posted for BW:
The topic I searched was reinforcement schedules. This was a whole section in chapter 2 and it shows different ways you can condition people into a behavior. This is interesting to me because who would have thought just by how often and at what times you reward or punish someone will affect how quickly they catch on and how long the behavior lasts. It is very interesting to me to learn that there are different ways to condition someone or something depending on the outcome you want and how much time you have and how much effort you are willing to put into it.
I found, which we also learned about in class, that there are many types of different schedules you can use for reinforcement. One way it is split up is by continuous and by partial reinforcement. Continuous reinforcement is when you reinforce and reward the desired behavior every single time that it happens. This is said to be best when first starting the conditioning so there is a heavy association with the behavior and the desired response. The other type of schedule is partial. This has many subtypes. There are fixed ratio, fixed interval, variable ratio, and variable interval. This chart is an easy way to see the difference between the four sub types of partial reinforcement.

Fixed ratio partial reinforcement is very quick. The conditioned behavior starts to happen more often very quickly. This also shows that the higher the ratios the higher the response rates. This type can be easily extinguished, though. Variable ratio partial reinforcement is also very quick. This conditioned behavior also starts to happen more often very quickly. This one, though, varies between a range of ratios to reinforce. This one differs also in the extinction rate. This schedule being used makes it less likely for the behavior to be extinguished. Another type is fixed interval partial reinforcement. This is more of a slower process. It takes a lot longer than ratio to get that behavior to occur more often. Because the interval is fixed it also does not have much resistance to extinction. Variable interval partial reinforcement has a higher resistance to extinction and again takes even a little bit more time than fixed interval. This is the slowest process of all four subtypes. Although, this may be the best schedule considering it would have the longest lasting effect.
http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/schedules.htm
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://psyresources.wikispaces.com/file/view/Schedules_of_Reinforcement.GIF/180882205/Schedules_of_Reinforcement.GIF&imgrefurl=http://psyresources.wikispaces.com/CH%2B07.%2BLearning&h=458&w=444&sz=47&tbnid=jHgt_roH4Cb6pM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=87&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dschedules%2Bof%2Breinforcement%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=schedules+of+reinforcement&usg=__z0kWs6KwtDLJxVxDc3zs4wGc4vA=&docid=wXBkLPLJjQrbnM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ERxzUO25LerryAGT54DoCg&ved=0CEIQ9QEwBQ&dur=0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoP-2wn-2rY

Terms: reinforcement schedules, reward, punish, condition, reinforcement, continuous reinforcement, partial reinforcement, fixed ratio schedule, fixed interval schedule, variable ratio schedule, variable interval schedule, extinction, extinguished

Systematic desensitization studied by Mary Cover Jones mentioned on page 5 of section 3.1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOtkLmXxIG4&feature=related

In this video we see a woman who is terrified of cotton and packing peanuts. On this show they use desensitization to help her cope, and manage her fear of cotton. Although they do this in a way that is not used in normal desensitization. They jump to the last stage which is known as flooding. Desensitization

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3skEh76l8w&feature=related

In this video a man has a peach phobia, they try to desensitize him,

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fighting-fear/201206/strategy-confronting-fears

Phobias cause many problems for people, all around the world. People struggle with their extreme distress, and fear telling others due to ridicule. These people can fear many things and begin to avoid contact with the subject that causes the fear. Phobias are generally considered to be easy to break through a psychological system called desensitization, where you slowly coax the subject to come in contact with the feared item. You slowly step up the contact with the item, and the last step is known as flooding. Making the person touch, or be surrounded by the phobic subject.
"Phobias are treated by exposing the affected person to the phobic situation a little at a time and for a long enough time for the fear of that situation to go away."
Different phobias are more, or less complicated to treat. According to Science Daily a fear of heights is one of the easiest phobias. If I were a practicing psychiatrist I would slowly disassociate fear with heights. I would show them pictures of high locations, and tell them to invasion themselves on said spot. Then I would have them sit on a higher chair, to show them that heights come in different sizes, and are not to be feared. After slow progressive steps, I would eventually take them to a high location in the town, or a place the formally held the most anxiety for these people. This slow process takes time and it will cause the patient a small amount of anxiety, but in the end their fear of heights the phobia should be completely gone, or at least greatly diminished.

Fear itself is common among all living thing, and is essential for a happy life. It is only natural to fear things that demand it; an angry grizzly bear, fire, guns, death, etc. Phobias are brought about by anxiety disorders, and are more common in America than you might think. 40 million Americans suffer from an anxiety disorders, eighteen percent of the adult population. Many don't seek treatment because they don't think they can be helped, or that their fear is only natural. Also people suffering from anxiety disorders also suffer more than one, and usually suffer depression as well.


sparklenfade27 | October 5, 2012 5:49 PM | Reply (this was the original posting date, however I posted it on Week 7 Reading Response page by mistake.
A pology)


Week 7 Topical Blog

I chose to investigate more about target behaviors. As I ponder said topic, I think of goals.
According to a behavior modification text, a target behavior is a behavior of interest for which one is attempting to increase (or decrease) in frequency. Depending on situational factors and individual differences, aspects of goals may vary. One may have a specific plan regarding how they may want to achieve their goal or modify their behavior. One may journal or document what approaches are valuable to them personally. One may be a pet looking up at dinner with hopeful eyes and a very clear plan in mind.
A target behavior may be a behavior an individual has emitted in the past or may be action that has not yet been experienced.
In a field of psychology, some folks may feel that taking certain steps is vital to achieving goals. These could possibly be some steps: describe a target behavior in clear, observable terms; describe antecedent events that occur and conditions that exist immediately before a behavior happens; describe consequences that immediately follow a behavior; examine an antecedent, a behavior and a consequence in sequence; devise new antecedents and/or consequences to teach new behaviors or change existing ones; evaluate the outcome. {http://www.parrots.org/pdfs/all_about_parrots/reference_library/behaviour_and_environmental_enrichment/The%20ABCs%20of%20Behaviour.pdf}
Or one may… Value a goal; Comprehend how individual circumstances may effect a goal; weight possible outcomes, play the tape through(!); consider effects on persons involves; focus on motivational techniques consistent with valued goal; journal, document, share, discuss, respect confidentiality.
http://www.associationofanimalbehaviorprofessionals.com/glossary.html
http://www.funderstanding.com/educators/self-efficacy/
SMW

Next what I would like you to do is to find a topic from what we have covered so far in class that you are interested in and search the internet for material on that topic. You might, for example, find people who are doing research on the topic, you might find web pages that discuss the topic, you might find youtube clips that demonstrate something related to the topic, etc. What you find and use is pretty much up to you at this point. But use at least 3 sources.

Once you have completed your search and explorations, I would like you to say what your topic is, how exactly it fits into the chapter, and why you are interested in it. Next, I would like you to take the information you found related to your topic, integrate/synthesize it, and then write about it. At the end, please include working URLs for the three websites.


Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.

By integrating/synthesizing I mean to take what your read/experienced from the internet search (and from chapter 1 if you like) organize the information into the main themes, issues, info, examples, etc. about your topic and then write about the topic in your own words using that information. This is hard for some people to do - many students write what we refer to as "serial abstracts." They are tempted to talk about the websites rather than the topic proper. They will talk all about website #1, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #2, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #3, and then write some kind of conclusion. Serial means one after the other...This what you DON'T want to do!

At first it is a real challenge to get out of the habit of writing "serial abstracts," but I assure you once you get the hang of it it is much easier to write using the integration method. And besides this is the way researchers and scientists write their technical reports and findings - many of you will have to be able to do this for other classes and for jobs that you may eventually be hired for so now is a good time to learn this skill. At this point don't worry about a grade, worry about doing your best to have fun with the topic and then integrate it into your own words to share what you found and now know. We will work on citing the sources later....

Let me know if you have any questions.


http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Skinner/Pigeon/
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html

Superstitious behavior is an interesting behavior that has been operantly conditioned. Although most people see this as a silly ritual. Most people will be conditioned by antcedents that they think cause a consequence. Skinner a prominent psychologist was able to demonstrate this target behavior with pigeons. A pigeon put inside a operant chamber will fall prey to this. A food chute that is on a fixed interval schedule will reinforce its superstitious behavior by rewarding what it thinks is the desired behavior. When the bird does not get the reinforcement it shows an extinction burst and will try variations of behavior to get the reward. It does not understand that those two behaviors are coincidental and cannot make the right connection. The bird is not able to discriminate between the behavior and the right reinforcement of the food it recieves. Studies have shown this in humans and have found that people who do believe in fate and chance are more susceptible to emit these behaviors. I find this behavior to be very interesting and would like to do more research on this subject.

terms: discriminate, elicit, emit, antecedent, behavior, consequence, target behavior, operant, operant chamber, positive, desirable, reinforcement, extinction burst, fixed interval, superstitious, operantly conditioned, Skinner,

Next what I would like you to do is to find a topic from what we have covered so far in class that you are interested in and search the internet for material on that topic. You might, for example, find people who are doing research on the topic, you might find web pages that discuss the topic, you might find youtube clips that demonstrate something related to the topic, etc. What you find and use is pretty much up to you at this point. But use at least 3 sources.

Once you have completed your search and explorations, I would like you to say what your topic is, how exactly it fits into the chapter, and why you are interested in it. Next, I would like you to take the information you found related to your topic, integrate/synthesize it, and then write about it. At the end, please include working URLs for the three websites.


Once you are done with your post make list of the terms and terminology you used in your post.

By integrating/synthesizing I mean to take what your read/experienced from the internet search (and from chapter 1 if you like) organize the information into the main themes, issues, info, examples, etc. about your topic and then write about the topic in your own words using that information. This is hard for some people to do - many students write what we refer to as "serial abstracts." They are tempted to talk about the websites rather than the topic proper. They will talk all about website #1, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #2, start a new paragraph and talk all about web site #3, and then write some kind of conclusion. Serial means one after the other...This what you DON'T want to do!

At first it is a real challenge to get out of the habit of writing "serial abstracts," but I assure you once you get the hang of it it is much easier to write using the integration method. And besides this is the way researchers and scientists write their technical reports and findings - many of you will have to be able to do this for other classes and for jobs that you may eventually be hired for so now is a good time to learn this skill. At this point don't worry about a grade, worry about doing your best to have fun with the topic and then integrate it into your own words to share what you found and now know. We will work on citing the sources later....

Let me know if you have any questions.


http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Skinner/Pigeon/
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/09/03/scientific-view-of-superstitious-behavior/17698.html

Superstitious behavior is an interesting behavior that has been operantly conditioned. Although most people see this as a silly ritual. Most people will be conditioned by antcedents that they think cause a consequence. Skinner a prominent psychologist was able to demonstrate this target behavior with pigeons. A pigeon put inside a operant chamber will fall prey to this. A food chute that is on a fixed interval schedule will reinforce its superstitious behavior by rewarding what it thinks is the desired behavior. When the bird does not get the reinforcement it shows an extinction burst and will try variations of behavior to get the reward. It does not understand that those two behaviors are coincidental and cannot make the right connection. The bird is not able to discriminate between the behavior and the right reinforcement of the food it recieves. Studies have shown this in humans and have found that people who do believe in fate and chance are more susceptible to emit these behaviors. I find this behavior to be very interesting and would like to do more research on this subject.

terms: discriminate, elicit, emit, antecedent, behavior, consequence, target behavior, operant, operant chamber, positive, desirable, reinforcement, extinction burst, fixed interval, superstitious, operantly conditioned, Skinner,

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Reading Activity Week #1 (Due ASAP)
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Welcome to the behavior modification hybrid class. We would like…
Topical Blog Week #1 (Due Friday)
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 By now you should have completed Reading Assignment #1. This…
Reading Activity Week #2 (Due Monday)
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Please go to the following blog page: http://www.psychologicalscience.com/bmod/abcs.html Please read…